TheoremBase

Composing the two fields with the coordinate projections embeds them isometrically in the square-integrable fields against the coupling, by change of variables; the cross pairing is their inner product there, so the bound is Cauchy-Schwarz, bilinearity is linearity of the integral, polarisation expands the squared norm pointwise, and the diagonal case is one more change of variables.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. By Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii), in force through The Intrinsic Calculus on the Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation, a representative of qq is a Borel map Rd→Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} whose squared norm has finite integral against ν\nu, and likewise for η\eta and μ\mu. Fix representatives, again written qq and η\eta. Since π∈Π(ν,μ)\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu), the push-forwards of π\pi under pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} and pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} are ν\nu and μ\mu (Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i)). Put

A=q∘pr1,B=η∘pr2,A=q\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\qquad B=\eta\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2},

maps Rd+d→Rd\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d}; they are Borel as compositions of Borel maps (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii)), the projections being Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v). By construction A(z)⋅B(z)=q(x)⋅η(y)A(z)\cdot B(z)=q(x)\cdot\eta(y) for every z∈Rd+dz\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}.

Step 1 (square integrals). The change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv), applied to the nonnegative Borel function w↦∥q(w)∥2w\mapsto\lVert q(w)\rVert^{2} (Borel as the composition of the Borel map qq with the map x↦∥x∥2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2}, which is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv), compositions of Borel maps being Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii)) and the map pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1}, gives

∫Rd+d∥A∥2 dπ=∫Rd∥q∥2 d((pr1)#π)=∫Rd∥q∥2 dν=∥q∥ν2<∞,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert A\rVert^{2}\,d\pi=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert q\rVert^{2}\,d\bigl((\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi\bigr)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert q\rVert^{2}\,d\nu=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}<\infty,

and in the same way, with pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2}, ∫Rd+d∥B∥2 dπ=∥η∥μ2<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert B\rVert^{2}\,d\pi=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}<\infty. Hence, by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii) read with d+dd+d as the dimension of the base space and dd as the dimension of the values, the classes of AA and BB belong to the real Hilbert space L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}), with

∥A∥π=∥q∥ν,∥B∥π=∥η∥μ.(1)\lVert A\rVert_{\pi}=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu},\qquad\lVert B\rVert_{\pi}=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}. \tag{1}

Step 2 (claim 1). The function z↦A(z)⋅B(z)z\mapsto A(z)\cdot B(z) is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv), which also gives ∣A(z)⋅B(z)∣≤12(∥A(z)∥2+∥B(z)∥2)|A(z)\cdot B(z)|\le\tfrac12\bigl(\lVert A(z)\rVert^{2}+\lVert B(z)\rVert^{2}\bigr) for every zz. The right side has finite integral by Step 1 and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, so ∣A⋅B∣|A\cdot B| has finite integral by the monotonicity in the same claim; that is, A⋅BA\cdot B is integrable with respect to π\pi. By the definition of the inner product of L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}) in Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii),

∫Rd+dA⋅B dπ=⟨A,B⟩π.(2)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}A\cdot B\,d\pi=\langle A,B\rangle_{\pi}. \tag{2}

Independence of the representatives: let q′q' be another representative of qq. By the relation ∼ν\sim_{\nu} of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii) the Borel set N={w∈Rd:q(w)≠q′(w)}N=\{w\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:q(w)\neq q'(w)\}, the complement of the set {q=q′}\{q=q'\} of full ν\nu-measure, satisfies ν(N)=0\nu(N)=0. The set of zz with q(pr1(z))≠q′(pr1(z))q(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z))\neq q'(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)) is pr1−1(N)\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(N), whose π\pi-measure is ((pr1)#π)(N)=ν(N)=0\bigl((\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi\bigr)(N)=\nu(N)=0 by the definition of the push-forward in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv). So the Borel functions A⋅BA\cdot B and (q′∘pr1)⋅B(q'\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1})\cdot B agree π\pi-almost everywhere, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii) the second is integrable with the same integral. The same argument with pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} and μ\mu handles a change of the representative of η\eta, and a change of both is two successive changes. This proves claim 1, and by (2)

K(q,η,π)=⟨A,B⟩π.(3)\mathcal{K}(q,\eta,\pi)=\langle A,B\rangle_{\pi}. \tag{3}

Step 3 (claim 2). By (3), The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in the real inner product space L2(π;Rd)L^{2}(\pi;\mathbb{R}^{d}), and (1),

∣K(q,η,π)∣=∣⟨A,B⟩π∣≤∥A∥π∥B∥π=∥q∥ν∥η∥μ.\bigl|\mathcal{K}(q,\eta,\pi)\bigr|=\bigl|\langle A,B\rangle_{\pi}\bigr|\le\lVert A\rVert_{\pi}\lVert B\rVert_{\pi}=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}.

Step 4 (claim 3). Let q′∈L2(ν;Rd)q'\in L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}, and fix a representative of q′q', again written q′q'. By Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Coordinates, Operations, Almost Sure Equality and the Mean-Square Form (v), applied as in Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii) to the probability space (Rd,B(Rd),ν)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\nu), the class a q+b q′a\,q+b\,q' has the pointwise combination w↦a q(w)+b q′(w)w\mapsto a\,q(w)+b\,q'(w) as a representative; by claim 1 we may compute K(a q+b q′,η,π)\mathcal{K}(a\,q+b\,q',\eta,\pi) with it. Writing A′=q′∘pr1A'=q'\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}, for every zz

(a A(z)+b A′(z))⋅B(z)=a A(z)⋅B(z)+b A′(z)⋅B(z)\bigl(a\,A(z)+b\,A'(z)\bigr)\cdot B(z)=a\,A(z)\cdot B(z)+b\,A'(z)\cdot B(z)

by The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite. Both functions on the right are integrable by Step 2 (applied to qq and to q′q'), so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion gives K(a q+b q′,η,π)=a K(q,η,π)+b K(q′,η,π)\mathcal{K}(a\,q+b\,q',\eta,\pi)=a\,\mathcal{K}(q,\eta,\pi)+b\,\mathcal{K}(q',\eta,\pi). Linearity in the second slot is the same argument with η,η′\eta,\eta', the projection pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} and the probability space (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu).

Step 5 (claim 4). For every zz, claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (∥w∥2=w⋅w\lVert w\rVert^{2}=w\cdot w) together with the bilinearity and symmetry of the dot product (The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite) gives

∥A(z)−B(z)∥2=∥A(z)∥2−2 A(z)⋅B(z)+∥B(z)∥2.\lVert A(z)-B(z)\rVert^{2}=\lVert A(z)\rVert^{2}-2\,A(z)\cdot B(z)+\lVert B(z)\rVert^{2}.

The three functions on the right are integrable by Steps 1 and 2. The function on the left is nonnegative and Borel, and its integral is the discrepancy of qq and η\eta along π\pi, a real number by The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures (i), computed there with any representatives; so it is integrable. Integrating with claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and using Step 1 and claim 1 yields claim 4.

Step 6 (claim 5). Let μ=ν\mu=\nu and π=(id,id)#ν\pi=(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})_{\#}\nu, which belongs to Π(ν,ν)\Pi(\nu,\nu) by Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound (iv). By Step 2 the Borel function A⋅BA\cdot B is integrable with respect to π\pi, so the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv), applied to it and to the map (id,id)(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id}), which is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (ii), id\mathrm{id} being continuous and hence Borel, gives

∫Rd+dA⋅B dπ=∫Rd(A⋅B)∘(id,id) dν.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}A\cdot B\,d\pi=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}(A\cdot B)\circ(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})\,d\nu .

For w∈Rdw\in\mathbb{R}^{d} the point (id,id)(w)(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})(w) is ι(w,w)\iota(w,w) by the definition of the pairing in Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (ii), so both of its projections equal ww by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), and (A⋅B)((id,id)(w))=q(w)⋅η(w)(A\cdot B)\bigl((\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})(w)\bigr)=q(w)\cdot\eta(w). By claim 1 and the definition of the inner product of L2(ν;Rd)L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) in Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation (ii), K(q,η,π)=∫Rdq⋅η dν=⟨q,η⟩ν\mathcal{K}(q,\eta,\pi)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}q\cdot\eta\,d\nu=\langle q,\eta\rangle_{\nu}. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…