TheoremBase

Proof of One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative

lemmalem:test-function-one-dimensional-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 8,687 chars · 25 deps · depth 26 Reason: Batch C: proof of the one-dimensional test-function lemma.

The one-dimensional identities are the one-term finite sum and the uniqueness of the nonnegative square root; the derivative identifications are the agreement of one-dimensional derivatives with first partial derivatives on the real line, applied to the test function and to its derivative; the difference-quotient clause is the published difference-quotient lemma applied to the derivative, with bounded Borel functions integrable against probability measures; linearity is pointwise field arithmetic and linearity of the integral.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, the identification of R\mathbb{R} with R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is that of the preamble; points of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} are read as 11-tuples by Euclidean Points as Tuples of Real Numbers (as in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces), so that a point xR1x\in\mathbb{R}^{1} has the single coordinate x1=xx_{1}=x; and a one-term finite sum satisfies k=11ak=a1\sum_{k=1}^{1}a_{k}=a_{1} by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums. Sums, scalar multiples and the dot product on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} are those fixed in Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §background, namely Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and clause 2 of Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, all formed coordinatewise. Field arithmetic in R\mathbb{R} is that of Field, a quotient s/ts/t for t0t\ne0 meaning st1s\,t^{-1}.

Step 1: claim 1. Let x,yR1x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{1}. Then xy=i=11xiyi=x1y1=xyx\cdot y=\sum_{i=1}^{1}x_{i}y_{i}=x_{1}y_{1}=xy. By Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, x=i=11xi2=x2\lVert x\rVert=\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{1}x_{i}^{2}}=\sqrt{x^{2}}, the nonnegative square root of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root. Since x2=x2x^{2}=|x|^{2} by claim 1 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field and 0x0\le|x| by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the number x|x| is a nonnegative square root of x2x^{2}, so by the uniqueness in that theorem x=x\lVert x\rVert=|x|; hence x2=x2=x2\lVert x\rVert^{2}=|x|^{2}=x^{2}. Now let μP(R)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}). By Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}) consists of the classes of the Borel maps ξ:R1R1\xi:\mathbb{R}^{1}\to\mathbb{R}^{1} with Rξ2dμ<\int_{\mathbb{R}}\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, with ξ,ημ=Rξηdμ\langle\xi,\eta\rangle_{\mu}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\xi\cdot\eta\,d\mu and ξμ=Rξ2dμ\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}=\sqrt{\int_{\mathbb{R}}\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\,d\mu}, so that ξμ2=Rξ2dμ\lVert\xi\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\,d\mu (the square of the nonnegative square root of a number being that number, by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root). A map into R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is Borel exactly when it is Borel as a map into R\mathbb{R}, since B(R1)=B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{1})=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) (preamble). Substituting ξ(x)2=ξ(x)2\lVert\xi(x)\rVert^{2}=\xi(x)^{2} and ξ(x)η(x)=ξ(x)η(x)\xi(x)\cdot\eta(x)=\xi(x)\eta(x) pointwise gives the description of L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}) and the two displayed formulas.

Step 2: claim 2. Let ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}). By Test Functions on Euclidean Space, Their Gradient Maps and Laplacians §gradient, ψ\psi is of class C1C^{1} and of class C2C^{2} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} in the sense of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives, so by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, read through its clause 3, the partial derivative 1ψ(x)\partial_{1}\psi(x) exists at every xR1x\in\mathbb{R}^{1}, and ψ(x)=Dψ(x)\nabla\psi(x)=D\psi(x) is the point of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with single coordinate 1ψ(x)\partial_{1}\psi(x) by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set, that is, ψ(x)=1ψ(x)\nabla\psi(x)=\partial_{1}\psi(x). By claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line, ψ\psi is differentiable at every xRx\in\mathbb{R} with ψ(x)=1ψ(x)\psi'(x)=\partial_{1}\psi(x); thus ψ=1ψ=ψ\psi'=\partial_{1}\psi=\nabla\psi. Since ψ\psi is of class C2C^{2}, clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set makes 1ψ=ψ\partial_{1}\psi=\psi' of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, so 11ψ(x)\partial_{1}\partial_{1}\psi(x) (clause 4 there) exists at every xx, and claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line, applied to f=ψf=\psi', shows that ψ\psi' is differentiable at every xx with (ψ)(x)=11ψ(x)(\psi')'(x)=\partial_{1}\partial_{1}\psi(x). By The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian, Δψ(x)=i=11iiψ(x)=11ψ(x)\Delta\psi(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{1}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(x)=\partial_{1}\partial_{1}\psi(x). Hence (ψ)=11ψ=Δψ(\psi')'=\partial_{1}\partial_{1}\psi=\Delta\psi. By The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §gradient, applied with q=1q=1 and i=1i=1, the function 1ψ=ψ\partial_{1}\psi=\psi' is continuous and bounded, and by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §laplacian so is Δψ\Delta\psi; continuity there is that of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §extrema, namely continuity for the Euclidean distance of R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, which is dRd_{\mathbb{R}}, into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), exactly the reading fixed in the preamble. Finally, let μP(R)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) and ξL2(μ;R)\xi\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}); the class of ψ=ψ\nabla\psi=\psi' belongs to L2(μ;R)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}) by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §test, and the two displayed formulas are those of claim 1 with η=ψ=ψ\eta=\nabla\psi=\psi', respectively with ξ=ψ=ψ\xi=\nabla\psi=\psi'.

Step 3: claim 3. Let ψCc(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}). Since Δψ\Delta\psi is bounded (Step 2), by Bounded Real-Valued Function on a Set there is a real L0L\ge0 with Δψ(t)L|\Delta\psi(t)|\le L for every tRt\in\mathbb{R}; now let LL be any real number with this property; then 0Δψ(0)L0\le|\Delta\psi(0)|\le L by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so LL is a bound for Δψ\Delta\psi in the sense of Bounded Real-Valued Function on a Set. Apply The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane to the function ψ\psi', in the role of the function ϕ\phi of that lemma: by Step 2, ψ\psi' is differentiable at every point of R\mathbb{R}, its derivative (ψ)=Δψ(\psi')'=\Delta\psi is continuous as a map from (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), and Δψ(t)L|\Delta\psi(t)|\le L for every tt. The function FF of that lemma is given by F(x,y)=(ψ(x)ψ(y))/(xy)F(x,y)=\bigl(\psi'(x)-\psi'(y)\bigr)/(x-y) for xyx\ne y and F(x,x)=(ψ)(x)=Δψ(x)F(x,x)=(\psi')'(x)=\Delta\psi(x), where a point of R2\mathbb{R}^{2} is read there as the pair (x,y)(x,y) of its two coordinates, which is the point ι(x,y)\iota(x,y) by the definition of the concatenation map in Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space; so F=FψF=F_{\psi}. By The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §bound, Fψ(x,y)L|F_{\psi}(x,y)|\le L and Fψ(x,y)=Fψ(y,x)F_{\psi}(x,y)=F_{\psi}(y,x) for all x,yRx,y\in\mathbb{R}; by The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §continuous, FψF_{\psi} is continuous on R2\mathbb{R}^{2}; and by The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §measurable, FψF_{\psi} is measurable with respect to B(R2)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{2}) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}), that is, Borel in the sense of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps. Now let ρP(R2)\rho\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{2}). By Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures, ρ\rho is a Borel measure on the metric space (R2,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{2},d_{E}) with ρ(R2)=1\rho(\mathbb{R}^{2})=1, and B(R2)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{2}) is the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of that metric space (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces); so claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, applied to the Borel function FψF_{\psi} with the bound L0L\ge0, shows that FψF_{\psi} is integrable with respect to ρ\rho and R2FψdρLρ(R2)=L\bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}F_{\psi}\,d\rho\bigr|\le L\,\rho(\mathbb{R}^{2})=L.

Step 4: claim 4. Let ψ,ϕCc(R)\psi,\phi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) and a,bRa,b\in\mathbb{R}, and put θ=aψ+bϕ\theta=a\psi+b\phi. By The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure §linear, θCc(R)\theta\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), and θ(x)=aψ(x)+bϕ(x)\nabla\theta(x)=a\,\nabla\psi(x)+b\,\nabla\phi(x) and Δθ(x)=aΔψ(x)+bΔϕ(x)\Delta\theta(x)=a\,\Delta\psi(x)+b\,\Delta\phi(x) for every xRx\in\mathbb{R}. The sum and scalar multiples on the right of the first identity are formed on the single coordinate, so by Step 2, θ(x)=θ(x)=aψ(x)+bϕ(x)\theta'(x)=\nabla\theta(x)=a\,\psi'(x)+b\,\phi'(x) for every xx. Let x,yRx,y\in\mathbb{R}. If xyx\ne y, then xy0x-y\ne0 has the inverse (xy)1(x-y)^{-1}, and by distributivity, associativity and commutativity of multiplication in the field R\mathbb{R},

Fθ(x,y)=(aψ(x)+bϕ(x)aψ(y)bϕ(y))(xy)1=a(ψ(x)ψ(y))(xy)1+b(ϕ(x)ϕ(y))(xy)1=aFψ(x,y)+bFϕ(x,y).F_{\theta}(x,y)=\bigl(a\,\psi'(x)+b\,\phi'(x)-a\,\psi'(y)-b\,\phi'(y)\bigr)(x-y)^{-1}=a\,\bigl(\psi'(x)-\psi'(y)\bigr)(x-y)^{-1}+b\,\bigl(\phi'(x)-\phi'(y)\bigr)(x-y)^{-1}=a\,F_{\psi}(x,y)+b\,F_{\phi}(x,y).

If x=yx=y, then Fθ(x,x)=Δθ(x)=aΔψ(x)+bΔϕ(x)=aFψ(x,x)+bFϕ(x,x)F_{\theta}(x,x)=\Delta\theta(x)=a\,\Delta\psi(x)+b\,\Delta\phi(x)=a\,F_{\psi}(x,x)+b\,F_{\phi}(x,x). Hence Fθ=aFψ+bFϕF_{\theta}=a\,F_{\psi}+b\,F_{\phi} pointwise on R2\mathbb{R}^{2}. Let ρP(R2)\rho\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{2}). By Step 3, FψF_{\psi} and FϕF_{\phi} are integrable with respect to ρ\rho, so by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, applied on the measure space (R2,B(R2),ρ)(\mathbb{R}^{2},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{2}),\rho), aFψ+bFϕ=Fθa\,F_{\psi}+b\,F_{\phi}=F_{\theta} is integrable and R2Fθdρ=aR2Fψdρ+bR2Fϕdρ\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}F_{\theta}\,d\rho=a\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}F_{\psi}\,d\rho+b\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}F_{\phi}\,d\rho.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…