TheoremBase

The values of phi fill no more than a closed interval [m,M] inside J. If m = M both sides vanish; otherwise the indefinite integral H of f from m is an antiderivative of f on [m,M] by the first fundamental theorem, H composed with phi is an antiderivative of g by the chain rule, and the second fundamental theorem with additivity of the oriented integral gives the formula.

Proof

Proof of (i). Let u,v∈Ju,v\in J with u<vu<v. Then [u,v]⊆J[u,v]\subseteq J by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (ii), and [u,v][u,v] is an interval containing two distinct points by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v). As ff is continuous at every point of JJ relative to JJ, the restriction f∣[u,v]:[u,v]→Rf|_{[u,v]}:[u,v]\to\mathbb{R} is continuous at every point of [u,v][u,v] relative to [u,v][u,v] by Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative (i), applied with I=JI=J and [u,v][u,v] in place of JJ, hence continuous on [u,v][u,v] by The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi). By A Continuous Function on a Closed Interval is Riemann Integrable (i), applied to u<vu<v and f∣[u,v]f|_{[u,v]}, this restriction is bounded and integrable on [u,v][u,v], which by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (vi) says that ff is integrable on [u,v][u,v] and defines ∫uvf\int_{u}^{v}f.

Now let u,v∈Ju,v\in J be arbitrary. If u<vu<v, ∫uvf\int_{u}^{v}f is defined by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (vi), as just shown. If u=vu=v, then ∫uuf=0\int_{u}^{u}f=0 by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (vii). If v<uv<u, then ff is integrable on [v,u][v,u] by the first paragraph, and ∫uvf=−∫vuf\int_{u}^{v}f=-\int_{v}^{u}f by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (vii). In each case ∫uvf\int_{u}^{v}f is defined in the sense of The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (viii).

Proof of (ii). Let t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]. As φ\varphi is differentiable at tt, it is continuous at tt by The Increment Form of the Derivative, and Differentiability Implies Continuity (ii); as tt was arbitrary, φ\varphi is continuous on [a,b][a,b] by The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi). By the composition rule of The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi), applied with A=[a,b]A=[a,b], B=JB=J and ff in place of gg, the composition f∘φ:[a,b]→Rf\circ\varphi:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R} is continuous on [a,b][a,b]. The map gg is the pointwise product (f∘φ) φ′(f\circ\varphi)\,\varphi', as both have the value f(φ(t)) φ′(t)f(\varphi(t))\,\varphi'(t) at every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], so gg is continuous on [a,b][a,b] by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space (v), applied with (X,d)=(R,dR)(X,d)=(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) and A=[a,b]A=[a,b]. Hence gg is bounded by Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval (i) and integrable on [a,b][a,b] by A Continuous Function on a Closed Interval is Riemann Integrable (i).

The range of φ\varphi. By Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval (ii) there are p,q∈[a,b]p,q\in[a,b] with φ(p)≤φ(t)≤φ(q)\varphi(p)\le\varphi(t)\le\varphi(q) for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]. Let m=φ(p)m=\varphi(p) and M=φ(q)M=\varphi(q). Then m,M∈Jm,M\in J and m≤Mm\le M, so K=[m,M]⊆JK=[m,M]\subseteq J by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (ii), and φ(t)∈K\varphi(t)\in K for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]; in particular φ(a),φ(b)∈K\varphi(a),\varphi(b)\in K.

Case m=Mm=M. Then φ(t)=m\varphi(t)=m for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], so φ\varphi is the constant map with value mm. By Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (i), 00 is the derivative of this map at every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], so φ′(t)=0\varphi'(t)=0, the derivative being unique by Derivative of a Real Function on an Interval (ii). Hence g(t)=f(m)⋅0=0g(t)=f(m)\cdot0=0 for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], so gg is the constant map with value 00, and ∫abg=0⋅(b−a)=0\int_{a}^{b}g=0\cdot(b-a)=0 by Rules for the Riemann Integral: Sums, Scalar Multiples, Monotonicity, Bounds and Constants (vi). On the other side, φ(a)=φ(b)=m\varphi(a)=\varphi(b)=m, and ∫mmf=0\int_{m}^{m}f=0 by The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (vii). As ∫abg\int_{a}^{b}g is ∫abf(φ(t)) φ′(t) dt\int_{a}^{b}f(\varphi(t))\,\varphi'(t)\,dt in the notation of The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (v), this is (iii).

Case m<Mm<M. Then KK is an interval containing two distinct points by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v). Let fK=f∣K:K→Rf_{K}=f|_{K}:K\to\mathbb{R}. By Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative (i), applied with I=JI=J and KK in place of JJ, fKf_{K} is continuous at every point of KK relative to KK, hence continuous on KK by The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi); so it is bounded by Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval (i) and integrable on KK by A Continuous Function on a Closed Interval is Riemann Integrable (i). For all u,v∈Ku,v\in K, Additivity of the Riemann Integral over Adjacent Intervals, Subintervals and Oriented Integrals, and Integrals of Restrictions (iv), applied with E=JE=J, g=fg=f and the subset KK of JJ, gives (1) below. Indeed, if u=vu=v, both sides of (1) are 00 by its last sentence. If u<vu<v, then [u,v]⊆K[u,v]\subseteq K by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (ii); ff is integrable on [u,v][u,v] by (i), as u,v∈Ju,v\in J; so fKf_{K} is integrable on [u,v][u,v], Additivity of the Riemann Integral over Adjacent Intervals, Subintervals and Oriented Integrals, and Integrals of Restrictions (iv) being an equivalence, and its first equation gives ∫uvfK=∫uvf\int_{u}^{v}f_{K}=\int_{u}^{v}f. If v<uv<u, then likewise [v,u]⊆K[v,u]\subseteq K and ff and fKf_{K} are integrable on [v,u][v,u], and the second equation of Additivity of the Riemann Integral over Adjacent Intervals, Subintervals and Oriented Integrals, and Integrals of Restrictions (iv), with vv and uu in place of uu and vv, gives ∫uvfK=∫uvf\int_{u}^{v}f_{K}=\int_{u}^{v}f. Thus

∫uvfK=∫uvffor all u,v∈K.(1)\int_{u}^{v}f_{K}=\int_{u}^{v}f\qquad\text{for all }u,v\in K.\qquad\text{(1)}

Let H:K→RH:K\to\mathbb{R} be the map H(u)=∫mufKH(u)=\int_{m}^{u}f_{K}, with derivatives taken relative to KK; it exists by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part I: the Indefinite Integral is Lipschitz, Continuous, and Differentiable at Points of Continuity (i), applied with mm, MM and fKf_{K} in place of aa, bb and ff, and it is the map FF there. As fKf_{K} is continuous at every u∈Ku\in K, Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part I: the Indefinite Integral is Lipschitz, Continuous, and Differentiable at Points of Continuity (iv) shows that HH is differentiable at every u∈Ku\in K with H′(u)=fK(u)=f(u)H'(u)=f_{K}(u)=f(u).

Let t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]. By Chain Rule for Real Functions on Intervals (i), applied with the intervals [a,b][a,b] and KK, with φ\varphi in place of ff (its values lie in KK) and HH in place of gg, the composition H∘φ:[a,b]→RH\circ\varphi:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R} is differentiable at tt and

(H∘φ)′(t)=H′(φ(t)) φ′(t)=f(φ(t)) φ′(t)=g(t).(H\circ\varphi)'(t)=H'(\varphi(t))\,\varphi'(t)=f(\varphi(t))\,\varphi'(t)=g(t).

By The Increment Form of the Derivative, and Differentiability Implies Continuity (ii), H∘φH\circ\varphi is continuous at tt; as tt was arbitrary, H∘φH\circ\varphi is continuous on [a,b][a,b] by The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus on Intervals (vi), and it is differentiable at every point of (a,b)(a,b) with derivative gg there. Since gg is bounded and integrable on [a,b][a,b] by (ii), Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II: Evaluating an Integral by an Antiderivative (i), applied to gg in place of ff and H∘φH\circ\varphi in place of FF, gives

∫abg=H(φ(b))−H(φ(a)).\int_{a}^{b}g=H(\varphi(b))-H(\varphi(a)).

By Additivity of the Riemann Integral over Adjacent Intervals, Subintervals and Oriented Integrals, and Integrals of Restrictions (iii), applied to fKf_{K} on [m,M][m,M] with u=mu=m, v=φ(a)v=\varphi(a) and w=φ(b)w=\varphi(b), we have ∫mφ(b)fK=∫mφ(a)fK+∫φ(a)φ(b)fK\int_{m}^{\varphi(b)}f_{K}=\int_{m}^{\varphi(a)}f_{K}+\int_{\varphi(a)}^{\varphi(b)}f_{K}, that is, H(φ(b))−H(φ(a))=∫φ(a)φ(b)fKH(\varphi(b))-H(\varphi(a))=\int_{\varphi(a)}^{\varphi(b)}f_{K}. By (1) this equals ∫φ(a)φ(b)f\int_{\varphi(a)}^{\varphi(b)}f. As ∫abg\int_{a}^{b}g is ∫abf(φ(t)) φ′(t) dt\int_{a}^{b}f(\varphi(t))\,\varphi'(t)\,dt in the notation of The Riemann Integral on a Closed Interval via Lower and Upper Integrals (v), this is (iii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…