TheoremBase

Restricting the function to a line in the iith coordinate direction gives a Lipschitz function of one variable, whose non-differentiability set is null by the one-dimensional result; the Borel set where the partial derivative fails to exist therefore has null lines and is null.

Proof

We use the notation of the statement.

Claim 1. Being Lipschitz, ff is continuous from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous, where dR(s,t)=∣s−t∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(s,t)=|s-t| is the absolute value metric. Hence Borel Structure of the Set Where a Partial Derivative Exists applies to ff and ii, and by Borel Structure of the Set Where a Partial Derivative Exists (iii) the set N=Rn∖EiN=\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus E_{i} belongs to B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}).

Fix y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and define g:R→Rg:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} by g(t)=f(y+tei)g(t)=f(y+te_{i}). For t,t′∈Rt,t'\in\mathbb{R} we have (y+tei)−(y+t′ei)=(t−t′)ei(y+te_{i})-(y+t'e_{i})=(t-t')e_{i}, so by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and ∥ei∥=1\lVert e_{i}\rVert=1, which holds by Orthonormal Families, Standard Basis Vectors, and Plane Rotations of Euclidean Space,

∣g(t)−g(t′)∣≤L ∥(t−t′)ei∥=L ∣t−t′∣,|g(t)-g(t')|\le L\,\lVert(t-t')e_{i}\rVert=L\,|t-t'| ,

so gg is Lipschitz with constant LL on every subset of R\mathbb{R}.

Let m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and let ImI_{m} be the open interval with endpoints −m-m and mm, a nonempty open interval. By A Lipschitz Function on an Open Interval is Differentiable Almost Everywhere (i), applied to the restriction of gg to ImI_{m}, the set Im∖DmI_{m}\setminus D_{m} is null, where DmD_{m} is the set of those t∈Imt\in I_{m} at which that restriction has a derivative.

We show that ∂if(y+tei)\partial_{i}f(y+te_{i}) exists for every t∈Dmt\in D_{m}. Let t∈Dmt\in D_{m} and let L0L_{0} be the derivative there. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Derivative of a Real Function on an Interval there is δ1>0\delta_{1}>0 such that every h∈Rh\in\mathbb{R} with 0<∣h∣<δ10<|h|<\delta_{1} and t+h∈Imt+h\in I_{m} satisfies ∣(g(t+h)−g(t))/h−L0∣<ε|(g(t+h)-g(t))/h-L_{0}|<\varepsilon. Since ImI_{m} is open and t∈Imt\in I_{m} there is δ2>0\delta_{2}>0 with t+h∈Imt+h\in I_{m} whenever ∣h∣<δ2|h|<\delta_{2}; let δ\delta be the smaller of δ1\delta_{1} and δ2\delta_{2}. Writing w=y+teiw=y+te_{i} we have w+hei=y+(t+h)eiw+he_{i}=y+(t+h)e_{i}, so (g(t+h)−g(t))/h=(f(w+hei)−f(w))/h(g(t+h)-g(t))/h=(f(w+he_{i})-f(w))/h, and this quotient differs from L0L_{0} by less than ε\varepsilon for every real hh with 0<∣h∣<δ0<|h|<\delta. By Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied with the open set Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, the partial derivative of ff with respect to the iith variable exists at ww with value L0L_{0}; that is, y+tei∈Eiy+te_{i}\in E_{i}.

Consequently {t∈R:y+tei∈N}∩Im⊆Im∖Dm\{t\in\mathbb{R}:y+te_{i}\in N\}\cap I_{m}\subseteq I_{m}\setminus D_{m}, which is null, so this intersection is null by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n used in dimension 11. By The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} satisfies ∣t∣<m|t|<m for some m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, so R=⋃m∈NIm\mathbb{R}=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}I_{m} and therefore

{t∈R:y+tei∈N}=⋃m∈N({t∈R:y+tei∈N}∩Im),\{t\in\mathbb{R}:y+te_{i}\in N\}=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\Bigl(\{t\in\mathbb{R}:y+te_{i}\in N\}\cap I_{m}\Bigr),

a countable union of null sets, which is null by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

This holds for every y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, so A Borel Set Whose Lines in One Coordinate Direction Are Null Is Null (i) gives λn(N)=0\lambda_{n}(N)=0, and NN is null.

Claim 2. Let y∈Eiy\in E_{i} and write L0=∂if(y)L_{0}=\partial_{i}f(y). Suppose L<∣L0∣L<|L_{0}| and put ε=∣L0∣−L\varepsilon=|L_{0}|-L, a positive real number. By Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n there is δ>0\delta>0 such that every real ss with 0<∣s∣<δ0<|s|<\delta satisfies

∣f(y+sei)−f(y)s−L0∣<ε.\Bigl|\frac{f(y+se_{i})-f(y)}{s}-L_{0}\Bigr|<\varepsilon .

Fix such an ss. By claim 7 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field the left-hand side is at least ∣L0∣−∣(f(y+sei)−f(y))/s∣|L_{0}|-|(f(y+se_{i})-f(y))/s|, so

∣f(y+sei)−f(y)s∣>∣L0∣−ε=L.\Bigl|\frac{f(y+se_{i})-f(y)}{s}\Bigr|>|L_{0}|-\varepsilon=L .

On the other hand the Lipschitz hypothesis, claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and ∥ei∥=1\lVert e_{i}\rVert=1 give ∣f(y+sei)−f(y)∣≤L∥sei∥=L∣s∣|f(y+se_{i})-f(y)|\le L\lVert se_{i}\rVert=L|s|, so by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field the same quotient has absolute value at most LL. This contradiction shows ∣∂if(y)∣≤L|\partial_{i}f(y)|\le L.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…