TheoremBase

A key step shows that if f(p)<f(q)f(p)<f(q) then ff takes values strictly between f(p)f(p) and f(q)f(q) at every intermediate point, each failure being contradicted by the intermediate value theorem and injectivity; applying it twice gives strict monotonicity, and the decreasing case follows by negating ff.

Proof

Since a≠ba\ne b and ff is injective, f(a)≠f(b)f(a)\ne f(b). The order of R\mathbb{R} is total, so either f(a)<f(b)f(a)<f(b) or f(b)<f(a)f(b)<f(a).

Step 1 (key step). We claim: if p,q∈[a,b]p,q\in[a,b] satisfy p<qp<q and f(p)<f(q)f(p)<f(q), and if p<z<qp<z<q, then

f(p)<f(z)<f(q).f(p)<f(z)<f(q) .

First, z∈[a,b]z\in[a,b], since a≤p<z<q≤ba\le p<z<q\le b. As z≠pz\ne p and z≠qz\ne q, injectivity gives f(z)≠f(p)f(z)\ne f(p) and f(z)≠f(q)f(z)\ne f(q).

Suppose f(z)<f(p)f(z)<f(p). Then f(z)≤f(p)≤f(q)f(z)\le f(p)\le f(q). The restriction of ff to [z,q][z,q] is continuous on [z,q][z,q] by clause 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, and z<qz<q; so Intermediate Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, and Continuous Images of Intervals, applied on [z,q][z,q] with the value f(p)f(p), gives w∈[z,q]w\in[z,q] with f(w)=f(p)f(w)=f(p). But p<z≤wp<z\le w, so w≠pw\ne p, and injectivity is contradicted.

Suppose instead f(q)<f(z)f(q)<f(z). Then f(p)≤f(q)≤f(z)f(p)\le f(q)\le f(z). The restriction of ff to [p,z][p,z] is continuous on [p,z][p,z], and p<zp<z; so Intermediate Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, and Continuous Images of Intervals, applied on [p,z][p,z] with the value f(q)f(q), gives w∈[p,z]w\in[p,z] with f(w)=f(q)f(w)=f(q). But w≤z<qw\le z<q, so w≠qw\ne q, and injectivity is contradicted.

Since the order is total and f(z)f(z) equals neither f(p)f(p) nor f(q)f(q), the only remaining possibility is f(p)<f(z)f(p)<f(z) and f(z)<f(q)f(z)<f(q), which is the claim.

Step 2: the case f(a)<f(b)f(a)<f(b). Assume f(a)<f(b)f(a)<f(b), and let x,y∈[a,b]x,y\in[a,b] with x<yx<y. We show f(x)<f(y)f(x)<f(y).

Since x<y≤bx<y\le b we have x<bx<b. We first check that f(x)<f(b)f(x)<f(b). If x=ax=a, this is the assumption. If a<xa<x, then a<x<ba<x<b, and Step 1 with p=ap=a, q=bq=b, z=xz=x gives f(a)<f(x)<f(b)f(a)<f(x)<f(b), so in particular f(x)<f(b)f(x)<f(b).

Now x<bx<b and f(x)<f(b)f(x)<f(b). If y=by=b, then f(x)<f(b)=f(y)f(x)<f(b)=f(y). If y<by<b, then x<y<bx<y<b, and Step 1 with p=xp=x, q=bq=b, z=yz=y gives f(x)<f(y)<f(b)f(x)<f(y)<f(b), so in particular f(x)<f(y)f(x)<f(y).

Hence f(x)<f(y)f(x)<f(y) whenever x<yx<y, that is, ff is strictly increasing on [a,b][a,b] in the sense of Monotone Real Function (iii).

Step 3: the case f(b)<f(a)f(b)<f(a). Assume f(b)<f(a)f(b)<f(a), and define g:[a,b]→Rg:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R} by g(x)=(−1)⋅f(x)g(x)=(-1)\cdot f(x). By clauses 4 and 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, gg is continuous on [a,b][a,b]. It is injective: if x,y∈[a,b]x,y\in[a,b] with x≠yx\ne y then f(x)≠f(y)f(x)\ne f(y), hence −f(x)≠−f(y)-f(x)\ne-f(y), that is, g(x)≠g(y)g(x)\ne g(y). Multiplying f(b)<f(a)f(b)<f(a) by −1-1 reverses the inequality, by Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so

g(a)=−f(a)<−f(b)=g(b).g(a)=-f(a)<-f(b)=g(b) .

Steps 1 and 2 apply verbatim to gg in place of ff and show that gg is strictly increasing on [a,b][a,b]. Hence, for x,y∈[a,b]x,y\in[a,b] with x<yx<y, we have −f(x)<−f(y)-f(x)<-f(y) and therefore f(y)<f(x)f(y)<f(x), again by Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. That is, ff is strictly decreasing on [a,b][a,b] in the sense of Monotone Real Function (iv).

In both cases ff is strictly monotone on [a,b][a,b].

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…