Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named here. We write W for W2, which is a metric on P2(Rd) by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §metric, so that it is symmetric, vanishes on the diagonal and satisfies the triangle inequality (Metric Space); 1/n is the multiplicative inverse of the positive real attached to n∈N (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers), and the sequence (1/n)n∈N converges to 0: given a positive ε, The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers provides N∈N with 1/N<ε, and for n≥N the real attached to n is at least the positive real attached to N (claims 3 and 6 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field), so 0<1/n≤1/N<ε by Order Reversal under Reciprocals, and Summability of the Reciprocals of the Squares §reciprocal. Fix positive δ,α. The set D contains the nonempty DΣ (Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair, Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §nonempty), so D×D is nonempty. As in the statement, δe0≤δE(σ) for every σ∈D (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field).
Step 0 (Envelope bounds). By Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity, uδ− is upper and vδ+ lower semicontinuous on D relative to D in (P2(Rd),W), and u(σ)−δE(σ)≤uδ−(σ) and vδ+(σ)≤v(σ)+δE(σ) for σ∈D. By The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §bounded,
uδ−(σ)≤b−δE(σ),b′+δE(σ)≤vδ+(σ)(σ∈D).(0a)
Since 0≤2αW(μ,ν)2 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field), (0a) gives, for (μ,ν)∈D×D,
Ψδ,α(μ,ν)≤b−b′−δE(μ)−δE(ν)≤b−b′−2δe0.(0b)
Claim 1. By (0b) the nonempty set of values of Ψδ,α is bounded above by b−b′−2δe0, so it has a least upper bound M=M(δ,α)∈R. For each n∈N, claim 3 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R provides a pair with value above M−1/n; by Axiom of Countable Choice choose such a pair (μn,νn) for every n. As 1/n≤1, M−1<Ψδ,α(μn,νn), so by the first inequality of (0b) and δe0≤δE(νn), δE(μn)<b−b′−δe0−M+1; multiplying by the positive δ−1 (claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives E(μn)≤c with c=δ−1(b−b′−M+1)−e0, and in the same way E(νn)≤c. The set K={σ∈D:E(σ)≤c} is sequentially compact by Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pairs §coercive. So (μn)n has a subsequence converging to some μ^∈K; the corresponding subsequence of (νn)n, a sequence in K, has in turn a subsequence converging to some ν^∈K, along which the μ-terms still converge to μ^ (A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit), the indices forming a subsequence of the indices of N (A Subsequence of a Subsequence is a Subsequence). Write (μmk,νmk)k∈N for this subsequence, with (mk)k strictly increasing; then μ^,ν^∈D, W(μmk,μ^)→0, W(νmk,ν^)→0, and 1/mk→0 by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit.
Put a=W(μ^,ν^), ak=W(μmk,νmk) and sk=W(μmk,μ^)+W(νmk,ν^), all nonnegative. The triangle inequality, used twice with the symmetry of W, gives a≤ak+sk and ak≤a+sk. Squares being monotone on nonnegative reals (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field) and by the square of a sum (claim 5 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field),
a2≤ak2+2aksk+sk2≤ak2+sk(2a+3sk),
the second step by ak≤a+sk and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.
Let ε∈R be positive. By the upper semicontinuity of uδ− at μ^ (Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space) there is a positive r1 with uδ−(μ′)<uδ−(μ^)+ε for μ′∈D with W(μ′,μ^)<r1, and by the lower semicontinuity of vδ+ at ν^ (Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space) a positive r2 with vδ+(ν^)−ε<vδ+(ν′) for ν′∈D with W(ν′,ν^)<r2. The number α(2a+3) is positive (claims 1 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), so it has a positive inverse (claim 7 of that lemma). Let t be the least of 21, r1, r2 and ε(α(2a+3))−1, obtained by applying claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field three times, a positive number. Fix k with W(μmk,μ^)<t, W(νmk,ν^)<t and 1/mk<ε. Then sk<2t≤1, so sk(2a+3sk)≤sk(2a+3)<2t(2a+3)≤2εα−1, and the last display gives 2αa2<2αak2+ε. Together with the two semicontinuity bounds at μ′=μmk and ν′=νmk,
Ψδ,α(μ^,ν^)>(uδ−(μmk)−ε)−(vδ+(νmk)+ε)−(2αak2+ε)=Ψδ,α(μmk,νmk)−3ε>M−4ε
(claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). As ε was arbitrary, M≤Ψδ,α(μ^,ν^) by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above; and Ψδ,α(μ^,ν^)≤M, M being an upper bound. So Ψδ,α(μ^,ν^)=M.
Claim 2. Let 0≤Ψδ,α(μ,ν). By (0b), δE(μ)≤b−b′−δE(ν)≤b−b′−δe0≤∣b∣+∣b′∣+δ∣e0∣, the last step by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field applied to b, −b′ and −δe0, with ∣−b′∣=∣b′∣ and ∣−δe0∣=δ∣e0∣ (claims 2 and 4 of that lemma, δ being positive). Also −(∣b∣+∣b′∣+δ∣e0∣)≤−δ∣e0∣≤δe0≤δE(μ), by claims 1 and 3 of that lemma. So ∣δE(μ)∣≤∣b∣+∣b′∣+δ∣e0∣ by claim 6 of that lemma, and ∣δE(μ)∣=δ∣E(μ)∣ by its claim 4. The bound for ν follows by exchanging the roles of μ and ν.
Claim 3. Let 0<δ′<δ and let (μ^,ν^) be a maximising pair of Ψδ,α. By The Delta-Envelopes of Bounded Functions and Their Monotonicity in the Weight, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §monotone, read with δ′ and δ in the roles of the smaller and the larger weight there, uδ−(μ^)+(δ−δ′)E(μ^)≤uδ′−(μ^) and vδ′+(ν^)≤vδ+(ν^)−(δ−δ′)E(ν^). Hence
M(δ′,α)≥Ψδ′,α(μ^,ν^)≥uδ−(μ^)−vδ+(ν^)−2αW(μ^,ν^)2+(δ−δ′)(E(μ^)+E(ν^))=M(δ,α)+(δ−δ′)(E(μ^)+E(ν^)).
Claim 4. Let 0<α′<α and let (μ^,ν^) be a maximising pair of Ψδ,α. Since 2α′=2α−2α−α′ by distributivity,
M(δ,α′)≥Ψδ,α′(μ^,ν^)=Ψδ,α(μ^,ν^)+2α−α′W(μ^,ν^)2=M(δ,α)+2α−α′W(μ^,ν^)2.