TheoremBase

The two measures agree on the measurable rectangles, a generating pi-system, because the graph condition turns a rectangle into a preimage under the first projection.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

1. The coupling ignores the complement of the graph. Since Ο€\pi is a probability measure and Ο€(Ξ“S)=1\pi(\Gamma_{S})=1, claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure gives Ο€(Rd+dβˆ–Ξ“S)=1βˆ’1=0\pi(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\setminus\Gamma_{S})=1-1=0. Hence for every B∈B(Rd+d)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) the sets Bβˆ©Ξ“SB\cap\Gamma_{S} and Bβˆ–Ξ“SB\setminus\Gamma_{S} are disjoint members of B(Rd+d)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) with union BB, so claims 1 and 2 of that lemma give

Ο€(B)=Ο€(Bβˆ©Ξ“S)+Ο€(Bβˆ–Ξ“S)=Ο€(Bβˆ©Ξ“S),\pi(B)=\pi(B\cap\Gamma_{S})+\pi(B\setminus\Gamma_{S})=\pi(B\cap\Gamma_{S}),

because Ο€(Bβˆ–Ξ“S)≀π(Rd+dβˆ–Ξ“S)=0\pi(B\setminus\Gamma_{S})\le\pi(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\setminus\Gamma_{S})=0.

2. On the graph, membership in BB is a condition on the first coordinate. Let zβˆˆΞ“Sz\in\Gamma_{S} and put x=pr1(z)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z). By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i) we have z=ΞΉ(pr1(z),pr2(z))z=\iota(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)), and pr2(z)=S(x)\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)=S(x) by the definition of Ξ“S\Gamma_{S}, so z=ΞΉ(x,S(x))=(id,S)(x)z=\iota(x,S(x))=(\mathrm{id},S)(x), the pairing being as in Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (ii). Consequently, for B∈B(Rd+d)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) and zβˆˆΞ“Sz\in\Gamma_{S},

z∈Bβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š(id,S)(pr1(z))∈Bβ€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Špr1(z)∈E,E=(id,S)βˆ’1(B),z\in B\iff(\mathrm{id},S)\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)\bigr)\in B\iff\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)\in E,\qquad E=(\mathrm{id},S)^{-1}(B),

and E∈B(Rd)E\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) because (id,S)(\mathrm{id},S) is Borel. Therefore Bβˆ©Ξ“S=pr1βˆ’1(E)βˆ©Ξ“SB\cap\Gamma_{S}=\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(E)\cap\Gamma_{S}.

3. Identification of the coupling. Combining steps 1 and 2, and applying step 1 once more to the Borel set pr1βˆ’1(E)\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(E),

Ο€(B)=Ο€(pr1βˆ’1(E)βˆ©Ξ“S)=Ο€(pr1βˆ’1(E))=ΞΌ(E)=ΞΌ((id,S)βˆ’1(B))=(id,S)#μ (B),\pi(B)=\pi\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(E)\cap\Gamma_{S}\bigr)=\pi\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(E)\bigr)=\mu(E)=\mu\bigl((\mathrm{id},S)^{-1}(B)\bigr)=(\mathrm{id},S)_{\#}\mu\,(B),

the third equality because (pr1)#Ο€=ΞΌ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i) and the last by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv). As B∈B(Rd+d)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) was arbitrary, Ο€=(id,S)#ΞΌ\pi=(\mathrm{id},S)_{\#}\mu.

4. The map transports the first marginal to the second. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i) and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (ii) we have pr2((id,S)(x))=pr2(ΞΉ(x,S(x)))=S(x)\mathrm{pr}_{2}((\mathrm{id},S)(x))=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(\iota(x,S(x)))=S(x) for every x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, so (id,S)βˆ’1(pr2βˆ’1(B))=Sβˆ’1(B)(\mathrm{id},S)^{-1}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(B))=S^{-1}(B) for every B∈B(Rd)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). Hence, using step 3 and (pr2)#Ο€=Ξ½(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\nu from Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i),

Ξ½(B)=Ο€(pr2βˆ’1(B))=ΞΌ((id,S)βˆ’1(pr2βˆ’1(B)))=ΞΌ(Sβˆ’1(B))=S#μ (B),\nu(B)=\pi\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(B)\bigr)=\mu\bigl((\mathrm{id},S)^{-1}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(B))\bigr)=\mu\bigl(S^{-1}(B)\bigr)=S_{\#}\mu\,(B),

so S#ΞΌ=Ξ½S_{\#}\mu=\nu. This proves claim 1 of the statement.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…