Write H=G⊗Bn and define Φ:Ω→Ω×Rn by Φ(ω)=(ω,X(ω)).
Measurability of Φ, and claim 1. The class of sets E⊆Ω×Rn with Φ−1(E)∈F is a σ-algebra, since preimages commute with complements and countable unions. It contains every measurable rectangle G×B with G∈G and B∈Bn, because Φ−1(G×B)=G∩X−1(B)∈F. Since the rectangles generate H, the map Φ is measurable from (Ω,F) to (Ω×Rn,H). Hence ω↦Ψ(Φ(ω)) is F-measurable: for every real c, its superlevel set is Φ−1({Ψ>c}). This is claim 1.
The law of Φ is a product. Let P∣G denote the set function P considered on G only; then (Ω,G,P∣G) is a probability space, since P∣G(∅)=0, P∣G(Ω)=1, and countable additivity is inherited, disjoint sequences in G being disjoint sequences in F with union in G. Let π=P∣G⊗μX be the product measure on H, both factors being probability measures, hence σ-finite. Let PΦ be the image measure of P under Φ, likewise a probability measure on H. For G∈G and B∈Bn,
PΦ(G×B)=P(G∩X−1(B))=P(G)P(X−1(B))=π(G×B),
the middle equality by the independence of G and σ(X), the event X−1(B) belonging to σ(X). The measurable rectangles form a π-system, since (G×B)∩(G′×B′)=(G∩G′)×(B∩B′), they generate H, and PΦ and π have equal total mass 1; by claim 1 of Uniqueness of Finite Measures on a Generating Pi-System and the Density of the Exponential Law, PΦ=π.
Claims 2 and 3. The Tonelli theorem, applied to Ψ on the product of the probability spaces (Ω,G,P∣G) and (Rn,Bn,μX) (both σ-finite), gives: every section u↦Ψ(ω,u) is Bn-measurable; the map ω↦∫RnΨ(ω,u)dμX(u) is G-measurable, which is claim 2; and
∫Ω×RnΨdπ=∫Ω(∫RnΨ(ω,u)dμX(u))dP∣G(ω).
By the change of variables for the image measure and PΦ=π,
E[Ψ(⋅,X(⋅))]=∫ΩΨ∘ΦdP=∫Ω×RnΨdPΦ=∫Ω×RnΨdπ.
It remains to observe that the integral of the G-measurable map Ξ(ω)=∫RnΨ(ω,u)dμX(u) with respect to P∣G equals its integral with respect to P: taking the nondecreasing simple functions sm=∑p=1m2m2−m1{Ξ≥p2−m}, which are G-measurable and converge pointwise to Ξ, each ∫smdP∣G=∫smdP since P∣G agrees with P on the G-measurable level sets, and the Monotone Convergence Theorem applied on both sides gives the equality. Combining the three displays yields claim 3.