TheoremBase

Push-forward and change-of-variables computations for the marginals and costs; the Minkowski-type bounds come from the triangle inequality of the mean-square norm on the coupling regarded as a probability space; quantisation uses the tail of the second moment and a finite cover of a closed ball by small balls; gluing over a finitely supported middle measure is done by a density against the product of the two couplings, with Tonelli's theorem for the marginals.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. "The integral theorem" refers to Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (claim 1: additivity, homogeneity with a factor in [0,∞)[0,\infty), and monotonicity of the nonnegative integral; claim 2: linearity, ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣|\int f|\le\int|f| and monotonicity for integrable functions), and "change of variables" to the formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv). Let φ:Rd+d→R\varphi:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R} be the Borel map z↦∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥2z\mapsto\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2} and φ0\varphi_{0} the Borel map z↦∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥z\mapsto\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert, both of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv), so that I(π)=∫φ dπI(\pi)=\int\varphi\,d\pi for every π∈P(Rd+d)\pi\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (ii), each such π\pi being a coupling of its own push-forwards by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i). Two facts are used repeatedly. (i) For Borel G:Rm→RlG:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R}^{l} and H:Rl→RkH:\mathbb{R}^{l}\to\mathbb{R}^{k} and λ∈P(Rm)\lambda\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{m}), one has (H∘G)#λ=H#(G#λ)(H\circ G)_{\#}\lambda=H_{\#}(G_{\#}\lambda), since both sides assign to a Borel BB the value λ(G−1(H−1(B)))\lambda(G^{-1}(H^{-1}(B))). (ii) For u,v:Rm→Rdu,v:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} Borel, pr1∘(u,v)=u\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ(u,v)=u and pr2∘(u,v)=v\mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ(u,v)=v by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), and φ((u,v)(x))=∥u(x)−v(x)∥2\varphi((u,v)(x))=\lVert u(x)-v(x)\rVert^{2}, φ0((u,v)(x))=∥u(x)−v(x)∥\varphi_{0}((u,v)(x))=\lVert u(x)-v(x)\rVert. Finally, if λ\lambda is a probability measure on a measurable space, a nonnegative measurable real function with finite integral is integrable with the same integral, by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (its negative part is 00); this identifies the two readings of such integrals below.

Claim 1. By Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v) and Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii) (with q=p=dq=p=d), μ⊠ν∈P(Rd+d)\mu\boxtimes\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) and its push-forwards by pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} and pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} are μ\mu and ν\nu; so μ⊠ν∈Π(μ,ν)\mu\boxtimes\nu\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) by Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i).

Claim 2. The swap σ\sigma is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (ii), so σ#π∈P(Rd+d)\sigma_{\#}\pi\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}). By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), pr1∘σ=pr2\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\sigma=\mathrm{pr}_{2} and pr2∘σ=pr1\mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ\sigma=\mathrm{pr}_{1}, and σ(σ(z))=ι(pr2(σ(z)),pr1(σ(z)))=ι(pr1(z),pr2(z))=z\sigma(\sigma(z))=\iota(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(\sigma(z)),\mathrm{pr}_{1}(\sigma(z)))=\iota(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z))=z. Hence by (i), (pr1)#(σ#π)=(pr1∘σ)#π=(pr2)#π=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=(\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\sigma)_{\#}\pi=(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\nu and (pr2)#(σ#π)=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=\mu, so σ#π∈Π(ν,μ)\sigma_{\#}\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu); and σ#(σ#π)=(σ∘σ)#π=π\sigma_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=(\sigma\circ\sigma)_{\#}\pi=\pi. By change of variables, I(σ#π)=∫φ∘σ dπI(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=\int\varphi\circ\sigma\,d\pi, and φ(σ(z))=∥pr2(z)−pr1(z)∥2=φ(z)\varphi(\sigma(z))=\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)\rVert^{2}=\varphi(z) because pr2(z)−pr1(z)=(−1)(pr1(z)−pr2(z))\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)=(-1)(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)) by claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space and claims 2 and 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, and ∥(−1)x∥=∥x∥\lVert(-1)x\rVert=\lVert x\rVert by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square; so I(σ#π)=I(π)I(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=I(\pi). The map π↦σ#π\pi\mapsto\sigma_{\#}\pi thus sends Π(μ,ν)\Pi(\mu,\nu) into Π(ν,μ)\Pi(\nu,\mu), and the same map on Π(ν,μ)\Pi(\nu,\mu) is a two-sided inverse of it, so it is a bijection.

Claim 3. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv), φ(z)≤2∥pr1(z)∥2+2∥pr2(z)∥2\varphi(z)\le2\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)\rVert^{2}+2\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2} for every zz. The maps z↦∥pri(z)∥2z\mapsto\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{i}(z)\rVert^{2} are Borel, being compositions of pri\mathrm{pr}_{i} with x↦∥x∥2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2} (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii)), and by change of variables ∫∥pr1(z)∥2 π(dz)=∫∥x∥2 ((pr1)#π)(dx)=M2(μ)\int\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)=\int\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,((\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi)(dx)=M_{2}(\mu), and likewise the second integral is M2(ν)M_{2}(\nu), by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (i). Claim 1 of the integral theorem gives I(π)≤2M2(μ)+2M2(ν)I(\pi)\le2M_{2}(\mu)+2M_{2}(\nu) in [0,∞][0,\infty], which is finite when μ,ν∈P2(Rd)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). Conversely, Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv) with x=pr2(z)x=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z) and y=pr1(z)y=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z) gives ∥pr2(z)∥2≤2∥pr1(z)∥2+2φ(z)\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)\rVert^{2}+2\varphi(z), using ∥pr2(z)−pr1(z)∥=∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)\rVert=\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert as in claim 2; integrating as before, M2(ν)≤2M2(μ)+2I(π)M_{2}(\nu)\le2M_{2}(\mu)+2I(\pi), which is finite under the stated hypotheses, so ν∈P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Claim 4. The pairing (S,T)(S,T) is Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v), so (S,T)#μ∈P(Rd+d)(S,T)_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}), and by (i) and (ii) its push-forward by pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} is (pr1∘(S,T))#μ=S#μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ(S,T))_{\#}\mu=S_{\#}\mu, and by pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} is T#μT_{\#}\mu. By change of variables and (ii), I((S,T)#μ)=∫φ∘(S,T) dμ=∫∥S(x)−T(x)∥2 μ(dx)I((S,T)_{\#}\mu)=\int\varphi\circ(S,T)\,d\mu=\int\lVert S(x)-T(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx). For S=T=idS=T=\mathrm{id}, id#μ=μ\mathrm{id}_{\#}\mu=\mu and the integrand is ∥x−x∥2=0\lVert x-x\rVert^{2}=0 by claim 2 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and claim 3 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, whose integral is 00 by claim 1 of the integral theorem with the factor 00.

Claim 5. The maps T∘pr2T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} and S∘pr1S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} are Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii), so the two pairings are Borel and the push-forwards lie in P(Rd+d)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}). By (i) and (ii), the push-forward of π′=(pr1,T∘pr2)#π\pi'=(\mathrm{pr}_{1},T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi by pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} is (pr1)#π=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi=\mu and by pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} is (T∘pr2)#π=T#((pr2)#π)=T#ν(T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=T_{\#}((\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi)=T_{\#}\nu; so π′∈Π(μ,T#ν)\pi'\in\Pi(\mu,T_{\#}\nu), and likewise (S∘pr1,pr2)#π∈Π(S#μ,ν)(S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi\in\Pi(S_{\#}\mu,\nu). Now assume I(π)<∞I(\pi)<\infty and ∫∥T(y)−y∥2 ν(dy)<∞\int\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dy)<\infty. Regard (Rd+d,B(Rd+d),π)(\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\pi) as a probability space, so that Borel real functions on Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} are random variables on it; let f=φ0f=\varphi_{0} and g=φ0∘(pr2,T∘pr2)g=\varphi_{0}\circ(\mathrm{pr}_{2},T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}), Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii), so that f(z)=∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥f(z)=\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert and g(z)=∥pr2(z)−T(pr2(z))∥g(z)=\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-T(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z))\rVert by (ii). Then ∫f2 dπ=I(π)<∞\int f^{2}\,d\pi=I(\pi)<\infty, and ∫g2 dπ=∫∥pr2(z)−T(pr2(z))∥2 π(dz)=∫∥y−T(y)∥2 ν(dy)<∞\int g^{2}\,d\pi=\int\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-T(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z))\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)=\int\lVert y-T(y)\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dy)<\infty by change of variables through pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2}, the integrand being ∥y−T(y)∥2=∥T(y)−y∥2\lVert y-T(y)\rVert^{2}=\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2} (claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square as in claim 2); so ff and gg are square-integrable random variables with ∥f∥2=I(π)\lVert f\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi)} and ∥g∥2=∫∥T(y)−y∥2 ν(dy)\lVert g\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{\int\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dy)}. For every zz, writing x=pr1(z)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z) and y=pr2(z)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z), one has x−T(y)=(x−y)+(y−T(y))x-T(y)=(x-y)+(y-T(y)) by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space, so ∥x−T(y)∥≤f(z)+g(z)\lVert x-T(y)\rVert\le f(z)+g(z) by claim 6 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, and ∥x−T(y)∥2≤(f(z)+g(z))2\lVert x-T(y)\rVert^{2}\le(f(z)+g(z))^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. By change of variables and (ii), I(π′)=∫φ∘(pr1,T∘pr2) dπ=∫∥pr1(z)−T(pr2(z))∥2 π(dz)≤∫(f+g)2 dπ=∥f+g∥22I(\pi')=\int\varphi\circ(\mathrm{pr}_{1},T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})\,d\pi=\int\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-T(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z))\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)\le\int(f+g)^{2}\,d\pi=\lVert f+g\rVert_{2}^{2} by monotonicity, and ∥f+g∥2≤∥f∥2+∥g∥2\lVert f+g\rVert_{2}\le\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert g\rVert_{2} by claim 2 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm; hence I(π′)I(\pi') is finite and I(π′)≤∥f+g∥2≤∥f∥2+∥g∥2\sqrt{I(\pi')}\le\lVert f+g\rVert_{2}\le\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert g\rVert_{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, which is the asserted bound. For the second assertion, one checks from Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i) that σ∘(pr1,S∘pr2)∘σ=(S∘pr1,pr2)\sigma\circ(\mathrm{pr}_{1},S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})\circ\sigma=(S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2}) pointwise, so by (i) (S∘pr1,pr2)#π=σ#((pr1,S∘pr2)#(σ#π))(S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi=\sigma_{\#}\bigl((\mathrm{pr}_{1},S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi)\bigr); by claim 2, σ#π∈Π(ν,μ)\sigma_{\#}\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu) with I(σ#π)=I(π)I(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=I(\pi), so the first assertion applied to σ#π\sigma_{\#}\pi and SS bounds the cost of (pr1,S∘pr2)#(σ#π)(\mathrm{pr}_{1},S\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}(\sigma_{\#}\pi) by the square of I(π)+∫∥S(x)−x∥2 μ(dx)\sqrt{I(\pi)}+\sqrt{\int\lVert S(x)-x\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)}, and claim 2 again shows that the swap preserves this cost.

Claim 6. If TT has finite image F=T(Rd)F=T(\mathbb{R}^{d}), then T−1(Rd∖F)=∅T^{-1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F)=\varnothing, so T#ν(Rd∖F)=ν(∅)=0T_{\#}\nu(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F)=\nu(\varnothing)=0 by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure. Now let ν∈P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and 0<ε0<\varepsilon; put η=ε2⋅2−1\eta=\varepsilon^{2}\cdot2^{-1} and ε′=ε⋅2−1\varepsilon'=\varepsilon\cdot2^{-1}, so that η+η=ε2\eta+\eta=\varepsilon^{2}, 0<η0<\eta, 0<ε′0<\varepsilon' by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and ε′2=ε2⋅2−1⋅2−1≤η\varepsilon'^{2}=\varepsilon^{2}\cdot2^{-1}\cdot2^{-1}\le\eta because 2−1<12^{-1}<1 (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with ε=1\varepsilon=1, using claim 6 there) and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Let κ:N→R\kappa:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R} be the canonical map. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let Kn={y:∥y∥≤κ(n)}K_{n}=\{y:\lVert y\rVert\le\kappa(n)\}, the complement of {y:∥y∥>κ(n)}\{y:\lVert y\rVert>\kappa(n)\}, which is Borel by Measurable Functions and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation (iii) since y↦∥y∥y\mapsto\lVert y\rVert is Borel; and let hn=∥⋅∥21Knh_{n}=\lVert\cdot\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{K_{n}}, Borel by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps. As κ\kappa is increasing (claim 6 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field), Kn⊆Kn+1K_{n}\subseteq K_{n+1} and (hn(y))n(h_{n}(y))_{n} is nondecreasing for each yy; and by claim 1 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is nn with ∥y∥<κ(n)\lVert y\rVert<\kappa(n), so hm(y)=∥y∥2h_{m}(y)=\lVert y\rVert^{2} for all m≥nm\ge n and sup⁡nhn(y)=∥y∥2\sup_{n}h_{n}(y)=\lVert y\rVert^{2}. By Monotone Convergence Theorem, M2(ν)=sup⁡n∫hn dνM_{2}(\nu)=\sup_{n}\int h_{n}\,d\nu, each ∫hn dν\int h_{n}\,d\nu being a real number at most M2(ν)<∞M_{2}(\nu)<\infty by monotonicity. By claim 3 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} there is nn with M2(ν)−η<∫hn dνM_{2}(\nu)-\eta<\int h_{n}\,d\nu. Fix this nn, put R=κ(n)R=\kappa(n) and K=KnK=K_{n}, and let g=∥⋅∥21Rd∖Kg=\lVert\cdot\rVert^{2}\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus K}, Borel likewise. Since ∥y∥2=hn(y)+g(y)\lVert y\rVert^{2}=h_{n}(y)+g(y) for every yy, claim 1 of the integral theorem gives M2(ν)=∫hn dν+∫g dνM_{2}(\nu)=\int h_{n}\,d\nu+\int g\,d\nu with both terms real, whence ∫g dν=M2(ν)−∫hn dν<η\int g\,d\nu=M_{2}(\nu)-\int h_{n}\,d\nu<\eta.

KK is the closed ball of (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) with centre 0Rd0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} and radius RR, since dE(0Rd,y)=∥y∥d_{E}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},y)=\lVert y\rVert by claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and symmetry of the metric; it is compact by claim 2 of A Closed Euclidean Ball is Convex and Compact, the radius R=κ(n)R=\kappa(n) being nonnegative by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field. The family (B(c,ε′))c∈K(B(c,\varepsilon'))_{c\in K} of open balls, which are open by Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open, covers KK, as c∈B(c,ε′)c\in B(c,\varepsilon'); by Compact Subset Criterion via Open Covers in the Ambient Space there is a finite J⊆KJ\subseteq K with K⊆⋃c∈JB(c,ε′)K\subseteq\bigcup_{c\in J}B(c,\varepsilon'). Since 0Rd∈K0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\in K, JJ is nonempty, so by Finite Set there are n′∈Nn'\in\mathbb{N} and a bijection [n′]→J[n']\to J, j↦cjj\mapsto c_{j}. For j∈[n′]j\in[n'] let Bj=B(cj,ε′)B_{j}=B(c_{j},\varepsilon') and Ej=(K∩Bj)∖⋃i∈[n′], i<jBiE_{j}=(K\cap B_{j})\setminus\bigcup_{i\in[n'],\,i<j}B_{i}, a Borel set (open sets being Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (i), and finite intersections, unions and differences of Borel sets being Borel by σ-Algebra and Measurable Space). For y∈Ky\in K the set {j∈[n′]:y∈Bj}\{j\in[n']:y\in B_{j}\} is nonempty, so it has a least element j(y)j(y) by The Natural Numbers Are Well Ordered, and y∈Ej(y)y\in E_{j(y)} while y∉Ejy\notin E_{j} for j≠j(y)j\ne j(y); thus the sets EjE_{j} are pairwise disjoint with union KK. Define T:Rd→RdT:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} by T(y)=cj(y)T(y)=c_{j(y)} for y∈Ky\in K and T(y)=0RdT(y)=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} for y∉Ky\notin K. For B∈B(Rd)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),

T−1(B)=⋃j∈[n′], cj∈BEj ∪ NB,NB=Rd∖K if 0Rd∈B,NB=∅ otherwise,T^{-1}(B)=\bigcup_{j\in[n'],\,c_{j}\in B}E_{j}\ \cup\ N_{B},\qquad N_{B}=\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus K\ \text{if }0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\in B,\quad N_{B}=\varnothing\ \text{otherwise},

a finite union of Borel sets, hence Borel; so TT is Borel. Its image is contained in {c1,…,cn′}∪{0Rd}\{c_{1},\dots,c_{n'}\}\cup\{0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\}, the image of the finite set [n′+1][n'+1] under the map sending j≤n′j\le n' to cjc_{j} and n′+1n'+1 to 0Rd0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}, which is finite by claims 1 and 4 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets; so T(Rd)T(\mathbb{R}^{d}) is finite by claim 3 there. For y∈Ky\in K, ∥T(y)−y∥=dE(cj(y),y)<ε′\lVert T(y)-y\rVert=d_{E}(c_{j(y)},y)<\varepsilon' since y∈Bj(y)y\in B_{j(y)}, so ∥T(y)−y∥2≤ε′2≤η\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}\le\varepsilon'^{2}\le\eta by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; for y∉Ky\notin K, T(y)−y=(−1)yT(y)-y=(-1)y by claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space and Vector Space over a Field, so ∥T(y)−y∥2=∥y∥2=g(y)\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}=\lVert y\rVert^{2}=g(y) by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square. Hence ∥T(y)−y∥2≤η1K(y)+g(y)\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}\le\eta\mathbf{1}_{K}(y)+g(y) for every yy, and by claim 1 of the integral theorem and The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set,

∫∥T(y)−y∥2 ν(dy)≤η ν(K)+∫g dν≤η+η=ε2,\int\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dy)\le\eta\,\nu(K)+\int g\,d\nu\le\eta+\eta=\varepsilon^{2},

using ν(K)≤1\nu(K)\le1 (claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure) and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Claim 7. Write F+={y∈F:0<ρ({y})}F_{+}=\{y\in F:0<\rho(\{y\})\}, a subset of FF, finite by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets (singletons being Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (v), so that ρ({y})\rho(\{y\}) is defined), and let w:Rd→Rw:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be w(y)=ρ({y})−1w(y)=\rho(\{y\})^{-1} for y∈F+y\in F_{+} and w(y)=0w(y)=0 otherwise, Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (v) applied to the finite set F+F_{+}. Then w(y)ρ({y})=1F+(y)w(y)\rho(\{y\})=\mathbf{1}_{F_{+}}(y) for every yy. Moreover ρ(Rd∖F+)=0\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F_{+})=0: the set F∖F+F\setminus F_{+} is finite by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, so it is empty or the image of a bijection [k]→F∖F+[k]\to F\setminus F_{+}, and then ρ(F∖F+)\rho(F\setminus F_{+}) is the sum of the kk values ρ({y})=0\rho(\{y\})=0 by claim 1 of Basic Properties of a Measure, hence 00; and ρ(Rd∖F+)=ρ(Rd∖F)+ρ(F∖F+)=0\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F_{+})=\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F)+\rho(F\setminus F_{+})=0 by the same claim.

Let q=d+dq=d+d and consider Rq+q\mathbb{R}^{q+q} with the projections P1=pr1q,qP_{1}=\mathrm{pr}^{q,q}_{1}, P2=pr2q,qP_{2}=\mathrm{pr}^{q,q}_{2} and the concatenation ιq,q\iota^{q,q} of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v); for ζ∈Rq+q\zeta\in\mathbb{R}^{q+q} write x(ζ)=pr1(P1ζ)x(\zeta)=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(P_{1}\zeta), y(ζ)=pr2(P1ζ)y(\zeta)=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(P_{1}\zeta), y′(ζ)=pr1(P2ζ)y'(\zeta)=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(P_{2}\zeta) and v(ζ)=pr2(P2ζ)v(\zeta)=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(P_{2}\zeta), four Borel maps Rq+q→Rd\mathbb{R}^{q+q}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii)). Let θ0=π12⊠π23∈P(Rq+q)\theta_{0}=\pi_{12}\boxtimes\pi_{23}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{q+q}) (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii)). The set D={ζ:y(ζ)=y′(ζ)}D=\{\zeta:y(\zeta)=y'(\zeta)\} is Borel: it is the complement of {ζ:∥y(ζ)−y′(ζ)∥2>0}\{\zeta:\lVert y(\zeta)-y'(\zeta)\rVert^{2}>0\}, the function ζ↦∥y(ζ)−y′(ζ)∥2\zeta\mapsto\lVert y(\zeta)-y'(\zeta)\rVert^{2} being Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv) and vanishing exactly on DD by claim 3 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, claim 3 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and claim 2 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Let h=(w∘y) 1Dh=(w\circ y)\,\mathbf{1}_{D}, a nonnegative Borel function on Rq+q\mathbb{R}^{q+q} (claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps), and let θ\theta be the measure with density hh with respect to θ0\theta_{0}, so that ∫G dθ=∫Gh dθ0\int G\,d\theta=\int Gh\,d\theta_{0} for every Borel G:Rq+q→[0,∞]G:\mathbb{R}^{q+q}\to[0,\infty] by claim 3 of that lemma.

Two disintegration identities. Let g:Rq→[0,∞)g:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to[0,\infty) be Borel. We claim the following two identities, referred to below as (∗)(\ast):

∫g(P1ζ) h(ζ) θ0(dζ)=∫g dπ12and∫g(P2ζ) h(ζ) θ0(dζ)=∫g dπ23.\int g(P_{1}\zeta)\,h(\zeta)\,\theta_{0}(d\zeta)=\int g\,d\pi_{12}\qquad\text{and}\qquad\int g(P_{2}\zeta)\,h(\zeta)\,\theta_{0}(d\zeta)=\int g\,d\pi_{23}.

For the first, the integrand G=(g∘P1)hG=(g\circ P_{1})h is Borel, so by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii) the function G∘ιq,qG\circ\iota^{q,q} is measurable for B(Rq)⊗B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q})\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) and ∫G dθ0=∫G∘ιq,q d(π12⊗π23)\int G\,d\theta_{0}=\int G\circ\iota^{q,q}\,d(\pi_{12}\otimes\pi_{23}); here, for z∈Rqz\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and z′∈Rqz'\in\mathbb{R}^{q}, G(ιq,q(z,z′))=g(z) w(pr2z) 1[pr2z=pr1z′]G(\iota^{q,q}(z,z'))=g(z)\,w(\mathrm{pr}_{2}z)\,\mathbf{1}[\mathrm{pr}_{2}z=\mathrm{pr}_{1}z'] by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i). By the Tonelli clause of Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems (both factors being probability measures, hence σ\sigma-finite), this equals ∫Rq(∫Rqg(z)w(pr2z)1[pr2z=pr1z′] π23(dz′))π12(dz)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}g(z)w(\mathrm{pr}_{2}z)\mathbf{1}[\mathrm{pr}_{2}z=\mathrm{pr}_{1}z']\,\pi_{23}(dz')\bigr)\pi_{12}(dz). For fixed zz, with y=pr2zy=\mathrm{pr}_{2}z, the inner integrand is the real constant g(z)w(y)g(z)w(y) times the indicator of pr1−1({y})\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(\{y\}), so the inner integral is g(z)w(y)π23(pr1−1({y}))=g(z)w(y)ρ({y})=g(z)1F+(y)g(z)w(y)\pi_{23}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(\{y\}))=g(z)w(y)\rho(\{y\})=g(z)\mathbf{1}_{F_{+}}(y) by claim 1 of the integral theorem, The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set and π23∈Π(ρ,ν)\pi_{23}\in\Pi(\rho,\nu). Thus the first integral in (∗)(\ast) equals ∫g(z)1F+(pr2z) π12(dz)\int g(z)\mathbf{1}_{F_{+}}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}z)\,\pi_{12}(dz). The integrands gg and g⋅(1F+∘pr2)g\cdot(\mathbf{1}_{F_{+}}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}) agree off the set pr2−1(Rd∖F+)\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F_{+}), which has π12\pi_{12}-measure ρ(Rd∖F+)=0\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F_{+})=0 as π12∈Π(μ,ρ)\pi_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\rho); so they agree π12\pi_{12}-almost everywhere and their integrals coincide by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii), proving the first identity. The second is proved in the same way with the order of integration in Tonelli's theorem reversed: for fixed z′z', with y′=pr1z′y'=\mathrm{pr}_{1}z', the inner integrand g(z′)w(pr2z)1[pr2z=y′]g(z')w(\mathrm{pr}_{2}z)\mathbf{1}[\mathrm{pr}_{2}z=y'] equals g(z′)w(y′)g(z')w(y') times the indicator of pr2−1({y′})\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(\{y'\}), whose π12\pi_{12}-integral is g(z′)w(y′)ρ({y′})=g(z′)1F+(y′)g(z')w(y')\rho(\{y'\})=g(z')\mathbf{1}_{F_{+}}(y'), and the outer integral is ∫g dπ23\int g\,d\pi_{23} by the same almost-everywhere argument with π23∈Π(ρ,ν)\pi_{23}\in\Pi(\rho,\nu).

The glued coupling. Taking gg the constant 11 in (∗)(\ast) gives θ(Rq+q)=∫h dθ0=π12(Rq)=1\theta(\mathbb{R}^{q+q})=\int h\,d\theta_{0}=\pi_{12}(\mathbb{R}^{q})=1, so θ∈P(Rq+q)\theta\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{q+q}). Let Φ=(x,v):Rq+q→Rd+d\Phi=(x,v):\mathbb{R}^{q+q}\to\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, the pairing of the Borel maps xx and vv, Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v), and put π13=Φ#θ∈P(Rd+d)\pi_{13}=\Phi_{\#}\theta\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}). For A∈B(Rd)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), by (i), (ii) and the density formula, (pr1)#π13(A)=θ(x−1(A))=∫1x−1(A)h dθ0(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\pi_{13}(A)=\theta(x^{-1}(A))=\int\mathbf{1}_{x^{-1}(A)}h\,d\theta_{0}, and 1x−1(A)=g∘P1\mathbf{1}_{x^{-1}(A)}=g\circ P_{1} with g=1pr1−1(A)g=\mathbf{1}_{\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A)}, a Borel map Rq→[0,∞)\mathbb{R}^{q}\to[0,\infty); so by (∗)(\ast) this equals π12(pr1−1(A))=μ(A)\pi_{12}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A))=\mu(A). Likewise (pr2)#π13(C)=∫(1pr2−1(C)∘P2)h dθ0=π23(pr2−1(C))=ν(C)(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi_{13}(C)=\int(\mathbf{1}_{\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(C)}\circ P_{2})h\,d\theta_{0}=\pi_{23}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}^{-1}(C))=\nu(C). Hence π13∈Π(μ,ν)\pi_{13}\in\Pi(\mu,\nu).

The cost bound. Regard (Rq+q,B(Rq+q),θ)(\mathbb{R}^{q+q},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q+q}),\theta) as a probability space, and let f=φ0∘P1f=\varphi_{0}\circ P_{1} and f′=φ0∘P2f'=\varphi_{0}\circ P_{2}, Borel, so that f(ζ)=∥x(ζ)−y(ζ)∥f(\zeta)=\lVert x(\zeta)-y(\zeta)\rVert and f′(ζ)=∥y′(ζ)−v(ζ)∥f'(\zeta)=\lVert y'(\zeta)-v(\zeta)\rVert by (ii). By the density formula and (∗)(\ast) with g=φg=\varphi, ∫f2 dθ=∫(φ∘P1)h dθ0=∫φ dπ12=I(π12)<∞\int f^{2}\,d\theta=\int(\varphi\circ P_{1})h\,d\theta_{0}=\int\varphi\,d\pi_{12}=I(\pi_{12})<\infty, and similarly ∫f′2 dθ=I(π23)<∞\int f'^{2}\,d\theta=I(\pi_{23})<\infty; so f,f′f,f' are square-integrable random variables on this probability space with ∥f∥2=I(π12)\lVert f\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi_{12})} and ∥f′∥2=I(π23)\lVert f'\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi_{23})}. Let u(ζ)=∥x(ζ)−v(ζ)∥2u(\zeta)=\lVert x(\zeta)-v(\zeta)\rVert^{2}, Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv). For ζ∈D\zeta\in D one has y(ζ)=y′(ζ)y(\zeta)=y'(\zeta), so x−v=(x−y)+(y′−v)x-v=(x-y)+(y'-v) at ζ\zeta by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space, whence ∥x(ζ)−v(ζ)∥≤f(ζ)+f′(ζ)\lVert x(\zeta)-v(\zeta)\rVert\le f(\zeta)+f'(\zeta) by claim 6 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and u(ζ)≤(f(ζ)+f′(ζ))2u(\zeta)\le(f(\zeta)+f'(\zeta))^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; for ζ∉D\zeta\notin D, h(ζ)=0h(\zeta)=0. Hence uh≤(f+f′)2huh\le(f+f')^{2}h pointwise, and by change of variables, (ii), the density formula, monotonicity and claim 2 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm,

I(π13)=∫φ∘Φ dθ=∫u dθ=∫uh dθ0≤∫(f+f′)2h dθ0=∫(f+f′)2 dθ=∥f+f′∥22≤(∥f∥2+∥f′∥2)2.I(\pi_{13})=\int\varphi\circ\Phi\,d\theta=\int u\,d\theta=\int uh\,d\theta_{0}\le\int(f+f')^{2}h\,d\theta_{0}=\int(f+f')^{2}\,d\theta=\lVert f+f'\rVert_{2}^{2}\le\bigl(\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert f'\rVert_{2}\bigr)^{2}.

So I(π13)I(\pi_{13}) is finite and I(π13)≤∥f∥2+∥f′∥2=I(π12)+I(π23)\sqrt{I(\pi_{13})}\le\lVert f\rVert_{2}+\lVert f'\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi_{12})}+\sqrt{I(\pi_{23})} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Claim 8. A Lipschitz ff is continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous, hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii), and being bounded it is integrable with respect to μ\mu and to ν\nu by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii). By change of variables in the integrable case, f∘pr1f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} and f∘pr2f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2} are π\pi-integrable with ∫f∘pr1 dπ=∫f dμ\int f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}\,d\pi=\int f\,d\mu and ∫f∘pr2 dπ=∫f dν\int f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}\,d\pi=\int f\,d\nu. For every zz, ∣f(pr1(z))−f(pr2(z))∣≤L φ0(z)|f(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z))-f(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z))|\le L\,\varphi_{0}(z) by the Lipschitz property. By claim 2 of the integral theorem, then monotonicity and homogeneity of the nonnegative integral,

∣∫f dμ−∫f dν∣=∣∫(f∘pr1−f∘pr2) dπ∣≤∫∣f∘pr1−f∘pr2∣ dπ≤L∫φ0 dπ.\Bigl|\int f\,d\mu-\int f\,d\nu\Bigr|=\Bigl|\int(f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}-f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})\,d\pi\Bigr|\le\int|f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1}-f\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2}|\,d\pi\le L\int\varphi_{0}\,d\pi .

Finally, on the probability space (Rd+d,B(Rd+d),π)(\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\pi) the random variable φ0\varphi_{0} is square-integrable with ∥φ0∥2=I(π)\lVert\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi)}, as φ02=φ\varphi_{0}^{2}=\varphi, and the constant 11 is square-integrable with ∥1∥2=1\lVert1\rVert_{2}=1 (The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set with A=Rd+dA=\mathbb{R}^{d+d}); so ∫φ0 dπ=Eπ[φ0⋅1]≤∥φ0∥2∥1∥2=I(π)\int\varphi_{0}\,d\pi=\mathbb{E}_{\pi}[\varphi_{0}\cdot1]\le\lVert\varphi_{0}\rVert_{2}\lVert1\rVert_{2}=\sqrt{I(\pi)} by claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm, the expectation being the nonnegative integral by the identification recorded at the start. Combining, ∣∫f dμ−∫f dν∣≤LI(π)|\int f\,d\mu-\int f\,d\nu|\le L\sqrt{I(\pi)} by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…