TheoremBase

Proof

Elementary facts about N\mathbb{N} used below — transitivity and totality of ≤\le; that k≤nk\le n implies k≤S(n)k\le S(n) and S(k)≤S(n)S(k)\le S(n); that l<S(m)l<S(m) implies l≤ml\le m; that m<S(m)m<S(m); and that every natural number ll with 1<l1<l is the successor of a natural number — are those of Order on the Natural Numbers and Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, together with the Peano structure of Natural Numbers, in which the successor map SS is injective.

Claim 1. The values of gjg_{j} avoid jj. If k<jk<j then gj(k)=k≠jg_{j}(k)=k\ne j. If j≤kj\le k then j≤k<S(k)=gj(k)j\le k<S(k)=g_{j}(k), so again gj(k)≠jg_{j}(k)\ne j.

Injectivity. Let k,k′∈[n]k,k'\in[n] with gj(k)=gj(k′)g_{j}(k)=g_{j}(k'). If k<jk<j and k′<jk'<j then k=gj(k)=gj(k′)=k′k=g_{j}(k)=g_{j}(k')=k'. If j≤kj\le k and j≤k′j\le k' then S(k)=S(k′)S(k)=S(k'), so k=k′k=k' by injectivity of SS. If k<j≤k′k<j\le k' then gj(k)=k<j≤k′<S(k′)=gj(k′)g_{j}(k)=k<j\le k'<S(k')=g_{j}(k'), contradicting equality; the remaining mixed case is symmetric.

Surjectivity onto the complement of jj. Let l∈[S(n)]l\in[S(n)] with l≠jl\ne j; by totality, either l<jl<j or j<lj<l. If l<jl<j then, since j≤S(n)j\le S(n), transitivity gives l<S(n)l<S(n) and hence l≤nl\le n, so l∈[n]l\in[n] and gj(l)=lg_{j}(l)=l. If j<lj<l then 1≤j<l1\le j<l, so 1<l1<l and l=S(k)l=S(k) for some natural number kk; from S(k)=l≤S(n)S(k)=l\le S(n) we get k≤nk\le n, so k∈[n]k\in[n], and from j<S(k)j<S(k) we get j≤kj\le k, so gj(k)=S(k)=lg_{j}(k)=S(k)=l.

Claims 2 and 3. We prove claim 2. Claim 3 is obtained by the same argument with the addition of KK replaced by its multiplication: the only properties of the operation used are commutativity and associativity, which hold for both operations of a field, and the recursion identity of claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, whose counterpart for products is claim 1 of Properties of Finite Products.

We argue by induction on nn, using the induction principle for the natural numbers. Let P\mathcal{P} be the set of natural numbers nn such that the identity of claim 2 holds for every map a:[S(n)]→Ka:[S(n)]\to K and every j∈[S(n)]j\in[S(n)].

Base. Let n=1n=1, so that [S(1)][S(1)] consists of 11 and S(1)S(1), and [1][1] consists of 11 alone. If j=S(1)j=S(1) then 1<j1<j, so gj(1)=1g_{j}(1)=1, and both sides equal a1+aS(1)a_{1}+a_{S(1)} by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums. If j=1j=1 then j≤1j\le1, so gj(1)=S(1)g_{j}(1)=S(1), the right-hand side is aS(1)+a1a_{S(1)}+a_{1} and the left-hand side is a1+aS(1)a_{1}+a_{S(1)}; these agree by commutativity of addition. Hence 1∈P1\in\mathcal{P}.

Step. Suppose n∈Pn\in\mathcal{P}, and let a:[S(S(n))]→Ka:[S(S(n))]\to K and j∈[S(S(n))]j\in[S(S(n))] be given; write gjg_{j} for the gap map from [S(n)][S(n)] to [S(S(n))][S(S(n))] and bb for the restriction of aa to [S(n)][S(n)]. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums,

∑k=1S(S(n))ak=(∑k=1S(n)bk)+aS(S(n)).(i)\sum_{k=1}^{S(S(n))}a_{k}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}b_{k}\Bigr)+a_{S(S(n))}. \tag{i}

Suppose first that j=S(S(n))j=S(S(n)). For every k∈[S(n)]k\in[S(n)] we have k≤S(n)<S(S(n))=jk\le S(n)<S(S(n))=j, so gj(k)=kg_{j}(k)=k and agj(k)=bka_{g_{j}(k)}=b_{k}. Hence the right-hand side of claim 2 equals the right-hand side of (i), as required.

Suppose now that j≠S(S(n))j\ne S(S(n)), so that j<S(S(n))j<S(S(n)) and therefore j∈[S(n)]j\in[S(n)]. Let hj:[n]→[S(n)]h_{j}:[n]\to[S(n)] be the gap map formed at level nn for this same jj. For k∈[n]k\in[n] the defining case distinction for gjg_{j} and for hjh_{j} is the same, so gj(k)=hj(k)∈[S(n)]g_{j}(k)=h_{j}(k)\in[S(n)] and hence agj(k)=bhj(k)a_{g_{j}(k)}=b_{h_{j}(k)}. Also j≤S(n)j\le S(n) gives gj(S(n))=S(S(n))g_{j}(S(n))=S(S(n)).

By the induction hypothesis applied to bb and jj,

∑k=1S(n)bk=(∑k=1nbhj(k))+bj=(∑k=1nagj(k))+aj,\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}b_{k}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}b_{h_{j}(k)}\Bigr)+b_{j}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{g_{j}(k)}\Bigr)+a_{j},

and by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums applied to the family k↦agj(k)k\mapsto a_{g_{j}(k)} on [S(n)][S(n)],

∑k=1S(n)agj(k)=(∑k=1nagj(k))+agj(S(n))=(∑k=1nagj(k))+aS(S(n)).\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}a_{g_{j}(k)}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{g_{j}(k)}\Bigr)+a_{g_{j}(S(n))}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{g_{j}(k)}\Bigr)+a_{S(S(n))}.

Substituting the first of these into (i) and regrouping by commutativity and associativity of addition,

∑k=1S(S(n))ak=((∑k=1nagj(k))+aS(S(n)))+aj=(∑k=1S(n)agj(k))+aj,\sum_{k=1}^{S(S(n))}a_{k}=\Bigl(\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{g_{j}(k)}\Bigr)+a_{S(S(n))}\Bigr)+a_{j}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}a_{g_{j}(k)}\Bigr)+a_{j},

which is the identity of claim 2 at level S(n)S(n). Hence S(n)∈PS(n)\in\mathcal{P}, and by induction P\mathcal{P} contains every natural number.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…