Reason: Proof of lem:positive-semidefinite-cauchy-schwarz-2026b. Body carried over unchanged from the proof of the 2026a version, with the self-adjointness reference updated from def:self-adjoint-operator-2026a to def:self-adjoint-operator-2026b so that the symmetry identity used in facts (i) and in claim 2 is supplied by a definition stated in the setting the lemma actually assumes. No step of the argument changed.
(i) ⟨v,T(u)⟩=z. Indeed, T being self-adjoint gives ⟨T(v),u⟩=⟨v,T(u)⟩, while conjugate symmetry (condition 1 of Complex Inner Product Space) gives ⟨T(v),u⟩=⟨u,T(v)⟩=z.
(ii) For all x,y,y′∈V and every complex t, ⟨y+ty′,x⟩=⟨y,x⟩+t⟨y′,x⟩. This follows by applying conjugate symmetry, then conditions 2 and 3 of Complex Inner Product Space in the second argument, then conjugate symmetry again, using that conjugation preserves sums and products.
(iii) For every complex w, ww=∣w∣2, where ∣w∣ is the modulus. Indeed, writing w=p+qi with p,q real, claim 4 of Canonical Form and Arithmetic of Complex Numbers gives ww=p2+q2, which is ∣w∣2 by the definition of the modulus.
Claim 1. Let t be a complex number. Since T is a linear operator, T(u+tv)=T(u)+tT(v). Using (ii) in the first argument and conditions 2 and 3 of Complex Inner Product Space in the second, together with (i),
If z=0, then ∣z∣2=0 and 0≤ab because a and b are nonnegative, so the asserted inequality holds. Assume therefore z=0; then ∣z∣=0, and 0<∣z∣ since a modulus is nonnegative. Let s be a real number and put t=−(s/∣z∣)z. By (iii),
and tz=tz=−s∣z∣ because −s∣z∣ is real. Substituting into the display,
0≤a−2s∣z∣+s2bfor every real number s.
If b=0, then taking s=(a+1)/(2∣z∣) gives 2s∣z∣=a+1 and hence 0≤a−(a+1)=−1, which is false in the ordered fieldR. Hence b=0 and so 0<b. Taking s=∣z∣/b gives
0≤a−b2∣z∣2+b∣z∣2=a−b∣z∣2,
and multiplying by the positive number b yields 0≤ab−∣z∣2, that is ∣z∣2≤ab, which is claim 1.
Claim 2. Suppose ⟨u,T(u)⟩=0, and let v∈V be arbitrary. Claim 1 gives
⟨u,T(v)⟩2≤0⋅⟨v,T(v)⟩=0.
Writing ⟨u,T(v)⟩=p+qi with p,q the real and imaginary parts, the modulus satisfies ∣p+qi∣2=p2+q2, and squares are nonnegative in an ordered field, so p2+q2≤0 forces p2=q2=0 and hence p=q=0. Thus ⟨u,T(v)⟩=0 for every v∈V.
Since T is self-adjoint, ⟨T(u),v⟩=⟨u,T(v)⟩=0 for every v∈V. Taking v=T(u) gives ⟨T(u),T(u)⟩=0, so T(u)=0V by condition 4 of Complex Inner Product Space.