TheoremBase

Proof of Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for a Positive Semi-Definite Self-Adjoint Operator

lemmalem:positive-semidefinite-cauchy-schwarz-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of lem:positive-semidefinite-cauchy-schwarz-2026b. Body carried over unchanged from the proof of the 2026a version, with the self-adjointness reference updated from def:self-adjoint-operator-2026a to def:self-adjoint-operator-2026b so that the symmetry identity used in facts (i) and in claim 2 is supplied by a definition stated in the setting the lemma actually assumes. No step of the argument changed.

Proof

Let u,vVu,v\in V and write a=u,T(u)a=\langle u,T(u)\rangle, b=v,T(v)b=\langle v,T(v)\rangle and z=u,T(v)z=\langle u,T(v)\rangle. By Positive Semi-Definite Operator, aa and bb are real numbers with 0a0\le a and 0b0\le b. Let w\overline{w} denote the complex conjugate of a complex number ww.

We first record three facts.

(i) v,T(u)=z\langle v,T(u)\rangle=\overline{z}. Indeed, TT being self-adjoint gives T(v),u=v,T(u)\langle T(v),u\rangle=\langle v,T(u)\rangle, while conjugate symmetry (condition 1 of Complex Inner Product Space) gives T(v),u=u,T(v)=z\langle T(v),u\rangle=\overline{\langle u,T(v)\rangle}=\overline{z}.

(ii) For all x,y,yVx,y,y'\in V and every complex tt, y+ty,x=y,x+ty,x\langle y+ty',x\rangle=\langle y,x\rangle+\overline{t}\,\langle y',x\rangle. This follows by applying conjugate symmetry, then conditions 2 and 3 of Complex Inner Product Space in the second argument, then conjugate symmetry again, using that conjugation preserves sums and products.

(iii) For every complex ww, ww=w2w\overline{w}=|w|^{2}, where w|w| is the modulus. Indeed, writing w=p+qiw=p+qi with p,qp,q real, claim 4 of Canonical Form and Arithmetic of Complex Numbers gives ww=p2+q2w\overline{w}=p^{2}+q^{2}, which is w2|w|^{2} by the definition of the modulus.

Claim 1. Let tt be a complex number. Since TT is a linear operator, T(u+tv)=T(u)+tT(v)T(u+tv)=T(u)+tT(v). Using (ii) in the first argument and conditions 2 and 3 of Complex Inner Product Space in the second, together with (i),

u+tv,T(u+tv)=a+tz+tz+ttb.\langle u+tv,\,T(u+tv)\rangle=a+t z+\overline{t}\,\overline{z}+\overline{t}t\,b .

By Positive Semi-Definite Operator the left-hand side is a real number that is at least 00.

If z=0z=0, then z2=0|z|^{2}=0 and 0ab0\le ab because aa and bb are nonnegative, so the asserted inequality holds. Assume therefore z0z\ne0; then z0|z|\ne0, and 0<z0<|z| since a modulus is nonnegative. Let ss be a real number and put t=(s/z)zt=-(s/|z|)\overline{z}. By (iii),

tz=(s/z)zz=(s/z)z2=sz,tt=(s/z)2zz=s2,tz=-(s/|z|)\,\overline{z}z=-(s/|z|)|z|^{2}=-s|z| ,\qquad \overline{t}t=(s/|z|)^{2}\,z\overline{z}=s^{2},

and tz=tz=sz\overline{t}\,\overline{z}=\overline{tz}=-s|z| because sz-s|z| is real. Substituting into the display,

0a2sz+s2bfor every real number s.0\le a-2s|z|+s^{2}b\qquad\text{for every real number }s .

If b=0b=0, then taking s=(a+1)/(2z)s=(a+1)/(2|z|) gives 2sz=a+12s|z|=a+1 and hence 0a(a+1)=10\le a-(a+1)=-1, which is false in the ordered field R\mathbb{R}. Hence b0b\ne0 and so 0<b0<b. Taking s=z/bs=|z|/b gives

0a2z2b+z2b=az2b,0\le a-\frac{2|z|^{2}}{b}+\frac{|z|^{2}}{b}=a-\frac{|z|^{2}}{b},

and multiplying by the positive number bb yields 0abz20\le ab-|z|^{2}, that is z2ab|z|^{2}\le ab, which is claim 1.

Claim 2. Suppose u,T(u)=0\langle u,T(u)\rangle=0, and let vVv\in V be arbitrary. Claim 1 gives

u,T(v)20v,T(v)=0.\bigl|\langle u,T(v)\rangle\bigr|^{2}\le 0\cdot\langle v,T(v)\rangle=0 .

Writing u,T(v)=p+qi\langle u,T(v)\rangle=p+qi with p,qp,q the real and imaginary parts, the modulus satisfies p+qi2=p2+q2|p+qi|^{2}=p^{2}+q^{2}, and squares are nonnegative in an ordered field, so p2+q20p^{2}+q^{2}\le0 forces p2=q2=0p^{2}=q^{2}=0 and hence p=q=0p=q=0. Thus u,T(v)=0\langle u,T(v)\rangle=0 for every vVv\in V.

Since TT is self-adjoint, T(u),v=u,T(v)=0\langle T(u),v\rangle=\langle u,T(v)\rangle=0 for every vVv\in V. Taking v=T(u)v=T(u) gives T(u),T(u)=0\langle T(u),T(u)\rangle=0, so T(u)=0VT(u)=0_{V} by condition 4 of Complex Inner Product Space.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…