TheoremBase

Strict properness reduces to the monotonicity of the trace for the semidefinite ordering, and the structure condition follows by applying the example of an elliptic operator with a continuous inhomogeneity. Continuity is checked directly, by bounding each of the four terms of FF separately: a trace norm bound, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the quadratic term, and the continuity of ff.

Proof

Conventions. The order ≤\le and the arithmetic of R\mathbb{R} are those of the ordered field of real numbers. Multiplication by a nonnegative real number preserves ≤\le: if a≤ba\le b and 0≤λ0\le\lambda, then either a=ba=b, and the two products are equal, or a<ba<b, and then λa≤λb\lambda a\le\lambda b by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field when 0<λ0<\lambda, while λ=0\lambda=0 makes both products 00. Adding a fixed real number to both sides of an inequality also preserves it, by the compatibility of ≤\le with addition. Finally, 0<2−10<2^{-1} by claims 8 and 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so κ2=κ⋅2−1\tfrac{\kappa}{2}=\kappa\cdot2^{-1} is nonnegative and 12=1⋅2−1\tfrac{1}{2}=1\cdot 2^{-1} is positive.

Proof of claim 2. We first check degenerate ellipticity. Let x∈Ωx\in\Omega, r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, p∈Rnp\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and X,Y∈S(n)X,Y\in\mathcal{S}(n) with X⪯YX\preceq Y. By The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound (iv), tr⁡(X)≤tr⁡(Y)\operatorname{tr}(X)\le\operatorname{tr}(Y). Multiplying by the nonnegative κ2\tfrac{\kappa}{2} gives κ2tr⁡(X)≤κ2tr⁡(Y)\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\operatorname{tr}(X)\le\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\operatorname{tr}(Y), and claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field then gives

−κ2tr⁡(Y)≤−κ2tr⁡(X).-\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\operatorname{tr}(Y)\le-\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\operatorname{tr}(X).

Adding γr+12∥p∥2−f(x)\gamma r+\tfrac{1}{2}\lVert p\rVert^{2}-f(x) to both sides yields F(x,r,p,Y)≤F(x,r,p,X)F(x,r,p,Y)\le F(x,r,p,X). As xx, rr, pp, XX and YY were arbitrary, FF is degenerate elliptic, which is condition 1 of Strictly Proper Second-Order Equation Operator.

For condition 2, let x∈Ωx\in\Omega, p∈Rnp\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, X∈S(n)X\in\mathcal{S}(n) and r,s∈Rr,s\in\mathbb{R} with s≤rs\le r. The three terms −κ2tr⁡(X)-\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\operatorname{tr}(X), 12∥p∥2\tfrac{1}{2}\lVert p\rVert^{2} and −f(x)-f(x) are the same in F(x,r,p,X)F(x,r,p,X) and in F(x,s,p,X)F(x,s,p,X), so

F(x,r,p,X)−F(x,s,p,X)=γr−γs=γ(r−s)F(x,r,p,X)-F(x,s,p,X)=\gamma r-\gamma s=\gamma(r-s)

by distributivity. In particular γ(r−s)≤F(x,r,p,X)−F(x,s,p,X)\gamma(r-s)\le F(x,r,p,X)-F(x,s,p,X), and claim 2 is proved.

Proof of claim 3. Define G:R×Rn×S(n)→RG:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathcal{S}(n)\to\mathbb{R} by

G(r,p,X)=γr−κ2tr⁡(X)+12∥p∥2,G(r,p,X)=\gamma r-\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\operatorname{tr}(X)+\tfrac{1}{2}\lVert p\rVert^{2},

so that F(x,r,p,X)=G(r,p,X)−f(x)F(x,r,p,X)=G(r,p,X)-f(x) for every x∈Ωx\in\Omega, r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, p∈Rnp\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and X∈S(n)X\in\mathcal{S}(n). The computation carried out in the proof of claim 2, with the term −f(x)-f(x) omitted throughout, shows that G(r,p,Y)≤G(r,p,X)G(r,p,Y)\le G(r,p,X) whenever r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, p∈Rnp\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and X,Y∈S(n)X,Y\in\mathcal{S}(n) satisfy X⪯YX\preceq Y; that is, GG is degenerate elliptic in the matrix variable in the sense required by Structure Condition: a Degenerate Elliptic Operator with a Continuous Inhomogeneity. Since ff and ω\omega are as required there, that example applies to this GG, this ff and this ω\omega, and its conclusion Structure Condition: a Degenerate Elliptic Operator with a Continuous Inhomogeneity (i) is exactly claim 3.

Proof of claim 1. Fix x0∈Ωx_{0}\in\Omega, r0∈Rr_{0}\in\mathbb{R}, p0∈Rnp_{0}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and X0∈S(n)X_{0}\in\mathcal{S}(n), and let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Put 4=2+24=2+2; then 0<20<2 by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and hence 0<40<4 by claim 3 there, so 4−14^{-1} exists and is positive by claim 7 there, and ε′=ε⋅4−1\varepsilon'=\varepsilon\cdot4^{-1} is positive by claim 5 there. Moreover ε′+ε′+ε′+ε′=(1+1+1+1)ε′=4(ε⋅4−1)=ε\varepsilon'+\varepsilon'+\varepsilon'+\varepsilon'=(1+1+1+1)\varepsilon'=4\bigl(\varepsilon\cdot4^{-1}\bigr)=\varepsilon by distributivity, commutativity and the defining property of the multiplicative inverse.

Four bounds. We record four estimates.

(i) For s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}, distributivity and claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give ∣γs−γr0∣=∣γ(s−r0)∣=∣γ∣∣s−r0∣=γ∣s−r0∣|\gamma s-\gamma r_{0}|=|\gamma(s-r_{0})|=|\gamma||s-r_{0}|=\gamma|s-r_{0}|, the last step because ∣γ∣=γ|\gamma|=\gamma by the definition of the absolute value, γ\gamma being nonnegative.

(ii) Let Y∈S(n)Y\in\mathcal{S}(n). Then Y−X0∈S(n)Y-X_{0}\in\mathcal{S}(n) by Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (iii), and since the entries of Y−X0Y-X_{0} are the differences of the corresponding entries by the definition of a matrix difference, claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Trace, applied with the coefficients 11 and −1-1, gives tr⁡(Y)−tr⁡(X0)=tr⁡(Y−X0)\operatorname{tr}(Y)-\operatorname{tr}(X_{0})=\operatorname{tr}(Y-X_{0}). Hence, by The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound (v) and Euclidean Space and Real Matrices: Standing Notation (v),

∣tr⁡(Y)−tr⁡(X0)∣≤βn∥Y−X0∥=βn dS(n)(Y,X0),\bigl|\operatorname{tr}(Y)-\operatorname{tr}(X_{0})\bigr|\le\beta_{n}\lVert Y-X_{0}\rVert=\beta_{n}\,d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X_{0}),

where βn=∑k=1n1\beta_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}1 is as in The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound.

(iii) Let q∈Rnq\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and put h=q−p0h=q-p_{0}, so that q=p0+hq=p_{0}+h. By claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and claims 1, 2 and 5 of The Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Is Symmetric, Bilinear and Positive Definite,

∥q∥2=q⋅q=p0⋅p0+(p0⋅h)+(h⋅p0)+h⋅h=∥p0∥2+2(p0⋅h)+∥h∥2,\lVert q\rVert^{2}=q\cdot q=p_{0}\cdot p_{0}+(p_{0}\cdot h)+(h\cdot p_{0})+h\cdot h=\lVert p_{0}\rVert^{2}+2(p_{0}\cdot h)+\lVert h\rVert^{2},

where 2(p0⋅h)2(p_{0}\cdot h) abbreviates (p0⋅h)+(p0⋅h)(p_{0}\cdot h)+(p_{0}\cdot h), the two middle terms being equal by the symmetry of the dot product. Hence ∥q∥2−∥p0∥2=2(p0⋅h)+∥h∥2\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert p_{0}\rVert^{2}=2(p_{0}\cdot h)+\lVert h\rVert^{2}, and by claims 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the nonnegativity of norms recorded in claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square,

∣∥q∥2−∥p0∥2∣≤2∣p0⋅h∣+∥h∥2≤2∥p0∥∥h∥+∥h∥2.\bigl|\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert p_{0}\rVert^{2}\bigr|\le2|p_{0}\cdot h|+\lVert h\rVert^{2}\le2\lVert p_{0}\rVert\lVert h\rVert+\lVert h\rVert^{2}.

If moreover ∥h∥≤1\lVert h\rVert\le1, then multiplying by the nonnegative ∥h∥\lVert h\rVert gives ∥h∥2≤∥h∥\lVert h\rVert^{2}\le\lVert h\rVert, so that by distributivity

∣∥q∥2−∥p0∥2∣≤(2∥p0∥+1)∥h∥.\bigl|\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert p_{0}\rVert^{2}\bigr|\le\bigl(2\lVert p_{0}\rVert+1\bigr)\lVert h\rVert .

(iv) Since Ω⊆Ω‾\Omega\subseteq\overline{\Omega} and ff is continuous at x0x_{0} relative to Ω‾\overline{\Omega}, there is a positive δf∈R\delta_{f}\in\mathbb{R} such that every y∈Ω‾y\in\overline{\Omega} with dE(x0,y)<δfd_{E}(x_{0},y)<\delta_{f} satisfies ∣f(y)−f(x0)∣<ε′|f(y)-f(x_{0})|<\varepsilon'; in particular this holds for every y∈Ωy\in\Omega.

Choice of δ\delta. Put

c1=γ,c2=κ2βn+1,c3=12(2∥p0∥+1)+1.c_{1}=\gamma,\qquad c_{2}=\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\beta_{n}+1,\qquad c_{3}=\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl(2\lVert p_{0}\rVert+1\bigr)+1 .

Each cic_{i} is positive: c1=γc_{1}=\gamma is positive by hypothesis, while κ2βn\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\beta_{n} and 12(2∥p0∥+1)\tfrac{1}{2}(2\lVert p_{0}\rVert+1) are nonnegative, being products of nonnegative numbers — for βn\beta_{n} this is recorded in The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound, where 1≤βn1\le\beta_{n} — so c2c_{2} and c3c_{3} are at least 11 and 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By claim 7 there each ci−1c_{i}^{-1} exists and is positive, and by claim 5 there each ε′ci−1\varepsilon'c_{i}^{-1} is positive. Applying claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field repeatedly to the five positive numbers 11, δf\delta_{f}, ε′c1−1\varepsilon'c_{1}^{-1}, ε′c2−1\varepsilon'c_{2}^{-1} and ε′c3−1\varepsilon'c_{3}^{-1} produces a real number δ\delta that is at most each of them and equal to one of them, hence positive.

Conclusion. Let y∈Ωy\in\Omega, s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}, q∈Rnq\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and Y∈S(n)Y\in\mathcal{S}(n) satisfy

dE(y,x0)<δ,∣s−r0∣<δ,∥q−p0∥<δ,dS(n)(Y,X0)<δ,d_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta,\qquad|s-r_{0}|<\delta,\qquad\lVert q-p_{0}\rVert<\delta,\qquad d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X_{0})<\delta,

and put h=q−p0h=q-p_{0}, so that ∥h∥<δ≤1\lVert h\rVert<\delta\le1. Grouping the four terms of FF,

F(y,s,q,Y)−F(x0,r0,p0,X0)=(γs−γr0)−κ2(tr⁡(Y)−tr⁡(X0))+12(∥q∥2−∥p0∥2)−(f(y)−f(x0)).F(y,s,q,Y)-F(x_{0},r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})=\bigl(\gamma s-\gamma r_{0}\bigr)-\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\bigl(\operatorname{tr}(Y)-\operatorname{tr}(X_{0})\bigr)+\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl(\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert p_{0}\rVert^{2}\bigr)-\bigl(f(y)-f(x_{0})\bigr).

By claims 2, 4 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the absolute value of the left-hand side is at most the sum of

γ∣s−r0∣,κ2∣tr⁡(Y)−tr⁡(X0)∣,12∣∥q∥2−∥p0∥2∣,∣f(y)−f(x0)∣.\gamma|s-r_{0}|,\qquad\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\bigl|\operatorname{tr}(Y)-\operatorname{tr}(X_{0})\bigr|,\qquad\tfrac{1}{2}\bigl|\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert p_{0}\rVert^{2}\bigr|,\qquad|f(y)-f(x_{0})| .

We bound each summand by ε′\varepsilon'. By (i) and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, γ∣s−r0∣<γδ\gamma|s-r_{0}|<\gamma\delta, and multiplying δ≤ε′c1−1\delta\le\varepsilon'c_{1}^{-1} by the nonnegative γ=c1\gamma=c_{1} gives γδ≤ε′\gamma\delta\le\varepsilon'; hence the first summand is less than ε′\varepsilon'. By (ii), κ2βn≤c2\tfrac{\kappa}{2}\beta_{n}\le c_{2}, so multiplying by the nonnegative dS(n)(Y,X0)d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X_{0}) and using (ii) again gives κ2∣tr⁡(Y)−tr⁡(X0)∣≤c2 dS(n)(Y,X0)<c2δ≤ε′\tfrac{\kappa}{2}|\operatorname{tr}(Y)-\operatorname{tr}(X_{0})|\le c_{2}\,d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(Y,X_{0})<c_{2}\delta\le\varepsilon', the last two steps by claim 10 and by multiplying δ≤ε′c2−1\delta\le\varepsilon'c_{2}^{-1} by c2c_{2}. By (iii), and since ∥h∥≤1\lVert h\rVert\le1, the same reasoning with c3c_{3} gives 12∣∥q∥2−∥p0∥2∣≤c3∥h∥<c3δ≤ε′\tfrac{1}{2}|\lVert q\rVert^{2}-\lVert p_{0}\rVert^{2}|\le c_{3}\lVert h\rVert<c_{3}\delta\le\varepsilon'. By (iv) and dE(y,x0)<δ≤δfd_{E}(y,x_{0})<\delta\le\delta_{f}, the fourth summand is less than ε′\varepsilon'.

Adding the four strict inequalities by claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, applied repeatedly, and using claim 2 there,

∣F(y,s,q,Y)−F(x0,r0,p0,X0)∣<ε′+ε′+ε′+ε′=ε.\bigl|F(y,s,q,Y)-F(x_{0},r_{0},p_{0},X_{0})\bigr|<\varepsilon'+\varepsilon'+\varepsilon'+\varepsilon'=\varepsilon .

Thus FF is continuous at (x0,r0,p0,X0)(x_{0},r_{0},p_{0},X_{0}) in the sense of Continuity of a Second-Order Equation Operator (i). Since the quadruple was arbitrary, FF is continuous, which is claim 1.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…