Strict properness reduces to the monotonicity of the trace for the semidefinite ordering, and the structure condition follows by applying the example of an elliptic operator with a continuous inhomogeneity. Continuity is checked directly, by bounding each of the four terms of F separately: a trace norm bound, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the quadratic term, and the continuity of f.
Proof
Conventions. The order ≤ and the arithmetic of R are those of the ordered field of real numbers. Multiplication by a nonnegative real number preserves ≤: if a≤b and 0≤λ, then either a=b, and the two products are equal, or a<b, and then λa≤λb by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field when 0<λ, while λ=0 makes both products 0. Adding a fixed real number to both sides of an inequality also preserves it, by the compatibility of ≤ with addition. Finally, 0<2−1 by claims 8 and 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so 2κ=κ⋅2−1 is nonnegative and 21=1⋅2−1 is positive.
For condition 2, let x∈Ω, p∈Rn, X∈S(n) and r,s∈R with s≤r. The three terms −2κtr(X), 21∥p∥2 and −f(x) are the same in F(x,r,p,X) and in F(x,s,p,X), so
F(x,r,p,X)−F(x,s,p,X)=γr−γs=γ(r−s)
by distributivity. In particular γ(r−s)≤F(x,r,p,X)−F(x,s,p,X), and claim 2 is proved.
Proof of claim 1. Fix x0∈Ω, r0∈R, p0∈Rn and X0∈S(n), and let ε∈R be positive. Put 4=2+2; then 0<2 by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and hence 0<4 by claim 3 there, so 4−1 exists and is positive by claim 7 there, and ε′=ε⋅4−1 is positive by claim 5 there. Moreover ε′+ε′+ε′+ε′=(1+1+1+1)ε′=4(ε⋅4−1)=ε by distributivity, commutativity and the defining property of the multiplicative inverse.
If moreover ∥h∥≤1, then multiplying by the nonnegative ∥h∥ gives ∥h∥2≤∥h∥, so that by distributivity
∥q∥2−∥p0∥2≤(2∥p0∥+1)∥h∥.
(iv) Since Ω⊆Ω and f is continuous at x0 relative to Ω, there is a positive δf∈R such that every y∈Ω with dE(x0,y)<δf satisfies ∣f(y)−f(x0)∣<ε′; in particular this holds for every y∈Ω.
Choice of δ. Put
c1=γ,c2=2κβn+1,c3=21(2∥p0∥+1)+1.
Each ci is positive: c1=γ is positive by hypothesis, while 2κβn and 21(2∥p0∥+1) are nonnegative, being products of nonnegative numbers — for βn this is recorded in The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound, where 1≤βn — so c2 and c3 are at least 1 and 0<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By claim 7 there each ci−1 exists and is positive, and by claim 5 there each ε′ci−1 is positive. Applying claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field repeatedly to the five positive numbers 1, δf, ε′c1−1, ε′c2−1 and ε′c3−1 produces a real number δ that is at most each of them and equal to one of them, hence positive.
Conclusion. Let y∈Ω, s∈R, q∈Rn and Y∈S(n) satisfy
dE(y,x0)<δ,∣s−r0∣<δ,∥q−p0∥<δ,dS(n)(Y,X0)<δ,
and put h=q−p0, so that ∥h∥<δ≤1. Grouping the four terms of F,
We bound each summand by ε′. By (i) and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, γ∣s−r0∣<γδ, and multiplying δ≤ε′c1−1 by the nonnegative γ=c1 gives γδ≤ε′; hence the first summand is less than ε′. By (ii), 2κβn≤c2, so multiplying by the nonnegative dS(n)(Y,X0) and using (ii) again gives 2κ∣tr(Y)−tr(X0)∣≤c2dS(n)(Y,X0)<c2δ≤ε′, the last two steps by claim 10 and by multiplying δ≤ε′c2−1 by c2. By (iii), and since ∥h∥≤1, the same reasoning with c3 gives 21∣∥q∥2−∥p0∥2∣≤c3∥h∥<c3δ≤ε′. By (iv) and dE(y,x0)<δ≤δf, the fourth summand is less than ε′.