TheoremBase

The moment identity is the change-of-variables formula for a push-forward; the cost identity unfolds optimality of the graph coupling; uniqueness follows by integrating the squared difference against the common optimal coupling, computed through each of its two representations.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement above.

Claim 1. Let S:Rd→RdS:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} be Borel. The function ∥S∥2\lVert S\rVert^{2} is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv), applied on the measurable space (Rd,B(Rd))(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d})) with SS in the role of both uu and vv there, and it is nonnegative by Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, being a square. Likewise the function Rd→R\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} with value ∥x∥2\lVert x\rVert^{2} at xx is Borel and nonnegative, as recorded in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v). Both are read as maps into [0,∞][0,\infty], the two readings of measurability agreeing by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii).

By The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (i), read with S#μS_{\#}\mu in place of the measure named there,

M2(S#μ)=∫Rd∥x∥2 (S#μ)(dx).M_{2}(S_{\#}\mu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,(S_{\#}\mu)(dx).

The change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv), applied to the Borel map SS and to the nonnegative Borel function x↦∥x∥2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2}, turns the right-hand side into ∫Rd∥S∥2 dμ\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S\rVert^{2}\,d\mu, the composite of x↦∥x∥2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2} with SS being the function ∥S∥2\lVert S\rVert^{2}. This proves the displayed identity, both sides being elements of [0,∞][0,\infty].

Suppose now that ∫Rd∥S∥2 dμ<∞\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty. Then M2(S#μ)<∞M_{2}(S_{\#}\mu)<\infty by that identity, and S#μ∈P(Rd)S_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv), so S#μ∈P2(Rd)S_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (ii). Being a Borel map Rd→Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} whose squared norm has finite integral against μ\mu, SS has a class in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation (ii). That clause also records that L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) is a real Hilbert space, hence a real vector space, and id\mathrm{id} belongs to it by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (ii); therefore the difference id−S\mathrm{id}-S belongs to it.

Suppose instead that S#μ=νS_{\#}\mu=\nu. Then the displayed identity gives ∫Rd∥S∥2 dμ=M2(ν)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert S\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=M_{2}(\nu), which is finite because ν∈P2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (ii); so the hypothesis of the previous paragraph holds and its conclusions follow.

Finally let a∈Rda\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, so that τa\tau_{a} is the Borel map x↦x+ax\mapsto x+a of The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation (vi). Fix x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. By the triangle inequality, claim 6 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, ∥x+a∥≤∥x∥+∥a∥\lVert x+a\rVert\le\lVert x\rVert+\lVert a\rVert; both sides are nonnegative by claim 1 of that lemma and by claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so squaring preserves the inequality, by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, and

∥x+a∥2≤(∥x∥+∥a∥)2=∥x∥2+2 ∥x∥ ∥a∥+∥a∥2,\lVert x+a\rVert^{2}\le\bigl(\lVert x\rVert+\lVert a\rVert\bigr)^{2}=\lVert x\rVert^{2}+2\,\lVert x\rVert\,\lVert a\rVert+\lVert a\rVert^{2},

the equality being claim 5 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. By the inequality ∥x∥ ∥a∥≤12(∥x∥2+∥a∥2)\lVert x\rVert\,\lVert a\rVert\le\tfrac{1}{2}(\lVert x\rVert^{2}+\lVert a\rVert^{2}) recorded in Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv), multiplied by the nonnegative 22 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, the positivity of 22 being claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and added to the preceding bound by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∥τa(x)∥2≤2 ∥x∥2+2 ∥a∥2for every x∈Rd.\lVert\tau_{a}(x)\rVert^{2}\le2\,\lVert x\rVert^{2}+2\,\lVert a\rVert^{2}\qquad\text{for every }x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}.

The function on the right is nonnegative and Borel, being the sum of a real scalar multiple of the Borel function x↦∥x∥2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2} and the constant function with value 2∥a∥22\lVert a\rVert^{2}, which is measurable by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps, the sum and the scalar multiple being measurable by claim 2 of that lemma. Integrating the pointwise bound against μ\mu and using claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion for monotonicity, additivity and nonnegative scalar multiples,

∫Rd∥τa∥2 dμ≤2∫Rd∥x∥2 μ(dx)+2 ∥a∥2∫Rd1Rd dμ=2 M2(μ)+2 ∥a∥2,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert\tau_{a}\rVert^{2}\,d\mu\le2\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)+2\,\lVert a\rVert^{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\,d\mu=2\,M_{2}(\mu)+2\,\lVert a\rVert^{2},

the constant function with value 2∥a∥22\lVert a\rVert^{2} being 2∥a∥2 1Rd2\lVert a\rVert^{2}\,\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}, and ∫Rd1Rd dμ=μ(Rd)=1\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\,d\mu=\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1 by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set and Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii). The right-hand side is a real number, since M2(μ)<∞M_{2}(\mu)<\infty; so the hypothesis of the second paragraph holds for τa\tau_{a}, and (τa)#μ∈P2(Rd)(\tau_{a})_{\#}\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) with the stated bound, the bound being the displayed inequality read through the identity of the first paragraph.

Claim 2. Let TT be an optimal map from μ\mu to ν\nu. By Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures (i) one has T#μ=νT_{\#}\mu=\nu and the coupling (id,T)#μ(\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu is optimal, so I((id,T)#μ)=W2(μ,ν)2I((\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu)=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2} by Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (i). By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound (iv), applied with id\mathrm{id} and TT in the roles of the two Borel maps there,

I((id,T)#μ)=∫Rd∥x−T(x)∥2 μ(dx).I\bigl((\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu\bigr)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x-T(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx).

By claim 1 the class of id−T\mathrm{id}-T belongs to L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), and the map x↦x−T(x)x\mapsto x-T(x) represents it, so its norm satisfies ∥id−T∥μ2=∫Rd∥x−T(x)∥2 μ(dx)\lVert\mathrm{id}-T\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert x-T(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx) by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation (ii). Combining the three displays gives ∥id−T∥μ2=W2(μ,ν)2\lVert\mathrm{id}-T\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}.

Claim 3. Since (μ,ν)(\mu,\nu) is uniquely mapped, Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures (ii) supplies an optimal map T0T_{0} from μ\mu to ν\nu such that every optimal coupling of μ\mu and ν\nu equals (id,T0)#μ(\mathrm{id},T_{0})_{\#}\mu. The maps TT and T′T' are optimal, so (id,T)#μ(\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu and (id,T′)#μ(\mathrm{id},T')_{\#}\mu are optimal couplings of μ\mu and ν\nu by Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures (i); both therefore equal (id,T0)#μ(\mathrm{id},T_{0})_{\#}\mu, and in particular they are equal to each other. Write π\pi for this common measure.

The maps T∘pr1T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1} and pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} from Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d} to Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} are Borel, the projections by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (v) and the composite by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii), so the function

g:Rd+d→R,g(z)=∥T(pr1(z))−pr2(z)∥2,g:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R},\qquad g(z)=\bigl\lVert T(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z))-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\bigr\rVert^{2},

is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iv) and nonnegative by Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field. We compute ∫Rd+dg dπ\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}g\,d\pi through each of the two representations of π\pi, using the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv) and the identities pr1((id,R)(x))=x\mathrm{pr}_{1}((\mathrm{id},R)(x))=x and pr2((id,R)(x))=R(x)\mathrm{pr}_{2}((\mathrm{id},R)(x))=R(x) of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), valid for any Borel R:Rd→RdR:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d}. With π=(id,T)#μ\pi=(\mathrm{id},T)_{\#}\mu the integrand becomes ∥T(x)−T(x)∥2\lVert T(x)-T(x)\rVert^{2}, which is 00 for every xx by claim 3 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, so the integral is 00 by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion applied with the constant 00. With π=(id,T′)#μ\pi=(\mathrm{id},T')_{\#}\mu it becomes ∥T(x)−T′(x)∥2\lVert T(x)-T'(x)\rVert^{2}. Hence

∫Rd∥T(x)−T′(x)∥2 μ(dx)=0.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\lVert T(x)-T'(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)=0 .

By claim 1 the classes of TT and of T′T' belong to L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), and x↦T(x)−T′(x)x\mapsto T(x)-T'(x) represents their difference, so the integral just displayed is ∥T−T′∥μ2\lVert T-T'\rVert_{\mu}^{2} by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation (ii). Therefore ∥T−T′∥μ=0\lVert T-T'\rVert_{\mu}=0, since a nonnegative real number whose square is 00 is 00 by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, and T−T′T-T' is the zero class by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii); that is, the classes of TT and T′T' are equal. Finally (id−T)−(id−T′)=T′−T(\mathrm{id}-T)-(\mathrm{id}-T')=T'-T in the real vector space L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}), which is the zero class, so the classes of id−T\mathrm{id}-T and of id−T′\mathrm{id}-T' are equal as well.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…