TheoremBase

Claim 1 is the locality lemma for envelopes applied to u−δhu-\delta h on V∩UV\cap U; claim 2 combines lower semicontinuity of hh with the fixed-point property of the envelopes; claim 3 transfers closed superlevel sets from the metric space (U,dH)(U,d_H) to HH using closedness of KK.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named at the point of use. Since UU is nonempty and open in HH, the sets D(A)∩UD(A)\cap U and V∩UV\cap U are nonempty by The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (v), and the same applies to any nonempty U′⊆UU'\subseteq U open in HH; so all the δ\delta-envelopes named below are defined once the stated local bounds hold.

We record two remarks used repeatedly.

Remark A (restriction). Let B′⊆B⊆HB'\subseteq B\subseteq H with x∈B′x\in B', and let ϑ:B→R\vartheta:B\to\mathbb{R}. If ϑ\vartheta is continuous, upper semicontinuous or lower semicontinuous at xx relative to BB, then the restriction of ϑ\vartheta to B′B' has the same property at xx relative to B′B'. Indeed, each of those three conditions asserts the existence, for a given positive ε\varepsilon, of a positive δ\delta such that an inequality holds for every point yy of the set relative to which the property is asserted with dH(x,y)<δd_{H}(x,y)<\delta; since B′⊆BB'\subseteq B, the same δ\delta serves.

Remark B (ambient space). Each of those three conditions, and likewise convergence of a sequence, constrains only values of the metric at pairs of points lying in the set in question. Consequently, for A⊆X⊆HA\subseteq X\subseteq H, a function on AA has one of those properties at a point relative to AA in the metric space (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) if and only if it has it in the metric space (X,dH)(X,d_{H}), the restriction of dHd_{H} to XX being a metric by claim 1 of The Restriction of a Metric to a Subset Induces the Subspace Topology; and a sequence in AA converges to a point x∈Xx\in X in (X,dH)(X,d_{H}) if and only if it converges to xx in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}).

Claim 1. Let U′⊆UU'\subseteq U be nonempty and open in HH, and suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU. We apply Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set twice, in both cases with the metric space (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) and the open set O=U′O=U'.

First, with S=US=U: here S∩O=U∩U′=U′S\cap O=U\cap U'=U', and claim 1 of that lemma shows that u∣U′u|_{U'} is bounded above near each point of U′U'.

Secondly, with S=V∩US=V\cap U and the function V∩U→RV\cap U\to\mathbb{R} whose value at xx is u(x)−δh(x)u(x)-\delta h(x), which is bounded above near each point of V∩UV\cap U by The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (vi): here S∩O=(V∩U)∩U′=V∩U′S\cap O=(V\cap U)\cap U'=V\cap U', since U′⊆UU'\subseteq U. Claim 2 of that lemma gives, for every x∈V∩U′x\in V\cap U',

((u−δh)∣V∩U′)∗(x)=(u−δh)∗(x),\bigl((u-\delta h)|_{V\cap U'}\bigr)^{*}(x)=(u-\delta h)^{*}(x),

where u−δhu-\delta h abbreviates the function just named. The right-hand side is uδ−(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x) by The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (i). The left-hand side is (u∣U′)δ−(x)\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(x) by the same reference applied to the function u∣U′u|_{U'} on U′U': the function it attaches to u∣U′u|_{U'} is the function on V∩U′V\cap U' with value u(x)−δh(x)u(x)-\delta h(x) at xx, which is precisely (u−δh)∣V∩U′(u-\delta h)|_{V\cap U'}. This proves the first half of the claim; the second half is obtained in the same way, using the second half of The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (vi), claim 3 of Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set and The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (ii).

Claim 2. Let ψ:U→R\psi:U\to\mathbb{R} be continuous on UU and let 0<λ0<\lambda, so that 0≤λ0\le\lambda.

Local bounds for ψ\psi. Let x∈Ux\in U. Applying Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces with ε=1\varepsilon=1, there is a positive δ0∈R\delta_{0}\in\mathbb{R} such that every y∈Uy\in U with dH(x,y)<δ0d_{H}(x,y)<\delta_{0} satisfies ∣ψ(y)−ψ(x)∣<1|\psi(y)-\psi(x)|<1, hence ψ(y)<ψ(x)+1\psi(y)<\psi(x)+1 and ψ(x)−1<ψ(y)\psi(x)-1<\psi(y) by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Put r=δ02r=\tfrac{\delta_{0}}{2}, which is positive and satisfies r<δ0r<\delta_{0} by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Every y∈Uy\in U with dH(y,x)≤rd_{H}(y,x)\le r satisfies dH(x,y)=dH(y,x)≤r<δ0d_{H}(x,y)=d_{H}(y,x)\le r<\delta_{0} by the symmetry axiom and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, hence ψ(y)≤ψ(x)+1\psi(y)\le\psi(x)+1 and ψ(x)−1≤ψ(y)\psi(x)-1\le\psi(y). So ψ\psi is bounded above and bounded below near each point of UU, by Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function (i).

Upper semicontinuity. By The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (iv), hh is lower semicontinuous on VV; by Remark A its restriction to V∩UV\cap U is lower semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U, so by claim 1 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity the function V∩U→RV\cap U\to\mathbb{R} with value −h(x)-h(x) at xx is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U, and by claim 2 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions so is its multiple by λ\lambda, whose value at xx is −λh(x)-\lambda h(x). By Remark A and claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity, the restriction of ψ\psi to V∩UV\cap U is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U. By claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions their sum, the function with value ψ(x)−λh(x)\psi(x)-\lambda h(x) at xx, is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U.

Local bounds and the envelope. Since ψ\psi is bounded above near each point of UU, The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (vi), applied to ψ\psi with λ\lambda in the role of its δ\delta, shows that the function with value ψ(x)−λh(x)\psi(x)-\lambda h(x) at xx is bounded above near each point of V∩UV\cap U; its upper semicontinuous envelope is therefore defined, and equals the function itself by claim 4 of Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope.

The statement for ψ+λh\psi+\lambda h is obtained in the same way: hh restricted to V∩UV\cap U is lower semicontinuous there, hence so is its multiple by λ\lambda and its sum with the restriction of ψ\psi, by claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions used twice together with claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity; the function is bounded below near each point of V∩UV\cap U by the second half of The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (vi); and it equals its own lower semicontinuous envelope by claim 5 of Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality.

Claim 3. Suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU, let K⊆UK\subseteq U be closed in HH and let ϑ:U→R\vartheta:U\to\mathbb{R} be continuous on UU. Write Φ\Phi for the function V∩K→RV\cap K\to\mathbb{R} with value uδ−(x)−ϑ(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\vartheta(x) at xx.

By Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity (iii), uδ−u^{-}_{\delta}, as a function on the subset V∩UV\cap U of the metric space (U,dH)(U,d_{H}), has closed superlevel sets in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}). By Remark B, ϑ\vartheta is continuous on UU as a map from the metric space (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). Claim 3 of Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits, applied in the metric space (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) with A=V∩UA=V\cap U, therefore shows that the function V∩U→RV\cap U\to\mathbb{R} with value uδ−(x)−ϑ(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\vartheta(x) at xx has closed superlevel sets in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}).

Now let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, let (xm)m∈N(x_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in V∩KV\cap K converging to a point x∈Hx\in H in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), and suppose t≤Φ(xm)t\le\Phi(x_{m}) for every mm. Since KK is closed in HH and xm∈Kx_{m}\in K for every mm, Sequential Characterization of Closed Subsets of a Metric Space gives x∈Kx\in K, hence x∈Ux\in U. By Remark B the sequence converges to xx in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}), and it lies in V∩UV\cap U because K⊆UK\subseteq U. Claim 1 of Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits, applied in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) to the function of the previous paragraph, therefore gives x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U and t≤uδ−(x)−ϑ(x)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\vartheta(x); since also x∈Kx\in K, we have x∈V∩Kx\in V\cap K and t≤Φ(x)t\le\Phi(x). Claim 1 of Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits, applied now in the metric space (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) with A=V∩KA=V\cap K, shows that Φ\Phi has closed superlevel sets in HH.

For the second half, suppose uu is bounded below near each point of UU. By the second half of Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity (iii), the function V∩U→RV\cap U\to\mathbb{R} with value −uδ+(x)-u^{+}_{\delta}(x) at xx has closed superlevel sets in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}). The function −ϑ-\vartheta with value −ϑ(x)-\vartheta(x) at xx is continuous on UU, since ∣(−ϑ)(y)−(−ϑ)(x)∣=∣ϑ(y)−ϑ(x)∣|(-\vartheta)(y)-(-\vartheta)(x)|=|\vartheta(y)-\vartheta(x)| by claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces is satisfied with the same δ\delta as for ϑ\vartheta. Since ϑ(x)−uδ+(x)=(−uδ+(x))−(−ϑ(x))\vartheta(x)-u^{+}_{\delta}(x)=(-u^{+}_{\delta}(x))-(-\vartheta(x)), the argument above applies verbatim with these two functions in place of uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} and ϑ\vartheta.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…