TheoremBase

Completeness is proved by passing to a subsequence whose successive differences have rapidly decreasing seminorms, bounding the sum of their absolute values by monotone convergence, and identifying the limit by dominated convergence almost everywhere.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement above. We use countable choice, to select representatives and indices indexed by N\mathbb{N}.

Throughout, Lp\mathcal{L}^{p} is a real vector space with the pointwise operations, by Minkowski's Inequality (ii), and for f∈Lpf\in\mathcal{L}^{p} the class [f][f] is as in The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (i).

Claim 1. The two operations on LpL^{p} are well defined by The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (ii). Each of the conditions 1 to 8 of Vector Space over a Field is an identity between classes whose two sides are, by the definition of the operations, the classes of the two sides of the corresponding identity in Lp\mathcal{L}^{p}; since those identities hold in Lp\mathcal{L}^{p}, the conditions hold in LpL^{p}. For instance ([f]+[g])+[h]=[(f+g)+h]=[f+(g+h)]=[f]+([g]+[h])([f]+[g])+[h]=[(f+g)+h]=[f+(g+h)]=[f]+([g]+[h]), and [f]+[0X]=[f+0X]=[f][f]+[0_{X}]=[f+0_{X}]=[f], where 0X0_{X} is the map taking the value 00 everywhere, so [0X][0_{X}] is a zero vector and is the zero vector by claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space; and [f]+[−f]=[f+(−f)]=[0X][f]+[-f]=[f+(-f)]=[0_{X}] gives condition 4. So LpL^{p} is a vector space over R\mathbb{R}.

The number ∥[f]∥p\lVert[f]\rVert_{p} is well defined and nonnegative by The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (iii). If ∥[f]∥p=0\lVert[f]\rVert_{p}=0 then f=0f=0 almost everywhere by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (v), that is f∼0Xf\sim 0_{X}, so [f]=[0X][f]=[0_{X}] is the zero vector; this is condition (a) of Norms and Real Normed Spaces (i). Condition (b) holds because ∥c[f]∥p=∥[cf]∥p=∥cf∥p=∣c∣ ∥f∥p\lVert c[f]\rVert_{p}=\lVert[cf]\rVert_{p}=\lVert cf\rVert_{p}=|c|\,\lVert f\rVert_{p} by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (ii), and condition (c) because ∥[f]+[g]∥p=∥f+g∥p≤∥f∥p+∥g∥p\lVert[f]+[g]\rVert_{p}=\lVert f+g\rVert_{p}\le\lVert f\rVert_{p}+\lVert g\rVert_{p} by Minkowski's Inequality (i). Hence LpL^{p} is a real normed space. Its distance is dp([f],[g])=∥[f]−[g]∥pd_{p}([f],[g])=\lVert[f]-[g]\rVert_{p} by Norms and Real Normed Spaces (iii), and [f]−[g]=[f]+[−g]=[f−g][f]-[g]=[f]+[-g]=[f-g], which gives the stated formula.

A construction. Let (Fm)m∈N(F_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} be a Cauchy sequence in (Lp,dp)(L^{p},d_{p}) and for each mm let fm∈Lpf_{m}\in\mathcal{L}^{p} be a representative of FmF_{m}. We construct natural numbers m1<m2<…m_{1}<m_{2}<\dots, a function h∈Lph\in\mathcal{L}^{p}, a null set NN and a function g∈Lpg\in\mathcal{L}^{p} such that for every x∈X∖Nx\in X\setminus N the sequence (fmj(x))j(f_{m_{j}}(x))_{j} converges to g(x)g(x) with ∣fmj(x)∣≤h(x)|f_{m_{j}}(x)|\le h(x) for every jj, and such that ∥fmj−g∥p\lVert f_{m_{j}}-g\rVert_{p} converges to 00.

Step 1. For each j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N} the Cauchy condition, applied with the positive number (1/2)j(1/2)^{j}, provides Mj∈NM_{j}\in\mathbb{N} with dp(Fk,Fl)<(1/2)jd_{p}(F_{k},F_{l})<(1/2)^{j} whenever k,l≥Mjk,l\ge M_{j}; choose such an MjM_{j} for each jj. Define m1=M1m_{1}=M_{1} and, recursively, mj+1m_{j+1} to be the larger of mj+1m_{j}+1 and Mj+1M_{j+1}. Then mj<mj+1m_{j}<m_{j+1} for every jj, and mj≥Mjm_{j}\ge M_{j}, so both mjm_{j} and mj+1m_{j+1} are at least MjM_{j} and

∥fmj+1−fmj∥p=dp(Fmj+1,Fmj)<(12)j,\lVert f_{m_{j+1}}-f_{m_{j}}\rVert_{p}=d_{p}(F_{m_{j+1}},F_{m_{j}})<\Bigl(\frac{1}{2}\Bigr)^{j},

the first equality by claim 1. Write uj=fmju_{j}=f_{m_{j}}.

Step 2. For J∈NJ\in\mathbb{N} put TJ=∑j=1J∣uj+1−uj∣T_{J}=\sum_{j=1}^{J}|u_{j+1}-u_{j}|, a finite sum in Lp\mathcal{L}^{p}, and GJ=∣u1∣+TJG_{J}=|u_{1}|+T_{J}; also put T0=0XT_{0}=0_{X} and G0=∣u1∣G_{0}=|u_{1}|. Each ∣uj+1−uj∣|u_{j+1}-u_{j}| lies in Lp\mathcal{L}^{p} with the same seminorm as uj+1−uju_{j+1}-u_{j}, by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (iii) applied in both directions, and likewise for ∣u1∣|u_{1}|. By Minkowski's Inequality (iii),

∥GJ∥p≤∥u1∥p+∑j=1J∥uj+1−uj∥p≤∥u1∥p+∑j=1J(12)j≤∥u1∥p+1=:C,\lVert G_{J}\rVert_{p}\le\lVert u_{1}\rVert_{p}+\sum_{j=1}^{J}\lVert u_{j+1}-u_{j}\rVert_{p}\le\lVert u_{1}\rVert_{p}+\sum_{j=1}^{J}\Bigl(\frac{1}{2}\Bigr)^{j}\le\lVert u_{1}\rVert_{p}+1=:C,

the last inequality because the partial sums of the series of the (1/2)j(1/2)^{j} are at most its sum, which is 11, by claims 2 and 4 of Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series. By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (i) and Properties of Real Powers (v) this gives ∫XGJp dμ=(∥GJ∥p)p≤Cp\int_{X}G_{J}^{p}\,d\mu=(\lVert G_{J}\rVert_{p})^{p}\le C^{p} for every JJ.

The sequence (GJ)J(G_{J})_{J} is pointwise nondecreasing, since each added term is nonnegative, so (GJp)J(G_{J}^{p})_{J} is pointwise nondecreasing by Properties of Real Powers (v). Let H:X→[0,∞]H:X\to[0,\infty] be its pointwise least upper bound. By Monotone Convergence Theorem the map HH is measurable and ∫XH dμ\int_{X}H\,d\mu is the least upper bound of the numbers ∫XGJp dμ\int_{X}G_{J}^{p}\,d\mu, hence at most CpC^{p} and in particular finite. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (v) the set N={x∈X:H(x)=∞}N=\{x\in X:H(x)=\infty\} belongs to F\mathcal{F} and has measure 00; it is therefore null.

Step 3. Let H~:X→R\tilde H:X\to\mathbb{R} be the map equal to HH off NN and to 00 on NN; it takes real values because HH is finite off NN, and it is nonnegative. It is measurable: for a real c<0c<0 the set {x∈X:H~(x)>c}\{x\in X:\tilde H(x)>c\} is XX, while for 0≤c0\le c it equals {x∈X:H(x)>c}∩(X∖N)\{x\in X:H(x)>c\}\cap(X\setminus N), a member of F\mathcal{F} because HH is measurable and N∈FN\in\mathcal{F}; the criterion in Measurable Functions and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation (iii) applies. Put h=∣H~∣1/ph=|\tilde H|^{1/p}, which is measurable by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (vi) applied with the exponents 1/p1/p and pp, and satisfies hp=H~≤Hh^{p}=\tilde H\le H pointwise by Properties of Real Powers (iv). Hence ∫Xhp dμ≤∫XH dμ<∞\int_{X}h^{p}\,d\mu\le\int_{X}H\,d\mu<\infty by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion, so h∈Lph\in\mathcal{L}^{p}.

Let x∈X∖Nx\in X\setminus N, so that H(x)=H~(x)H(x)=\tilde H(x) is a nonnegative real number. For every JJ we have (GJ(x))p≤H(x)(G_{J}(x))^{p}\le H(x), hence GJ(x)≤h(x)G_{J}(x)\le h(x) by Properties of Real Powers (vi). Since ∣uj(x)∣≤Gj−1(x)|u_{j}(x)|\le G_{j-1}(x) for every jj, by the triangle inequality of claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field applied along the telescoping identity uj=u1+∑i=1j−1(ui+1−ui)u_{j}=u_{1}+\sum_{i=1}^{j-1}(u_{i+1}-u_{i}), we obtain

∣uj(x)∣≤h(x)for every j∈N.|u_{j}(x)|\le h(x)\qquad\text{for every }j\in\mathbb{N}.

Moreover (TJ(x))J(T_{J}(x))_{J} is nondecreasing and bounded above by h(x)h(x), so it converges by A Bounded Monotone Sequence of Real Numbers Converges (i) and is therefore a Cauchy sequence of real numbers. For l>j≥1l>j\ge 1 the same triangle inequality gives

∣ul(x)−uj(x)∣≤∑i=jl−1∣ui+1(x)−ui(x)∣=Tl−1(x)−Tj−1(x),|u_{l}(x)-u_{j}(x)|\le\sum_{i=j}^{l-1}|u_{i+1}(x)-u_{i}(x)|=T_{l-1}(x)-T_{j-1}(x),

so (uj(x))j(u_{j}(x))_{j} is a Cauchy sequence of real numbers and hence converges, by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (iii).

Step 4. Define g:X→Rg:X\to\mathbb{R} by letting g(x)g(x) be the limit of (uj(x))j(u_{j}(x))_{j} for x∉Nx\notin N and g(x)=0g(x)=0 for x∈Nx\in N. Writing u~j=uj 1X∖N\tilde u_{j}=u_{j}\,\mathbf{1}_{X\setminus N} for the map equal to uju_{j} off NN and to 00 on NN, which is measurable by claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps since X∖N∈FX\setminus N\in\mathcal{F}, the sequence (u~j(x))j(\tilde u_{j}(x))_{j} converges to g(x)g(x) at every x∈Xx\in X, so gg is measurable by claim 5 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps. Passing to the limit in the bound ∣uj(x)∣≤h(x)|u_{j}(x)|\le h(x), valid off NN, and using g=0=∣g∣≤hg=0=|g|\le h on NN together with h≥0h\ge0, we get ∣g∣≤h|g|\le h pointwise, so g∈Lpg\in\mathcal{L}^{p} by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (iii).

For x∉Nx\notin N the sequence (∣uj(x)−g(x)∣)j(|u_{j}(x)-g(x)|)_{j} converges to 00, hence so does ((∣uj(x)−g(x)∣)p)j((|u_{j}(x)-g(x)|)^{p})_{j} by Properties of Real Powers (vii) and 0p=00^{p}=0. Also ∣uj−g∣≤∣uj∣+∣g∣≤2h|u_{j}-g|\le|u_{j}|+|g|\le 2h pointwise off NN, by claims 2 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so ∣uj−g∣p≤2php|u_{j}-g|^{p}\le 2^{p}h^{p} there, by Properties of Real Powers (v) and Properties of Real Powers (iii); the map 2php2^{p}h^{p} is integrable since h∈Lph\in\mathcal{L}^{p}. The maps ∣uj−g∣p|u_{j}-g|^{p} are measurable by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i). Applying The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (vii), with the constant limit function 0X0_{X}, gives

lim⁡j→∞∫X∣uj−g∣p dμ=0.\lim_{j\to\infty}\int_{X}|u_{j}-g|^{p}\,d\mu=0 .

By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (i) the integral equals (∥uj−g∥p)p(\lVert u_{j}-g\rVert_{p})^{p}, and applying Properties of Real Powers (vii) with the exponent 1/p1/p to this sequence of nonnegative reals, together with ((∥uj−g∥p)p)1/p=∥uj−g∥p((\lVert u_{j}-g\rVert_{p})^{p})^{1/p}=\lVert u_{j}-g\rVert_{p} and 01/p=00^{1/p}=0, we conclude that ∥uj−g∥p\lVert u_{j}-g\rVert_{p} converges to 00. This completes the construction.

Claim 2. Let (Fm)(F_{m}) be a Cauchy sequence in (Lp,dp)(L^{p},d_{p}); choose a representative fmf_{m} of each FmF_{m} and run the construction, obtaining mjm_{j}, gg and the convergence ∥fmj−g∥p→0\lVert f_{m_{j}}-g\rVert_{p}\to0, that is dp(Fmj,[g])→0d_{p}(F_{m_{j}},[g])\to 0.

Let ε\varepsilon be a positive real number. There is M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} with dp(Fk,Fl)<ε/2d_{p}(F_{k},F_{l})<\varepsilon/2 for all k,l≥Mk,l\ge M, and there is jj with mj≥Mm_{j}\ge M and dp(Fmj,[g])<ε/2d_{p}(F_{m_{j}},[g])<\varepsilon/2, because mj≥jm_{j}\ge j for every jj and dp(Fmj,[g])→0d_{p}(F_{m_{j}},[g])\to0. For every k≥Mk\ge M the triangle inequality in the metric dpd_{p} gives

dp(Fk,[g])≤dp(Fk,Fmj)+dp(Fmj,[g])<ε.d_{p}(F_{k},[g])\le d_{p}(F_{k},F_{m_{j}})+d_{p}(F_{m_{j}},[g])<\varepsilon .

Hence (Fm)(F_{m}) converges to [g]∈Lp[g]\in L^{p}. So every Cauchy sequence in (Lp,dp)(L^{p},d_{p}) converges, that is (Lp,dp)(L^{p},d_{p}) is complete, and LpL^{p} is a real Banach space by Norms and Real Normed Spaces (v).

Claim 3. Let (Fm)(F_{m}) converge to FF, with representatives fmf_{m} and ff as in the statement. The sequence (Fm)(F_{m}) is Cauchy: given a positive ε\varepsilon, choose MM with dp(Fm,F)<ε/2d_{p}(F_{m},F)<\varepsilon/2 for m≥Mm\ge M; then dp(Fk,Fl)≤dp(Fk,F)+dp(F,Fl)<εd_{p}(F_{k},F_{l})\le d_{p}(F_{k},F)+d_{p}(F,F_{l})<\varepsilon for k,l≥Mk,l\ge M. Run the construction with these representatives, obtaining m1<m2<…m_{1}<m_{2}<\dots, a function h∈Lph\in\mathcal{L}^{p}, a null set N1N_{1} and g∈Lpg\in\mathcal{L}^{p} with (fmj(x))j(f_{m_{j}}(x))_{j} converging to g(x)g(x) and ∣fmj(x)∣≤h(x)|f_{m_{j}}(x)|\le h(x) for every x∉N1x\notin N_{1} and every jj, and with dp(Fmj,[g])→0d_{p}(F_{m_{j}},[g])\to0.

By A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit the subsequence (Fmj)j(F_{m_{j}})_{j} converges to FF, so for every positive ε\varepsilon we have, for large jj,

∥g−f∥p=dp([g],F)≤dp([g],Fmj)+dp(Fmj,F)<ε.\lVert g-f\rVert_{p}=d_{p}([g],F)\le d_{p}([g],F_{m_{j}})+d_{p}(F_{m_{j}},F)<\varepsilon .

Hence ∥g−f∥p=0\lVert g-f\rVert_{p}=0, by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack, so g−f=0g-f=0 almost everywhere by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (v); let N2N_{2} be the null set of points where gg and ff differ. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (i) the set N=N1∪N2N=N_{1}\cup N_{2} is null, and for x∈X∖Nx\in X\setminus N the sequence (fmj(x))j(f_{m_{j}}(x))_{j} converges to g(x)=f(x)g(x)=f(x) and satisfies ∣fmj(x)∣≤h(x)|f_{m_{j}}(x)|\le h(x) for every jj. This is the assertion.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…