TheoremBase

The perturbation is written as the head map TFT_F for F the gradient of the potential |u|^2/2 + t g(rescaled u), whose Hessian is pinched between I/2 and 3I/2, so the head-map lemma supplies a positive density and an explicit log-density; the bijection lemma for relative entropy then gives the formula. The second-order bound follows from the expansion of log det(I+tM), and the first variation from the bound by an epsilon-delta argument.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, and partial derivatives, the class CkC^{k}, gradients and Hessian matrices are those of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives. Let δn−1:Rn→Rn\delta_{n}^{-1}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be the map u↦(a11/2u1,…,an1/2un)u\mapsto(a_{1}^{1/2}u_{1},\dots,a_{n}^{1/2}u_{n}); it is the inverse of the map δn\delta_{n} of A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §heads, since ak1/2ak−1/2=1a_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{-1/2}=1, and as rn=δn∘pnr_{n}=\delta_{n}\circ p_{n} there, pn=δn−1∘rnp_{n}=\delta_{n}^{-1}\circ r_{n}. Let h=g∘δn−1h=g\circ\delta_{n}^{-1}, and for x∈Xx\in X and k∈[n]k\in[n] let βk(x)=∂kg(pn(x))\beta_{k}(x)=\partial_{k}g(p_{n}(x)).

Step 1 (Partial derivatives along δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1}). Let f:Rn→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}, y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and i∈[n]i\in[n], and suppose that the partial derivative of ff with respect to the iith variable exists at δn−1(y)\delta_{n}^{-1}(y) with value LL. For s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}, the point obtained from yy by adding ss to its iith coordinate is mapped by δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1} to the point obtained from δn−1(y)\delta_{n}^{-1}(y) by adding ai1/2sa_{i}^{1/2}s to its iith coordinate. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set gives η>0\eta>0 such that the difference quotient of ff at δn−1(y)\delta_{n}^{-1}(y) in the iith variable with increment σ\sigma differs from LL by less than ε/ai1/2\varepsilon/a_{i}^{1/2} whenever 0<∣σ∣<η0<|\sigma|<\eta. If 0<∣s∣<η/ai1/20<|s|<\eta/a_{i}^{1/2}, then σ=ai1/2s\sigma=a_{i}^{1/2}s satisfies 0<∣σ∣<η0<|\sigma|<\eta, and the difference quotient of f∘δn−1f\circ\delta_{n}^{-1} at yy in the iith variable with increment ss is ai1/2a_{i}^{1/2} times the former one with increment σ\sigma, so it differs from ai1/2La_{i}^{1/2}L by less than ε\varepsilon. Hence ∂i(f∘δn−1)(y)\partial_{i}(f\circ\delta_{n}^{-1})(y) exists and equals ai1/2 ∂if(δn−1(y))a_{i}^{1/2}\,\partial_{i}f(\delta_{n}^{-1}(y)). Moreover δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1} is continuous at every point: with A=∑k=1nakA=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}, each (yk−yk′)2(y_{k}-y'_{k})^{2} is at most ∑j=1n(yj−yj′)2\sum_{j=1}^{n}(y_{j}-y'_{j})^{2}, so ∑k=1nak(yk−yk′)2≤A∑j=1n(yj−yj′)2\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}(y_{k}-y'_{k})^{2}\le A\sum_{j=1}^{n}(y_{j}-y'_{j})^{2}, which is less than ε2\varepsilon^{2} when ∑j(yj−yj′)2<(ε/(1+A))2\sum_{j}(y_{j}-y'_{j})^{2}<(\varepsilon/(1+A))^{2}. So if ff is continuous at every point, so is f∘δn−1f\circ\delta_{n}^{-1}, by Composition of Continuous Euclidean Maps. Consequently, if ff is of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} (C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, clauses 1 and 3), then so is f∘δn−1f\circ\delta_{n}^{-1}, with ∂i(f∘δn−1)=ai1/2 (∂if)∘δn−1\partial_{i}(f\circ\delta_{n}^{-1})=a_{i}^{1/2}\,(\partial_{i}f)\circ\delta_{n}^{-1}, a constant multiple of a function continuous at every point. Such a multiple is again continuous at every point: if φ:Rn→R\varphi:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} is continuous at yy and ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose δ>0\delta>0 for φ\varphi at yy and ε/(1+ai1/2)\varepsilon/(1+a_{i}^{1/2}) in place of ε\varepsilon; then ∑j(yj′−yj)2<δ2\sum_{j}(y'_{j}-y_{j})^{2}<\delta^{2} gives (ai1/2φ(y′)−ai1/2φ(y))2=ai(φ(y′)−φ(y))2<aiε2/(1+ai1/2)2<ε2\bigl(a_{i}^{1/2}\varphi(y')-a_{i}^{1/2}\varphi(y)\bigr)^{2}=a_{i}\bigl(\varphi(y')-\varphi(y)\bigr)^{2}<a_{i}\varepsilon^{2}/(1+a_{i}^{1/2})^{2}<\varepsilon^{2}.

Step 2 (hh is of class C2C^{2} with Hessian MM). The function gg is of class C2C^{2}, hence of class C1C^{1} by claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, and each ∂ig\partial_{i}g is of class C1C^{1} by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set. By Step 1 with f=gf=g, hh is of class C1C^{1} with ∂ih=ai1/2(∂ig)∘δn−1\partial_{i}h=a_{i}^{1/2}(\partial_{i}g)\circ\delta_{n}^{-1}. By Step 1 with f=∂igf=\partial_{i}g, the function (∂ig)∘δn−1(\partial_{i}g)\circ\delta_{n}^{-1} is of class C1C^{1} with jjth partial derivative aj1/2(∂j∂ig)∘δn−1a_{j}^{1/2}(\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g)\circ\delta_{n}^{-1}; so by claims 3 and 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, ∂ih\partial_{i}h is of class C1C^{1} and

∂j∂ih(u)=ai1/2aj1/2 ∂j∂ig(δn−1(u))(u∈Rn, i,j∈[n]).\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h(u)=a_{i}^{1/2}a_{j}^{1/2}\,\partial_{j}\partial_{i}g(\delta_{n}^{-1}(u))\qquad(u\in\mathbb{R}^{n},\ i,j\in[n]).

Hence hh is of class C2C^{2} by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set. By Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function, the entry of D2h(u)D^{2}h(u) in row ii and column jj is ∂i∂jh(u)=ai1/2aj1/2∂i∂jg(δn−1(u))\partial_{i}\partial_{j}h(u)=a_{i}^{1/2}a_{j}^{1/2}\partial_{i}\partial_{j}g(\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)), which is at most bb in absolute value by the hypothesis on bb (with the indices interchanged). For x∈Xx\in X and u=rn(x)u=r_{n}(x) we have δn−1(u)=pn(x)\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)=p_{n}(x), so the entry of D2h(rn(x))D^{2}h(r_{n}(x)) in row ii and column jj is the entry of M(x)M(x) in row jj and column ii; since D2h(rn(x))D^{2}h(r_{n}(x)) is symmetric by claim 2 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian, it follows that D2h(rn(x))=M(x)D^{2}h(r_{n}(x))=M(x). Also ∂ih(rn(x))=ai1/2βi(x)\partial_{i}h(r_{n}(x))=a_{i}^{1/2}\beta_{i}(x).

Step 3 (The potential). Let q(u)=12∥u∥2=12∑l=1nπl(u)2q(u)=\tfrac12\lVert u\rVert^{2}=\tfrac12\sum_{l=1}^{n}\pi_{l}(u)^{2} (Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square), with the coordinate functions πl(u)=ul\pi_{l}(u)=u_{l}. By claims 2 and 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, qq is smooth, hence of class C2C^{2} (Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set). Directly from Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set, ∂iπl\partial_{i}\pi_{l} is the constant 11 if l=il=i and 00 otherwise, the difference quotients being constant; so claim 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set gives ∂iq=πi\partial_{i}q=\pi_{i} and ∂j∂iq\partial_{j}\partial_{i}q equal to 11 if j=ij=i and 00 otherwise, that is, D2q(u)=InD^{2}q(u)=I_{n}. For t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} let Φt=q+t h\Phi_{t}=q+t\,h. By claims 3 and 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set (applied to q,hq,h and to their first partial derivatives), Φt\Phi_{t} is of class C2C^{2}, ∂iΦt(u)=ui+t ∂ih(u)\partial_{i}\Phi_{t}(u)=u_{i}+t\,\partial_{i}h(u), and D2Φt(u)=In+t D2h(u)D^{2}\Phi_{t}(u)=I_{n}+t\,D^{2}h(u) for every uu.

Step 4 (Pinching). Let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 2n∣t∣b≤12n|t|b\le1, and let u,z∈Rnu,z\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and A=D2h(u)A=D^{2}h(u). By Step 2 and 2∣zi∣∣zj∣≤zi2+zj22|z_{i}||z_{j}|\le z_{i}^{2}+z_{j}^{2},

∣z⋅(Az)∣=∣∑i,j=1nziAijzj∣≤b∑i,j=1n∣zi∣∣zj∣≤b2∑i,j=1n(zi2+zj2)=n b ∥z∥2,|z\cdot(Az)|=\Bigl|\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}z_{i}A_{ij}z_{j}\Bigr|\le b\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}|z_{i}||z_{j}|\le\frac{b}{2}\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}(z_{i}^{2}+z_{j}^{2})=n\,b\,\lVert z\rVert^{2},

using Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square. Since z⋅(D2Φt(u)z)=z⋅z+t z⋅(Az)=∥z∥2+t z⋅(Az)z\cdot(D^{2}\Phi_{t}(u)z)=z\cdot z+t\,z\cdot(Az)=\lVert z\rVert^{2}+t\,z\cdot(Az) and n∣t∣b≤12n|t|b\le\tfrac12, we get 12∥z∥2≤z⋅(D2Φt(u)z)≤32∥z∥2\tfrac12\lVert z\rVert^{2}\le z\cdot(D^{2}\Phi_{t}(u)z)\le\tfrac32\lVert z\rVert^{2}, that is, z⋅((12In)z)≤z⋅(D2Φt(u)z)≤z⋅((32In)z)z\cdot((\tfrac12I_{n})z)\le z\cdot(D^{2}\Phi_{t}(u)z)\le z\cdot((\tfrac32I_{n})z). The matrix D2Φt(u)D^{2}\Phi_{t}(u) lies in S(n)\mathcal{S}(n) by Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §derivatives, so by The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices

12In⪯D2Φt(u)⪯32In(u∈Rn).\tfrac12I_{n}\preceq D^{2}\Phi_{t}(u)\preceq\tfrac32I_{n}\qquad(u\in\mathbb{R}^{n}).

Step 5 (The head map). Keep tt as in Step 4 and let Ft=∇ΦtF_{t}=\nabla\Phi_{t}, the gradient map u↦DΦt(u)u\mapsto D\Phi_{t}(u), so that by Steps 2 and 3 its kkth coordinate is (Ft)k(u)=uk+t ak1/2∂kg(δn−1(u))(F_{t})_{k}(u)=u_{k}+t\,a_{k}^{1/2}\partial_{k}g(\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)). By The Gradient of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function with Hessian Pinched between Two Positive Multiples of the Identity is a Bi-Lipschitz Bijection of Euclidean Space with Continuously Differentiable Inverse with d=nd=n, Φ=Φt\Phi=\Phi_{t}, ε=12\varepsilon=\tfrac12 and L=32L=\tfrac32, which applies by Step 4: FtF_{t} has components of class C1C^{1} (as recorded in its preamble) and is a bijection of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} (The Gradient of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function with Hessian Pinched between Two Positive Multiples of the Identity is a Bi-Lipschitz Bijection of Euclidean Space with Continuously Differentiable Inverse §bijection); and by The Gradient of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function with Hessian Pinched between Two Positive Multiples of the Identity is a Bi-Lipschitz Bijection of Euclidean Space with Continuously Differentiable Inverse §inverse, for every uu the matrix DFt(u)=D2Φt(u)DF_{t}(u)=D^{2}\Phi_{t}(u) is symmetric and positive definite, the inverse map Ft−1F_{t}^{-1} has components of class C1C^{1}, and D(Ft−1)(Ft(u))D(F_{t}^{-1})(F_{t}(u)) is the inverse matrix of DFt(u)DF_{t}(u). So FtF_{t} satisfies the hypotheses imposed on FF in Moving the Rescaled Head of the Diagonal Gaussian Measure by a Diffeomorphism: the Image Has an Explicit Positive Density Depending on the Head Only, and 0<det⁡DFt(u)0<\det DF_{t}(u) for every uu, as recorded there.

Step 6 (The perturbation is TFtT_{F_{t}}). For x∈Xx\in X and u=rn(x)u=r_{n}(x), Step 5 and δn−1(u)=pn(x)\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)=p_{n}(x) give (Ft(u)−u)k=t ak1/2βk(x)(F_{t}(u)-u)_{k}=t\,a_{k}^{1/2}\beta_{k}(x), so by the definition of the lift in Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space and ak1/2ak1/2=aka_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{1/2}=a_{k},

Λn(Ft−id)(x)=∑k=1nak1/2 t ak1/2βk(x) ek=t∑k=1nak ∂kg(pn(x)) ek=t ∇aψ(x),\Lambda_{n}(F_{t}-\mathrm{id})(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}\,t\,a_{k}^{1/2}\beta_{k}(x)\,e_{k}=t\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}g(p_{n}(x))\,e_{k}=t\,\nabla_{a}\psi(x),

the last equality being the formula for ∇aψ\nabla_{a}\psi recorded in the statement. Hence TFt=id+t∇aψT_{F_{t}}=\mathrm{id}+t\nabla_{a}\psi. By Moving the Rescaled Head of the Diagonal Gaussian Measure by a Diffeomorphism: the Image Has an Explicit Positive Density Depending on the Head Only §bijection, this map is a bijection of XX, it and its inverse TFt−1T_{F_{t}^{-1}} are Borel, and rn(TFt(x))=Ft(rn(x))r_{n}(T_{F_{t}}(x))=F_{t}(r_{n}(x)) for every x∈Xx\in X.

Step 7 (The log-determinant). For x∈Xx\in X, Steps 3, 2 and 5 give DFt(rn(x))=D2Φt(rn(x))=In+t M(x)DF_{t}(r_{n}(x))=D^{2}\Phi_{t}(r_{n}(x))=I_{n}+t\,M(x), so 0<det⁡(In+tM(x))0<\det(I_{n}+tM(x)) by Step 5. By Determinants of Positive Definite Matrices: Positivity, the Bound log⁡det⁡A≤tr A−d\log\det A\le\mathrm{tr}\,A-d, Bounds under Pinching, and the Expansion of det⁡(I+tB)\det(I+tB) §pinching with d=nd=n, ε=12\varepsilon=\tfrac12 and L=32L=\tfrac32, which applies by Step 4, n−2n≤log⁡det⁡(In+tM(x))≤32n−nn-2n\le\log\det(I_{n}+tM(x))\le\tfrac32n-n; so ∣log⁡det⁡(In+tM(x))∣≤n|\log\det(I_{n}+tM(x))|\le n. The function u↦det⁡DFt(u)u\mapsto\det DF_{t}(u) is continuous on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §regularity, and it takes values in (0,∞)(0,\infty) by Step 5; log⁡\log is smooth on the open set (0,∞)(0,\infty) by The Natural Logarithm, hence continuous relative to (0,∞)(0,\infty) at every point of (0,∞)(0,\infty) by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, the Euclidean distance on the real line being the absolute-value metric by The Euclidean Distance on the Real Line is the Absolute Value Metric; and rnr_{n} is continuous by Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §head. So x↦log⁡det⁡(In+tM(x))=log⁡det⁡DFt(rn(x))x\mapsto\log\det(I_{n}+tM(x))=\log\det DF_{t}(r_{n}(x)) is continuous, as a composite of continuous maps between metric spaces, the inner ones taking values in the sets on which the outer ones are continuous (two applications of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces), hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and bounded.

Step 8 (Integrability). Let k∈[n]k\in[n]. The function ∂kg\partial_{k}g is of class C1C^{1} by clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set and is bounded with bounded partial derivatives by Bounded Twice Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded First and Second Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded, so it lies in Cb1(Rn)C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded) and βk=(∂kg)∘pn∈FCb1(X)\beta_{k}=(\partial_{k}g)\circ p_{n}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical. Since μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X), as recorded in the statement, the function x↦xkβk(x)x\mapsto x_{k}\beta_{k}(x) is integrable with respect to μ\mu by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §coordinate-integrable. The function ∂kg\partial_{k}g, being of class C1C^{1}, is continuous on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} as a map from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), where dR(s,s′)=∣s−s′∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(s,s')=|s-s'|, by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. The function ∂k∂kg\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g is continuous at every point in the Euclidean sense by clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, applied to the function ∂kg\partial_{k}g of class C1C^{1} (gg itself is only of class C2C^{2}, so claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous is not applied to ∂k∂kg\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g). Since dE(y,y′)=∥y−y′∥d_{E}(y,y')=\lVert y-y'\rVert is nonnegative with dE(y,y′)2=∑j=1n(yj−yj′)2d_{E}(y,y')^{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}(y_{j}-y'_{j})^{2} by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §distance and Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square, the condition ∑j(yj−yj′)2<δ2\sum_{j}(y_{j}-y'_{j})^{2}<\delta^{2} is equivalent to dE(y,y′)<δd_{E}(y,y')<\delta, and for real s,s′s,s' the condition (s−s′)2<ε2(s-s')^{2}<\varepsilon^{2} is equivalent to ∣s−s′∣<ε|s-s'|<\varepsilon; so ∂k∂kg\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g is continuous on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} as a map from (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). The map pn:(X,d)→(Rn,dE)p_{n}:(X,d)\to(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) is continuous by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, being Lipschitz there (A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous); so βk\beta_{k}, βk2\beta_{k}^{2} (by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set) and x↦∂k∂kg(pn(x))x\mapsto\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g(p_{n}(x)) are continuous, as composites of continuous maps between metric spaces, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and they are bounded, by BB, B2B^{2} and a bound for ∂k∂kg\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g respectively. By claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space they, and the bounded Borel function of Step 7, are integrable with respect to the probability measure μ\mu. Hence, by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, the function

Θt(x)=∑k=1n(t ak xkck βk(x)+t2ak22ck βk(x)2)−log⁡det⁡(In+tM(x))\Theta_{t}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\Bigl(\frac{t\,a_{k}\,x_{k}}{c_{k}}\,\beta_{k}(x)+\frac{t^{2}a_{k}^{2}}{2c_{k}}\,\beta_{k}(x)^{2}\Bigr)-\log\det\bigl(I_{n}+tM(x)\bigr)

is integrable with respect to μ\mu, and so is each summand.

Step 9 (The logarithm of the density along the map). Let G=GFtG=G_{F_{t}} be the function of Moving the Rescaled Head of the Diagonal Gaussian Measure by a Diffeomorphism: the Image Has an Explicit Positive Density Depending on the Head Only for F=FtF=F_{t}. By Moving the Rescaled Head of the Diagonal Gaussian Measure by a Diffeomorphism: the Image Has an Explicit Positive Density Depending on the Head Only §density, GG is Borel and positive, and G∘rnG\circ r_{n}, which is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and positive, is a density of (TFt)#γc(T_{F_{t}})_{\#}\gamma_{c} with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. Let x∈Xx\in X and u=rn(x)u=r_{n}(x), so that ak1/2uk=xka_{k}^{1/2}u_{k}=x_{k} and Ft(u)k=uk+t ak1/2βk(x)F_{t}(u)_{k}=u_{k}+t\,a_{k}^{1/2}\beta_{k}(x). By Step 6 and Moving the Rescaled Head of the Diagonal Gaussian Measure by a Diffeomorphism: the Image Has an Explicit Positive Density Depending on the Head Only §log-density,

log⁡G(rn(TFt(x)))=log⁡G(Ft(u))=12 ∣Ft(u)∣c~(n)2−12 ∣u∣c~(n)2−log⁡det⁡DFt(u).\log G\bigl(r_{n}(T_{F_{t}}(x))\bigr)=\log G(F_{t}(u))=\tfrac12\,|F_{t}(u)|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}-\tfrac12\,|u|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}-\log\det DF_{t}(u).

By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling and c~k(n)=ck/ak\tilde{c}^{(n)}_{k}=c_{k}/a_{k} (A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §heads), ∣v∣c~(n)2=∑k=1nakvk2/ck|v|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}v_{k}^{2}/c_{k} for v∈Rnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, and for each kk

ak2ck((uk+t ak1/2βk(x))2−uk2)=akck t ak1/2uk βk(x)+t2ak22ck βk(x)2=t ak xkck βk(x)+t2ak22ck βk(x)2.\frac{a_{k}}{2c_{k}}\Bigl(\bigl(u_{k}+t\,a_{k}^{1/2}\beta_{k}(x)\bigr)^{2}-u_{k}^{2}\Bigr)=\frac{a_{k}}{c_{k}}\,t\,a_{k}^{1/2}u_{k}\,\beta_{k}(x)+\frac{t^{2}a_{k}^{2}}{2c_{k}}\,\beta_{k}(x)^{2}=\frac{t\,a_{k}\,x_{k}}{c_{k}}\,\beta_{k}(x)+\frac{t^{2}a_{k}^{2}}{2c_{k}}\,\beta_{k}(x)^{2}.

Together with det⁡DFt(u)=det⁡(In+tM(x))\det DF_{t}(u)=\det(I_{n}+tM(x)) (Step 7), this gives log⁡G(rn(TFt(x)))=Θt(x)\log G\bigl(r_{n}(T_{F_{t}}(x))\bigr)=\Theta_{t}(x) for every x∈Xx\in X.

Step 10 (Claim 1). Apply Relative Entropy of the Image under a Bimeasurable Bijection that Moves the Reference Measure by a Positive Density §entropy on (S,S)=(X,B(X))(S,\mathcal{S})=(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) with γ=γc\gamma=\gamma_{c}, ν=μ\nu=\mu, T=TFtT=T_{F_{t}} and the density G∘rnG\circ r_{n}: TT is a bijection with TT and T−1T^{-1} Borel (Step 6); G∘rnG\circ r_{n} is measurable, positive and a density of T#γcT_{\#}\gamma_{c} with respect to γc\gamma_{c} (Step 9); μ\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}; and s↦log⁡((G∘rn)(T(s)))=Θt(s)s\mapsto\log\bigl((G\circ r_{n})(T(s))\bigr)=\Theta_{t}(s) is integrable with respect to μ\mu (Steps 8 and 9). The image measure T#μT_{\#}\mu there is the push-forward (id+t∇aψ)#μ(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla_{a}\psi)_{\#}\mu of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward, by Step 6. Hence (id+t∇aψ)#μ(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla_{a}\psi)_{\#}\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and

H((id+t∇aψ)#μ ∣ γc)=H(μ ∣ γc)+∫XΘt dμ,H\bigl((\mathrm{id}+t\nabla_{a}\psi)_{\#}\mu\,\big|\,\gamma_{c}\bigr)=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})+\int_{X}\Theta_{t}\,d\mu ,

and splitting ∫XΘt dμ\int_{X}\Theta_{t}\,d\mu into the integrals of its summands by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable (Step 8) gives the displayed formula of claim 1. The remaining assertions of claim 1 are Step 7 (positivity of the determinant; the log-determinant is Borel and bounded) and Step 6 (the map id+t∇aψ\mathrm{id}+t\nabla_{a}\psi is Borel).

Step 11 (Claim 2). Let tt satisfy 2n∣t∣b≤12n|t|b\le1 and ∣t∣b≤θn|t|b\le\theta_{n}. By The Noise Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Functional of a Probability Measure at a Bounded C^2 Function of Finitely Many Coordinates §functional and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable (with the integrable functions of Step 8),

t Lμa(g)=∑k=1n∫Xt ak xkck βk(x) μ(dx)−∫Xt tr M(x) μ(dx),t\,L^{a}_{\mu}(g)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\int_{X}\frac{t\,a_{k}\,x_{k}}{c_{k}}\,\beta_{k}(x)\,\mu(dx)-\int_{X}t\,\mathrm{tr}\,M(x)\,\mu(dx),

since ∑k=1nak ∂k∂kg(pn(x))=∑k=1nM(x)kk=tr M(x)\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g(p_{n}(x))=\sum_{k=1}^{n}M(x)_{kk}=\mathrm{tr}\,M(x) by Trace of a Real Square Matrix and ak1/2ak1/2=aka_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{1/2}=a_{k}. Subtracting this from the formula of claim 1, again by linearity of the integral,

H((id+t∇aψ)#μ ∣ γc)−H(μ ∣ γc)−t Lμa(g)=∑k=1n∫Xt2ak22ck βk2 dμ−∫X(log⁡det⁡(In+tM(x))−t tr M(x))μ(dx).H\bigl((\mathrm{id}+t\nabla_{a}\psi)_{\#}\mu\,\big|\,\gamma_{c}\bigr)-H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})-t\,L^{a}_{\mu}(g)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\int_{X}\frac{t^{2}a_{k}^{2}}{2c_{k}}\,\beta_{k}^{2}\,d\mu-\int_{X}\Bigl(\log\det\bigl(I_{n}+tM(x)\bigr)-t\,\mathrm{tr}\,M(x)\Bigr)\mu(dx).

Since 0≤βk2≤B20\le\beta_{k}^{2}\le B^{2} and μ(X)=1\mu(X)=1, monotonicity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable) and claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space give 0≤∫Xt2ak22ckβk2 dμ≤t2B2ak22ck0\le\int_{X}\frac{t^{2}a_{k}^{2}}{2c_{k}}\beta_{k}^{2}\,d\mu\le t^{2}B^{2}\frac{a_{k}^{2}}{2c_{k}}. For each x∈Xx\in X, the matrix M(x)M(x) has entries of absolute value at most bb by the hypothesis on bb, and ∣t∣ b≤θn≤1|t|\,b\le\theta_{n}\le1, θn\theta_{n} being the constant cn≤1c_{n}\le1 of Determinants of Positive Definite Matrices: Positivity, the Bound log⁡det⁡A≤tr A−d\log\det A\le\mathrm{tr}\,A-d, Bounds under Pinching, and the Expansion of det⁡(I+tB)\det(I+tB) §expansion with d=nd=n, as in the statement; so Determinants of Positive Definite Matrices: Positivity, the Bound log⁡det⁡A≤tr A−d\log\det A\le\mathrm{tr}\,A-d, Bounds under Pinching, and the Expansion of det⁡(I+tB)\det(I+tB) §expansion with d=nd=n, the matrix M(x)M(x) in place of BB and m=bm=b gives ∣log⁡det⁡(In+tM(x))−t tr M(x)∣≤Knt2b2\bigl|\log\det(I_{n}+tM(x))-t\,\mathrm{tr}\,M(x)\bigr|\le K_{n}t^{2}b^{2}. The function x↦t tr M(x)=∑k=1nt ak ∂k∂kg(pn(x))x\mapsto t\,\mathrm{tr}\,M(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}t\,a_{k}\,\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g(p_{n}(x)) is continuous by Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set, applied to the continuous functions x↦∂k∂kg(pn(x))x\mapsto\partial_{k}\partial_{k}g(p_{n}(x)) of Step 8; so the integrand of the last integral, its difference with the continuous function of Step 7, is continuous by the same theorem, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and bounded by Knt2b2K_{n}t^{2}b^{2}; and so claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space bounds the absolute value of that integral by Knt2b2K_{n}t^{2}b^{2}. The triangle inequality now gives claim 2.

Step 12 (Claim 3). If b>0b>0, let t0t_{0} be the lesser of 1/(2nb)1/(2nb) and θn/b\theta_{n}/b; if b=0b=0, let t0=1t_{0}=1. Then t0>0t_{0}>0, θn\theta_{n} being positive, and every tt in the open interval I=(−t0,t0)I=(-t_{0},t_{0}) satisfies 2n∣t∣b≤12n|t|b\le1 and ∣t∣b≤θn|t|b\le\theta_{n} (if b>0b>0 because ∣t∣<t0|t|<t_{0}, and if b=0b=0 trivially). The set II is an interval: if s1,s3∈Is_{1},s_{3}\in I and s1≤s2≤s3s_{1}\le s_{2}\le s_{3}, then −t0<s1≤s2≤s3<t0-t_{0}<s_{1}\le s_{2}\le s_{3}<t_{0}, so −t0<s2<t0-t_{0}<s_{2}<t_{0} and s2∈Is_{2}\in I. By claim 1, (id+t∇aψ)#μ(\mathrm{id}+t\nabla_{a}\psi)_{\#}\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} for every t∈It\in I; let H(t)\mathcal{H}(t) be its relative entropy. Since id+0∇aψ\mathrm{id}+0\nabla_{a}\psi is the identity map of XX, whose push-forward of μ\mu is μ\mu, H(0)=H(μ ∣ γc)\mathcal{H}(0)=H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}). The point 00 is an interior point of II, as −t0/2<0<t0/2-t_{0}/2<0<t_{0}/2 with both bounds in II. Let C=Knb2+B2∑k=1nak2/(2ck)C=K_{n}b^{2}+B^{2}\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{2}/(2c_{k}), a nonnegative number, and L=Lμa(g)L=L^{a}_{\mu}(g). For s∈Is\in I with s≠0s\ne0, claim 2 divided by ∣s∣|s| gives

∣H(s)−H(0)s−L∣≤C ∣s∣.\Bigl|\frac{\mathcal{H}(s)-\mathcal{H}(0)}{s}-L\Bigr|\le C\,|s| .

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, let δ\delta be the lesser of t0t_{0} and ε/(C+1)\varepsilon/(C+1). If 0<∣s∣<δ0<|s|<\delta, then s∈Is\in I and C∣s∣≤Cε/(C+1)<εC|s|\le C\varepsilon/(C+1)<\varepsilon. Hence, by Derivative at an Interior Point, the function H\mathcal{H} on II is differentiable at 00 with derivative Lμa(g)L^{a}_{\mu}(g), which is claim 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…