Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Conventions. "Change of variables" is claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables , for the push-forwards of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward and of the statement; "the integral theorem" is Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral . For measurable maps G G G and H H H the image measures of claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables satisfy ( H ∘ G ) # τ = H # ( G # τ ) (H\circ G)_{\#}\tau=H_{\#}(G_{\#}\tau) ( H ∘ G ) # τ = H # ( G # τ ) , both sides assigning to B B B the value τ ( G − 1 ( H − 1 ( B ) ) ) \tau(G^{-1}(H^{-1}(B))) τ ( G − 1 ( H − 1 ( B ))) , and G # τ G_{\#}\tau G # τ has the total mass of τ \tau τ . For maps S , T S,T S , T into X X X one has π 1 ∘ ( S , T ) = S \pi_{1}\circ(S,T)=S π 1 ∘ ( S , T ) = S and π 2 ∘ ( S , T ) = T \pi_{2}\circ(S,T)=T π 2 ∘ ( S , T ) = T , and a pair is determined by its coordinates, by The Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §notation ; in particular π 1 ∘ ( q 1 , q 2 ) = q 1 = π 1 ∘ ( q 1 , q 3 ) \pi_{1}\circ(q_{1},q_{2})=q_{1}=\pi_{1}\circ(q_{1},q_{3}) π 1 ∘ ( q 1 , q 2 ) = q 1 = π 1 ∘ ( q 1 , q 3 ) , π 2 ∘ ( q 1 , q 2 ) = q 2 = π 1 ∘ ( q 2 , q 3 ) \pi_{2}\circ(q_{1},q_{2})=q_{2}=\pi_{1}\circ(q_{2},q_{3}) π 2 ∘ ( q 1 , q 2 ) = q 2 = π 1 ∘ ( q 2 , q 3 ) and π 2 ∘ ( q 2 , q 3 ) = q 3 = π 2 ∘ ( q 1 , q 3 ) \pi_{2}\circ(q_{2},q_{3})=q_{3}=\pi_{2}\circ(q_{1},q_{3}) π 2 ∘ ( q 2 , q 3 ) = q 3 = π 2 ∘ ( q 1 , q 3 ) , and w = ( ( q 1 w , q 2 w ) , q 3 w ) w=((q_{1}w,q_{2}w),q_{3}w) w = (( q 1 w , q 2 w ) , q 3 w ) , so ( q 1 , q 2 ) ( w ) (q_{1},q_{2})(w) ( q 1 , q 2 ) ( w ) is the first coordinate of w w w in ( X × X ) × X (X\times X)\times X ( X × X ) × X . Measure-theoretic facts are those of Basic Properties of a Measure , cited by anchor. Applying Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric to X × X X\times X X × X and then to X ( 3 ) X_{(3)} X ( 3 ) , for w = ( ( u , v ) , s ) w=((u,v),s) w = (( u , v ) , s ) and w ′ = ( ( u ′ , v ′ ) , s ′ ) w'=((u',v'),s') w ′ = (( u ′ , v ′ ) , s ′ ) ,
d ( w , w ′ ) 2 = ∣ u − u ′ ∣ 2 + ∣ v − v ′ ∣ 2 + ∣ s − s ′ ∣ 2 . (M) d(w,w')^{2}=|u-u'|^{2}+|v-v'|^{2}+|s-s'|^{2}. \tag{M} d ( w , w ′ ) 2 = ∣ u − u ′ ∣ 2 + ∣ v − v ′ ∣ 2 + ∣ s − s ′ ∣ 2 . ( M )
Hence ( q 1 , q 2 ) (q_{1},q_{2}) ( q 1 , q 2 ) and ( q 2 , q 3 ) (q_{2},q_{3}) ( q 2 , q 3 ) are Lipschitz with constant 1 1 1 from ( X ( 3 ) , d ) (X_{(3)},d) ( X ( 3 ) , d ) to ( X × X , d ) (X\times X,d) ( X × X , d ) , so continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous . For p ∈ X p\in X p ∈ X let ψ p : X × X → X ( 3 ) \psi_{p}:X\times X\to X_{(3)} ψ p : X × X → X ( 3 ) , ψ p ( x , s ) = ( ( x , p ) , s ) \psi_{p}(x,s)=((x,p),s) ψ p ( x , s ) = (( x , p ) , s ) , and ι p , ι p ′ : X → X × X \iota_{p},\iota'_{p}:X\to X\times X ι p , ι p ′ : X → X × X , ι p ( x ) = ( x , p ) \iota_{p}(x)=(x,p) ι p ( x ) = ( x , p ) , ι p ′ ( s ) = ( p , s ) \iota'_{p}(s)=(p,s) ι p ′ ( s ) = ( p , s ) . By (M) and Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric these maps preserve distances, so they are continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space .
Two real inequalities. (E1) For real r , s ≥ 0 r,s\ge0 r , s ≥ 0 and t > 0 t>0 t > 0 , ( r + s ) 2 ≤ ( 1 + t ) r 2 + ( 1 + t − 1 ) s 2 (r+s)^{2}\le(1+t)r^{2}+(1+t^{-1})s^{2} ( r + s ) 2 ≤ ( 1 + t ) r 2 + ( 1 + t − 1 ) s 2 , since the difference is ( t r − s ) 2 / t ≥ 0 (tr-s)^{2}/t\ge0 ( t r − s ) 2 / t ≥ 0 . (E2) Let A , B , C ≥ 0 A,B,C\ge0 A , B , C ≥ 0 be real with C ≤ ( 1 + t ) A + ( 1 + t − 1 ) B C\le(1+t)A+(1+t^{-1})B C ≤ ( 1 + t ) A + ( 1 + t − 1 ) B for every real t > 0 t>0 t > 0 . Then C ≤ A + B \sqrt{C}\le\sqrt{A}+\sqrt{B} C ≤ A + B (square roots of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root ). Indeed, if A > 0 A>0 A > 0 and B > 0 B>0 B > 0 , the choice t = B / A t=\sqrt{B}/\sqrt{A} t = B / A gives C ≤ A + 2 A B + B = ( A + B ) 2 C\le A+2\sqrt{A}\sqrt{B}+B=(\sqrt{A}+\sqrt{B})^{2} C ≤ A + 2 A B + B = ( A + B ) 2 . If A = 0 A=0 A = 0 , then C ≤ B C\le B C ≤ B : otherwise C > B C>B C > B , and t = 1 t=1 t = 1 excludes B = 0 B=0 B = 0 , while for B > 0 B>0 B > 0 the choice t = 2 B / ( C − B ) t=2B/(C-B) t = 2 B / ( C − B ) gives C ≤ B + ( C − B ) / 2 < C C\le B+(C-B)/2<C C ≤ B + ( C − B ) /2 < C . If B = 0 B=0 B = 0 , then likewise C ≤ A C\le A C ≤ A : otherwise C > A C>A C > A , A = 0 A=0 A = 0 is excluded by the case just treated, and for A > 0 A>0 A > 0 the choice t = ( C − A ) / ( 2 A ) t=(C-A)/(2A) t = ( C − A ) / ( 2 A ) gives C ≤ A + ( C − A ) / 2 < C C\le A+(C-A)/2<C C ≤ A + ( C − A ) /2 < C . In all cases C ≤ ( A + B ) 2 C\le(\sqrt{A}+\sqrt{B})^{2} C ≤ ( A + B ) 2 , and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives the assertion.
Step 1 (gluing over a finitely supported middle marginal). Let λ ′ ∈ P ( X ) \lambda'\in\mathcal{P}(X) λ ′ ∈ P ( X ) with λ ′ ( X ∖ F ) = 0 \lambda'(X\setminus F)=0 λ ′ ( X ∖ F ) = 0 for a finite F ⊆ X F\subseteq X F ⊆ X , and let π 12 ′ ∈ Π ( μ , λ ′ ) \pi'_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\lambda') π 12 ′ ∈ Π ( μ , λ ′ ) and π 23 ′ ∈ Π ( λ ′ , ν ) \pi'_{23}\in\Pi(\lambda',\nu) π 23 ′ ∈ Π ( λ ′ , ν ) . We construct σ ′ ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) \sigma'\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) σ ′ ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) with ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ ′ = π 12 ′ (q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma'=\pi'_{12} ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ ′ = π 12 ′ and ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ ′ = π 23 ′ (q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma'=\pi'_{23} ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ ′ = π 23 ′ . Finite subsets of X X X and their complements are Borel, as recorded in the statement of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound . Let F + = { p ∈ F : 0 < λ ′ ( { p } ) } F_{+}=\{p\in F:0<\lambda'(\{p\})\} F + = { p ∈ F : 0 < λ ′ ({ p })} , finite by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets , and r p = λ ′ ( { p } ) r_{p}=\lambda'(\{p\}) r p = λ ′ ({ p }) for p ∈ F + p\in F_{+} p ∈ F + . The finite set F ∖ F + F\setminus F_{+} F ∖ F + is either empty, in which case λ ′ ( F ∖ F + ) = 0 \lambda'(F\setminus F_{+})=0 λ ′ ( F ∖ F + ) = 0 trivially, or a finite disjoint union of λ ′ \lambda' λ ′ -null singletons, so that λ ′ ( F ∖ F + ) = 0 \lambda'(F\setminus F_{+})=0 λ ′ ( F ∖ F + ) = 0 by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity ; whence λ ′ ( X ∖ F + ) = λ ′ ( X ∖ F ) + λ ′ ( F ∖ F + ) = 0 \lambda'(X\setminus F_{+})=\lambda'(X\setminus F)+\lambda'(F\setminus F_{+})=0 λ ′ ( X ∖ F + ) = λ ′ ( X ∖ F ) + λ ′ ( F ∖ F + ) = 0 by the same claim, λ ′ ( F + ) = 1 \lambda'(F_{+})=1 λ ′ ( F + ) = 1 by Basic Properties of a Measure §differences , and F + ≠ ∅ F_{+}\neq\varnothing F + = ∅ , since λ ′ ( F + ) = 1 ≠ 0 = λ ′ ( ∅ ) \lambda'(F_{+})=1\neq0=\lambda'(\varnothing) λ ′ ( F + ) = 1 = 0 = λ ′ ( ∅ ) . By the marginal conditions of Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling ,
π 12 ′ ( π 2 − 1 ( X ∖ F + ) ) = 0 = π 23 ′ ( π 1 − 1 ( X ∖ F + ) ) . (N) \pi'_{12}\bigl(\pi_{2}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+})\bigr)=0=\pi'_{23}\bigl(\pi_{1}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+})\bigr). \tag{N} π 12 ′ ( π 2 − 1 ( X ∖ F + ) ) = 0 = π 23 ′ ( π 1 − 1 ( X ∖ F + ) ) . ( N )
For p ∈ F + p\in F_{+} p ∈ F + and A , C ∈ B ( X ) A,C\in\mathcal{B}(X) A , C ∈ B ( X ) put α p ( A ) = π 12 ′ ( π 1 − 1 ( A ) ∩ π 2 − 1 ( { p } ) ) \alpha_{p}(A)=\pi'_{12}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(A)\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(\{p\})) α p ( A ) = π 12 ′ ( π 1 − 1 ( A ) ∩ π 2 − 1 ({ p })) and β p ( C ) = π 23 ′ ( π 1 − 1 ( { p } ) ∩ π 2 − 1 ( C ) ) \beta_{p}(C)=\pi'_{23}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(\{p\})\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(C)) β p ( C ) = π 23 ′ ( π 1 − 1 ({ p }) ∩ π 2 − 1 ( C )) . Preimages and intersection with a fixed Borel set preserve countable disjoint unions, so α p , β p \alpha_{p},\beta_{p} α p , β p are Borel measures on ( X , d ) (X,d) ( X , d ) (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure ), with α p ( X ) = λ ′ ( { p } ) = r p = β p ( X ) \alpha_{p}(X)=\lambda'(\{p\})=r_{p}=\beta_{p}(X) α p ( X ) = λ ′ ({ p }) = r p = β p ( X ) by the marginal conditions. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-measure the product measure θ p = α p ⊗ β p \theta_{p}=\alpha_{p}\otimes\beta_{p} θ p = α p ⊗ β p is a Borel measure on X × X X\times X X × X , and θ p ( A × C ) = α p ( A ) β p ( C ) \theta_{p}(A\times C)=\alpha_{p}(A)\beta_{p}(C) θ p ( A × C ) = α p ( A ) β p ( C ) for A , C ∈ B ( X ) A,C\in\mathcal{B}(X) A , C ∈ B ( X ) by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure , as B ( X × X ) = B ( X ) ⊗ B ( X ) \mathcal{B}(X\times X)=\mathcal{B}(X)\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) B ( X × X ) = B ( X ) ⊗ B ( X ) by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma . Define, for W ∈ B ( X ( 3 ) ) W\in\mathcal{B}(X_{(3)}) W ∈ B ( X ( 3 ) ) ,
σ ′ ( W ) = ∑ p ∈ F + r p − 1 θ p ( ψ p − 1 ( W ) ) . \sigma'(W)=\sum_{p\in F_{+}}r_{p}^{-1}\,\theta_{p}\bigl(\psi_{p}^{-1}(W)\bigr). σ ′ ( W ) = p ∈ F + ∑ r p − 1 θ p ( ψ p − 1 ( W ) ) .
Each summand is a positive multiple of the image measure ( ψ p ) # θ p (\psi_{p})_{\#}\theta_{p} ( ψ p ) # θ p , and a finite sum of measures with positive real coefficients is a measure (series of nonnegative terms add termwise in [ 0 , ∞ ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , ∞ ] ), so σ ′ \sigma' σ ′ is a Borel measure on X ( 3 ) X_{(3)} X ( 3 ) , with σ ′ ( X ( 3 ) ) = ∑ p r p − 1 α p ( X ) β p ( X ) = ∑ p λ ′ ( { p } ) = λ ′ ( F + ) = 1 \sigma'(X_{(3)})=\sum_{p}r_{p}^{-1}\alpha_{p}(X)\beta_{p}(X)=\sum_{p}\lambda'(\{p\})=\lambda'(F_{+})=1 σ ′ ( X ( 3 ) ) = ∑ p r p − 1 α p ( X ) β p ( X ) = ∑ p λ ′ ({ p }) = λ ′ ( F + ) = 1 by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity . Thus σ ′ ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) \sigma'\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) σ ′ ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) .
Let E ∈ B ( X × X ) E\in\mathcal{B}(X\times X) E ∈ B ( X × X ) and p ∈ F + p\in F_{+} p ∈ F + . Since ( q 1 , q 2 ) ( ψ p ( x , s ) ) = ( x , p ) (q_{1},q_{2})(\psi_{p}(x,s))=(x,p) ( q 1 , q 2 ) ( ψ p ( x , s )) = ( x , p ) , one has ψ p − 1 ( ( q 1 , q 2 ) − 1 ( E ) ) = E p × X \psi_{p}^{-1}((q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(E))=E^{p}\times X ψ p − 1 (( q 1 , q 2 ) − 1 ( E )) = E p × X with E p = ι p − 1 ( E ) ∈ B ( X ) E^{p}=\iota_{p}^{-1}(E)\in\mathcal{B}(X) E p = ι p − 1 ( E ) ∈ B ( X ) , so θ p ( ψ p − 1 ( ( q 1 , q 2 ) − 1 ( E ) ) ) = r p α p ( E p ) \theta_{p}(\psi_{p}^{-1}((q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(E)))=r_{p}\,\alpha_{p}(E^{p}) θ p ( ψ p − 1 (( q 1 , q 2 ) − 1 ( E ))) = r p α p ( E p ) ; and a pair z z z with π 2 ( z ) = p \pi_{2}(z)=p π 2 ( z ) = p equals ( π 1 ( z ) , p ) (\pi_{1}(z),p) ( π 1 ( z ) , p ) , so π 1 − 1 ( E p ) ∩ π 2 − 1 ( { p } ) = E ∩ π 2 − 1 ( { p } ) \pi_{1}^{-1}(E^{p})\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(\{p\})=E\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(\{p\}) π 1 − 1 ( E p ) ∩ π 2 − 1 ({ p }) = E ∩ π 2 − 1 ({ p }) . These sets are pairwise disjoint for p ∈ F + p\in F_{+} p ∈ F + with union E ∩ π 2 − 1 ( F + ) E\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+}) E ∩ π 2 − 1 ( F + ) , so by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity , Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone and (N),
( ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ ′ ) ( E ) = ∑ p ∈ F + α p ( E p ) = π 12 ′ ( E ∩ π 2 − 1 ( F + ) ) = π 12 ′ ( E ) . \bigl((q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma'\bigr)(E)=\sum_{p\in F_{+}}\alpha_{p}(E^{p})=\pi'_{12}\bigl(E\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+})\bigr)=\pi'_{12}(E). ( ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ ′ ) ( E ) = p ∈ F + ∑ α p ( E p ) = π 12 ′ ( E ∩ π 2 − 1 ( F + ) ) = π 12 ′ ( E ) .
Likewise ( q 2 , q 3 ) ( ψ p ( x , s ) ) = ( p , s ) (q_{2},q_{3})(\psi_{p}(x,s))=(p,s) ( q 2 , q 3 ) ( ψ p ( x , s )) = ( p , s ) , so ψ p − 1 ( ( q 2 , q 3 ) − 1 ( E ) ) = X × E p \psi_{p}^{-1}((q_{2},q_{3})^{-1}(E))=X\times E_{p} ψ p − 1 (( q 2 , q 3 ) − 1 ( E )) = X × E p with E p = ( ι p ′ ) − 1 ( E ) E_{p}=(\iota'_{p})^{-1}(E) E p = ( ι p ′ ) − 1 ( E ) , its θ p \theta_{p} θ p -measure is r p β p ( E p ) r_{p}\beta_{p}(E_{p}) r p β p ( E p ) , π 1 − 1 ( { p } ) ∩ π 2 − 1 ( E p ) = E ∩ π 1 − 1 ( { p } ) \pi_{1}^{-1}(\{p\})\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(E_{p})=E\cap\pi_{1}^{-1}(\{p\}) π 1 − 1 ({ p }) ∩ π 2 − 1 ( E p ) = E ∩ π 1 − 1 ({ p }) , and the same computation with (N) gives ( ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ ′ ) ( E ) = π 23 ′ ( E ) ((q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma')(E)=\pi'_{23}(E) (( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ ′ ) ( E ) = π 23 ′ ( E ) .
Step 2 (quantisation). Fix m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N . By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §quantisation , applied to λ ∈ P 2 ( X ) \lambda\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) λ ∈ P 2 ( X ) with ε = 1 / m \varepsilon=1/m ε = 1/ m , choose a Borel T m : X → X T_{m}:X\to X T m : X → X with finite image F m = T m ( X ) F_{m}=T_{m}(X) F m = T m ( X ) and ∫ X ∣ T m ( y ) − y ∣ 2 λ ( d y ) ≤ m − 2 \int_{X}|T_{m}(y)-y|^{2}\,\lambda(dy)\le m^{-2} ∫ X ∣ T m ( y ) − y ∣ 2 λ ( d y ) ≤ m − 2 ; by the same clause λ m = ( T m ) # λ ∈ P ( X ) \lambda_{m}=(T_{m})_{\#}\lambda\in\mathcal{P}(X) λ m = ( T m ) # λ ∈ P ( X ) satisfies λ m ( X ∖ F m ) = 0 \lambda_{m}(X\setminus F_{m})=0 λ m ( X ∖ F m ) = 0 . By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §modification , π 12 m = ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) # π 12 ∈ Π ( μ , λ m ) \pi_{12}^{m}=(\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\lambda_{m}) π 12 m = ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) # π 12 ∈ Π ( μ , λ m ) and π 23 m = ( T m ∘ π 1 , π 2 ) # π 23 ∈ Π ( λ m , ν ) \pi_{23}^{m}=(T_{m}\circ\pi_{1},\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{23}\in\Pi(\lambda_{m},\nu) π 23 m = ( T m ∘ π 1 , π 2 ) # π 23 ∈ Π ( λ m , ν ) . Step 1, with λ ′ = λ m \lambda'=\lambda_{m} λ ′ = λ m and F = F m F=F_{m} F = F m , gives σ m ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) \sigma_{m}\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) σ m ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) with ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ m = π 12 m (q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma_{m}=\pi_{12}^{m} ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ m = π 12 m and ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ m = π 23 m (q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma_{m}=\pi_{23}^{m} ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ m = π 23 m .
Step 3 (the quantised middle marginals are tight). By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §pushforward with S = i d X S=\mathrm{id}_{X} S = id X and T = T m T=T_{m} T = T m , the coupling ( i d X , T m ) # λ ∈ Π ( λ , λ m ) (\mathrm{id}_{X},T_{m})_{\#}\lambda\in\Pi(\lambda,\lambda_{m}) ( id X , T m ) # λ ∈ Π ( λ , λ m ) has cost ∫ ∣ y − T m ( y ) ∣ 2 λ ( d y ) ≤ m − 2 \int|y-T_{m}(y)|^{2}\lambda(dy)\le m^{-2} ∫ ∣ y − T m ( y ) ∣ 2 λ ( d y ) ≤ m − 2 , as ∣ y − T m ( y ) ∣ = ∣ T m ( y ) − y ∣ |y-T_{m}(y)|=|T_{m}(y)-y| ∣ y − T m ( y ) ∣ = ∣ T m ( y ) − y ∣ . So λ m ∈ P 2 ( X ) \lambda_{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) λ m ∈ P 2 ( X ) by the converse part of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §cost-finite , and W 2 ( λ , λ m ) 2 ≤ m − 2 W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda_{m})^{2}\le m^{-2} W 2 ( λ , λ m ) 2 ≤ m − 2 by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance , whence W 2 ( λ , λ m ) ≤ 1 / m W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda_{m})\le1/m W 2 ( λ , λ m ) ≤ 1/ m by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field . By The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §symmetry and The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §triangle , W 2 ( λ m , λ ℓ ) ≤ 1 / m + 1 / ℓ W_{2}(\lambda_{m},\lambda_{\ell})\le1/m+1/\ell W 2 ( λ m , λ ℓ ) ≤ 1/ m + 1/ ℓ ; given a real ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 and N ∈ N N\in\mathbb{N} N ∈ N with 2 / N < ε 2/N<\varepsilon 2/ N < ε , this is < ε <\varepsilon < ε for m , ℓ ≥ N m,\ell\ge N m , ℓ ≥ N , so ( λ m ) (\lambda_{m}) ( λ m ) is a Cauchy sequence in ( P 2 ( X ) , W 2 ) (\mathcal{P}_{2}(X),W_{2}) ( P 2 ( X ) , W 2 ) by Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space , and it is tight in ( X , d ) (X,d) ( X , d ) by Cauchy Sequences in the Quadratic Wasserstein Space and Weakly Convergent Sequences on a Hilbert Space are Tight §tight .
Step 4 (the gluings are tight). Fix a real ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 ; first K 1 K_{1} K 1 , then K 3 K_{3} K 3 is chosen. The sets { μ } \{\mu\} { μ } (by Ulam's Theorem: a Finite Borel Measure on a Complete Separable Metric Space is Tight §tight , ( X , d ) (X,d) ( X , d ) being complete and separable by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space ) and { λ m : m ∈ N } \{\lambda_{m}:m\in\mathbb{N}\} { λ m : m ∈ N } (by Step 3 and Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence ) are tight, so by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Tightness, Closedness under Weak Convergence, and Lower Semicontinuity of the Quadratic Cost §tight and Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §tight there is a compact K 1 ⊆ X × X K_{1}\subseteq X\times X K 1 ⊆ X × X with π 12 m ( ( X × X ) ∖ K 1 ) ≤ ε / 2 \pi_{12}^{m}((X\times X)\setminus K_{1})\le\varepsilon/2 π 12 m (( X × X ) ∖ K 1 ) ≤ ε /2 for every m m m . By Ulam's Theorem: a Finite Borel Measure on a Complete Separable Metric Space is Tight §tight choose a compact K 3 ⊆ X K_{3}\subseteq X K 3 ⊆ X with ν ( X ∖ K 3 ) ≤ ε / 2 \nu(X\setminus K_{3})\le\varepsilon/2 ν ( X ∖ K 3 ) ≤ ε /2 . By A Product of Compact Subsets is Compact in the Product Metric , applied to ( X × X , d ) (X\times X,d) ( X × X , d ) and ( X , d ) (X,d) ( X , d ) , the set K 1 × K 3 K_{1}\times K_{3} K 1 × K 3 is compact for the topology of the product metric, which by Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric (with E 1 = X × X E_{1}=X\times X E 1 = X × X , E 2 = X E_{2}=X E 2 = X ) has the same open sets as ( X ( 3 ) , d ) (X_{(3)},d) ( X ( 3 ) , d ) ; compactness depending only on the topology (Compact Topological Space and Compact Subset ), K 1 × K 3 K_{1}\times K_{3} K 1 × K 3 is compact in ( X ( 3 ) , d ) (X_{(3)},d) ( X ( 3 ) , d ) . The sets ( X × X ) ∖ K 1 (X\times X)\setminus K_{1} ( X × X ) ∖ K 1 and X ∖ K 3 X\setminus K_{3} X ∖ K 3 are Borel by Compact Subsets of a Metric Space are Closed and Borel §borel , and a point w w w lies outside K 1 × K 3 K_{1}\times K_{3} K 1 × K 3 exactly when ( q 1 , q 2 ) ( w ) ∉ K 1 (q_{1},q_{2})(w)\notin K_{1} ( q 1 , q 2 ) ( w ) ∈ / K 1 or q 3 ( w ) ∉ K 3 q_{3}(w)\notin K_{3} q 3 ( w ) ∈ / K 3 . Since q 3 = π 2 ∘ ( q 2 , q 3 ) q_{3}=\pi_{2}\circ(q_{2},q_{3}) q 3 = π 2 ∘ ( q 2 , q 3 ) , one has ( q 3 ) # σ m = ( π 2 ) # π 23 m = ν (q_{3})_{\#}\sigma_{m}=(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{23}^{m}=\nu ( q 3 ) # σ m = ( π 2 ) # π 23 m = ν . By Basic Properties of a Measure §subadditivity (padding with empty sets),
σ m ( X ( 3 ) ∖ ( K 1 × K 3 ) ) ≤ π 12 m ( ( X × X ) ∖ K 1 ) + ν ( X ∖ K 3 ) ≤ ε \sigma_{m}\bigl(X_{(3)}\setminus(K_{1}\times K_{3})\bigr)\le\pi_{12}^{m}\bigl((X\times X)\setminus K_{1}\bigr)+\nu(X\setminus K_{3})\le\varepsilon σ m ( X ( 3 ) ∖ ( K 1 × K 3 ) ) ≤ π 12 m ( ( X × X ) ∖ K 1 ) + ν ( X ∖ K 3 ) ≤ ε
for every m m m , so ( σ m ) (\sigma_{m}) ( σ m ) is tight in ( X ( 3 ) , d ) (X_{(3)},d) ( X ( 3 ) , d ) by Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence .
Step 5 (a weak limit). By Prokhorov's Theorem on a Metric Space: a Tight Sequence of Borel Probability Measures Has a Weakly Convergent Subsequence §subsequence on ( X ( 3 ) , d ) (X_{(3)},d) ( X ( 3 ) , d ) there are a strictly increasing ( m i ) i ∈ N (m_{i})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} ( m i ) i ∈ N and σ ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) \sigma\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) σ ∈ P ( X ( 3 ) ) with σ m i ⇒ σ \sigma_{m_{i}}\Rightarrow\sigma σ m i ⇒ σ . By Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures is Preserved by Continuous Maps between Metric Spaces §weak , applied to the continuous maps ( q 1 , q 2 ) (q_{1},q_{2}) ( q 1 , q 2 ) and ( q 2 , q 3 ) (q_{2},q_{3}) ( q 2 , q 3 ) , we get π 12 m i ⇒ ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ \pi_{12}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma π 12 m i ⇒ ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ and π 23 m i ⇒ ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ \pi_{23}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow(q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma π 23 m i ⇒ ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ on ( X × X , d ) (X\times X,d) ( X × X , d ) .
Step 6 (identification; clause 1). Let f : X × X → R f:X\times X\to\mathbb{R} f : X × X → R be bounded and Lipschitz with constant L L L . It is continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , so f f f and f ∘ ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) f\circ(\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2}) f ∘ ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) are bounded Borel functions, the latter because π 1 , π 2 \pi_{1},\pi_{2} π 1 , π 2 are Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma , T m ∘ π 2 T_{m}\circ\pi_{2} T m ∘ π 2 is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , the pair ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) (\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2}) ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing , and its composite with f f f is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space again (likewise f ∘ ( T m ∘ π 1 , π 2 ) f\circ(T_{m}\circ\pi_{1},\pi_{2}) f ∘ ( T m ∘ π 1 , π 2 ) is Borel, with the roles of the coordinates exchanged); integrable against every member of P ( X × X ) \mathcal{P}(X\times X) P ( X × X ) by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space . For x , y ∈ X x,y\in X x , y ∈ X , by Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric and the inequality 2 m r ≤ m 2 r 2 + 1 2mr\le m^{2}r^{2}+1 2 m r ≤ m 2 r 2 + 1 for real r r r (as ( m r − 1 ) 2 ≥ 0 (mr-1)^{2}\ge0 ( m r − 1 ) 2 ≥ 0 ),
∣ f ( x , T m y ) − f ( x , y ) ∣ ≤ L d ( ( x , T m y ) , ( x , y ) ) = L ∣ T m y − y ∣ ≤ L ( m 2 ∣ T m y − y ∣ 2 + 1 2 m ) . |f(x,T_{m}y)-f(x,y)|\le L\,d\bigl((x,T_{m}y),(x,y)\bigr)=L|T_{m}y-y|\le L\Bigl(\frac{m}{2}|T_{m}y-y|^{2}+\frac{1}{2m}\Bigr). ∣ f ( x , T m y ) − f ( x , y ) ∣ ≤ L d ( ( x , T m y ) , ( x , y ) ) = L ∣ T m y − y ∣ ≤ L ( 2 m ∣ T m y − y ∣ 2 + 2 m 1 ) .
The right side, as a function of z = ( x , y ) z=(x,y) z = ( x , y ) , is L ( m 2 h ( π 2 z ) + 1 2 m ) L(\frac{m}{2}h(\pi_{2}z)+\frac{1}{2m}) L ( 2 m h ( π 2 z ) + 2 m 1 ) with h ( y ) = ∣ T m y − y ∣ 2 h(y)=|T_{m}y-y|^{2} h ( y ) = ∣ T m y − y ∣ 2 Borel (statement of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound ). By change of variables (integrable case, then through π 2 \pi_{2} π 2 with ( π 2 ) # π 12 = λ (\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{12}=\lambda ( π 2 ) # π 12 = λ ), the integral theorem (claim 2 for linearity and for ∣ ∫ g ∣ ≤ ∫ ∣ g ∣ |\int g|\le\int|g| ∣ ∫ g ∣ ≤ ∫ ∣ g ∣ , claim 1 for monotonicity and linearity of nonnegative integrals, the two readings of the integral of the bounded nonnegative function ∣ g ∣ |g| ∣ g ∣ agreeing by claim 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space ), the constant L 2 m \frac{L}{2m} 2 m L having integral L 2 m π 12 ( X × X ) = L 2 m \frac{L}{2m}\,\pi_{12}(X\times X)=\frac{L}{2m} 2 m L π 12 ( X × X ) = 2 m L , the constant times the total mass 1 1 1 , by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , and Step 2,
∣ ∫ f d π 12 m − ∫ f d π 12 ∣ ≤ ∫ ∣ f ∘ ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) − f ∣ d π 12 ≤ L m 2 ∫ X ∣ T m y − y ∣ 2 λ ( d y ) + L 2 m ≤ L m . \Bigl|\int f\,d\pi_{12}^{m}-\int f\,d\pi_{12}\Bigr|\le\int\bigl|f\circ(\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2})-f\bigr|\,d\pi_{12}\le\frac{Lm}{2}\int_{X}|T_{m}y-y|^{2}\,\lambda(dy)+\frac{L}{2m}\le\frac{L}{m}. ∫ f d π 12 m − ∫ f d π 12 ≤ ∫ f ∘ ( π 1 , T m ∘ π 2 ) − f d π 12 ≤ 2 L m ∫ X ∣ T m y − y ∣ 2 λ ( d y ) + 2 m L ≤ m L .
As m i ≥ i m_{i}\ge i m i ≥ i , the integrals ∫ f d π 12 m i \int f\,d\pi_{12}^{m_{i}} ∫ f d π 12 m i converge to ∫ f d π 12 \int f\,d\pi_{12} ∫ f d π 12 , so claim 1 of Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space on ( X × X , d ) (X\times X,d) ( X × X , d ) gives π 12 m i ⇒ π 12 \pi_{12}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow\pi_{12} π 12 m i ⇒ π 12 . The same argument with f ( T m x , y ) − f ( x , y ) f(T_{m}x,y)-f(x,y) f ( T m x , y ) − f ( x , y ) and change of variables through π 1 \pi_{1} π 1 , where ( π 1 ) # π 23 = λ (\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi_{23}=\lambda ( π 1 ) # π 23 = λ , gives π 23 m i ⇒ π 23 \pi_{23}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow\pi_{23} π 23 m i ⇒ π 23 . By claim 2 of Lipschitz Test Functions Determine a Finite Borel Measure, and Uniqueness of Weak Limits on ( X × X , d ) (X\times X,d) ( X × X , d ) and Step 5, ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ = π 12 (q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma=\pi_{12} ( q 1 , q 2 ) # σ = π 12 and ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ = π 23 (q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma=\pi_{23} ( q 2 , q 3 ) # σ = π 23 . This proves clause 1.
Step 7 (clause 2). Let σ \sigma σ be a gluing and γ = ( q 1 , q 3 ) # σ ∈ P ( X × X ) \gamma=(q_{1},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X) γ = ( q 1 , q 3 ) # σ ∈ P ( X × X ) . By the conventions, ( π 1 ) # γ = ( q 1 ) # σ = ( π 1 ) # π 12 = μ (\pi_{1})_{\#}\gamma=(q_{1})_{\#}\sigma=(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi_{12}=\mu ( π 1 ) # γ = ( q 1 ) # σ = ( π 1 ) # π 12 = μ and ( π 2 ) # γ = ( q 3 ) # σ = ( π 2 ) # π 23 = ν (\pi_{2})_{\#}\gamma=(q_{3})_{\#}\sigma=(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{23}=\nu ( π 2 ) # γ = ( q 3 ) # σ = ( π 2 ) # π 23 = ν , so γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) \gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling , and the three costs are real by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §cost-finite . With the Borel function φ ( z ) = ∣ π 1 z − π 2 z ∣ 2 \varphi(z)=|\pi_{1}z-\pi_{2}z|^{2} φ ( z ) = ∣ π 1 z − π 2 z ∣ 2 of Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost , change of variables gives I ( γ ) = ∫ ∣ q 1 − q 3 ∣ 2 d σ I(\gamma)=\int|q_{1}-q_{3}|^{2}\,d\sigma I ( γ ) = ∫ ∣ q 1 − q 3 ∣ 2 d σ , I ( π 12 ) = ∫ ∣ q 1 − q 2 ∣ 2 d σ I(\pi_{12})=\int|q_{1}-q_{2}|^{2}\,d\sigma I ( π 12 ) = ∫ ∣ q 1 − q 2 ∣ 2 d σ and I ( π 23 ) = ∫ ∣ q 2 − q 3 ∣ 2 d σ I(\pi_{23})=\int|q_{2}-q_{3}|^{2}\,d\sigma I ( π 23 ) = ∫ ∣ q 2 − q 3 ∣ 2 d σ . Pointwise q 1 − q 3 = ( q 1 − q 2 ) + ( q 2 − q 3 ) q_{1}-q_{3}=(q_{1}-q_{2})+(q_{2}-q_{3}) q 1 − q 3 = ( q 1 − q 2 ) + ( q 2 − q 3 ) , so by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle , claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and (E1), for every real t > 0 t>0 t > 0 ,
∣ q 1 − q 3 ∣ 2 ≤ ( 1 + t ) ∣ q 1 − q 2 ∣ 2 + ( 1 + t − 1 ) ∣ q 2 − q 3 ∣ 2 on X ( 3 ) . |q_{1}-q_{3}|^{2}\le(1+t)|q_{1}-q_{2}|^{2}+(1+t^{-1})|q_{2}-q_{3}|^{2}\quad\text{on }X_{(3)} . ∣ q 1 − q 3 ∣ 2 ≤ ( 1 + t ) ∣ q 1 − q 2 ∣ 2 + ( 1 + t − 1 ) ∣ q 2 − q 3 ∣ 2 on X ( 3 ) .
Integrating by claim 1 of the integral theorem, I ( γ ) ≤ ( 1 + t ) I ( π 12 ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) I ( π 23 ) I(\gamma)\le(1+t)I(\pi_{12})+(1+t^{-1})I(\pi_{23}) I ( γ ) ≤ ( 1 + t ) I ( π 12 ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) I ( π 23 ) for every t > 0 t>0 t > 0 , and (E2) gives clause 2.
Step 8 (clause 3). Let π 12 ∈ Π a ( μ , λ ) \pi_{12}\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\lambda) π 12 ∈ Π a ( μ , λ ) , π 23 ∈ Π a ( λ , ν ) \pi_{23}\in\Pi^{a}(\lambda,\nu) π 23 ∈ Π a ( λ , ν ) , σ \sigma σ a gluing and γ \gamma γ as in Step 7, so γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) \gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) . With D a D_{a} D a , n a n_{a} n a and c a c_{a} c a of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel and The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §pairs , the sets G 12 = ( q 1 , q 2 ) − 1 ( D a ) = { w : q 2 w − q 1 w ∈ X a } G_{12}=(q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(D_{a})=\{w:q_{2}w-q_{1}w\in X^{a}\} G 12 = ( q 1 , q 2 ) − 1 ( D a ) = { w : q 2 w − q 1 w ∈ X a } and G 23 = ( q 2 , q 3 ) − 1 ( D a ) = { w : q 3 w − q 2 w ∈ X a } G_{23}=(q_{2},q_{3})^{-1}(D_{a})=\{w:q_{3}w-q_{2}w\in X^{a}\} G 23 = ( q 2 , q 3 ) − 1 ( D a ) = { w : q 3 w − q 2 w ∈ X a } are Borel, and σ ( G 12 ) = π 12 ( D a ) = 1 \sigma(G_{12})=\pi_{12}(D_{a})=1 σ ( G 12 ) = π 12 ( D a ) = 1 and σ ( G 23 ) = π 23 ( D a ) = 1 \sigma(G_{23})=\pi_{23}(D_{a})=1 σ ( G 23 ) = π 23 ( D a ) = 1 by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite . Let G = G 12 ∩ G 23 G=G_{12}\cap G_{23} G = G 12 ∩ G 23 ; its complement is the union of two σ \sigma σ -null sets (Basic Properties of a Measure §differences ), so σ ( X ( 3 ) ∖ G ) = 0 \sigma(X_{(3)}\setminus G)=0 σ ( X ( 3 ) ∖ G ) = 0 by Basic Properties of a Measure §subadditivity and σ ( G ) = 1 \sigma(G)=1 σ ( G ) = 1 . For w ∈ G w\in G w ∈ G , q 3 w − q 1 w = ( q 3 w − q 2 w ) + ( q 2 w − q 1 w ) ∈ X a q_{3}w-q_{1}w=(q_{3}w-q_{2}w)+(q_{2}w-q_{1}w)\in X^{a} q 3 w − q 1 w = ( q 3 w − q 2 w ) + ( q 2 w − q 1 w ) ∈ X a , a linear subspace by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert ; so G ⊆ ( q 1 , q 3 ) − 1 ( D a ) G\subseteq(q_{1},q_{3})^{-1}(D_{a}) G ⊆ ( q 1 , q 3 ) − 1 ( D a ) and γ ( D a ) = 1 \gamma(D_{a})=1 γ ( D a ) = 1 by Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone . Moreover, for w ∈ G w\in G w ∈ G and real t > 0 t>0 t > 0 , by the definition of n a n_{a} n a , The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle in the real inner product space ( X a , ⟨ ⋅ , ⋅ ⟩ a ) (X^{a},\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{a}) ( X a , ⟨ ⋅ , ⋅ ⟩ a ) of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert , claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and (E1),
c a ( ( q 1 , q 3 ) w ) = ∣ q 3 w − q 1 w ∣ a 2 ≤ ( 1 + t ) c a ( ( q 1 , q 2 ) w ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) c a ( ( q 2 , q 3 ) w ) , c_{a}\bigl((q_{1},q_{3})w\bigr)=|q_{3}w-q_{1}w|_{a}^{2}\le(1+t)\,c_{a}\bigl((q_{1},q_{2})w\bigr)+(1+t^{-1})\,c_{a}\bigl((q_{2},q_{3})w\bigr), c a ( ( q 1 , q 3 ) w ) = ∣ q 3 w − q 1 w ∣ a 2 ≤ ( 1 + t ) c a ( ( q 1 , q 2 ) w ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) c a ( ( q 2 , q 3 ) w ) ,
where c a ( ( q i , q j ) w ) = n a ( q j w − q i w ) c_{a}((q_{i},q_{j})w)=n_{a}(q_{j}w-q_{i}w) c a (( q i , q j ) w ) = n a ( q j w − q i w ) . All three functions are nonnegative and Borel, as composites of Borel maps (claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space ), and the inequality holds σ \sigma σ -almost everywhere. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison , claim 1 of the integral theorem and change of variables,
∫ X × X c a d γ ≤ ( 1 + t ) ∫ c a d π 12 + ( 1 + t − 1 ) ∫ c a d π 23 = ( 1 + t ) I a ( π 12 ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) I a ( π 23 ) < ∞ , \int_{X\times X}c_{a}\,d\gamma\le(1+t)\int c_{a}\,d\pi_{12}+(1+t^{-1})\int c_{a}\,d\pi_{23}=(1+t)I^{a}(\pi_{12})+(1+t^{-1})I^{a}(\pi_{23})<\infty, ∫ X × X c a d γ ≤ ( 1 + t ) ∫ c a d π 12 + ( 1 + t − 1 ) ∫ c a d π 23 = ( 1 + t ) I a ( π 12 ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) I a ( π 23 ) < ∞ ,
using Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §cost . Hence γ \gamma γ has finite noise cost by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite , γ ∈ Π a ( μ , ν ) \gamma\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\nu) γ ∈ Π a ( μ , ν ) by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings , and I a ( γ ) ≤ ( 1 + t ) I a ( π 12 ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) I a ( π 23 ) I^{a}(\gamma)\le(1+t)I^{a}(\pi_{12})+(1+t^{-1})I^{a}(\pi_{23}) I a ( γ ) ≤ ( 1 + t ) I a ( π 12 ) + ( 1 + t − 1 ) I a ( π 23 ) for every t > 0 t>0 t > 0 ; (E2) gives clause 3.