TheoremBase

Two couplings over a finitely supported middle marginal are glued explicitly, atom by atom, with product measures; in general the middle marginal is quantised, the quantised couplings are glued, the gluings form a tight sequence on the threefold product, and a weak subsequential limit is a gluing of the original couplings. The two triangle inequalities follow by integrating a pointwise bound (r+s)^2 <= (1+t)r^2+(1+1/t)s^2 against the gluing and optimising over t.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Conventions. "Change of variables" is claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, for the push-forwards of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward and of the statement; "the integral theorem" is Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. For measurable maps GG and HH the image measures of claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables satisfy (H∘G)#τ=H#(G#τ)(H\circ G)_{\#}\tau=H_{\#}(G_{\#}\tau), both sides assigning to BB the value τ(G−1(H−1(B)))\tau(G^{-1}(H^{-1}(B))), and G#τG_{\#}\tau has the total mass of τ\tau. For maps S,TS,T into XX one has π1∘(S,T)=S\pi_{1}\circ(S,T)=S and π2∘(S,T)=T\pi_{2}\circ(S,T)=T, and a pair is determined by its coordinates, by The Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §notation; in particular π1∘(q1,q2)=q1=π1∘(q1,q3)\pi_{1}\circ(q_{1},q_{2})=q_{1}=\pi_{1}\circ(q_{1},q_{3}), π2∘(q1,q2)=q2=π1∘(q2,q3)\pi_{2}\circ(q_{1},q_{2})=q_{2}=\pi_{1}\circ(q_{2},q_{3}) and π2∘(q2,q3)=q3=π2∘(q1,q3)\pi_{2}\circ(q_{2},q_{3})=q_{3}=\pi_{2}\circ(q_{1},q_{3}), and w=((q1w,q2w),q3w)w=((q_{1}w,q_{2}w),q_{3}w), so (q1,q2)(w)(q_{1},q_{2})(w) is the first coordinate of ww in (X×X)×X(X\times X)\times X. Measure-theoretic facts are those of Basic Properties of a Measure, cited by anchor. Applying Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric to X×XX\times X and then to X(3)X_{(3)}, for w=((u,v),s)w=((u,v),s) and w′=((u′,v′),s′)w'=((u',v'),s'),

d(w,w′)2=∣u−u′∣2+∣v−v′∣2+∣s−s′∣2.(M)d(w,w')^{2}=|u-u'|^{2}+|v-v'|^{2}+|s-s'|^{2}. \tag{M}

Hence (q1,q2)(q_{1},q_{2}) and (q2,q3)(q_{2},q_{3}) are Lipschitz with constant 11 from (X(3),d)(X_{(3)},d) to (X×X,d)(X\times X,d), so continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous. For p∈Xp\in X let ψp:X×X→X(3)\psi_{p}:X\times X\to X_{(3)}, ψp(x,s)=((x,p),s)\psi_{p}(x,s)=((x,p),s), and ιp,ιp′:X→X×X\iota_{p},\iota'_{p}:X\to X\times X, ιp(x)=(x,p)\iota_{p}(x)=(x,p), ιp′(s)=(p,s)\iota'_{p}(s)=(p,s). By (M) and Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric these maps preserve distances, so they are continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

Two real inequalities. (E1) For real r,s≥0r,s\ge0 and t>0t>0, (r+s)2≤(1+t)r2+(1+t−1)s2(r+s)^{2}\le(1+t)r^{2}+(1+t^{-1})s^{2}, since the difference is (tr−s)2/t≥0(tr-s)^{2}/t\ge0. (E2) Let A,B,C≥0A,B,C\ge0 be real with C≤(1+t)A+(1+t−1)BC\le(1+t)A+(1+t^{-1})B for every real t>0t>0. Then C≤A+B\sqrt{C}\le\sqrt{A}+\sqrt{B} (square roots of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root). Indeed, if A>0A>0 and B>0B>0, the choice t=B/At=\sqrt{B}/\sqrt{A} gives C≤A+2AB+B=(A+B)2C\le A+2\sqrt{A}\sqrt{B}+B=(\sqrt{A}+\sqrt{B})^{2}. If A=0A=0, then C≤BC\le B: otherwise C>BC>B, and t=1t=1 excludes B=0B=0, while for B>0B>0 the choice t=2B/(C−B)t=2B/(C-B) gives C≤B+(C−B)/2<CC\le B+(C-B)/2<C. If B=0B=0, then likewise C≤AC\le A: otherwise C>AC>A, A=0A=0 is excluded by the case just treated, and for A>0A>0 the choice t=(C−A)/(2A)t=(C-A)/(2A) gives C≤A+(C−A)/2<CC\le A+(C-A)/2<C. In all cases C≤(A+B)2C\le(\sqrt{A}+\sqrt{B})^{2}, and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives the assertion.

Step 1 (gluing over a finitely supported middle marginal). Let λ′∈P(X)\lambda'\in\mathcal{P}(X) with λ′(X∖F)=0\lambda'(X\setminus F)=0 for a finite F⊆XF\subseteq X, and let π12′∈Π(μ,λ′)\pi'_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\lambda') and π23′∈Π(λ′,ν)\pi'_{23}\in\Pi(\lambda',\nu). We construct σ′∈P(X(3))\sigma'\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) with (q1,q2)#σ′=π12′(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma'=\pi'_{12} and (q2,q3)#σ′=π23′(q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma'=\pi'_{23}. Finite subsets of XX and their complements are Borel, as recorded in the statement of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound. Let F+={p∈F:0<λ′({p})}F_{+}=\{p\in F:0<\lambda'(\{p\})\}, finite by claim 3 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and rp=λ′({p})r_{p}=\lambda'(\{p\}) for p∈F+p\in F_{+}. The finite set F∖F+F\setminus F_{+} is either empty, in which case λ′(F∖F+)=0\lambda'(F\setminus F_{+})=0 trivially, or a finite disjoint union of λ′\lambda'-null singletons, so that λ′(F∖F+)=0\lambda'(F\setminus F_{+})=0 by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity; whence λ′(X∖F+)=λ′(X∖F)+λ′(F∖F+)=0\lambda'(X\setminus F_{+})=\lambda'(X\setminus F)+\lambda'(F\setminus F_{+})=0 by the same claim, λ′(F+)=1\lambda'(F_{+})=1 by Basic Properties of a Measure §differences, and F+≠∅F_{+}\neq\varnothing, since λ′(F+)=1≠0=λ′(∅)\lambda'(F_{+})=1\neq0=\lambda'(\varnothing). By the marginal conditions of Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling,

π12′(π2−1(X∖F+))=0=π23′(π1−1(X∖F+)).(N)\pi'_{12}\bigl(\pi_{2}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+})\bigr)=0=\pi'_{23}\bigl(\pi_{1}^{-1}(X\setminus F_{+})\bigr). \tag{N}

For p∈F+p\in F_{+} and A,C∈B(X)A,C\in\mathcal{B}(X) put αp(A)=π12′(π1−1(A)∩π2−1({p}))\alpha_{p}(A)=\pi'_{12}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(A)\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(\{p\})) and βp(C)=π23′(π1−1({p})∩π2−1(C))\beta_{p}(C)=\pi'_{23}(\pi_{1}^{-1}(\{p\})\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(C)). Preimages and intersection with a fixed Borel set preserve countable disjoint unions, so αp,βp\alpha_{p},\beta_{p} are Borel measures on (X,d)(X,d) (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure), with αp(X)=λ′({p})=rp=βp(X)\alpha_{p}(X)=\lambda'(\{p\})=r_{p}=\beta_{p}(X) by the marginal conditions. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-measure the product measure θp=αp⊗βp\theta_{p}=\alpha_{p}\otimes\beta_{p} is a Borel measure on X×XX\times X, and θp(A×C)=αp(A)βp(C)\theta_{p}(A\times C)=\alpha_{p}(A)\beta_{p}(C) for A,C∈B(X)A,C\in\mathcal{B}(X) by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, as B(X×X)=B(X)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(X\times X)=\mathcal{B}(X)\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma. Define, for W∈B(X(3))W\in\mathcal{B}(X_{(3)}),

σ′(W)=∑p∈F+rp−1 θp(ψp−1(W)).\sigma'(W)=\sum_{p\in F_{+}}r_{p}^{-1}\,\theta_{p}\bigl(\psi_{p}^{-1}(W)\bigr).

Each summand is a positive multiple of the image measure (ψp)#θp(\psi_{p})_{\#}\theta_{p}, and a finite sum of measures with positive real coefficients is a measure (series of nonnegative terms add termwise in [0,∞][0,\infty]), so σ′\sigma' is a Borel measure on X(3)X_{(3)}, with σ′(X(3))=∑prp−1αp(X)βp(X)=∑pλ′({p})=λ′(F+)=1\sigma'(X_{(3)})=\sum_{p}r_{p}^{-1}\alpha_{p}(X)\beta_{p}(X)=\sum_{p}\lambda'(\{p\})=\lambda'(F_{+})=1 by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity. Thus σ′∈P(X(3))\sigma'\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}).

Let E∈B(X×X)E\in\mathcal{B}(X\times X) and p∈F+p\in F_{+}. Since (q1,q2)(ψp(x,s))=(x,p)(q_{1},q_{2})(\psi_{p}(x,s))=(x,p), one has ψp−1((q1,q2)−1(E))=Ep×X\psi_{p}^{-1}((q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(E))=E^{p}\times X with Ep=ιp−1(E)∈B(X)E^{p}=\iota_{p}^{-1}(E)\in\mathcal{B}(X), so θp(ψp−1((q1,q2)−1(E)))=rp αp(Ep)\theta_{p}(\psi_{p}^{-1}((q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(E)))=r_{p}\,\alpha_{p}(E^{p}); and a pair zz with π2(z)=p\pi_{2}(z)=p equals (π1(z),p)(\pi_{1}(z),p), so π1−1(Ep)∩π2−1({p})=E∩π2−1({p})\pi_{1}^{-1}(E^{p})\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(\{p\})=E\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(\{p\}). These sets are pairwise disjoint for p∈F+p\in F_{+} with union E∩π2−1(F+)E\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+}), so by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity, Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone and (N),

((q1,q2)#σ′)(E)=∑p∈F+αp(Ep)=π12′(E∩π2−1(F+))=π12′(E).\bigl((q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma'\bigr)(E)=\sum_{p\in F_{+}}\alpha_{p}(E^{p})=\pi'_{12}\bigl(E\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(F_{+})\bigr)=\pi'_{12}(E).

Likewise (q2,q3)(ψp(x,s))=(p,s)(q_{2},q_{3})(\psi_{p}(x,s))=(p,s), so ψp−1((q2,q3)−1(E))=X×Ep\psi_{p}^{-1}((q_{2},q_{3})^{-1}(E))=X\times E_{p} with Ep=(ιp′)−1(E)E_{p}=(\iota'_{p})^{-1}(E), its θp\theta_{p}-measure is rpβp(Ep)r_{p}\beta_{p}(E_{p}), π1−1({p})∩π2−1(Ep)=E∩π1−1({p})\pi_{1}^{-1}(\{p\})\cap\pi_{2}^{-1}(E_{p})=E\cap\pi_{1}^{-1}(\{p\}), and the same computation with (N) gives ((q2,q3)#σ′)(E)=π23′(E)((q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma')(E)=\pi'_{23}(E).

Step 2 (quantisation). Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §quantisation, applied to λ∈P2(X)\lambda\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) with ε=1/m\varepsilon=1/m, choose a Borel Tm:X→XT_{m}:X\to X with finite image Fm=Tm(X)F_{m}=T_{m}(X) and ∫X∣Tm(y)−y∣2 λ(dy)≤m−2\int_{X}|T_{m}(y)-y|^{2}\,\lambda(dy)\le m^{-2}; by the same clause λm=(Tm)#λ∈P(X)\lambda_{m}=(T_{m})_{\#}\lambda\in\mathcal{P}(X) satisfies λm(X∖Fm)=0\lambda_{m}(X\setminus F_{m})=0. By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §modification, π12m=(π1,Tm∘π2)#π12∈Π(μ,λm)\pi_{12}^{m}=(\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\lambda_{m}) and π23m=(Tm∘π1,π2)#π23∈Π(λm,ν)\pi_{23}^{m}=(T_{m}\circ\pi_{1},\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{23}\in\Pi(\lambda_{m},\nu). Step 1, with λ′=λm\lambda'=\lambda_{m} and F=FmF=F_{m}, gives σm∈P(X(3))\sigma_{m}\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) with (q1,q2)#σm=π12m(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma_{m}=\pi_{12}^{m} and (q2,q3)#σm=π23m(q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma_{m}=\pi_{23}^{m}.

Step 3 (the quantised middle marginals are tight). By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §pushforward with S=idXS=\mathrm{id}_{X} and T=TmT=T_{m}, the coupling (idX,Tm)#λ∈Π(λ,λm)(\mathrm{id}_{X},T_{m})_{\#}\lambda\in\Pi(\lambda,\lambda_{m}) has cost ∫∣y−Tm(y)∣2λ(dy)≤m−2\int|y-T_{m}(y)|^{2}\lambda(dy)\le m^{-2}, as ∣y−Tm(y)∣=∣Tm(y)−y∣|y-T_{m}(y)|=|T_{m}(y)-y|. So λm∈P2(X)\lambda_{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by the converse part of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §cost-finite, and W2(λ,λm)2≤m−2W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda_{m})^{2}\le m^{-2} by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance, whence W2(λ,λm)≤1/mW_{2}(\lambda,\lambda_{m})\le1/m by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. By The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §symmetry and The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §triangle, W2(λm,λℓ)≤1/m+1/ℓW_{2}(\lambda_{m},\lambda_{\ell})\le1/m+1/\ell; given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0 and N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with 2/N<ε2/N<\varepsilon, this is <ε<\varepsilon for m,ℓ≥Nm,\ell\ge N, so (λm)(\lambda_{m}) is a Cauchy sequence in (P2(X),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(X),W_{2}) by Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space, and it is tight in (X,d)(X,d) by Cauchy Sequences in the Quadratic Wasserstein Space and Weakly Convergent Sequences on a Hilbert Space are Tight §tight.

Step 4 (the gluings are tight). Fix a real ε>0\varepsilon>0; first K1K_{1}, then K3K_{3} is chosen. The sets {μ}\{\mu\} (by Ulam's Theorem: a Finite Borel Measure on a Complete Separable Metric Space is Tight §tight, (X,d)(X,d) being complete and separable by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space) and {λm:m∈N}\{\lambda_{m}:m\in\mathbb{N}\} (by Step 3 and Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence) are tight, so by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Tightness, Closedness under Weak Convergence, and Lower Semicontinuity of the Quadratic Cost §tight and Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §tight there is a compact K1⊆X×XK_{1}\subseteq X\times X with π12m((X×X)∖K1)≤ε/2\pi_{12}^{m}((X\times X)\setminus K_{1})\le\varepsilon/2 for every mm. By Ulam's Theorem: a Finite Borel Measure on a Complete Separable Metric Space is Tight §tight choose a compact K3⊆XK_{3}\subseteq X with ν(X∖K3)≤ε/2\nu(X\setminus K_{3})\le\varepsilon/2. By A Product of Compact Subsets is Compact in the Product Metric, applied to (X×X,d)(X\times X,d) and (X,d)(X,d), the set K1×K3K_{1}\times K_{3} is compact for the topology of the product metric, which by Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric (with E1=X×XE_{1}=X\times X, E2=XE_{2}=X) has the same open sets as (X(3),d)(X_{(3)},d); compactness depending only on the topology (Compact Topological Space and Compact Subset), K1×K3K_{1}\times K_{3} is compact in (X(3),d)(X_{(3)},d). The sets (X×X)∖K1(X\times X)\setminus K_{1} and X∖K3X\setminus K_{3} are Borel by Compact Subsets of a Metric Space are Closed and Borel §borel, and a point ww lies outside K1×K3K_{1}\times K_{3} exactly when (q1,q2)(w)∉K1(q_{1},q_{2})(w)\notin K_{1} or q3(w)∉K3q_{3}(w)\notin K_{3}. Since q3=π2∘(q2,q3)q_{3}=\pi_{2}\circ(q_{2},q_{3}), one has (q3)#σm=(π2)#π23m=ν(q_{3})_{\#}\sigma_{m}=(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{23}^{m}=\nu. By Basic Properties of a Measure §subadditivity (padding with empty sets),

σm(X(3)∖(K1×K3))≤π12m((X×X)∖K1)+ν(X∖K3)≤ε\sigma_{m}\bigl(X_{(3)}\setminus(K_{1}\times K_{3})\bigr)\le\pi_{12}^{m}\bigl((X\times X)\setminus K_{1}\bigr)+\nu(X\setminus K_{3})\le\varepsilon

for every mm, so (σm)(\sigma_{m}) is tight in (X(3),d)(X_{(3)},d) by Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence.

Step 5 (a weak limit). By Prokhorov's Theorem on a Metric Space: a Tight Sequence of Borel Probability Measures Has a Weakly Convergent Subsequence §subsequence on (X(3),d)(X_{(3)},d) there are a strictly increasing (mi)i∈N(m_{i})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} and σ∈P(X(3))\sigma\in\mathcal{P}(X_{(3)}) with σmi⇒σ\sigma_{m_{i}}\Rightarrow\sigma. By Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures is Preserved by Continuous Maps between Metric Spaces §weak, applied to the continuous maps (q1,q2)(q_{1},q_{2}) and (q2,q3)(q_{2},q_{3}), we get π12mi⇒(q1,q2)#σ\pi_{12}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma and π23mi⇒(q2,q3)#σ\pi_{23}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow(q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma on (X×X,d)(X\times X,d).

Step 6 (identification; clause 1). Let f:X×X→Rf:X\times X\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and Lipschitz with constant LL. It is continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, so ff and f∘(π1,Tm∘π2)f\circ(\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2}) are bounded Borel functions, the latter because π1,π2\pi_{1},\pi_{2} are Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma, Tm∘π2T_{m}\circ\pi_{2} is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, the pair (π1,Tm∘π2)(\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2}) is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, and its composite with ff is Borel by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space again (likewise f∘(Tm∘π1,π2)f\circ(T_{m}\circ\pi_{1},\pi_{2}) is Borel, with the roles of the coordinates exchanged); integrable against every member of P(X×X)\mathcal{P}(X\times X) by claim 6 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For x,y∈Xx,y\in X, by Properties of the Product of Two Real Inner Product Spaces §metric and the inequality 2mr≤m2r2+12mr\le m^{2}r^{2}+1 for real rr (as (mr−1)2≥0(mr-1)^{2}\ge0),

∣f(x,Tmy)−f(x,y)∣≤L d((x,Tmy),(x,y))=L∣Tmy−y∣≤L(m2∣Tmy−y∣2+12m).|f(x,T_{m}y)-f(x,y)|\le L\,d\bigl((x,T_{m}y),(x,y)\bigr)=L|T_{m}y-y|\le L\Bigl(\frac{m}{2}|T_{m}y-y|^{2}+\frac{1}{2m}\Bigr).

The right side, as a function of z=(x,y)z=(x,y), is L(m2h(π2z)+12m)L(\frac{m}{2}h(\pi_{2}z)+\frac{1}{2m}) with h(y)=∣Tmy−y∣2h(y)=|T_{m}y-y|^{2} Borel (statement of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound). By change of variables (integrable case, then through π2\pi_{2} with (π2)#π12=λ(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{12}=\lambda), the integral theorem (claim 2 for linearity and for ∣∫g∣≤∫∣g∣|\int g|\le\int|g|, claim 1 for monotonicity and linearity of nonnegative integrals, the two readings of the integral of the bounded nonnegative function ∣g∣|g| agreeing by claim 6(c) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), the constant L2m\frac{L}{2m} having integral L2m π12(X×X)=L2m\frac{L}{2m}\,\pi_{12}(X\times X)=\frac{L}{2m}, the constant times the total mass 11, by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and Step 2,

∣∫f dπ12m−∫f dπ12∣≤∫∣f∘(π1,Tm∘π2)−f∣ dπ12≤Lm2∫X∣Tmy−y∣2 λ(dy)+L2m≤Lm.\Bigl|\int f\,d\pi_{12}^{m}-\int f\,d\pi_{12}\Bigr|\le\int\bigl|f\circ(\pi_{1},T_{m}\circ\pi_{2})-f\bigr|\,d\pi_{12}\le\frac{Lm}{2}\int_{X}|T_{m}y-y|^{2}\,\lambda(dy)+\frac{L}{2m}\le\frac{L}{m}.

As mi≥im_{i}\ge i, the integrals ∫f dπ12mi\int f\,d\pi_{12}^{m_{i}} converge to ∫f dπ12\int f\,d\pi_{12}, so claim 1 of Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space on (X×X,d)(X\times X,d) gives π12mi⇒π12\pi_{12}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow\pi_{12}. The same argument with f(Tmx,y)−f(x,y)f(T_{m}x,y)-f(x,y) and change of variables through π1\pi_{1}, where (π1)#π23=λ(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi_{23}=\lambda, gives π23mi⇒π23\pi_{23}^{m_{i}}\Rightarrow\pi_{23}. By claim 2 of Lipschitz Test Functions Determine a Finite Borel Measure, and Uniqueness of Weak Limits on (X×X,d)(X\times X,d) and Step 5, (q1,q2)#σ=π12(q_{1},q_{2})_{\#}\sigma=\pi_{12} and (q2,q3)#σ=π23(q_{2},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma=\pi_{23}. This proves clause 1.

Step 7 (clause 2). Let σ\sigma be a gluing and γ=(q1,q3)#σ∈P(X×X)\gamma=(q_{1},q_{3})_{\#}\sigma\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X). By the conventions, (π1)#γ=(q1)#σ=(π1)#π12=μ(\pi_{1})_{\#}\gamma=(q_{1})_{\#}\sigma=(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi_{12}=\mu and (π2)#γ=(q3)#σ=(π2)#π23=ν(\pi_{2})_{\#}\gamma=(q_{3})_{\#}\sigma=(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi_{23}=\nu, so γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) by Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling, and the three costs are real by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §cost-finite. With the Borel function φ(z)=∣π1z−π2z∣2\varphi(z)=|\pi_{1}z-\pi_{2}z|^{2} of Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost, change of variables gives I(γ)=∫∣q1−q3∣2 dσI(\gamma)=\int|q_{1}-q_{3}|^{2}\,d\sigma, I(π12)=∫∣q1−q2∣2 dσI(\pi_{12})=\int|q_{1}-q_{2}|^{2}\,d\sigma and I(π23)=∫∣q2−q3∣2 dσI(\pi_{23})=\int|q_{2}-q_{3}|^{2}\,d\sigma. Pointwise q1−q3=(q1−q2)+(q2−q3)q_{1}-q_{3}=(q_{1}-q_{2})+(q_{2}-q_{3}), so by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and (E1), for every real t>0t>0,

∣q1−q3∣2≤(1+t)∣q1−q2∣2+(1+t−1)∣q2−q3∣2on X(3).|q_{1}-q_{3}|^{2}\le(1+t)|q_{1}-q_{2}|^{2}+(1+t^{-1})|q_{2}-q_{3}|^{2}\quad\text{on }X_{(3)} .

Integrating by claim 1 of the integral theorem, I(γ)≤(1+t)I(π12)+(1+t−1)I(π23)I(\gamma)\le(1+t)I(\pi_{12})+(1+t^{-1})I(\pi_{23}) for every t>0t>0, and (E2) gives clause 2.

Step 8 (clause 3). Let π12∈Πa(μ,λ)\pi_{12}\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\lambda), π23∈Πa(λ,ν)\pi_{23}\in\Pi^{a}(\lambda,\nu), σ\sigma a gluing and γ\gamma as in Step 7, so γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu). With DaD_{a}, nan_{a} and cac_{a} of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel and The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §pairs, the sets G12=(q1,q2)−1(Da)={w:q2w−q1w∈Xa}G_{12}=(q_{1},q_{2})^{-1}(D_{a})=\{w:q_{2}w-q_{1}w\in X^{a}\} and G23=(q2,q3)−1(Da)={w:q3w−q2w∈Xa}G_{23}=(q_{2},q_{3})^{-1}(D_{a})=\{w:q_{3}w-q_{2}w\in X^{a}\} are Borel, and σ(G12)=π12(Da)=1\sigma(G_{12})=\pi_{12}(D_{a})=1 and σ(G23)=π23(Da)=1\sigma(G_{23})=\pi_{23}(D_{a})=1 by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite. Let G=G12∩G23G=G_{12}\cap G_{23}; its complement is the union of two σ\sigma-null sets (Basic Properties of a Measure §differences), so σ(X(3)∖G)=0\sigma(X_{(3)}\setminus G)=0 by Basic Properties of a Measure §subadditivity and σ(G)=1\sigma(G)=1. For w∈Gw\in G, q3w−q1w=(q3w−q2w)+(q2w−q1w)∈Xaq_{3}w-q_{1}w=(q_{3}w-q_{2}w)+(q_{2}w-q_{1}w)\in X^{a}, a linear subspace by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert; so G⊆(q1,q3)−1(Da)G\subseteq(q_{1},q_{3})^{-1}(D_{a}) and γ(Da)=1\gamma(D_{a})=1 by Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone. Moreover, for w∈Gw\in G and real t>0t>0, by the definition of nan_{a}, The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle in the real inner product space (Xa,⟨⋅,⋅⟩a)(X^{a},\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{a}) of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and (E1),

ca((q1,q3)w)=∣q3w−q1w∣a2≤(1+t) ca((q1,q2)w)+(1+t−1) ca((q2,q3)w),c_{a}\bigl((q_{1},q_{3})w\bigr)=|q_{3}w-q_{1}w|_{a}^{2}\le(1+t)\,c_{a}\bigl((q_{1},q_{2})w\bigr)+(1+t^{-1})\,c_{a}\bigl((q_{2},q_{3})w\bigr),

where ca((qi,qj)w)=na(qjw−qiw)c_{a}((q_{i},q_{j})w)=n_{a}(q_{j}w-q_{i}w). All three functions are nonnegative and Borel, as composites of Borel maps (claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), and the inequality holds σ\sigma-almost everywhere. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison, claim 1 of the integral theorem and change of variables,

∫X×Xca dγ≤(1+t)∫ca dπ12+(1+t−1)∫ca dπ23=(1+t)Ia(π12)+(1+t−1)Ia(π23)<∞,\int_{X\times X}c_{a}\,d\gamma\le(1+t)\int c_{a}\,d\pi_{12}+(1+t^{-1})\int c_{a}\,d\pi_{23}=(1+t)I^{a}(\pi_{12})+(1+t^{-1})I^{a}(\pi_{23})<\infty,

using Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §cost. Hence γ\gamma has finite noise cost by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite, γ∈Πa(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi^{a}(\mu,\nu) by Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings, and Ia(γ)≤(1+t)Ia(π12)+(1+t−1)Ia(π23)I^{a}(\gamma)\le(1+t)I^{a}(\pi_{12})+(1+t^{-1})I^{a}(\pi_{23}) for every t>0t>0; (E2) gives clause 3.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…