TheoremBase

Proof of Orthonormal Expansion and Parseval's Identity in Finite Dimensions

theoremthm:orthonormal-expansion-parseval-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of thm:orthonormal-expansion-parseval-2026b. Carried over from the proof of the 2026a version with coefficient families written as n-tuples in C^n, an opening note recording that an n-tuple is a map on [n], and references updated to def:orthonormal-family-2026b, def:orthonormal-basis-2026b and lem:orthonormal-family-properties-2026b. No step of the argument changed.

Proof

Throughout, [n][n] is the initial segment determined by nn, and by the definition of a tuple an nn-tuple in a set XX is a map from [n][n] to XX.

Claim 1. Suppose first that ee is an orthonormal basis of VV. Then ee is a basis, so in particular it spans VV. Let u∈Vu\in V. By the spanning property there is c∈Cnc\in\mathbb{C}^{n} with u=βˆ‘k=1nckeku=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}e_{k}. Applying claim 1 of Elementary Properties of an Orthonormal Family to this tuple gives, for every j∈[n]j\in[n],

cj=⟨ej,βˆ‘k=1nckek⟩=⟨ej,u⟩.c_{j}=\Bigl\langle e_{j},\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}e_{k}\Bigr\rangle=\langle e_{j},u\rangle .

Thus cc coincides with the nn-tuple in C\mathbb{C} whose kk-th component is ⟨ek,u⟩\langle e_{k},u\rangle, and therefore u=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,u⟩eku=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle e_{k},u\rangle e_{k}.

Conversely, suppose that u=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,u⟩eku=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle e_{k},u\rangle e_{k} for every u∈Vu\in V. Then for each u∈Vu\in V the nn-tuple c∈Cnc\in\mathbb{C}^{n} given by ck=⟨ek,u⟩c_{k}=\langle e_{k},u\rangle satisfies u=βˆ‘k=1nckeku=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}e_{k}, so ee spans VV in the sense of Finite Family Spanning a Vector Space. By claim 3 of Elementary Properties of an Orthonormal Family the tuple ee is linearly independent. Hence ee is a basis of VV by Finite Basis of a Vector Space, and since it is by hypothesis orthonormal, it is an orthonormal basis by Orthonormal Basis of a Complex Inner Product Space.

Claim 2. Assume ee is an orthonormal basis and let u,w∈Vu,w\in V. By claim 1, u=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,u⟩eku=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle e_{k},u\rangle e_{k}. Applying the second identity of claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, with the scalars ck=⟨ek,u⟩c_{k}=\langle e_{k},u\rangle and the vectors eke_{k}, gives

⟨u,w⟩=βŸ¨βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,u⟩ek, w⟩=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,uβŸ©β€Ύβ€‰βŸ¨ek,w⟩.\langle u,w\rangle=\Bigl\langle \sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle e_{k},u\rangle e_{k},\,w\Bigr\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\overline{\langle e_{k},u\rangle}\,\langle e_{k},w\rangle .

Taking w=uw=u yields

⟨u,u⟩=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,uβŸ©β€Ύβ€‰βŸ¨ek,u⟩.\langle u,u\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\overline{\langle e_{k},u\rangle}\,\langle e_{k},u\rangle .

By claim 3 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus we have zβ€Ύz=∣z∣2\overline{z}z=|z|^{2} for every complex number zz, so the nn-tuples in C\mathbb{C} with components ⟨ek,uβŸ©β€ΎβŸ¨ek,u⟩\overline{\langle e_{k},u\rangle}\langle e_{k},u\rangle and ∣⟨ek,u⟩∣2|\langle e_{k},u\rangle|^{2} coincide and hence have the same finite sum. Since βˆ₯uβˆ₯2=⟨u,u⟩\lVert u\rVert^{2}=\langle u,u\rangle by the definition of the induced norm, this gives βˆ₯uβˆ₯2=βˆ‘k=1n∣⟨ek,u⟩∣2\lVert u\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}|\langle e_{k},u\rangle|^{2}.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…