TheoremBase

The negations are the ring negatives because they satisfy the defining equation and negatives are unique, and the facts about natural numbers follow by composing the embeddings of the naturals into the integers and of the integers into the rationals. The fraction formula follows by multiplying the known identity for a fraction times the image of its denominator by the reciprocal of that image.

Proof

By The Integers Form an Ordered Ring Containing the Natural Numbers as Its Positive Elements §ring, Z\mathbb{Z}, with ++, ⋅\cdot, 0Z0_{\mathbb{Z}} and 1Z1_{\mathbb{Z}}, is a commutative ring. By The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §ordered-field, Q\mathbb{Q}, with ++, ⋅\cdot, 0Q0_{\mathbb{Q}}, 1Q1_{\mathbb{Q}} and ≤\le, is an ordered field; so by Ordered Fields §ordered-field it is a field, and by Fields §field a commutative ring. For u,vu,v both in Z\mathbb{Z} or both in Q\mathbb{Q}, u<vu<v means u≤vu\le v and u≠vu\neq v, by The Integers §operations and The Rational Numbers §operations.

Negation. Let x∈Zx\in\mathbb{Z}, and let −x-x be its negation as in The Integers §operations. By The Integers Form an Ordered Ring Containing the Natural Numbers as Its Positive Elements §ring, x+(−x)=0Zx+(-x)=0_{\mathbb{Z}}. By Additive and Multiplicative Inverses Are Unique §negative, applied to the commutative ring Z\mathbb{Z}, there is exactly one w∈Zw\in\mathbb{Z} with x+w=0Zx+w=0_{\mathbb{Z}}, and by Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §negative the negative of xx in Z\mathbb{Z} is this ww. Since the negation −x-x is such an element, it equals the negative of xx. Likewise, for u∈Qu\in\mathbb{Q} with negation −u-u as in The Rational Numbers §operations, u+(−u)=0Qu+(-u)=0_{\mathbb{Q}} by The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §ordered-field, so by Additive and Multiplicative Inverses Are Unique §negative and Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §negative, applied to the commutative ring Q\mathbb{Q}, −u-u is the negative of uu in Q\mathbb{Q}. This proves the clause negation above.

Naturals. Let m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N}. By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §composition, applied to the maps ι:N→Z\iota:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z} of The Integers §embedding and j:Z→Qj:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Q} of The Rational Numbers §embedding, n↦j(ι(n))n\mapsto j(\iota(n)) is the map j∘ι:N→Qj\circ\iota:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Q}. If j(ι(m))=j(ι(n))j(\iota(m))=j(\iota(n)), then ι(m)=ι(n)\iota(m)=\iota(n) because jj is injective by The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §embedding, and then m=nm=n because ι\iota is injective by The Integers Form an Ordered Ring Containing the Natural Numbers as Its Positive Elements §embedding; so j∘ιj\circ\iota is injective by Injective, Surjective and Bijective Functions between Classes §injective.

Here 11, m+nm+n and mnmn are natural numbers by The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §sets and The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §operations. By The Integers Form an Ordered Ring Containing the Natural Numbers as Its Positive Elements §embedding and The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §embedding,

j(ι(1))=j(1Z)=1Q,j(ι(m+n))=j(ι(m)+ι(n))=j(ι(m))+j(ι(n)),j(ι(mn))=j(ι(m) ι(n))=j(ι(m)) j(ι(n)).j(\iota(1))=j(1_{\mathbb{Z}})=1_{\mathbb{Q}},\qquad j(\iota(m+n))=j(\iota(m)+\iota(n))=j(\iota(m))+j(\iota(n)),\qquad j(\iota(mn))=j(\iota(m)\,\iota(n))=j(\iota(m))\,j(\iota(n)).

For the order, let y,z∈Zy,z\in\mathbb{Z}. By The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §embedding, y≤zy\le z if and only if j(y)≤j(z)j(y)\le j(z); and y≠zy\neq z if and only if j(y)≠j(z)j(y)\neq j(z), since jj is injective and, conversely, y=zy=z gives j(y)=j(z)j(y)=j(z). Hence y<zy<z if and only if j(y)<j(z)j(y)<j(z). By The Integers Form an Ordered Ring Containing the Natural Numbers as Its Positive Elements §embedding, m<nm<n if and only if ι(m)<ι(n)\iota(m)<\iota(n), so taking y=ι(m)y=\iota(m) and z=ι(n)z=\iota(n), m<nm<n if and only if j(ι(m))<j(ι(n))j(\iota(m))<j(\iota(n)).

For ≤\le, put p=j(ι(m))p=j(\iota(m)) and q=j(ι(n))q=j(\iota(n)). By the injectivity of j∘ιj\circ\iota shown above, and since m=nm=n gives p=qp=q, we have m=nm=n if and only if p=qp=q. By The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §ordered-field, ≤\le is a total order on Q\mathbb{Q}, hence reflexive by Partial and Total Orders on a Set and the Associated Strict Relation §total and Partial and Total Orders on a Set and the Associated Strict Relation §partial. So p≤qp\le q if and only if p<qp<q or p=qp=q: if p≤qp\le q and p≠qp\neq q, then p<qp<q; conversely, p<qp<q gives p≤qp\le q, and p=qp=q gives p≤qp\le q by reflexivity. By Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §partial-order, m≤nm\le n if and only if m<nm<n or m=nm=n. Combining these with the strict form and the equivalence of m=nm=n and p=qp=q, m≤nm\le n if and only if p≤qp\le q, that is, j(ι(m))≤j(ι(n))j(\iota(m))\le j(\iota(n)).

Finally, 0Z<ι(n)0_{\mathbb{Z}}<\iota(n) by The Integers Form an Ordered Ring Containing the Natural Numbers as Its Positive Elements §positive, so j(0Z)<j(ι(n))j(0_{\mathbb{Z}})<j(\iota(n)), and j(0Z)=0Qj(0_{\mathbb{Z}})=0_{\mathbb{Q}} by The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §embedding; thus 0Q<j(ι(n))0_{\mathbb{Q}}<j(\iota(n)). This proves the clause naturals above.

Fractions. Let x∈Zx\in\mathbb{Z} and m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, and put c=j(ι(m))c=j(\iota(m)). By the clause naturals above, 0Q<c0_{\mathbb{Q}}<c, so c≠0Qc\neq0_{\mathbb{Q}}. As Q\mathbb{Q} is a field, Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §reciprocal gives the reciprocal c−1∈Qc^{-1}\in\mathbb{Q} with c⋅c−1=1Qc\cdot c^{-1}=1_{\mathbb{Q}} and the quotient j(x)/c=j(x)⋅c−1j(x)/c=j(x)\cdot c^{-1}. By The Rational Numbers Form an Archimedean Ordered Field Containing the Integers §fraction, [x,m]⋅c=j(x)[x,m]\cdot c=j(x). Using u⋅1Q=uu\cdot1_{\mathbb{Q}}=u and the associativity of ⋅\cdot from Commutative Rings §ring,

[x,m]=[x,m]⋅1Q=[x,m]⋅(c⋅c−1)=([x,m]⋅c)⋅c−1=j(x)⋅c−1=j(x)/c=j(x)/j(ι(m)).[x,m]=[x,m]\cdot1_{\mathbb{Q}}=[x,m]\cdot(c\cdot c^{-1})=([x,m]\cdot c)\cdot c^{-1}=j(x)\cdot c^{-1}=j(x)/c=j(x)/j(\iota(m)).

This proves the clause fractions above.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…