TheoremBase

Proof of Particle Blocks: Linearity, Splitting of Inner Products, Product Maps and Diagonal Shifts

lemmalem:particle-blocks-basic-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 15,449 chars · 37 deps · depth 32 Reason: Phase N1a proof.

Block maps act coordinatewise, so linearity, Borel measurability, the block splitting of dot products (via the block-index sum identity), the transfer of Borel, continuity and Lipschitz properties to product maps, the diagonal identities and the concatenation identities all follow by comparing coordinates block by block.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Points of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} are maps [m]→R[m]\to\mathbb{R} by Euclidean Points as Tuples of Real Numbers, as fixed in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces; equality of points is tested coordinatewise by claim 1 of Euclidean Points as Tuples of Real Numbers ("extensionality"). Unfolding Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §blocks, for x∈RqNx\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}, k∈[N]k\in[N] and i∈[q]i\in[q],

(pk(x))i=xb(k,i),(1)(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))_{i}=x_{b(k,i)},\tag{1}

where b(k,i)∈[qN]b(k,i)\in[qN] by Block Indices: Enumerating an Initial Segment of Length qN by Blocks and Positions §range; the same holds in RpN\mathbb{R}^{pN} with pp in place of qq, Block Indices: Enumerating an Initial Segment of Length qN by Blocks and Positions being applied with pp in place of qq. Every step below proved for qq holds likewise for pp. Field identities in R\mathbb{R} are the numbered axioms of Field.

Step 1 (Blocks determine points). Let x,x′∈RqNx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{qN} with pk(x)=pk(x′)\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x') for every k∈[N]k\in[N]. For j∈[qN]j\in[qN], Block Indices: Enumerating an Initial Segment of Length qN by Blocks and Positions §bijection gives k∈[N]k\in[N] and i∈[q]i\in[q] with b(k,i)=jb(k,i)=j, and by (1) xj=(pk(x))i=(pk(x′))i=xj′x_{j}=(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))_{i}=(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'))_{i}=x'_{j}. By extensionality x=x′x=x'.

Step 2 (Blocks of sums, multiples and differences). Let x,x′∈RqNx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}, t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} and k∈[N]k\in[N]. For i∈[q]i\in[q], by (1) and Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n (applied in RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN} and in Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}), (pk(x+x′))i=xb(k,i)+xb(k,i)′=(pk(x)+pk(x′))i(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x+x'))_{i}=x_{b(k,i)}+x'_{b(k,i)}=(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)+\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'))_{i}; likewise by Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, (pk(tx))i=(t pk(x))i(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(tx))_{i}=(t\,\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))_{i}, and by clause 1 of Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, (pk(x−x′))i=(pk(x)−pk(x′))i(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x-x'))_{i}=(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)-\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'))_{i}. By extensionality,

pk(x+x′)=pk(x)+pk(x′),pk(tx)=t pk(x),pk(x−x′)=pk(x)−pk(x′).\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x+x')=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)+\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'),\qquad\mathfrak{p}_{k}(tx)=t\,\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x),\qquad\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x-x')=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)-\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x').

Step 3 (Claim 1). RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN} and Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} are real vector spaces by Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space, and Step 2 gives conditions 1 and 2 of Linear Map, so pk\mathfrak{p}_{k} is linear. For i∈[q]i\in[q] the ii-th component of pk\mathfrak{p}_{k} is, by (1), the coordinate projection πb(k,i):RqN→R\pi_{b(k,i)}:\mathbb{R}^{qN}\to\mathbb{R}, measurable with respect to BqN\mathcal{B}_{qN} and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claim 1 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets; by claim 2 there, pk\mathfrak{p}_{k} is measurable with respect to BqN\mathcal{B}_{qN} and Bq\mathcal{B}_{q}, which are B(RqN)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{qN}) and B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) by claim 5 there; so pk\mathfrak{p}_{k} is Borel in the sense of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps. Next, for x∈RqNx\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}, Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §configuration gives pk([p1(x),…,pN(x)])=pk(x)\mathfrak{p}_{k}([\mathfrak{p}_{1}(x),\dots,\mathfrak{p}_{N}(x)])=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x) for every k∈[N]k\in[N], so x=[p1(x),…,pN(x)]x=[\mathfrak{p}_{1}(x),\dots,\mathfrak{p}_{N}(x)] by Step 1. Finally, for yk,yk′∈Rqy_{k},y'_{k}\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, write Y=[y1,…,yN]Y=[y_{1},\dots,y_{N}] and Y′=[y1′,…,yN′]Y'=[y'_{1},\dots,y'_{N}]. For every k∈[N]k\in[N], Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §configuration gives pk([y1+ty1′,…,yN+tyN′])=yk+tyk′\mathfrak{p}_{k}([y_{1}+ty'_{1},\dots,y_{N}+ty'_{N}])=y_{k}+ty'_{k}, while Step 2 and the same clause give pk(Y+tY′)=pk(Y)+t pk(Y′)=yk+tyk′\mathfrak{p}_{k}(Y+tY')=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(Y)+t\,\mathfrak{p}_{k}(Y')=y_{k}+ty'_{k}. Step 1 gives [y1+ty1′,…,yN+tyN′]=Y+tY′[y_{1}+ty'_{1},\dots,y_{N}+ty'_{N}]=Y+tY'.

Step 4 (Claim 2). Let x,x′∈RqNx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}. By clause 2 of Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, x⋅x′=∑j=1qNxjxj′x\cdot x'=\sum_{j=1}^{qN}x_{j}x'_{j}. Applying Block Indices: Enumerating an Initial Segment of Length qN by Blocks and Positions §sums to the family aj=xjxj′a_{j}=x_{j}x'_{j}, then (1) and clause 2 of Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n in Rq\mathbb{R}^{q},

x⋅x′=∑k=1N∑i=1qxb(k,i)xb(k,i)′=∑k=1N∑i=1q(pk(x))i(pk(x′))i=∑k=1Npk(x)⋅pk(x′).x\cdot x'=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\sum_{i=1}^{q}x_{b(k,i)}x'_{b(k,i)}=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\sum_{i=1}^{q}(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))_{i}(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'))_{i}=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)\cdot\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x').

Taking x′=xx'=x and using ∥z∥2=z⋅z\lVert z\rVert^{2}=z\cdot z in RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN} and in Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} (claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n) gives ∥x∥2=∑k=1N∥pk(x)∥2\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)\rVert^{2}. Each summand is nonnegative by claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, so claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums gives ∥pk(x)∥2≤∥x∥2\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)\rVert^{2}\le\lVert x\rVert^{2}; as 0≤∥pk(x)∥0\le\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)\rVert and 0≤∥x∥0\le\lVert x\rVert by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∥pk(x)∥≤∥x∥\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)\rVert\le\lVert x\rVert. Combined with Step 2, for x,x′∈RqNx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{qN} and k∈[N]k\in[N],

∥pk(x)−pk(x′)∥=∥pk(x−x′)∥≤∥x−x′∥.(2)\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)-\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x')\rVert=\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x-x')\rVert\le\lVert x-x'\rVert.\tag{2}

Step 5 (Claim 3: blocks of h⊕h^{\oplus}). Let h:Rq→Rph:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R}^{p} and x∈RqNx\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}. By Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §product-map, h⊕(x)=[h(p1(x)),…,h(pN(x))]∈RpNh^{\oplus}(x)=[h(\mathfrak{p}_{1}(x)),\dots,h(\mathfrak{p}_{N}(x))]\in\mathbb{R}^{pN}, so Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §configuration, formed in dimension pp, gives pk(h⊕(x))=h(pk(x))\mathfrak{p}_{k}(h^{\oplus}(x))=h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)) for every k∈[N]k\in[N]. With (1) in dimension pp,

(h⊕(x))b(k,i)=(h(pk(x)))i(k∈[N], i∈[p]).(3)(h^{\oplus}(x))_{b(k,i)}=(h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)))_{i}\qquad(k\in[N],\ i\in[p]).\tag{3}

For j∈[pN]j\in[pN] write j=b(k,i)j=b(k,i) with k∈[N]k\in[N], i∈[p]i\in[p], which is possible by Block Indices: Enumerating an Initial Segment of Length qN by Blocks and Positions §bijection in dimension pp; by (3) the jj-th component of h⊕h^{\oplus} is fj=πi∘h∘pkf_{j}=\pi_{i}\circ h\circ\mathfrak{p}_{k}, where πi:Rp→R\pi_{i}:\mathbb{R}^{p}\to\mathbb{R} is the ii-th coordinate projection.

Step 6 (Claim 3: Borel). Let hh be Borel and j∈[pN]j\in[pN], fj=πi∘h∘pkf_{j}=\pi_{i}\circ h\circ\mathfrak{p}_{k} as in Step 5. The map pk\mathfrak{p}_{k} is Borel by Step 3, and πi\pi_{i} is measurable with respect to B(Rp)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{p}) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by claims 1 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets. Since B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) is the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the metric space (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces, claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, applied first with Y=pkY=\mathfrak{p}_{k} and g=hg=h and then with Y=h∘pkY=h\circ\mathfrak{p}_{k} and g=πig=\pi_{i}, shows that fjf_{j} is measurable with respect to B(RqN)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{qN}) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). By claims 2 and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, h⊕h^{\oplus} is measurable with respect to B(RqN)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{qN}) and B(RpN)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{pN}), that is, Borel.

Step 7 (Claim 3: continuity). Let hh be continuous on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} in the sense of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, and fix x∈RqNx\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}. Recall that dE(z,z′)=∥z−z′∥d_{E}(z,z')=\lVert z-z'\rVert by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, that dE(z,z′)=dE(z′,z)d_{E}(z,z')=d_{E}(z',z) by condition 3 of Metric Space and Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and that ∥z−z′∥2=∑l(zl−zl′)2\lVert z-z'\rVert^{2}=\sum_{l}(z_{l}-z'_{l})^{2} by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and clause 1 of Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

First, each component fjf_{j} (j∈[pN]j\in[pN], fj=πi∘h∘pkf_{j}=\pi_{i}\circ h\circ\mathfrak{p}_{k} as in Step 5), regarded as a map into R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, is continuous at xx in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By continuity of hh at pk(x)\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x) choose, depending on ε\varepsilon, a real δ>0\delta>0 such that every z∈Rqz\in\mathbb{R}^{q} with dE(pk(x),z)<δd_{E}(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x),z)<\delta satisfies dE(h(z),h(pk(x)))<εd_{E}(h(z),h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)))<\varepsilon. Let y∈RqNy\in\mathbb{R}^{qN} with ∑l=1qN(yl−xl)2<δ2\sum_{l=1}^{qN}(y_{l}-x_{l})^{2}<\delta^{2}, that is, ∥y−x∥2<δ2\lVert y-x\rVert^{2}<\delta^{2}; by the three facts just recalled, ∥x−y∥=dE(x,y)=dE(y,x)=∥y−x∥\lVert x-y\rVert=d_{E}(x,y)=d_{E}(y,x)=\lVert y-x\rVert, so ∥x−y∥2<δ2\lVert x-y\rVert^{2}<\delta^{2}. Since 0≤∥x−y∥0\le\lVert x-y\rVert and 0<δ0<\delta, claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∥x−y∥<δ\lVert x-y\rVert<\delta, and by (2) and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, dE(pk(x),pk(y))=∥pk(x)−pk(y)∥<δd_{E}(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x),\mathfrak{p}_{k}(y))=\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)-\mathfrak{p}_{k}(y)\rVert<\delta. Hence w=h(pk(y))−h(pk(x))w=h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(y))-h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)) satisfies ∥w∥<ε\lVert w\rVert<\varepsilon, so ∥w∥2<ε2\lVert w\rVert^{2}<\varepsilon^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Now ∥w∥2=∑i′=1pwi′2\lVert w\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i'=1}^{p}w_{i'}^{2} with nonnegative summands (claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field), and wi=fj(y)−fj(x)w_{i}=f_{j}(y)-f_{j}(x), so claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give (fj(y)−fj(x))2<ε2(f_{j}(y)-f_{j}(x))^{2}<\varepsilon^{2}, which by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums is ∑l=11(fj(y)−fj(x))2<ε2\sum_{l=1}^{1}(f_{j}(y)-f_{j}(x))^{2}<\varepsilon^{2}.

By Coordinatewise Criterion for Continuity of a Map Between Euclidean Spaces (with n=qNn=qN, m=pNm=pN, E=RqNE=\mathbb{R}^{qN}, f=h⊕f=h^{\oplus}, a=xa=x), h⊕h^{\oplus} is continuous at xx in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and choose, depending on ε\varepsilon, the δ>0\delta>0 provided there. If y∈RqNy\in\mathbb{R}^{qN} and dE(x,y)<δd_{E}(x,y)<\delta, then ∥y−x∥=dE(y,x)=dE(x,y)<δ\lVert y-x\rVert=d_{E}(y,x)=d_{E}(x,y)<\delta, so ∑l=1qN(yl−xl)2=∥y−x∥2<δ2\sum_{l=1}^{qN}(y_{l}-x_{l})^{2}=\lVert y-x\rVert^{2}<\delta^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; hence ∥h⊕(y)−h⊕(x)∥2=∑j=1pN(fj(y)−fj(x))2<ε2\lVert h^{\oplus}(y)-h^{\oplus}(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{pN}(f_{j}(y)-f_{j}(x))^{2}<\varepsilon^{2}, and claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives dE(h⊕(y),h⊕(x))<εd_{E}(h^{\oplus}(y),h^{\oplus}(x))<\varepsilon. Thus h⊕h^{\oplus} is continuous at xx relative to RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN}, and, xx being arbitrary, continuous on RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN}.

Step 8 (Claim 3: Lipschitz). Let hh be Lipschitz with constant LL, a nonnegative real, in the sense of Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces, and let x,x′∈RqNx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}, z=h⊕(x)−h⊕(x′)z=h^{\oplus}(x)-h^{\oplus}(x'). By Steps 2 and 5 (in dimension pp), pk(z)=h(pk(x))−h(pk(x′))\mathfrak{p}_{k}(z)=h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))-h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x')), so Step 4 in RpN\mathbb{R}^{pN} gives ∥z∥2=∑k=1N∥h(pk(x))−h(pk(x′))∥2\lVert z\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\lVert h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))-h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'))\rVert^{2}. For each kk, the Lipschitz bound, claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Step 2 give

∥h(pk(x))−h(pk(x′))∥≤L ∥pk(x)−pk(x′)∥=L ∥pk(x−x′)∥.\lVert h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))-h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'))\rVert\le L\,\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)-\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x')\rVert=L\,\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x-x')\rVert .

Both sides are nonnegative: the left by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, the right by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to 0≤∥pk(x−x′)∥0\le\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x-x')\rVert and 0≤L0\le L, with L⋅0=0L\cdot0=0 by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. So claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and axioms 5 and 8 of Field give ∥h(pk(x))−h(pk(x′))∥2≤L2∥pk(x−x′)∥2\lVert h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x))-h(\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x'))\rVert^{2}\le L^{2}\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x-x')\rVert^{2}. By claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and Step 4 in RqN\mathbb{R}^{qN},

∥z∥2≤L2∑k=1N∥pk(x−x′)∥2=L2∥x−x′∥2=(L∥x−x′∥)2.\lVert z\rVert^{2}\le L^{2}\sum_{k=1}^{N}\lVert\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x-x')\rVert^{2}=L^{2}\lVert x-x'\rVert^{2}=(L\lVert x-x'\rVert)^{2}.

As 0≤∥z∥0\le\lVert z\rVert and 0≤L∥x−x′∥0\le L\lVert x-x'\rVert (as above), claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∥z∥≤L∥x−x′∥\lVert z\rVert\le L\lVert x-x'\rVert, that is, dE(h⊕(x),h⊕(x′))≤L dE(x,x′)d_{E}(h^{\oplus}(x),h^{\oplus}(x'))\le L\,d_{E}(x,x') by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. So h⊕h^{\oplus} is Lipschitz with constant LL.

Step 9 (Claim 4). Let a∈Rqa\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and x∈RqNx\in\mathbb{R}^{qN}. By Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §diagonal and Particle Blocks of the Configuration Space: Block Maps, Configurations, Product Maps and Diagonal Points §configuration, pk(a⊕)=a\mathfrak{p}_{k}(a^{\oplus})=a for every k∈[N]k\in[N], so Step 2 gives pk(x+a⊕)=pk(x)+a\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x+a^{\oplus})=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x)+a. By Step 4, a⊕⋅x=∑k=1Na⋅vka^{\oplus}\cdot x=\sum_{k=1}^{N}a\cdot v_{k} with vk=pk(x)v_{k}=\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x). The sum ∑k=1Nvk\sum_{k=1}^{N}v_{k} is the finite sum of Finite Sum Notation in a Vector Space in the real vector space Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space. Let AA be the set of n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} such that n∉[N]n\notin[N] or a⋅∑k=1nvk=∑k=1na⋅vka\cdot\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a\cdot v_{k}. Then 1∈A1\in A, both sides being a⋅v1a\cdot v_{1} by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors and claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums. Let n∈An\in A with S(n)∈[N]S(n)\in[N]; since n<S(n)n<S(n) by claim 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, claim 1 there gives n∈[N]n\in[N], and by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, n∈An\in A, and claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums,

a⋅∑k=1S(n)vk=a⋅∑k=1nvk+a⋅vS(n)=∑k=1na⋅vk+a⋅vS(n)=∑k=1S(n)a⋅vk;a\cdot\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}v_{k}=a\cdot\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}+a\cdot v_{S(n)}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a\cdot v_{k}+a\cdot v_{S(n)}=\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}a\cdot v_{k};

so S(n)∈AS(n)\in A. By Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, A=NA=\mathbb{N}; as N∈[N]N\in[N] by claim 1 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers, a⊕⋅x=a⋅∑k=1Npk(x)a^{\oplus}\cdot x=a\cdot\sum_{k=1}^{N}\mathfrak{p}_{k}(x). Finally, by Step 4, axiom 6 of Field, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field,

∥a⊕∥2=∑k=1N∥a∥2⋅1=∥a∥2∑k=1N1=∥a∥2 ιR(N),\lVert a^{\oplus}\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\lVert a\rVert^{2}\cdot1=\lVert a\rVert^{2}\sum_{k=1}^{N}1=\lVert a\rVert^{2}\,\iota_{\mathbb{R}}(N),

which is N∥a∥2N\lVert a\rVert^{2} by axiom 8 of Field and clause 3 of The Real Numbers and Standard Notation.

Step 10 (Claim 5). By identities 1 and 4 of Natural Numbers, q(n+1)=q S(n)=qn+qq(n+1)=q\,S(n)=qn+q. Let u∈Rqnu\in\mathbb{R}^{qn}, v∈Rqv\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and w=ιqn,q(u,v)w=\iota^{qn,q}(u,v). By the definition of the concatenation map in Concatenation Identifies a Product of Euclidean Spaces with a Euclidean Space (with m=qnm=qn and n=qn=q there), fixed in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pairs, wl=ulw_{l}=u_{l} for l∈[qn]l\in[qn] and wqn+j=vjw_{qn+j}=v_{j} for j∈[q]j\in[q]. The number b(k,i)=(k−1)q+ib(k,i)=(k-1)q+i does not depend on the number of blocks. For k∈[n]k\in[n] and i∈[q]i\in[q], b(k,i)∈[qn]b(k,i)\in[qn] by Block Indices: Enumerating an Initial Segment of Length qN by Blocks and Positions §range (with nn in place of NN), so by (1) for N=n+1N=n+1 and for N=nN=n, (pk(n+1)(w))i=wb(k,i)=ub(k,i)=(pk(n)(u))i(\mathfrak{p}^{(n+1)}_{k}(w))_{i}=w_{b(k,i)}=u_{b(k,i)}=(\mathfrak{p}^{(n)}_{k}(u))_{i}, and extensionality gives pk(n+1)(w)=pk(n)(u)\mathfrak{p}^{(n+1)}_{k}(w)=\mathfrak{p}^{(n)}_{k}(u). For k=n+1k=n+1, which lies in [n+1][n+1] by claim 1 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers: with ι=ιR\iota=\iota_{\mathbb{R}} as in clause 3 of The Real Numbers and Standard Notation, claim 1 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field and axioms 1, 3 and 2 of Field give ι(n+1)−1=ι(n)\iota(n+1)-1=\iota(n), so axiom 8 of Field and claims 5 and 4 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field give b(n+1,i)=ι(q)ι(n)+ι(i)=ι(qn+i)b(n+1,i)=\iota(q)\iota(n)+\iota(i)=\iota(qn+i), and by claim 7 there b(n+1,i)b(n+1,i) is the natural number qn+iqn+i. Hence (pn+1(n+1)(w))i=wqn+i=vi(\mathfrak{p}^{(n+1)}_{n+1}(w))_{i}=w_{qn+i}=v_{i} for every i∈[q]i\in[q], and extensionality gives pn+1(n+1)(w)=v\mathfrak{p}^{(n+1)}_{n+1}(w)=v.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…