Notation is as in the statement. Points of Euclidean space Rn are ordered n-tuples of real numbers, two points being equal exactly when their corresponding coordinates are equal; for a point z we write ziβ for its i-th coordinate. The real numbers form an ordered field, and in particular a field; its axioms of associativity, commutativity, distributivity, identities and inverses are used below without further comment.
Step 0 (Squares). Apply Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field to the ordered field of real numbers: for every real number t we have t2=β£tβ£2 by claim 1 there, and 0β€t2 by claim 2. Both are used repeatedly below.
Step 1 (The distance as a square root). Let u=(u1β,β¦,unβ) and v=(v1β,β¦,vnβ) be points of Rn. By Step 0 every summand (uiββviβ)2 is nonnegative, so claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives
0β€i=1βnβ(uiββviβ)2.
By the definition of the Euclidean distance, dEβ(u,v) is the nonnegative square root of this sum, so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root it is the unique real number r with 0β€r and r2=βi=1nβ(uiββviβ)2.
Step 2 (Claim 1). By Step 0 every summand xi2β is nonnegative, so claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives 0β€βi=1nβxi2β, where the finite sum is formed in the field of real numbers. By the definition of the Euclidean norm, β₯xβ₯ is the nonnegative square root of that sum, so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root it is the unique real number r with 0β€r and r2=βi=1nβxi2β. In particular 0β€β₯xβ₯ and β₯xβ₯2=βi=1nβxi2β. Finally, by the definition of the dot product,
xβ
x=i=1βnβxiβxiβ=i=1βnβxi2β,
since xi2β abbreviates xiβxiβ. This proves claim 1. The point x was arbitrary, so claim 1 is available below for any point of Rn.
Step 3 (Claim 2). By the definition of the difference of points, the i-th coordinate of xβy is xiββyiβ. Applying claim 1 to the point xβy shows that β₯xβyβ₯ is the unique nonnegative real number whose square is βi=1nβ(xiββyiβ)2, while Step 1 shows that dEβ(x,y) is the unique such number. Hence dEβ(x,y)=β₯xβyβ₯.
Taking y=0Rnβ here gives dEβ(x,0Rnβ)=β₯xβ0Rnββ₯. Every coordinate of the origin equals 0 and xiββ0=xiβ by claim 4 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, so xβ0Rnβ=x and therefore dEβ(x,0Rnβ)=β₯xβ₯.
For the third assertion, by the definition of the sum of points the i-th coordinate of x+h is xiβ+hiβ, so the i-th coordinate of (x+h)βx is
(xiβ+hiβ)+(βxiβ)=hiβ+(xiβ+(βxiβ))=hiβ+0=hiβ,
using commutativity and associativity of addition, the additive inverse axiom, and the additive identity axiom. Hence (x+h)βx=h, and the first assertion applied to the pair x+h, x gives dEβ(x+h,x)=β₯hβ₯. By Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn the function dEβ is a metric on Rn, so it is symmetric, and therefore dEβ(x,x+h)=dEβ(x+h,x)=β₯hβ₯.
Step 4 (Claim 3). By Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn the function dEβ is a metric on Rn, so by condition 2 of that definition dEβ(x,0Rnβ)=0 holds if and only if x=0Rnβ. Since β₯xβ₯=dEβ(x,0Rnβ) by the second assertion of claim 2, this is exactly claim 3.
Step 5 (Claim 4). Let j be a natural number with 1β€jβ€n. By Step 0 every summand xi2β is nonnegative, so claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 1 give
xj2ββ€i=1βnβxi2β=β₯xβ₯2.
By Step 0 again xj2β=β£xjββ£2, so β£xjββ£2β€β₯xβ₯2. Since 0β€β£xjββ£ by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and 0β€β₯xβ₯ by claim 1, the weak form (claim 2) of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field yields β£xjββ£β€β₯xβ₯.
Step 6 (Claim 5). By the definition of the scalar multiple the i-th coordinate of Ξ»x is Ξ»xiβ, and by commutativity and associativity of multiplication
(Ξ»xiβ)2=(Ξ»xiβ)(Ξ»xiβ)=(λλ)(xiβxiβ)=Ξ»2xi2β.
Hence, by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 1,
i=1βnβ(Ξ»xiβ)2=i=1βnβΞ»2xi2β=Ξ»2i=1βnβxi2β=Ξ»2β₯xβ₯2.
Put r=β£Ξ»β£β₯xβ₯. Applying claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to the inequality 0β€β₯xβ₯ with the nonnegative multiplier β£Ξ»β£ gives β£Ξ»β£β
0β€β£Ξ»β£β₯xβ₯, and β£Ξ»β£β
0=0 by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, so 0β€r. Moreover, using commutativity and associativity of multiplication and then Step 0,
r2=(β£Ξ»β£β₯xβ₯)(β£Ξ»β£β₯xβ₯)=β£Ξ»β£2β₯xβ₯2=Ξ»2β₯xβ₯2=i=1βnβ(Ξ»xiβ)2.
Claim 1, applied to the point Ξ»x, characterises β₯Ξ»xβ₯ as the unique nonnegative real number whose square is βi=1nβ(Ξ»xiβ)2. Hence β₯Ξ»xβ₯=r=β£Ξ»β£β₯xβ₯.
Step 7 (Claim 6). By Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn the function dEβ is a metric on Rn, so it is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
dEβ(a,c)β€dEβ(a,b)+dEβ(b,c)
for all points a,b,c of Rn. Taking a=x+y, b=y and c=0Rnβ, and using the second assertion of claim 2 twice, we get
β₯x+yβ₯=dEβ(x+y,0Rnβ)β€dEβ(x+y,y)+dEβ(y,0Rnβ)=dEβ(x+y,y)+β₯yβ₯.
By Euclidean Space Rn is a Real Vector Space the space Rn with these operations is a vector space, so its addition is commutative by condition 2 of that definition; hence x+y=y+x and, by symmetry of dEβ,
dEβ(x+y,y)=dEβ(y,y+x)=β₯xβ₯,
the last equality by the third assertion of claim 2, applied with y as the base point and x as the increment. Combining the two displays gives β₯x+yβ₯β€β₯xβ₯+β₯yβ₯. β