TheoremBase

Proof of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n

lemmalem:euclidean-norm-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial publication of the proof of lem:euclidean-norm-properties-2026a, deriving the six claims from the square root characterisation of the norm, the finite sum properties, and the metric axioms for the Euclidean distance.

Proof

Notation is as in the statement. Points of Euclidean space Rn\mathbb{R}^n are ordered nn-tuples of real numbers, two points being equal exactly when their corresponding coordinates are equal; for a point zz we write ziz_i for its ii-th coordinate. The real numbers form an ordered field, and in particular a field; its axioms of associativity, commutativity, distributivity, identities and inverses are used below without further comment.

Step 0 (Squares). Apply Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field to the ordered field of real numbers: for every real number tt we have t2=∣t∣2t^{2}=|t|^{2} by claim 1 there, and 0≀t20\le t^{2} by claim 2. Both are used repeatedly below.

Step 1 (The distance as a square root). Let u=(u1,…,un)u=(u_1,\dots,u_n) and v=(v1,…,vn)v=(v_1,\dots,v_n) be points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. By Step 0 every summand (uiβˆ’vi)2(u_i-v_i)^{2} is nonnegative, so claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives

0β‰€βˆ‘i=1n(uiβˆ’vi)2.0\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}(u_i-v_i)^{2}.

By the definition of the Euclidean distance, dE(u,v)d_E(u,v) is the nonnegative square root of this sum, so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root it is the unique real number rr with 0≀r0\le r and r2=βˆ‘i=1n(uiβˆ’vi)2r^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(u_i-v_i)^{2}.

Step 2 (Claim 1). By Step 0 every summand xi2x_i^{2} is nonnegative, so claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives 0β‰€βˆ‘i=1nxi20\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i^{2}, where the finite sum is formed in the field of real numbers. By the definition of the Euclidean norm, βˆ₯xβˆ₯\lVert x\rVert is the nonnegative square root of that sum, so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root it is the unique real number rr with 0≀r0\le r and r2=βˆ‘i=1nxi2r^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i^{2}. In particular 0≀βˆ₯xβˆ₯0\le\lVert x\rVert and βˆ₯xβˆ₯2=βˆ‘i=1nxi2\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i^{2}. Finally, by the definition of the dot product,

xβ‹…x=βˆ‘i=1nxixi=βˆ‘i=1nxi2,x\cdot x=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i x_i=\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i^{2},

since xi2x_i^{2} abbreviates xixix_i x_i. This proves claim 1. The point xx was arbitrary, so claim 1 is available below for any point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Step 3 (Claim 2). By the definition of the difference of points, the ii-th coordinate of xβˆ’yx-y is xiβˆ’yix_i-y_i. Applying claim 1 to the point xβˆ’yx-y shows that βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯\lVert x-y\rVert is the unique nonnegative real number whose square is βˆ‘i=1n(xiβˆ’yi)2\sum_{i=1}^{n}(x_i-y_i)^{2}, while Step 1 shows that dE(x,y)d_E(x,y) is the unique such number. Hence dE(x,y)=βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯d_E(x,y)=\lVert x-y\rVert.

Taking y=0Rny=0_{\mathbb{R}^n} here gives dE(x,0Rn)=βˆ₯xβˆ’0Rnβˆ₯d_E(x,0_{\mathbb{R}^n})=\lVert x-0_{\mathbb{R}^n}\rVert. Every coordinate of the origin equals 00 and xiβˆ’0=xix_i-0=x_i by claim 4 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, so xβˆ’0Rn=xx-0_{\mathbb{R}^n}=x and therefore dE(x,0Rn)=βˆ₯xβˆ₯d_E(x,0_{\mathbb{R}^n})=\lVert x\rVert.

For the third assertion, by the definition of the sum of points the ii-th coordinate of x+hx+h is xi+hix_i+h_i, so the ii-th coordinate of (x+h)βˆ’x(x+h)-x is

(xi+hi)+(βˆ’xi)=hi+(xi+(βˆ’xi))=hi+0=hi,(x_i+h_i)+(-x_i)=h_i+\bigl(x_i+(-x_i)\bigr)=h_i+0=h_i ,

using commutativity and associativity of addition, the additive inverse axiom, and the additive identity axiom. Hence (x+h)βˆ’x=h(x+h)-x=h, and the first assertion applied to the pair x+hx+h, xx gives dE(x+h,x)=βˆ₯hβˆ₯d_E(x+h,x)=\lVert h\rVert. By Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the function dEd_E is a metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so it is symmetric, and therefore dE(x,x+h)=dE(x+h,x)=βˆ₯hβˆ₯d_E(x,x+h)=d_E(x+h,x)=\lVert h\rVert.

Step 4 (Claim 3). By Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the function dEd_E is a metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so by condition 2 of that definition dE(x,0Rn)=0d_E(x,0_{\mathbb{R}^n})=0 holds if and only if x=0Rnx=0_{\mathbb{R}^n}. Since βˆ₯xβˆ₯=dE(x,0Rn)\lVert x\rVert=d_E(x,0_{\mathbb{R}^n}) by the second assertion of claim 2, this is exactly claim 3.

Step 5 (Claim 4). Let jj be a natural number with 1≀j≀n1\le j\le n. By Step 0 every summand xi2x_i^{2} is nonnegative, so claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 1 give

xj2β‰€βˆ‘i=1nxi2=βˆ₯xβˆ₯2.x_j^{2}\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i^{2}=\lVert x\rVert^{2}.

By Step 0 again xj2=∣xj∣2x_j^{2}=|x_j|^{2}, so ∣xj∣2≀βˆ₯xβˆ₯2|x_j|^{2}\le\lVert x\rVert^{2}. Since 0β‰€βˆ£xj∣0\le|x_j| by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and 0≀βˆ₯xβˆ₯0\le\lVert x\rVert by claim 1, the weak form (claim 2) of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field yields ∣xjβˆ£β‰€βˆ₯xβˆ₯|x_j|\le\lVert x\rVert.

Step 6 (Claim 5). By the definition of the scalar multiple the ii-th coordinate of Ξ»x\lambda x is Ξ»xi\lambda x_i, and by commutativity and associativity of multiplication

(λxi)2=(λxi)(λxi)=(λλ)(xixi)=λ2xi2.(\lambda x_i)^{2}=(\lambda x_i)(\lambda x_i)=(\lambda\lambda)(x_i x_i)=\lambda^{2}x_i^{2}.

Hence, by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 1,

βˆ‘i=1n(Ξ»xi)2=βˆ‘i=1nΞ»2xi2=Ξ»2βˆ‘i=1nxi2=Ξ»2βˆ₯xβˆ₯2.\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\lambda x_i)^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\lambda^{2}x_i^{2}=\lambda^{2}\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_i^{2}=\lambda^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}.

Put r=βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯xβˆ₯r=|\lambda|\,\lVert x\rVert. Applying claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to the inequality 0≀βˆ₯xβˆ₯0\le\lVert x\rVert with the nonnegative multiplier ∣λ∣|\lambda| gives βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β‹…0β‰€βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯xβˆ₯|\lambda|\cdot0\le|\lambda|\,\lVert x\rVert, and βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β‹…0=0|\lambda|\cdot0=0 by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, so 0≀r0\le r. Moreover, using commutativity and associativity of multiplication and then Step 0,

r2=(βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯xβˆ₯)(βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯xβˆ₯)=∣λ∣2βˆ₯xβˆ₯2=Ξ»2βˆ₯xβˆ₯2=βˆ‘i=1n(Ξ»xi)2.r^{2}=\bigl(|\lambda|\,\lVert x\rVert\bigr)\bigl(|\lambda|\,\lVert x\rVert\bigr)=|\lambda|^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\lambda^{2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\lambda x_i)^{2}.

Claim 1, applied to the point Ξ»x\lambda x, characterises βˆ₯Ξ»xβˆ₯\lVert\lambda x\rVert as the unique nonnegative real number whose square is βˆ‘i=1n(Ξ»xi)2\sum_{i=1}^{n}(\lambda x_i)^{2}. Hence βˆ₯Ξ»xβˆ₯=r=βˆ£Ξ»βˆ£β€‰βˆ₯xβˆ₯\lVert\lambda x\rVert=r=|\lambda|\,\lVert x\rVert.

Step 7 (Claim 6). By Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the function dEd_E is a metric on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so it is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality

dE(a,c)≀dE(a,b)+dE(b,c)d_E(a,c)\le d_E(a,b)+d_E(b,c)

for all points a,b,ca,b,c of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Taking a=x+ya=x+y, b=yb=y and c=0Rnc=0_{\mathbb{R}^n}, and using the second assertion of claim 2 twice, we get

βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯=dE(x+y,0Rn)≀dE(x+y,y)+dE(y,0Rn)=dE(x+y,y)+βˆ₯yβˆ₯.\lVert x+y\rVert=d_E(x+y,0_{\mathbb{R}^n})\le d_E(x+y,y)+d_E(y,0_{\mathbb{R}^n})=d_E(x+y,y)+\lVert y\rVert .

By Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space the space Rn\mathbb{R}^n with these operations is a vector space, so its addition is commutative by condition 2 of that definition; hence x+y=y+xx+y=y+x and, by symmetry of dEd_E,

dE(x+y,y)=dE(y,y+x)=βˆ₯xβˆ₯,d_E(x+y,y)=d_E(y,y+x)=\lVert x\rVert ,

the last equality by the third assertion of claim 2, applied with yy as the base point and xx as the increment. Combining the two displays gives βˆ₯x+yβˆ₯≀βˆ₯xβˆ₯+βˆ₯yβˆ₯\lVert x+y\rVert\le\lVert x\rVert+\lVert y\rVert. β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…