Proof of Consistency of the Classical and Viscosity Notions for Functions of Class
corollarycor:viscosity-classical-consistency-2026aThroughout, carries the order of its ordered field structure, which is a total order and is in particular reflexive and antisymmetric. For write for the gradient of at and for the Hessian matrix of at .
Claims 1 and 2. Both implications from left to right are claims 1 and 2 of Classical Sub- and Supersolutions of a Degenerate Elliptic Operator are Viscosity Sub- and Supersolutions, whose hypotheses hold because is degenerate elliptic and is of class on . Both implications from right to left are claims 1 and 2 of A Viscosity Subsolution or Supersolution of Class is Classical, whose hypotheses hold because is of class on .
Claim 3, from left to right. Suppose is a classical solution of on , so that for every . Since by reflexivity of , for every both
hold. Thus is both a classical subsolution and a classical supersolution of on , so by claims 1 and 2 it is both a viscosity subsolution and a viscosity supersolution of on , which is precisely what it means to be a viscosity solution of on .
Claim 3, from right to left. Suppose is a viscosity solution of on . By that definition is both a viscosity subsolution and a viscosity supersolution of on , so by claims 1 and 2 it is both a classical subsolution and a classical supersolution of on . Hence for every both
hold, and antisymmetry of gives for every . Since is of class on , this says that is a classical solution of on .
Loading…
Prerequisites
6dcd65ec-5769-4b3f-b9a7-1b348a045063