Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Claim 1. Let μ ^ ∈ Q ∩ D Σ \hat{\mu}\in Q\cap\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} μ ^ ∈ Q ∩ D Σ be a point at which χ − δ E \chi-\delta\mathcal{E} χ − δ E has a local maximum relative to D \mathcal{D} D . By Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space there is a positive R ∈ R R\in\mathbb{R} R ∈ R such that
χ ( μ ) − δ E ( μ ) ≤ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) for every μ ∈ D with W 2 ( μ , μ ^ ) < R . ( ∗ ) \chi(\mu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le\chi(\hat{\mu})-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})\qquad\text{for every }\mu\in\mathcal{D}\text{ with }W_{2}(\mu,\hat{\mu})<R. \tag{$\ast$} χ ( μ ) − δ E ( μ ) ≤ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) for every μ ∈ D with W 2 ( μ , μ ^ ) < R . ( ∗ )
The second-order condition. Let g : R d → R g:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} g : R d → R be the function g ( a ) = χ ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) g(a)=\chi\bigl((\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu}\bigr) g ( a ) = χ ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) ; by property (d) of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians (i) it is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , and its Hessian matrix at 0 R d 0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} 0 R d is H χ ( μ ^ ) H_{\chi}(\hat{\mu}) H χ ( μ ^ ) by Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians (vii) . Let a ∈ R d a\in\mathbb{R}^{d} a ∈ R d satisfy ∥ a ∥ < R \lVert a\rVert<R ∥ a ∥ < R . By Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (iv) the measure ( τ a ) # μ ^ (\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu} ( τ a ) # μ ^ belongs to D \mathcal{D} D and E ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) = E ( μ ^ ) \mathcal{E}\bigl((\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu}\bigr)=\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu}) E ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) = E ( μ ^ ) , and W 2 ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ , μ ^ ) ≤ ∥ a ∥ < R W_{2}\bigl((\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu}\bigr)\le\lVert a\rVert<R W 2 ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ , μ ^ ) ≤ ∥ a ∥ < R . Indeed, the map τ a \tau_{a} τ a is Borel, being continuous, and τ a − i d \tau_{a}-\mathrm{id} τ a − id is the constant map with value a a a , whose squared norm has integral ∥ a ∥ 2 \lVert a\rVert^{2} ∥ a ∥ 2 against the probability measure μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set and claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion ; so The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling (iv) , read with S = τ a S=\tau_{a} S = τ a , gives a coupling π a ∈ Π ( μ ^ , ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) \pi_{a}\in\Pi(\hat{\mu},(\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu}) π a ∈ Π ( μ ^ , ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) with I ( π a ) = ∥ a ∥ 2 I(\pi_{a})=\lVert a\rVert^{2} I ( π a ) = ∥ a ∥ 2 . Hence W 2 ( μ ^ , ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) 2 ≤ ∥ a ∥ 2 W_{2}\bigl(\hat{\mu},(\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu}\bigr)^{2}\le\lVert a\rVert^{2} W 2 ( μ ^ , ( τ a ) # μ ^ ) 2 ≤ ∥ a ∥ 2 by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space (i) , the left-hand side equals W 2 ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ , μ ^ ) 2 W_{2}\bigl((\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu}\bigr)^{2} W 2 ( ( τ a ) # μ ^ , μ ^ ) 2 by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space (i) , and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives the bound, both sides being nonnegative. So ( ∗ ) (\ast) ( ∗ ) applies to μ = ( τ a ) # μ ^ \mu=(\tau_{a})_{\#}\hat{\mu} μ = ( τ a ) # μ ^ and reads g ( a ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) ≤ g ( 0 R d ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) g(a)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})\le g(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu}) g ( a ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) ≤ g ( 0 R d ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) , whence g ( a ) ≤ g ( 0 R d ) g(a)\le g(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}) g ( a ) ≤ g ( 0 R d ) by the compatibility of the order with addition, an axiom of Ordered Field . Since d E ( a , 0 R d ) = ∥ a ∥ d_{E}(a,0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=\lVert a\rVert d E ( a , 0 R d ) = ∥ a ∥ by claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n : Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d is open in itself by claim 1 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself , the function g g g has a local maximum at 0 R d 0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} 0 R d relative to R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , so claim 1 of First- and Second-Order Conditions at a Local Extremum gives H χ ( μ ^ ) ⪯ 0 d H_{\chi}(\hat{\mu})\preceq0_{d} H χ ( μ ^ ) ⪯ 0 d .
The first-order condition. Let ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R d ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R d ) . By Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (v) there is a positive t 0 ∈ R t_{0}\in\mathbb{R} t 0 ∈ R such that ( i d + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ ∈ D (\mathrm{id}+t\,\nabla\psi)_{\#}\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} ( id + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ ∈ D for every t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}) t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) and such that the function e : ( − t 0 , t 0 ) → R e:(-t_{0},t_{0})\to\mathbb{R} e : ( − t 0 , t 0 ) → R , e ( t ) = E ( ( i d + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ ) e(t)=\mathcal{E}\bigl((\mathrm{id}+t\,\nabla\psi)_{\#}\hat{\mu}\bigr) e ( t ) = E ( ( id + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ ) , is differentiable at 0 0 0 with e ′ ( 0 ) = ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ e'(0)=\langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}} e ′ ( 0 ) = ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ . The function k : ( − t 0 , t 0 ) → R k:(-t_{0},t_{0})\to\mathbb{R} k : ( − t 0 , t 0 ) → R , k ( t ) = χ ( ( i d + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ ) k(t)=\chi\bigl((\mathrm{id}+t\,\nabla\psi)_{\#}\hat{\mu}\bigr) k ( t ) = χ ( ( id + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ ) , is differentiable at 0 0 0 with k ′ ( 0 ) = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ k'(0)=\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}} k ′ ( 0 ) = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ . Indeed, for t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}) t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) the map S t = i d + t ∇ ψ S_{t}=\mathrm{id}+t\,\nabla\psi S t = id + t ∇ ψ is Borel by The Push-Forward of a Probability Measure with Finite Second Moment by the Identity Perturbed along the Gradient of a Test Function: Borel, Finite Second Moment, the Diagonal Coupling and the Wasserstein Bound (i) , and S t − i d S_{t}-\mathrm{id} S t − id is the map x ↦ t ∇ ψ ( x ) x\mapsto t\,\nabla\psi(x) x ↦ t ∇ ψ ( x ) , whose squared norm is integrable against μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure and whose class is t ∇ ψ t\,\nabla\psi t ∇ ψ ; so The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling (iv) , read with S = S t S=S_{t} S = S t , gives a coupling π t ∈ Π ( μ ^ , ( S t ) # μ ^ ) \pi_{t}\in\Pi\bigl(\hat{\mu},(S_{t})_{\#}\hat{\mu}\bigr) π t ∈ Π ( μ ^ , ( S t ) # μ ^ ) with
I ( π t ) = ∥ t ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ 2 = ( ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ) 2 , J ( ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , π t ) = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , t ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = t ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ , I(\pi_{t})=\lVert t\,\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}=\bigl(|t|\,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\bigr)^{2},\qquad\mathcal{J}\bigl(\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}),\pi_{t}\bigr)=\bigl\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}),t\,\nabla\psi\bigr\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=t\,\bigl\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\bigr\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}, I ( π t ) = ∥ t ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ 2 = ( ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ) 2 , J ( ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , π t ) = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , t ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = t ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ ,
the norm being homogeneous and the inner product bilinear (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i) ); thus I ( π t ) = ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ \sqrt{I(\pi_{t})}=|t|\,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} I ( π t ) = ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root , the right-hand side being nonnegative. For t = 0 t=0 t = 0 the map S 0 S_{0} S 0 is i d \mathrm{id} id , so k ( 0 ) = χ ( μ ^ ) k(0)=\chi(\hat{\mu}) k ( 0 ) = χ ( μ ^ ) , and likewise e ( 0 ) = E ( μ ^ ) e(0)=\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu}) e ( 0 ) = E ( μ ^ ) . Let ε ∈ R \varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} ε ∈ R be positive and put c = 1 + ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ c=1+\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} c = 1 + ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ , a positive real number. The function χ \chi χ is differentiable along couplings at μ ^ ∈ Q \hat{\mu}\in Q μ ^ ∈ Q with gradient ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) \nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}) ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) by property (b) of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians (i) ; let θ \theta θ be as in Differentiability of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Along Couplings, and Its Gradient (i) for the positive number ε ( 2 c ) − 1 \varepsilon\,(2c)^{-1} ε ( 2 c ) − 1 in place of its ε \varepsilon ε . Let t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}) t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) satisfy 0 < ∣ t ∣ < θ c − 1 0<|t|<\theta\,c^{-1} 0 < ∣ t ∣ < θ c − 1 . Then I ( π t ) = ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ ∣ t ∣ c < θ \sqrt{I(\pi_{t})}=|t|\,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\le|t|\,c<\theta I ( π t ) = ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ ∣ t ∣ c < θ , by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ c \lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\le c ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ c with the nonnegative multiplier ∣ t ∣ |t| ∣ t ∣ , and by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to ∣ t ∣ < θ c − 1 |t|<\theta\,c^{-1} ∣ t ∣ < θ c − 1 with the positive multiplier c c c ; so I ( π t ) < θ 2 I(\pi_{t})<\theta^{2} I ( π t ) < θ 2 by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field , and the estimate of that clause gives
∣ k ( t ) − k ( 0 ) − t ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ ∣ ≤ ε ( 2 c ) − 1 ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ ε 2 ∣ t ∣ , \Bigl|k(t)-k(0)-t\,\bigl\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\bigr\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\Bigr|\le\varepsilon\,(2c)^{-1}\,|t|\,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\,|t| , k ( t ) − k ( 0 ) − t ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ ≤ ε ( 2 c ) − 1 ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ 2 ε ∣ t ∣ ,
the last step because ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ c \lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\le c ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ c . Multiplying by the positive ∣ t ∣ − 1 |t|^{-1} ∣ t ∣ − 1 , with claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , gives ∣ k ( t ) − k ( 0 ) t − ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ ∣ ≤ ε 2 < ε \bigl|\tfrac{k(t)-k(0)}{t}-\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\bigr|\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}<\varepsilon t k ( t ) − k ( 0 ) − ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ ≤ 2 ε < ε . As ε \varepsilon ε was arbitrary and 0 0 0 is an interior point of ( − t 0 , t 0 ) (-t_{0},t_{0}) ( − t 0 , t 0 ) (shown below), this is the differentiability of k k k at 0 0 0 in the sense of Derivative of a Real Function on an Interval , with the stated derivative. The point 0 0 0 is interior to ( − t 0 , t 0 ) (-t_{0},t_{0}) ( − t 0 , t 0 ) by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (iv) , since − t 0 < − 0 = 0 < t 0 -t_{0}<-0=0<t_{0} − t 0 < − 0 = 0 < t 0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , so by claim 2 of Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers the function h = k + ( − δ ) e h=k+(-\delta)e h = k + ( − δ ) e , whose value at t t t is k ( t ) − δ e ( t ) k(t)-\delta\,e(t) k ( t ) − δ e ( t ) by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field , is differentiable at 0 0 0 with
h ′ ( 0 ) = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ − δ ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ , h'(0)=\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}-\delta\,\langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\bigl\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu})-\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\bigr\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}, h ′ ( 0 ) = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ − δ ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ ,
the second equality by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i) .
Put c = 1 + ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ c=1+\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} c = 1 + ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ , positive by claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to 0 < 1 0<1 0 < 1 (claim 6 of that lemma) and 0 ≤ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ 0\le\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} 0 ≤ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ , and let ρ \rho ρ be the lesser of t 0 t_{0} t 0 and R c − 1 R\,c^{-1} R c − 1 (claim 9 of that lemma), positive because it is one of them, c − 1 c^{-1} c − 1 being positive by claim 7 and R c − 1 R\,c^{-1} R c − 1 by claim 5. For t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) t\in(-t_{0},t_{0}) t ∈ ( − t 0 , t 0 ) with ∣ t ∣ < ρ |t|<\rho ∣ t ∣ < ρ , The Push-Forward of a Probability Measure with Finite Second Moment by the Identity Perturbed along the Gradient of a Test Function: Borel, Finite Second Moment, the Diagonal Coupling and the Wasserstein Bound (iii) and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with the nonnegative multiplier ∣ t ∣ |t| ∣ t ∣ , followed by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with the positive multiplier c c c , give
W 2 ( ( i d + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ , μ ^ ) ≤ ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ ∣ t ∣ c < ρ c ≤ R . W_{2}\bigl((\mathrm{id}+t\,\nabla\psi)_{\#}\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu}\bigr)\le|t|\,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\le|t|\,c<\rho\,c\le R . W 2 ( ( id + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ , μ ^ ) ≤ ∣ t ∣ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ ≤ ∣ t ∣ c < ρ c ≤ R .
The last step holds by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , applied to ρ ≤ R c − 1 \rho\le R\,c^{-1} ρ ≤ R c − 1 with the nonnegative multiplier c c c . Hence ( ∗ ) (\ast) ( ∗ ) applies to μ = ( i d + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ \mu=(\mathrm{id}+t\,\nabla\psi)_{\#}\hat{\mu} μ = ( id + t ∇ ψ ) # μ ^ , which lies in D \mathcal{D} D , and yields h ( t ) ≤ h ( 0 ) h(t)\le h(0) h ( t ) ≤ h ( 0 ) for every such t t t , since h ( 0 ) = k ( 0 ) − δ e ( 0 ) = χ ( μ ^ ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) h(0)=k(0)-\delta\,e(0)=\chi(\hat{\mu})-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu}) h ( 0 ) = k ( 0 ) − δ e ( 0 ) = χ ( μ ^ ) − δ E ( μ ^ ) ; that is, h h h has a local maximum at 0 0 0 relative to ( − t 0 , t 0 ) (-t_{0},t_{0}) ( − t 0 , t 0 ) . By Vanishing of the Derivative at a Local Extremum Strictly Inside an Interval , h ′ ( 0 ) = 0 h'(0)=0 h ′ ( 0 ) = 0 , so
⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = 0 for every ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R d ) . \bigl\langle\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu})-\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\nabla\psi\bigr\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=0\qquad\text{for every }\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). ⟨ ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = 0 for every ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R d ) .
Write v = ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) v=\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu})-\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu}) v = ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) . The field ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) \nabla\chi(\hat{\mu}) ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) lies in T μ ^ T_{\hat{\mu}} T μ ^ by property (b) of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians (i) and Σ ( μ ^ ) \Sigma(\hat{\mu}) Σ ( μ ^ ) lies in T μ ^ T_{\hat{\mu}} T μ ^ by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains (i) , so v ∈ T μ ^ v\in T_{\hat{\mu}} v ∈ T μ ^ , that set being a linear subspace of L 2 ( μ ^ ; R d ) L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( μ ^ ; R d ) by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (i) . The function ℓ : C c ∞ ( R d ) → R \ell:C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d})\to\mathbb{R} ℓ : C c ∞ ( R d ) → R with constant value 0 0 0 satisfies the hypotheses of claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients with C = 0 C=0 C = 0 , since ∣ ℓ ( ψ ) ∣ = 0 = 0 ⋅ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ |\ell(\psi)|=0=0\cdot\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} ∣ ℓ ( ψ ) ∣ = 0 = 0 ⋅ ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field . Both v v v and the zero element of T μ ^ T_{\hat{\mu}} T μ ^ satisfy ⟨ ⋅ , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = ℓ ( ψ ) \langle\cdot,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\ell(\psi) ⟨ ⋅ , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = ℓ ( ψ ) for every ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R d ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R d ) , the latter by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii) ; by the uniqueness in that claim they are equal, so v v v is the zero element; adding δ Σ ( μ ^ ) \delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu}) δ Σ ( μ ^ ) to both sides of ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) + ( − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) ) = 0 \nabla\chi(\hat{\mu})+\bigl(-\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\bigr)=0 ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) + ( − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) ) = 0 , which is v = 0 v=0 v = 0 written out with claim 2 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space , gives ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) = δ Σ ( μ ^ ) \nabla\chi(\hat{\mu})=\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu}) ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) = δ Σ ( μ ^ ) by the associativity, inverse and identity axioms of the vector space L 2 ( μ ^ ; R d ) L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( μ ^ ; R d ) .
Claim 2. Let μ ^ ∈ Q ∩ D Σ \hat{\mu}\in Q\cap\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} μ ^ ∈ Q ∩ D Σ be a point at which χ + δ E \chi+\delta\mathcal{E} χ + δ E has a local minimum relative to D \mathcal{D} D . By Restrictions, Sums, Real Multiples and Differences of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space (iii) the function − χ -\chi − χ is an intrinsic test function on Q Q Q with ∇ ( − χ ) ( ν ) = − ∇ χ ( ν ) \nabla(-\chi)(\nu)=-\nabla\chi(\nu) ∇ ( − χ ) ( ν ) = − ∇ χ ( ν ) for every ν ∈ Q \nu\in Q ν ∈ Q and H − χ ( ν ) = − H χ ( ν ) H_{-\chi}(\nu)=-H_{\chi}(\nu) H − χ ( ν ) = − H χ ( ν ) for every ν ∈ P 2 ( R d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) ν ∈ P 2 ( R d ) . For μ ∈ D \mu\in\mathcal{D} μ ∈ D one has − ( χ ( μ ) + δ E ( μ ) ) = ( − χ ) ( μ ) − δ E ( μ ) -\bigl(\chi(\mu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)\bigr)=(-\chi)(\mu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu) − ( χ ( μ ) + δ E ( μ ) ) = ( − χ ) ( μ ) − δ E ( μ ) by the distributivity axiom of the field R \mathbb{R} R and claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field , so the function ( − χ ) − δ E (-\chi)-\delta\mathcal{E} ( − χ ) − δ E on D \mathcal{D} D is the negative of χ + δ E \chi+\delta\mathcal{E} χ + δ E ; by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , used in both directions, the inequalities defining a local minimum of χ + δ E \chi+\delta\mathcal{E} χ + δ E at μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ relative to D \mathcal{D} D are equivalent to those defining a local maximum of ( − χ ) − δ E (-\chi)-\delta\mathcal{E} ( − χ ) − δ E there. Claim 1, applied to the intrinsic test function − χ -\chi − χ on Q Q Q , therefore gives
− ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) = ∇ ( − χ ) ( μ ^ ) = δ Σ ( μ ^ ) , − H χ ( μ ^ ) = H − χ ( μ ^ ) ⪯ 0 d . -\nabla\chi(\hat{\mu})=\nabla(-\chi)(\hat{\mu})=\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\qquad -H_{\chi}(\hat{\mu})=H_{-\chi}(\hat{\mu})\preceq0_{d}. − ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) = ∇ ( − χ ) ( μ ^ ) = δ Σ ( μ ^ ) , − H χ ( μ ^ ) = H − χ ( μ ^ ) ⪯ 0 d .
Multiplying the first identity by − 1 -1 − 1 and using ( − 1 ) ( ( − 1 ) w ) = w (-1)\bigl((-1)w\bigr)=w ( − 1 ) ( ( − 1 ) w ) = w , which follows from claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and the scalar-multiplication axioms of the vector space L 2 ( μ ^ ; R d ) L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( μ ^ ; R d ) , gives ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) = − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) \nabla\chi(\hat{\mu})=-\delta\,\Sigma(\hat{\mu}) ∇ χ ( μ ^ ) = − δ Σ ( μ ^ ) . For the second, − H χ ( μ ^ ) = 0 d − H χ ( μ ^ ) -H_{\chi}(\hat{\mu})=0_{d}-H_{\chi}(\hat{\mu}) − H χ ( μ ^ ) = 0 d − H χ ( μ ^ ) entrywise by Difference of Real Matrices , and 0 d − H χ ( μ ^ ) ⪯ 0 d 0_{d}-H_{\chi}(\hat{\mu})\preceq0_{d} 0 d − H χ ( μ ^ ) ⪯ 0 d holds if and only if 0 d ⪯ H χ ( μ ^ ) 0_{d}\preceq H_{\chi}(\hat{\mu}) 0 d ⪯ H χ ( μ ^ ) by Comparison with the Zero Matrix in the Positive Semidefinite Ordering .