TheoremBase

Proof of Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity

lemmalem:delta-envelopes-basic-hilbert-triple-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 14,806 chars · 24 deps · depth 25 Reason: Copied from the previous proof version; adds the proof of claim 7 (gap).

Each property of the delta-envelopes is read off from the properties of semicontinuous envelopes and the lower semicontinuity of the penalty function; the gap clause uses that the envelope of u minus delta h, minus a nonnegative multiple of h, is an upper semicontinuous majorant of u minus delta' h.

Proof

Throughout, VUV\cap U is nonempty by The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §dense, and envelopes, local bounds and semicontinuity of functions on UU or on VUV\cap U refer to these sets as subsets of (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), as fixed in Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §open-sets; the sets Av(x)A_{v}(x) and Bv(x)B_{v}(x) of Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function are formed accordingly. Real arithmetic and order facts are those of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background. Two elementary observations are used repeatedly.

(i) Restriction preserves semicontinuity. If vv is a function on VV that is lower semicontinuous at xVUx\in V\cap U relative to VV, then its restriction to VUV\cap U is lower semicontinuous at xx relative to VUV\cap U: the defining condition requires, for each ε>0\varepsilon>0, some η>0\eta>0 such that v(x)ε<v(y)v(x)-\varepsilon<v(y) for every point yy of the set with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta, and an η\eta that works for all such yVy\in V works for all such yVUVy\in V\cap U\subseteq V. The same argument applies to upper semicontinuity (with v(y)<v(x)+εv(y)<v(x)+\varepsilon), and to a function on UU restricted to VUUV\cap U\subseteq U.

(ii) The functions ±δh\pm\delta h on VUV\cap U. By The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §closed-sublevel, hh is lower semicontinuous on VV; by (i) its restriction to VUV\cap U is lower semicontinuous on VUV\cap U, hence so is δh\delta h (claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions, as 0δ0\le\delta), while δh=δ(h)-\delta h=\delta(-h) is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U by claim 1 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity and claim 2 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions.

Claim 1. Suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU. By The δ\delta-Envelopes uδu^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple §minus, uδu^{-}_{\delta} is the upper semicontinuous envelope of the function uδhu-\delta h on the nonempty subset VUV\cap U of (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), which is bounded above near each point of VUV\cap U. Hence Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §usc shows that uδu^{-}_{\delta} is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U and bounded above near each point of VUV\cap U, and Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §bounds gives u(x)δh(x)uδ(x)u(x)-\delta h(x)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x) for xVUx\in V\cap U. The second half follows in the same way from The δ\delta-Envelopes uδu^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple §plus, Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §lsc and Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §bounds.

Claim 2. For xUx\in U, cRc\in\mathbb{R} and a real r>0r>0, the statement that u(y)cu(y)\le c for every yUy\in U with dH(y,x)rd_{H}(y,x)\le r is equivalent, by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, to the statement that c(u)(y)-c\le(-u)(y) for every such yy. Thus cAu(x)c\in A_{u}(x) if and only if cBu(x)-c\in B_{-u}(x), so Au(x)A_{u}(x) is nonempty if and only if Bu(x)B_{-u}(x) is; that is, uu is bounded above near each point of UU if and only if u-u is bounded below near each point of UU. In that case put v=(u)+δhv=(-u)+\delta h on VUV\cap U, so that v=(uδh)v=-(u-\delta h). The function vv is bounded below near each point of VUV\cap U by The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §near-bounds applied to u-u, so Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §duality applied to vv gives (v)=v(-v)^{*}=-v_{*} on VUV\cap U, that is, (uδh)=((u)+δh)(u-\delta h)^{*}=-\bigl((-u)+\delta h\bigr)_{*}, which by The δ\delta-Envelopes uδu^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple §minus and The δ\delta-Envelopes uδu^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple §plus reads uδ=(u)δ+u^{-}_{\delta}=-(-u)^{+}_{\delta}; multiplying by 1-1 gives (u)δ+=uδ(-u)^{+}_{\delta}=-u^{-}_{\delta}. The second assertion is the first applied to u-u in place of uu, since (u)=u-(-u)=u: u-u is bounded below near each point of UU if and only if uu is bounded above, and then uδ+=((u))δ+=(u)δu^{+}_{\delta}=(-(-u))^{+}_{\delta}=-(-u)^{-}_{\delta}, that is, (u)δ=uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta}.

Claim 3. Suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU. The metric space (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) carries the restriction of dHd_{H} (Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §topology), so a sequence in UU converges in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) to a point of UU if and only if it converges to that point in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), the defining condition involving only the distances dH(xm,x)d_{H}(x_{m},x). We verify the condition of Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits §sequential for the function uδu^{-}_{\delta} on the subset VUV\cap U of the metric space (U,dH)(U,d_{H}). Let (xm)mN(x_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in VUV\cap U converging to xUx\in U, and let tRt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy tuδ(xm)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m}) for every mm. We must show xVx\in V and tuδ(x)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x).

Since uu is bounded above near xUx\in U, there are cRc\in\mathbb{R} and a real r>0r>0 with u(y)cu(y)\le c for every yUy\in U with dH(y,x)rd_{H}(y,x)\le r. Choose M0NM_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with dH(xm,x)<r2d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{r}{2} for every mM0m\ge M_{0}. For each mNm\in\mathbb{N} let εm\varepsilon_{m} be the lesser of 1m\tfrac{1}{m} and r2\tfrac{r}{2}, and choose, by Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §approximation (countable choice), a point zmVUz_{m}\in V\cap U with

dH(zm,xm)εmandu(zm)δh(zm)uδ(xm)<εm.d_{H}(z_{m},x_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}\qquad\text{and}\qquad\bigl|u(z_{m})-\delta h(z_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m})\bigr|<\varepsilon_{m}.

For mM0m\ge M_{0} the triangle inequality gives dH(zm,x)dH(zm,xm)+dH(xm,x)<r2+r2=rd_{H}(z_{m},x)\le d_{H}(z_{m},x_{m})+d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{r}{2}+\tfrac{r}{2}=r, so u(zm)cu(z_{m})\le c; and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives u(zm)δh(zm)>uδ(xm)εmt1u(z_{m})-\delta h(z_{m})>u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m})-\varepsilon_{m}\ge t-1, using tuδ(xm)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m}) and εm1m1\varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac1m\le1, the last because 1m1\le m (claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, read in R\mathbb{R} as in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers) gives 1m1\tfrac1m\le1 on multiplying by 1m0\tfrac1m\ge0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Hence δh(zm)<u(zm)t+1ct+1\delta h(z_{m})<u(z_{m})-t+1\le c-t+1, and multiplying by δ10\delta^{-1}\ge0 (claims 4 and 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), h(zm)ch(z_{m})\le c' with c=(ct+1)/δc'=(c-t+1)/\delta, for every mM0m\ge M_{0}. Moreover (zm)(z_{m}) converges to xx in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}): given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose N1NN_{1}\in\mathbb{N} with 1N1<ε2\tfrac{1}{N_{1}}<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} (The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers) and N2NN_{2}\in\mathbb{N} with dH(xm,x)<ε2d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} for mN2m\ge N_{2}; for mm at least the larger of N1N_{1} and N2N_{2}, the triangle inequality of Metric Space and 1m1N1\tfrac1m\le\tfrac{1}{N_{1}} (from N1mN_{1}\le m, as above) give dH(zm,x)dH(zm,xm)+dH(xm,x)<ε2+ε2=εd_{H}(z_{m},x)\le d_{H}(z_{m},x_{m})+d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon.

The sequence (wj)jN(w_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} with wj=zM0+jw_{j}=z_{M_{0}+j} is a subsequence of (zm)(z_{m}), the indices nj=M0+jn_{j}=M_{0}+j being strictly increasing by claim 6 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers; so it converges to xx in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit, it lies in VV, and it satisfies h(wj)ch(w_{j})\le c' for every jj, since M0+jM0M_{0}+j\ge M_{0}. By The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §closed-sublevel, xVx\in V. Thus xVUx\in V\cap U.

Finally, let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By claim 1, uδu^{-}_{\delta} is upper semicontinuous at xx relative to VUV\cap U, so there is a real η>0\eta>0 with uδ(y)<uδ(x)+εu^{-}_{\delta}(y)<u^{-}_{\delta}(x)+\varepsilon for every yVUy\in V\cap U with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta. Choosing mm with dH(xm,x)<ηd_{H}(x_{m},x)<\eta gives tuδ(xm)<uδ(x)+εt\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m})<u^{-}_{\delta}(x)+\varepsilon. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above gives tuδ(x)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x). This verifies the condition of Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits §sequential, so uδu^{-}_{\delta} has closed superlevel sets in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}); by A Real Function with Closed Superlevel Sets on a Subset of a Metric Space §closed-superlevel this means that {xVU:tuδ(x)}\{x\in V\cap U:t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x)\} is closed in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) for every tRt\in\mathbb{R}.

If instead uu is bounded below near each point of UU, then by claim 2, u-u is bounded above near each point of UU and (u)δ=uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta} on VUV\cap U. Applying what was just proved to u-u, the function uδ+-u^{+}_{\delta} has closed superlevel sets in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}), and its superlevel set at height tt is {xVU:tuδ+(x)}={xVU:uδ+(x)t}\{x\in V\cap U:t\le-u^{+}_{\delta}(x)\}=\{x\in V\cap U:u^{+}_{\delta}(x)\le-t\} (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); as tt ranges over R\mathbb{R} so does t-t, which gives the stated form.

Claim 4. Suppose u(x)Cu(x)\le C for every xUx\in U. For each xUx\in U, CAu(x)C\in A_{u}(x) (with the positive radius 11, claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), so uu is bounded above near each point of UU. Let g:VURg:V\cap U\to\mathbb{R} be given by g(x)=Cδh(x)g(x)=C-\delta h(x). By (ii), δh-\delta h is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U; the constant function CC is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U (the defining inequality C<C+εC<C+\varepsilon holds at every point); hence gg is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions. Since u(y)δh(y)Cδh(y)=g(y)u(y)-\delta h(y)\le C-\delta h(y)=g(y) for every yVUy\in V\cap U (claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §least gives uδ(x)g(x)=Cδh(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)\le g(x)=C-\delta h(x) for xVUx\in V\cap U. Multiplying 12xH2h(x)\tfrac12|x|_{H}^{2}\le h(x) (The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §nonneg) by δ>0\delta>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives δ2xH2δh(x)\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}\le\delta h(x), hence Cδh(x)Cδ2xH2C-\delta h(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}.

If instead Cu(x)-C\le u(x) for every xUx\in U, then (u)(x)C(-u)(x)\le C for every xUx\in U, so by the first part u-u is bounded above near each point of UU and (u)δ(x)Cδh(x)Cδ2xH2(-u)^{-}_{\delta}(x)\le C-\delta h(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2} for xVUx\in V\cap U. By claim 2, uu is bounded below near each point of UU and (u)δ=uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta}; multiplying by 1-1 gives C+δ2xH2C+δh(x)uδ+(x)-C+\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}\le-C+\delta h(x)\le u^{+}_{\delta}(x).

Claim 5. Suppose uu and vv are bounded above near each point of UU, so that uδhu-\delta h, vδhv-\delta h and uδhu-\delta' h are bounded above near each point of VUV\cap U by The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §near-bounds (note 0<δδ0<\delta\le\delta'). For yVUy\in V\cap U, u(y)δh(y)v(y)δh(y)u(y)-\delta h(y)\le v(y)-\delta h(y) by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §monotone gives uδvδu^{-}_{\delta}\le v^{-}_{\delta} on VUV\cap U. Also 0(δδ)h(y)0\le(\delta'-\delta)h(y) by The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §nonneg and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so u(y)δh(y)u(y)δh(y)u(y)-\delta' h(y)\le u(y)-\delta h(y), and Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §monotone gives uδuδu^{-}_{\delta'}\le u^{-}_{\delta} on VUV\cap U. If uu and vv are bounded below near each point of UU, the same two comparisons, u+δhv+δhu+\delta h\le v+\delta h and u+δhu+δhu+\delta h\le u+\delta' h on VUV\cap U, together with Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §monotone, give uδ+vδ+u^{+}_{\delta}\le v^{+}_{\delta} and uδ+uδ+u^{+}_{\delta}\le u^{+}_{\delta'}.

Claim 6. Suppose uu is upper semicontinuous on UU. For xUx\in U, upper semicontinuity at xx with ε=1\varepsilon=1 gives a real η>0\eta>0 with u(y)<u(x)+1u(y)<u(x)+1 for every yUy\in U with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta; with r=η2r=\tfrac{\eta}{2}, every yUy\in U with dH(y,x)rd_{H}(y,x)\le r satisfies dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta, hence u(y)u(x)+1u(y)\le u(x)+1. Thus u(x)+1Au(x)u(x)+1\in A_{u}(x), and uu is bounded above near each point of UU. By (i) the restriction of uu to VUV\cap U is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U, by (ii) so is δh-\delta h, and so is their sum uδhu-\delta h by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions. Hence Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §fixed gives (uδh)=uδh(u-\delta h)^{*}=u-\delta h on VUV\cap U, that is, uδ(x)=u(x)δh(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)=u(x)-\delta h(x). If uu is lower semicontinuous on UU, then for xUx\in U lower semicontinuity at xx with ε=1\varepsilon=1 gives a real η>0\eta>0 with u(x)1<u(y)u(x)-1<u(y) for every yUy\in U with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta, so with r=η2r=\tfrac{\eta}{2} one has u(x)1Bu(x)u(x)-1\in B_{u}(x); thus uu is bounded below near each point of UU; the restriction of uu to VUV\cap U and δh\delta h are lower semicontinuous on VUV\cap U by (i) and (ii), hence so is u+δhu+\delta h by claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions, and Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §fixed gives uδ+(x)=u(x)+δh(x)u^{+}_{\delta}(x)=u(x)+\delta h(x). Finally, if uu is continuous on UU then it is both upper and lower semicontinuous on UU by claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity, so both conclusions hold.

Claim 7. Put γ=δδ\gamma=\delta'-\delta, so that 0γ0\le\gamma by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and 0<δ0<\delta' by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU, so that uδhu-\delta h and uδhu-\delta' h are bounded above near each point of VUV\cap U by The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §near-bounds and uδu^{-}_{\delta} and uδu^{-}_{\delta'} are defined on VUV\cap U by The δ\delta-Envelopes uδu^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple §minus. Let g:VURg:V\cap U\to\mathbb{R} be given by g(x)=uδ(x)γh(x)g(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\gamma h(x). By claim 1, uδu^{-}_{\delta} is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U; by (ii) applied with γ\gamma in place of δ\delta, which used only 0δ0\le\delta, the function γh-\gamma h is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U; hence gg is upper semicontinuous on VUV\cap U by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions. For yVUy\in V\cap U, claim 1 gives u(y)δh(y)uδ(y)u(y)-\delta h(y)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(y), and adding γh(y)-\gamma h(y) to both sides (claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives

u(y)δh(y)=(u(y)δh(y))γh(y)uδ(y)γh(y)=g(y),u(y)-\delta' h(y)=\bigl(u(y)-\delta h(y)\bigr)-\gamma h(y)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(y)-\gamma h(y)=g(y),

where δh(y)=δh(y)+γh(y)\delta' h(y)=\delta h(y)+\gamma h(y) by distributivity in R\mathbb{R}. Since uδu^{-}_{\delta'} is the upper semicontinuous envelope of uδhu-\delta' h on VUV\cap U (The δ\delta-Envelopes uδu^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple §minus), Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §least gives uδ(x)g(x)=uδ(x)γh(x)u^{-}_{\delta'}(x)\le g(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\gamma h(x) for every xVUx\in V\cap U, which is the first assertion after adding γh(x)\gamma h(x) to both sides.

If instead uu is bounded below near each point of UU, then by claim 2, u-u is bounded above near each point of UU, (u)δ=uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta} and (u)δ=uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta'}=-u^{+}_{\delta'} on VUV\cap U. The first assertion applied to u-u gives uδ+(x)+γh(x)uδ+(x)-u^{+}_{\delta'}(x)+\gamma h(x)\le-u^{+}_{\delta}(x) for xVUx\in V\cap U; multiplying by 1-1 (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives uδ+(x)uδ+(x)γh(x)u^{+}_{\delta}(x)\le u^{+}_{\delta'}(x)-\gamma h(x), that is, uδ+(x)+γh(x)uδ+(x)u^{+}_{\delta}(x)+\gamma h(x)\le u^{+}_{\delta'}(x).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…