TheoremBase

Each property of the delta-envelopes is read off from the properties of semicontinuous envelopes and the lower semicontinuity of the penalty function; the gap clause uses that the envelope of u minus delta h, minus a nonnegative multiple of h, is an upper semicontinuous majorant of u minus delta' h.

Proof

Throughout, V∩UV\cap U is nonempty by The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (v), and envelopes, local bounds and semicontinuity of functions on UU or on V∩UV\cap U refer to these sets as subsets of (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), as fixed in Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (v); the sets Av(x)A_{v}(x) and Bv(x)B_{v}(x) of Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function are formed accordingly. Real arithmetic and order facts are those of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background. Two elementary observations are used repeatedly.

(i) Restriction preserves semicontinuity. If vv is a function on VV that is lower semicontinuous at x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U relative to VV, then its restriction to V∩UV\cap U is lower semicontinuous at xx relative to V∩UV\cap U: the defining condition requires, for each ε>0\varepsilon>0, some η>0\eta>0 such that v(x)−ε<v(y)v(x)-\varepsilon<v(y) for every point yy of the set with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta, and an η\eta that works for all such y∈Vy\in V works for all such y∈V∩U⊆Vy\in V\cap U\subseteq V. The same argument applies to upper semicontinuity (with v(y)<v(x)+εv(y)<v(x)+\varepsilon), and to a function on UU restricted to V∩U⊆UV\cap U\subseteq U.

(ii) The functions ±δh\pm\delta h on V∩UV\cap U. By The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (iv), hh is lower semicontinuous on VV; by (i) its restriction to V∩UV\cap U is lower semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U, hence so is δh\delta h (claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions, as 0≤δ0\le\delta), while −δh=δ(−h)-\delta h=\delta(-h) is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U by claim 1 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity and claim 2 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions.

Claim 1. Suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU. By The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (i), uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} is the upper semicontinuous envelope of the function u−δhu-\delta h on the nonempty subset V∩UV\cap U of (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), which is bounded above near each point of V∩UV\cap U. Hence Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (ii) shows that uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U and bounded above near each point of V∩UV\cap U, and Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (i) gives u(x)−δh(x)≤uδ−(x)u(x)-\delta h(x)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x) for x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U. The second half follows in the same way from The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (ii), Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality (iii) and Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality (ii).

Claim 2. For x∈Ux\in U, c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and a real r>0r>0, the statement that u(y)≤cu(y)\le c for every y∈Uy\in U with dH(y,x)≤rd_{H}(y,x)\le r is equivalent, by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, to the statement that −c≤(−u)(y)-c\le(-u)(y) for every such yy. Thus c∈Au(x)c\in A_{u}(x) if and only if −c∈B−u(x)-c\in B_{-u}(x), so Au(x)A_{u}(x) is nonempty if and only if B−u(x)B_{-u}(x) is; that is, uu is bounded above near each point of UU if and only if −u-u is bounded below near each point of UU. In that case put v=(−u)+δhv=(-u)+\delta h on V∩UV\cap U, so that v=−(u−δh)v=-(u-\delta h). The function vv is bounded below near each point of V∩UV\cap U by The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (vi) applied to −u-u, so Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality (i) applied to vv gives (−v)∗=−v∗(-v)^{*}=-v_{*} on V∩UV\cap U, that is, (u−δh)∗=−((−u)+δh)∗(u-\delta h)^{*}=-\bigl((-u)+\delta h\bigr)_{*}, which by The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (i) and The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (ii) reads uδ−=−(−u)δ+u^{-}_{\delta}=-(-u)^{+}_{\delta}; multiplying by −1-1 gives (−u)δ+=−uδ−(-u)^{+}_{\delta}=-u^{-}_{\delta}. The second assertion is the first applied to −u-u in place of uu, since −(−u)=u-(-u)=u: −u-u is bounded below near each point of UU if and only if uu is bounded above, and then uδ+=(−(−u))δ+=−(−u)δ−u^{+}_{\delta}=(-(-u))^{+}_{\delta}=-(-u)^{-}_{\delta}, that is, (−u)δ−=−uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta}.

Claim 3. Suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU. The metric space (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) carries the restriction of dHd_{H} (Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background (iii)), so a sequence in UU converges in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) to a point of UU if and only if it converges to that point in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), the defining condition involving only the distances dH(xm,x)d_{H}(x_{m},x). We verify the condition of Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits (i) for the function uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} on the subset V∩UV\cap U of the metric space (U,dH)(U,d_{H}). Let (xm)m∈N(x_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in V∩UV\cap U converging to x∈Ux\in U, and let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy t≤uδ−(xm)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m}) for every mm. We must show x∈Vx\in V and t≤uδ−(x)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x).

Since uu is bounded above near x∈Ux\in U, there are c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and a real r>0r>0 with u(y)≤cu(y)\le c for every y∈Uy\in U with dH(y,x)≤rd_{H}(y,x)\le r. Choose M0∈NM_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with dH(xm,x)<r2d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{r}{2} for every m≥M0m\ge M_{0}. For each m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} let εm\varepsilon_{m} be the lesser of 1m\tfrac{1}{m} and r2\tfrac{r}{2}, and choose, by Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (v) (countable choice), a point zm∈V∩Uz_{m}\in V\cap U with

dH(zm,xm)≤εmand∣u(zm)−δh(zm)−uδ−(xm)∣<εm.d_{H}(z_{m},x_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}\qquad\text{and}\qquad\bigl|u(z_{m})-\delta h(z_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m})\bigr|<\varepsilon_{m}.

For m≥M0m\ge M_{0} the triangle inequality gives dH(zm,x)≤dH(zm,xm)+dH(xm,x)<r2+r2=rd_{H}(z_{m},x)\le d_{H}(z_{m},x_{m})+d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{r}{2}+\tfrac{r}{2}=r, so u(zm)≤cu(z_{m})\le c; and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives u(zm)−δh(zm)>uδ−(xm)−εm≥t−1u(z_{m})-\delta h(z_{m})>u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m})-\varepsilon_{m}\ge t-1, using t≤uδ−(xm)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m}) and εm≤1m≤1\varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac1m\le1, the last because 1≤m1\le m (claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, read in R\mathbb{R} as in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background (i)) gives 1m≤1\tfrac1m\le1 on multiplying by 1m≥0\tfrac1m\ge0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Hence δh(zm)<u(zm)−t+1≤c−t+1\delta h(z_{m})<u(z_{m})-t+1\le c-t+1, and multiplying by δ−1≥0\delta^{-1}\ge0 (claims 4 and 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), h(zm)≤c′h(z_{m})\le c' with c′=(c−t+1)/δc'=(c-t+1)/\delta, for every m≥M0m\ge M_{0}. Moreover (zm)(z_{m}) converges to xx in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}): given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose N1∈NN_{1}\in\mathbb{N} with 1N1<ε2\tfrac{1}{N_{1}}<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} (The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers) and N2∈NN_{2}\in\mathbb{N} with dH(xm,x)<ε2d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} for m≥N2m\ge N_{2}; for mm at least the larger of N1N_{1} and N2N_{2}, the triangle inequality of Metric Space and 1m≤1N1\tfrac1m\le\tfrac{1}{N_{1}} (from N1≤mN_{1}\le m, as above) give dH(zm,x)≤dH(zm,xm)+dH(xm,x)<ε2+ε2=εd_{H}(z_{m},x)\le d_{H}(z_{m},x_{m})+d_{H}(x_{m},x)<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon.

The sequence (wj)j∈N(w_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} with wj=zM0+jw_{j}=z_{M_{0}+j} is a subsequence of (zm)(z_{m}), the indices nj=M0+jn_{j}=M_{0}+j being strictly increasing by claim 6 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers; so it converges to xx in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit, it lies in VV, and it satisfies h(wj)≤c′h(w_{j})\le c' for every jj, since M0+j≥M0M_{0}+j\ge M_{0}. By The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (iv), x∈Vx\in V. Thus x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U.

Finally, let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By claim 1, uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} is upper semicontinuous at xx relative to V∩UV\cap U, so there is a real η>0\eta>0 with uδ−(y)<uδ−(x)+εu^{-}_{\delta}(y)<u^{-}_{\delta}(x)+\varepsilon for every y∈V∩Uy\in V\cap U with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta. Choosing mm with dH(xm,x)<ηd_{H}(x_{m},x)<\eta gives t≤uδ−(xm)<uδ−(x)+εt\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{m})<u^{-}_{\delta}(x)+\varepsilon. As ε>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack (i) gives t≤uδ−(x)t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x). This verifies the condition of Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits (i), so uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} has closed superlevel sets in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}); by A Real Function with Closed Superlevel Sets on a Subset of a Metric Space (ii) this means that {x∈V∩U:t≤uδ−(x)}\{x\in V\cap U:t\le u^{-}_{\delta}(x)\} is closed in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}) for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}.

If instead uu is bounded below near each point of UU, then by claim 2, −u-u is bounded above near each point of UU and (−u)δ−=−uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta} on V∩UV\cap U. Applying what was just proved to −u-u, the function −uδ+-u^{+}_{\delta} has closed superlevel sets in (U,dH)(U,d_{H}), and its superlevel set at height tt is {x∈V∩U:t≤−uδ+(x)}={x∈V∩U:uδ+(x)≤−t}\{x\in V\cap U:t\le-u^{+}_{\delta}(x)\}=\{x\in V\cap U:u^{+}_{\delta}(x)\le-t\} (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); as tt ranges over R\mathbb{R} so does −t-t, which gives the stated form.

Claim 4. Suppose u(x)≤Cu(x)\le C for every x∈Ux\in U. For each x∈Ux\in U, C∈Au(x)C\in A_{u}(x) (with the positive radius 11, claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), so uu is bounded above near each point of UU. Let g:V∩U→Rg:V\cap U\to\mathbb{R} be given by g(x)=C−δh(x)g(x)=C-\delta h(x). By (ii), −δh-\delta h is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U; the constant function CC is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U (the defining inequality C<C+εC<C+\varepsilon holds at every point); hence gg is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions. Since u(y)−δh(y)≤C−δh(y)=g(y)u(y)-\delta h(y)\le C-\delta h(y)=g(y) for every y∈V∩Uy\in V\cap U (claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (iii) gives uδ−(x)≤g(x)=C−δh(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)\le g(x)=C-\delta h(x) for x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U. Multiplying 12∣x∣H2≤h(x)\tfrac12|x|_{H}^{2}\le h(x) (The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (i)) by δ>0\delta>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives δ2∣x∣H2≤δh(x)\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}\le\delta h(x), hence C−δh(x)≤C−δ2∣x∣H2C-\delta h(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}.

If instead −C≤u(x)-C\le u(x) for every x∈Ux\in U, then (−u)(x)≤C(-u)(x)\le C for every x∈Ux\in U, so by the first part −u-u is bounded above near each point of UU and (−u)δ−(x)≤C−δh(x)≤C−δ2∣x∣H2(-u)^{-}_{\delta}(x)\le C-\delta h(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2} for x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U. By claim 2, uu is bounded below near each point of UU and (−u)δ−=−uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta}; multiplying by −1-1 gives −C+δ2∣x∣H2≤−C+δh(x)≤uδ+(x)-C+\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}\le-C+\delta h(x)\le u^{+}_{\delta}(x).

Claim 5. Suppose uu and vv are bounded above near each point of UU, so that u−δhu-\delta h, v−δhv-\delta h and u−δ′hu-\delta' h are bounded above near each point of V∩UV\cap U by The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (vi) (note 0<δ≤δ′0<\delta\le\delta'). For y∈V∩Uy\in V\cap U, u(y)−δh(y)≤v(y)−δh(y)u(y)-\delta h(y)\le v(y)-\delta h(y) by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (vi) gives uδ−≤vδ−u^{-}_{\delta}\le v^{-}_{\delta} on V∩UV\cap U. Also 0≤(δ′−δ)h(y)0\le(\delta'-\delta)h(y) by The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (i) and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so u(y)−δ′h(y)≤u(y)−δh(y)u(y)-\delta' h(y)\le u(y)-\delta h(y), and Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (vi) gives uδ′−≤uδ−u^{-}_{\delta'}\le u^{-}_{\delta} on V∩UV\cap U. If uu and vv are bounded below near each point of UU, the same two comparisons, u+δh≤v+δhu+\delta h\le v+\delta h and u+δh≤u+δ′hu+\delta h\le u+\delta' h on V∩UV\cap U, together with Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality (vii), give uδ+≤vδ+u^{+}_{\delta}\le v^{+}_{\delta} and uδ+≤uδ′+u^{+}_{\delta}\le u^{+}_{\delta'}.

Claim 6. Suppose uu is upper semicontinuous on UU. For x∈Ux\in U, upper semicontinuity at xx with ε=1\varepsilon=1 gives a real η>0\eta>0 with u(y)<u(x)+1u(y)<u(x)+1 for every y∈Uy\in U with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta; with r=η2r=\tfrac{\eta}{2}, every y∈Uy\in U with dH(y,x)≤rd_{H}(y,x)\le r satisfies dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta, hence u(y)≤u(x)+1u(y)\le u(x)+1. Thus u(x)+1∈Au(x)u(x)+1\in A_{u}(x), and uu is bounded above near each point of UU. By (i) the restriction of uu to V∩UV\cap U is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U, by (ii) so is −δh-\delta h, and so is their sum u−δhu-\delta h by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions. Hence Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (iv) gives (u−δh)∗=u−δh(u-\delta h)^{*}=u-\delta h on V∩UV\cap U, that is, uδ−(x)=u(x)−δh(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)=u(x)-\delta h(x). If uu is lower semicontinuous on UU, then for x∈Ux\in U lower semicontinuity at xx with ε=1\varepsilon=1 gives a real η>0\eta>0 with u(x)−1<u(y)u(x)-1<u(y) for every y∈Uy\in U with dH(x,y)<ηd_{H}(x,y)<\eta, so with r=η2r=\tfrac{\eta}{2} one has u(x)−1∈Bu(x)u(x)-1\in B_{u}(x); thus uu is bounded below near each point of UU; the restriction of uu to V∩UV\cap U and δh\delta h are lower semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U by (i) and (ii), hence so is u+δhu+\delta h by claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions, and Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality (v) gives uδ+(x)=u(x)+δh(x)u^{+}_{\delta}(x)=u(x)+\delta h(x). Finally, if uu is continuous on UU then it is both upper and lower semicontinuous on UU by claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity, so both conclusions hold.

Claim 7. Put γ=δ′−δ\gamma=\delta'-\delta, so that 0≤γ0\le\gamma by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and 0<δ′0<\delta' by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Suppose uu is bounded above near each point of UU, so that u−δhu-\delta h and u−δ′hu-\delta' h are bounded above near each point of V∩UV\cap U by The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (vi) and uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} and uδ′−u^{-}_{\delta'} are defined on V∩UV\cap U by The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (i). Let g:V∩U→Rg:V\cap U\to\mathbb{R} be given by g(x)=uδ−(x)−γh(x)g(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\gamma h(x). By claim 1, uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U; by (ii) applied with γ\gamma in place of δ\delta, which used only 0≤δ0\le\delta, the function −γh-\gamma h is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U; hence gg is upper semicontinuous on V∩UV\cap U by claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions. For y∈V∩Uy\in V\cap U, claim 1 gives u(y)−δh(y)≤uδ−(y)u(y)-\delta h(y)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(y), and adding −γh(y)-\gamma h(y) to both sides (claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives

u(y)−δ′h(y)=(u(y)−δh(y))−γh(y)≤uδ−(y)−γh(y)=g(y),u(y)-\delta' h(y)=\bigl(u(y)-\delta h(y)\bigr)-\gamma h(y)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(y)-\gamma h(y)=g(y),

where δ′h(y)=δh(y)+γh(y)\delta' h(y)=\delta h(y)+\gamma h(y) by distributivity in R\mathbb{R}. Since uδ′−u^{-}_{\delta'} is the upper semicontinuous envelope of u−δ′hu-\delta' h on V∩UV\cap U (The δ\delta-Envelopes uδ−u^-_\delta and uδ+u^+_\delta of a Function on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple (i)), Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope (iii) gives uδ′−(x)≤g(x)=uδ−(x)−γh(x)u^{-}_{\delta'}(x)\le g(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\gamma h(x) for every x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U, which is the first assertion after adding γh(x)\gamma h(x) to both sides.

If instead uu is bounded below near each point of UU, then by claim 2, −u-u is bounded above near each point of UU, (−u)δ−=−uδ+(-u)^{-}_{\delta}=-u^{+}_{\delta} and (−u)δ′−=−uδ′+(-u)^{-}_{\delta'}=-u^{+}_{\delta'} on V∩UV\cap U. The first assertion applied to −u-u gives −uδ′+(x)+γh(x)≤−uδ+(x)-u^{+}_{\delta'}(x)+\gamma h(x)\le-u^{+}_{\delta}(x) for x∈V∩Ux\in V\cap U; multiplying by −1-1 (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives uδ+(x)≤uδ′+(x)−γh(x)u^{+}_{\delta}(x)\le u^{+}_{\delta'}(x)-\gamma h(x), that is, uδ+(x)+γh(x)≤uδ′+(x)u^{+}_{\delta}(x)+\gamma h(x)\le u^{+}_{\delta'}(x).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…