TheoremBase

Proof

Sums of real numbers are the finite sums of the field R\mathbb{R}, and 0 t=00\,t=0 for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}, since 0 t=(0+0) t=0 t+0 t0\,t=(0+0)\,t=0\,t+0\,t by distributivity and claim 2 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field applies. As in Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, N+1N+1 denotes the successor of NN, so claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums may be used in the form βˆ‘k=1N+1ak=βˆ‘k=1Nak+aN+1\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}a_k=\sum_{k=1}^{N}a_k+a_{N+1}.

We use the induction principle for the natural numbers. Let P\mathcal{P} be the set of natural numbers NN with 1≀N1\le N such that the asserted inequality holds for every convex CβŠ†RnC\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n, every f:Cβ†’Rf:C\to\mathbb{R} that is convex on CC, every x:[N]β†’Rnx:[N]\to\mathbb{R}^n taking all of its values in CC, and every system of convex weights tt of length NN.

Base. Let N=1N=1. By claim 1 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, t1=1t_1=1 and βˆ‘k=11tkxk=x1\sum_{k=1}^{1}t_kx_k=x_1, so the left-hand side is f(x1)f(x_1); and claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums gives βˆ‘k=11tkf(xk)=t1f(x1)=f(x1)\sum_{k=1}^{1}t_kf(x_k)=t_1f(x_1)=f(x_1). The two sides are equal, so the inequality holds by reflexivity of the total order ≀\le. Hence 1∈P1\in\mathcal{P}.

Step. Suppose N∈PN\in\mathcal{P}, and let CC, ff, a map x:[N+1]β†’Rnx:[N+1]\to\mathbb{R}^n with values in CC, and a system tt of convex weights of length N+1N+1 be given. Adopt the notation tβ€²t', xβ€²x', ss, Ο„\tau and yy of claim 2 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations.

Suppose first that tN+1=1t_{N+1}=1. By claim 2 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations we have s=1βˆ’tN+1=0s=1-t_{N+1}=0, and since βˆ‘k=1Ntkβ€²=s=0\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_k=s=0 with 0≀tkβ€²0\le t'_k for every k∈[N]k\in[N], claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives tkβ€²=0t'_k=0 for every k∈[N]k\in[N]. Claim 2(a) of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations gives βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk=xN+1\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k=x_{N+1}, so the left-hand side is f(xN+1)f(x_{N+1}). On the right, claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums gives

βˆ‘k=1N+1tkf(xk)=βˆ‘k=1Ntkβ€²f(xkβ€²)+tN+1f(xN+1),\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kf(x_k)=\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_kf(x'_k)+t_{N+1}f(x_{N+1}),

and every summand of the first sum equals 0 f(xkβ€²)=00\,f(x'_k)=0, so that sum is 00 by claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums. Both sides therefore equal f(xN+1)f(x_{N+1}) and the inequality holds.

Suppose now that tN+1β‰ 1t_{N+1}\ne1. By claim 2(b) of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, Ο„\tau is a system of convex weights of length NN, s τk=tkβ€²s\,\tau_k=t'_k for every k∈[N]k\in[N], 0≀s0\le s, s≀1s\le1, and

βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk=s y+(1βˆ’s) xN+1,y=βˆ‘k=1NΟ„kxkβ€².\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k=s\,y+(1-s)\,x_{N+1},\qquad y=\sum_{k=1}^{N}\tau_kx'_k .

The restriction xβ€²x' takes all of its values in CC, so y∈Cy\in C by claim 3 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, and xN+1∈Cx_{N+1}\in C. Since ff is convex on CC,

f(βˆ‘k=1N+1tkxk)≀s f(y)+(1βˆ’s) f(xN+1).f\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kx_k\Bigr)\le s\,f(y)+(1-s)\,f(x_{N+1}).

By the induction hypothesis applied to CC, ff, xβ€²x' and Ο„\tau, we have f(y)β‰€βˆ‘k=1NΟ„kf(xkβ€²)f(y)\le\sum_{k=1}^{N}\tau_kf(x'_k). Multiplying by the nonnegative ss using claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and then using claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums together with s τk=tkβ€²s\,\tau_k=t'_k,

s f(y)≀sβˆ‘k=1NΟ„kf(xkβ€²)=βˆ‘k=1Ntkβ€²f(xkβ€²).s\,f(y)\le s\sum_{k=1}^{N}\tau_kf(x'_k)=\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_kf(x'_k).

Adding (1βˆ’s)f(xN+1)(1-s)f(x_{N+1}) to both sides by claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and using 1βˆ’s=tN+11-s=t_{N+1} together with claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums,

s f(y)+(1βˆ’s) f(xN+1)β‰€βˆ‘k=1Ntkβ€²f(xkβ€²)+tN+1f(xN+1)=βˆ‘k=1N+1tkf(xk).s\,f(y)+(1-s)\,f(x_{N+1})\le\sum_{k=1}^{N}t'_kf(x'_k)+t_{N+1}f(x_{N+1})=\sum_{k=1}^{N+1}t_kf(x_k).

Transitivity of ≀\le combines this with the convexity inequality above and gives the asserted bound. Hence N+1∈PN+1\in\mathcal{P}, and by induction P\mathcal{P} contains every natural number NN with 1≀N1\le N.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…