Sums of real numbers are the finite sums of the field R, and 0t=0 for every tβR, since 0t=(0+0)t=0t+0t by distributivity and claim 2 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field applies. As in Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, N+1 denotes the successor of N, so claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums may be used in the form βk=1N+1βakβ=βk=1Nβakβ+aN+1β.
We use the induction principle for the natural numbers. Let P be the set of natural numbers N with 1β€N such that the asserted inequality holds for every convex CβRn, every f:CβR that is convex on C, every x:[N]βRn taking all of its values in C, and every system of convex weights t of length N.
Base. Let N=1. By claim 1 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, t1β=1 and βk=11βtkβxkβ=x1β, so the left-hand side is f(x1β); and claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums gives βk=11βtkβf(xkβ)=t1βf(x1β)=f(x1β). The two sides are equal, so the inequality holds by reflexivity of the total order β€. Hence 1βP.
Step. Suppose NβP, and let C, f, a map x:[N+1]βRn with values in C, and a system t of convex weights of length N+1 be given. Adopt the notation tβ², xβ², s, Ο and y of claim 2 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations.
Suppose first that tN+1β=1. By claim 2 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations we have s=1βtN+1β=0, and since βk=1Nβtkβ²β=s=0 with 0β€tkβ²β for every kβ[N], claim 5 of Properties of Finite Sums gives tkβ²β=0 for every kβ[N]. Claim 2(a) of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations gives βk=1N+1βtkβxkβ=xN+1β, so the left-hand side is f(xN+1β). On the right, claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums gives
k=1βN+1βtkβf(xkβ)=k=1βNβtkβ²βf(xkβ²β)+tN+1βf(xN+1β),
and every summand of the first sum equals 0f(xkβ²β)=0, so that sum is 0 by claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums. Both sides therefore equal f(xN+1β) and the inequality holds.
Suppose now that tN+1βξ =1. By claim 2(b) of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, Ο is a system of convex weights of length N, sΟkβ=tkβ²β for every kβ[N], 0β€s, sβ€1, and
k=1βN+1βtkβxkβ=sy+(1βs)xN+1β,y=k=1βNβΟkβxkβ²β.
The restriction xβ² takes all of its values in C, so yβC by claim 3 of Small Cases, Reduction, and Membership for Convex Combinations, and xN+1ββC. Since f is convex on C,
f(k=1βN+1βtkβxkβ)β€sf(y)+(1βs)f(xN+1β).
By the induction hypothesis applied to C, f, xβ² and Ο, we have f(y)β€βk=1NβΟkβf(xkβ²β). Multiplying by the nonnegative s using claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and then using claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums together with sΟkβ=tkβ²β,
sf(y)β€sk=1βNβΟkβf(xkβ²β)=k=1βNβtkβ²βf(xkβ²β).
Adding (1βs)f(xN+1β) to both sides by claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and using 1βs=tN+1β together with claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums,
sf(y)+(1βs)f(xN+1β)β€k=1βNβtkβ²βf(xkβ²β)+tN+1βf(xN+1β)=k=1βN+1βtkβf(xkβ).
Transitivity of β€ combines this with the convexity inequality above and gives the asserted bound. Hence N+1βP, and by induction P contains every natural number N with 1β€N.