TheoremBase

Bessel follows from the finite-dimensional Pythagoras identity and the criterion for series with nonnegative terms; Riesz-Fischer from the identity relating a block of partial sums to the corresponding block of the real series, and the characterisation is proved as a cycle of implications.

Proof

Throughout, sn=∑k=1nckeks_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}e_{k} denotes the nn-th partial sum of (ckek)k∈N(c_{k}e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in HH and tn=∑k=1nck2t_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}^{2} that of (ck2)k∈N(c_{k}^{2})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in R\mathbb{R}; SS is the successor map and n+1=S(n)n+1=S(n). For each nn, the tuple e(n)e^{(n)} is orthonormal, since its components are components of the orthonormal sequence (ek)(e_{k}) and distinct indices in [n][n] are distinct in N\mathbb{N}.

Squares are nonnegative. For s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}, claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives ∣s∣∈{s,−s}|s|\in\{s,-s\} and 0≤∣s∣0\le|s|; in either case ∣s∣ ∣s∣=s s=s2|s|\,|s|=s\,s=s^{2}, and 0≤∣s∣ ∣s∣0\le|s|\,|s| by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Hence 0≤s20\le s^{2}.

Claim 1. Let P(n)P^{(n)} denote the projection onto span⁡(e(n))\operatorname{span}(e^{(n)}) of Projection onto the Span of an Orthonormal Tuple, and Coordinates on a Finite-Dimensional Subspace. By claim 2 of that lemma,

∑k=1n⟨x,ek⟩2=∣P(n)x∣2≤∣x∣2for every n∈N.\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle x,e_{k}\rangle^{2}=|P^{(n)}x|^{2}\le|x|^{2}\qquad\text{for every }n\in\mathbb{N}.

The terms ⟨x,ek⟩2\langle x,e_{k}\rangle^{2} are nonnegative, so the set of partial sums of ∑k=1∞⟨x,ek⟩2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\langle x,e_{k}\rangle^{2} is bounded above by ∣x∣2|x|^{2}, and claim 1 of Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series shows that the series converges with sum the supremum of that set, which is at most ∣x∣2|x|^{2}.

Claim 2. We first show, by induction on nn, that

∣sn−sm∣2=tn−tmwhenever m≤n.|s_{n}-s_{m}|^{2}=t_{n}-t_{m}\qquad\text{whenever }m\le n.

If n=1n=1 then m=1m=1 by claims 4 and 2 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, and both sides vanish. Assume the identity for nn and let m≤n+1m\le n+1. If m=n+1m=n+1 both sides vanish. Otherwise m≤nm\le n by claim 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers. By claim 2 of Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space and orthonormality, ⟨sn,en+1⟩=∑k=1nck⟨ek,en+1⟩=0\langle s_{n},e_{n+1}\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}\langle e_{k},e_{n+1}\rangle=0, since k≤n<n+1k\le n<n+1 gives k≠n+1k\ne n+1; likewise ⟨sm,en+1⟩=0\langle s_{m},e_{n+1}\rangle=0, so ⟨sn−sm,en+1⟩=0\langle s_{n}-s_{m},e_{n+1}\rangle=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i). Hence, by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (v) and ∣en+1∣=1|e_{n+1}|=1,

∣sn+1−sm∣2=∣(sn−sm)+cn+1en+1∣2=∣sn−sm∣2+cn+12=(tn−tm)+cn+12=tn+1−tm.|s_{n+1}-s_{m}|^{2}=|(s_{n}-s_{m})+c_{n+1}e_{n+1}|^{2}=|s_{n}-s_{m}|^{2}+c_{n+1}^{2}=(t_{n}-t_{m})+c_{n+1}^{2}=t_{n+1}-t_{m}.

Suppose ∑k=1∞ck2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}^{2} converges and let ε\varepsilon be positive. By claim 3 of Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers there is NN with ∣tn−tm∣<ε2|t_{n}-t_{m}|<\varepsilon^{2} for N≤mN\le m and N≤nN\le n. For such m,nm,n, the order being total, we may assume m≤nm\le n after possibly exchanging them, since ∣sn−sm∣=∣sm−sn∣|s_{n}-s_{m}|=|s_{m}-s_{n}|; then ∣sn−sm∣2=tn−tm≤∣tn−tm∣<ε2|s_{n}-s_{m}|^{2}=t_{n}-t_{m}\le|t_{n}-t_{m}|<\varepsilon^{2} by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, whence ∣sn−sm∣<ε|s_{n}-s_{m}|<\varepsilon by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and trichotomy. By claim 4 of Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space the series ∑k=1∞ckek\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}e_{k} converges.

Conversely, suppose ∑k=1∞ckek\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}e_{k} converges and let ε\varepsilon be positive. Let η\eta be the nonnegative real with η2=ε\eta^{2}=\varepsilon given by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root; then η\eta is positive. By claim 4 of Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space there is NN with ∣sn−sm∣<η|s_{n}-s_{m}|<\eta for N≤mN\le m and N≤nN\le n, and then ∣tn−tm∣=∣sn−sm∣2<ε|t_{n}-t_{m}|=|s_{n}-s_{m}|^{2}<\varepsilon for such m,nm,n with m≤nm\le n, using claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; the case n≤mn\le m follows by exchanging mm and nn. By claim 3 of Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers the series ∑k=1∞ck2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}^{2} converges.

Assume now both converge and write z=∑k=1∞ckekz=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}e_{k}. By claim 4 of Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space, ∣sn∣2=tn|s_{n}|^{2}=t_{n} for every nn. Since ∣∣sn∣−∣z∣∣≤∣sn−z∣\bigl||s_{n}|-|z|\bigr|\le|s_{n}-z| by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (ii), the sequence (∣sn∣)(|s_{n}|) converges to ∣z∣|z|, hence (∣sn∣2)(|s_{n}|^{2}) converges to ∣z∣2|z|^{2} by claim 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences; and (tn)(t_{n}) converges to ∑k=1∞ck2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}^{2}. By uniqueness of limits, ∣z∣2=∑k=1∞ck2|z|^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}^{2}.

Finally fix j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}. By claim 3 of Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space, ⟨sn,ej⟩=cj\langle s_{n},e_{j}\rangle=c_{j} whenever j≤nj\le n. Given a positive ε\varepsilon, choose NN with j≤Nj\le N and ∣sn−z∣<ε|s_{n}-z|<\varepsilon for N≤nN\le n; then, by The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space and ∣ej∣=1|e_{j}|=1,

∣cj−⟨z,ej⟩∣=∣⟨sn−z,ej⟩∣≤∣sn−z∣<ε.|c_{j}-\langle z,e_{j}\rangle|=|\langle s_{n}-z,e_{j}\rangle|\le|s_{n}-z|<\varepsilon .

As ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack gives ∣cj−⟨z,ej⟩∣=0|c_{j}-\langle z,e_{j}\rangle|=0, so ⟨z,ej⟩=cj\langle z,e_{j}\rangle=c_{j} by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Claim 3. Put ck=⟨x,ek⟩c_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle. By claim 1 the series ∑k=1∞ck2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}^{2} converges, so by claim 2 the series ∑k=1∞ckek\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}e_{k} converges, with sum zz say, and ⟨z,ej⟩=cj=⟨x,ej⟩\langle z,e_{j}\rangle=c_{j}=\langle x,e_{j}\rangle for every jj. Hence ⟨x−z,ej⟩=0\langle x-z,e_{j}\rangle=0 for every jj by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i), and since (ek)(e_{k}) is an orthonormal basis, x−z=0Hx-z=0_{H}, that is, x=zx=z.

Claim 4. The first identity is the norm identity of claim 2 with ck=⟨x,ek⟩c_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle and, by claim 3, z=xz=x. For the second, claim 3 says that ∑k=1∞⟨x,ek⟩ek\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\langle x,e_{k}\rangle e_{k} converges with sum xx, so claim 7 of Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space shows that the series with terms ⟨⟨x,ek⟩ek,y⟩\langle\langle x,e_{k}\rangle e_{k},y\rangle converges with sum ⟨x,y⟩\langle x,y\rangle. By condition (c) of Real Inner Product Spaces (i) and symmetry, ⟨⟨x,ek⟩ek,y⟩=⟨x,ek⟩⟨ek,y⟩=⟨x,ek⟩⟨y,ek⟩\langle\langle x,e_{k}\rangle e_{k},y\rangle=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle\langle e_{k},y\rangle=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle\langle y,e_{k}\rangle.

Claim 5. (a) implies (b) by claim 3, and (b) implies (c) by the norm identity of claim 2.

(c) implies (a): if ⟨x,ek⟩=0\langle x,e_{k}\rangle=0 for every kk, then every partial sum of ∑k=1∞⟨x,ek⟩2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\langle x,e_{k}\rangle^{2} vanishes, by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums with the factor 00, so the sum is 00 and (c) gives ∣x∣2=0|x|^{2}=0; hence ⟨x,x⟩=0\langle x,x\rangle=0 and x=0Hx=0_{H} by condition (d) of Real Inner Product Spaces (i).

(b) implies (d): given x∈Hx\in H and a positive ε\varepsilon, the partial sums ∑k=1n⟨x,ek⟩ek\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle x,e_{k}\rangle e_{k} lie in span⁡(e(n))\operatorname{span}(e^{(n)}) by the definition of the span and converge to xx, so some element of the union lies within ε\varepsilon of xx. Hence every open ball about xx meets the union, and xx lies in its closure by Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls. As xx was arbitrary, the union is dense.

(d) implies (a): suppose ⟨x,ek⟩=0\langle x,e_{k}\rangle=0 for every kk and let v∈span⁡(e(n))v\in\operatorname{span}(e^{(n)}) for some nn, say v=∑k=1nλkekv=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}e_{k}. By claim 2 of Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space, ⟨x,v⟩=∑k=1nλk⟨x,ek⟩=0\langle x,v\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}\langle x,e_{k}\rangle=0. Suppose x≠0Hx\ne0_{H}, so that ∣x∣|x| is positive. Let ε\varepsilon be positive. By (d) and Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls there is such a vv with ∣x−v∣<ε∣x∣|x-v|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{|x|}. Then, by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i) and The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space,

∣x∣2=⟨x,x⟩=⟨x,x−v⟩+⟨x,v⟩=⟨x,x−v⟩≤∣x∣ ∣x−v∣<ε.|x|^{2}=\langle x,x\rangle=\langle x,x-v\rangle+\langle x,v\rangle=\langle x,x-v\rangle\le|x|\,|x-v|<\varepsilon .

Since ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack gives ∣x∣2≤0|x|^{2}\le0, contradicting the positivity of ∣x∣2|x|^{2}. Hence x=0Hx=0_{H}, and (ek)(e_{k}) is an orthonormal basis.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…