TheoremBase

Symmetry follows from the swap of coordinates, separation from the diagonal coupling and from an optimal coupling of zero cost, and the triangle inequality from quantising the middle measure, modifying two near-optimal couplings and gluing them over the finitely supported quantised measure.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied with the data named at the point of citation.

Step 0 (Preliminaries). Couplings Π(⋅,⋅)\Pi(\cdot,\cdot) and the quadratic cost II are those of Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling and Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost. Let α,β∈P2(X)\alpha,\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and put J(α,β)={I(π):π∈Π(α,β)}J(\alpha,\beta)=\{I(\pi):\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta)\}. By The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance, J(α,β)J(\alpha,\beta) is a nonempty set of nonnegative real numbers, W2(α,β)W_{2}(\alpha,\beta) is the nonnegative square root of its greatest lower bound, so that W2(α,β)2=inf⁡J(α,β)W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)^{2}=\inf J(\alpha,\beta) by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, and W2(α,β)2≤I(π)W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)^{2}\le I(\pi) for every π∈Π(α,β)\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta). Since I(π)2=I(π)\sqrt{I(\pi)}^{2}=I(\pi), claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field turns the last inequality into

W2(α,β)≤I(π)for every π∈Π(α,β).W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}\qquad\text{for every }\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta).

We also use the following approximation (A): for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is π∈Π(α,β)\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta) with I(π)<W2(α,β)+ε\sqrt{I(\pi)}<W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)+\varepsilon. Indeed, with W=W2(α,β)≥0W=W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)\ge0 the number η=2Wε+ε2\eta=2W\varepsilon+\varepsilon^{2} is positive, so claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R}, applied to the set J(α,β)J(\alpha,\beta), bounded below by 00, and to η\eta, gives π∈Π(α,β)\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta) with I(π)<W2+η=(W+ε)2I(\pi)<W^{2}+\eta=(W+\varepsilon)^{2}; as I(π)\sqrt{I(\pi)} and W+εW+\varepsilon are nonnegative, claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives I(π)<W+ε\sqrt{I(\pi)}<W+\varepsilon.

Step 1 (Claim 1, symmetry). Let σ\sigma be the swap of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §swap. By that clause, applied to μ,ν\mu,\nu, every π∈Π(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) gives σ#π∈Π(ν,μ)\sigma_{\#}\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu) with I(σ#π)=I(π)I(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=I(\pi), so J(μ,ν)⊆J(ν,μ)J(\mu,\nu)\subseteq J(\nu,\mu); applied to ν,μ\nu,\mu it gives J(ν,μ)⊆J(μ,ν)J(\nu,\mu)\subseteq J(\mu,\nu). Hence J(μ,ν)=J(ν,μ)J(\mu,\nu)=J(\nu,\mu), the two sets have the same greatest lower bound, and its nonnegative square root is unique by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root; so W2(μ,ν)=W2(ν,μ)W_{2}(\mu,\nu)=W_{2}(\nu,\mu) by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance.

Step 2 (Claim 2, separation: equal measures). Suppose μ=ν\mu=\nu. By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §pushforward, (idX,idX)#μ∈Π(μ,μ)(\mathrm{id}_{X},\mathrm{id}_{X})_{\#}\mu\in\Pi(\mu,\mu) has quadratic cost 00, so W2(μ,μ)2≤0W_{2}(\mu,\mu)^{2}\le0 by Step 0. Being the square of a real number, W2(μ,μ)2≥0W_{2}(\mu,\mu)^{2}\ge0, so W2(μ,μ)2=0W_{2}(\mu,\mu)^{2}=0 and therefore W2(μ,μ)=0W_{2}(\mu,\mu)=0.

Step 3 (Claim 2, separation: zero distance). Suppose W2(μ,ν)=0W_{2}(\mu,\nu)=0. By Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Borel Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §existence there is π∈Π(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) with I(π)=W2(μ,ν)2=0I(\pi)=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}=0. Let g:X×X→[0,∞)g:X\times X\to[0,\infty) be g(z)=∣π1(z)−π2(z)∣2g(z)=|\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z)|^{2}, which is nonnegative and Borel as recorded in Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost, and whose integral against π\pi is I(π)=0I(\pi)=0. By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing, applied to the measure space (X×X,B(X×X),π)(X\times X,\mathcal{B}(X\times X),\pi) and to gg, we have g(z)=0g(z)=0 for π\pi-almost every zz; that is, by A Property Holding Almost Everywhere and Null Set of a Measure, there is B∈B(X×X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X\times X) with π(B)=0\pi(B)=0 such that g(z)=0g(z)=0 for every z∈(X×X)∖Bz\in(X\times X)\setminus B. For such zz the nonnegative real number ∣π1(z)−π2(z)∣|\pi_{1}(z)-\pi_{2}(z)| has square 00 and hence is 00, so d(π1(z),π2(z))=0d(\pi_{1}(z),\pi_{2}(z))=0 and π1(z)=π2(z)\pi_{1}(z)=\pi_{2}(z) by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §metric and condition 2 of Metric Space.

Now let A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X). The sets A×X=π1−1(A)A\times X=\pi_{1}^{-1}(A) and X×A=π2−1(A)X\times A=\pi_{2}^{-1}(A) belong to B(X×X)\mathcal{B}(X\times X), since π1,π2\pi_{1},\pi_{2} are Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma. For z∉Bz\notin B we have π1(z)=π2(z)\pi_{1}(z)=\pi_{2}(z), so z∈A×Xz\in A\times X if and only if z∈X×Az\in X\times A; hence the Borel set D=(A×X)∖BD=(A\times X)\setminus B equals (X×A)∖B(X\times A)\setminus B. The set A×XA\times X is the disjoint union of DD and (A×X)∩B(A\times X)\cap B, and π((A×X)∩B)≤π(B)=0\pi((A\times X)\cap B)\le\pi(B)=0, so by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity and Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone, applied to the measure π\pi, π(A×X)=π(D)\pi(A\times X)=\pi(D); in the same way π(X×A)=π(D)\pi(X\times A)=\pi(D). By Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling and the definition of the push-forward in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward,

μ(A)=(π1)#π(A)=π(A×X)=π(D)=π(X×A)=(π2)#π(A)=ν(A).\mu(A)=(\pi_{1})_{\#}\pi(A)=\pi(A\times X)=\pi(D)=\pi(X\times A)=(\pi_{2})_{\#}\pi(A)=\nu(A).

As A∈B(X)A\in\mathcal{B}(X) was arbitrary and μ,ν\mu,\nu are both defined on B(X)\mathcal{B}(X), μ=ν\mu=\nu. Together with Step 2 this proves claim 2.

Step 4 (Claim 3, triangle inequality). Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ε0<\varepsilon be given; the following choices are made in this order. First, by the approximation (A) of Step 0 choose α∈Π(μ,ν)\alpha\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) and β∈Π(ν,λ)\beta\in\Pi(\nu,\lambda) with

I(α)<W2(μ,ν)+ε,I(β)<W2(ν,λ)+ε;\sqrt{I(\alpha)}<W_{2}(\mu,\nu)+\varepsilon,\qquad\sqrt{I(\beta)}<W_{2}(\nu,\lambda)+\varepsilon ;

both costs are finite by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §cost-finite. Second, by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §quantisation, applied to ν∈P2(X)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and ε\varepsilon, choose a Borel map T:X→XT:X\to X whose image F=T(X)F=T(X) is a finite set and with e=∫X∣T(y)−y∣2 ν(dy)≤ε2e=\int_{X}|T(y)-y|^{2}\,\nu(dy)\le\varepsilon^{2}; then ee is a nonnegative real number and e≤ε\sqrt{e}\le\varepsilon by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Put ρ=T#ν\rho=T_{\#}\nu, a Borel measure on XX with ρ(X)=ν(T−1(X))=1\rho(X)=\nu(T^{-1}(X))=1, so ρ∈P(X)\rho\in\mathcal{P}(X) by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward; by the first sentence of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §quantisation, ρ(X∖F)=0\rho(X\setminus F)=0. By the first assertion of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §modification, applied to the coupling α∈Π(μ,ν)\alpha\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) and the map TT, the measure α′=(π1,T∘π2)#α\alpha'=(\pi_{1},T\circ\pi_{2})_{\#}\alpha belongs to Π(μ,ρ)\Pi(\mu,\rho), and since I(α)<∞I(\alpha)<\infty and e<∞e<\infty, I(α′)<∞I(\alpha')<\infty and I(α′)≤I(α)+e\sqrt{I(\alpha')}\le\sqrt{I(\alpha)}+\sqrt{e}. By the last assertion of the same clause, applied to the coupling β∈Π(ν,λ)\beta\in\Pi(\nu,\lambda) and the map S=TS=T, the measure β′=(T∘π1,π2)#β\beta'=(T\circ\pi_{1},\pi_{2})_{\#}\beta belongs to Π(ρ,λ)\Pi(\rho,\lambda), and since I(β)<∞I(\beta)<\infty and e<∞e<\infty, I(β′)<∞I(\beta')<\infty and I(β′)≤I(β)+e\sqrt{I(\beta')}\le\sqrt{I(\beta)}+\sqrt{e}. By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §gluing, applied to the measures μ\mu, λ\lambda, ρ\rho, the finite set FF and the couplings π12=α′\pi_{12}=\alpha' and π23=β′\pi_{23}=\beta', there is π13∈Π(μ,λ)\pi_{13}\in\Pi(\mu,\lambda) with I(π13)≤I(α′)+I(β′)\sqrt{I(\pi_{13})}\le\sqrt{I(\alpha')}+\sqrt{I(\beta')}. Since μ,λ∈P2(X)\mu,\lambda\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X), Step 0 applies to π13\pi_{13}, and combining the inequalities above gives

W2(μ,λ)≤I(π13)≤I(α)+I(β)+2e<W2(μ,ν)+W2(ν,λ)+4ε.W_{2}(\mu,\lambda)\le\sqrt{I(\pi_{13})}\le\sqrt{I(\alpha)}+\sqrt{I(\beta)}+2\sqrt{e}<W_{2}(\mu,\nu)+W_{2}(\nu,\lambda)+4\varepsilon .

Write s=W2(μ,ν)+W2(ν,λ)s=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)+W_{2}(\nu,\lambda). The display holds for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0; if s<W2(μ,λ)s<W_{2}(\mu,\lambda) held, the choice ε=(W2(μ,λ)−s)/8\varepsilon=(W_{2}(\mu,\lambda)-s)/8 would give W2(μ,λ)<s+(W2(μ,λ)−s)/2<W2(μ,λ)W_{2}(\mu,\lambda)<s+(W_{2}(\mu,\lambda)-s)/2<W_{2}(\mu,\lambda), which is impossible. Hence W2(μ,λ)≤sW_{2}(\mu,\lambda)\le s, which is claim 3.

Step 5 (Claim 4, the metric). By Metric Space, W2W_{2} is a metric on P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) if it is a real-valued function on pairs of elements of P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) satisfying, for all μ,ν,λ∈P2(X)\mu,\nu,\lambda\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X), conditions 1 to 4 there. W2W_{2} is real-valued and nonnegative by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance, which is condition 1; condition 2 is claim 2 (Steps 2 and 3); condition 3 is claim 1 (Step 1); and condition 4, with μ,ν,λ\mu,\nu,\lambda in the roles of x,y,zx,y,z, is claim 3 (Step 4). Hence (P2(X),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(X),W_{2}) is a metric space.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…