Symmetry follows from the swap of coordinates, separation from the diagonal coupling and from an optimal coupling of zero cost, and the triangle inequality from quantising the middle measure, modifying two near-optimal couplings and gluing them over the finitely supported quantised measure.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied with the data named at the point of citation.
Step 0 (Preliminaries). Couplings and the quadratic cost are those of Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling and Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost. Let and put . By The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance, is a nonempty set of nonnegative real numbers, is the nonnegative square root of its greatest lower bound, so that by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, and for every . Since , claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field turns the last inequality into
We also use the following approximation (A): for every real there is with . Indeed, with the number is positive, so claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in , applied to the set , bounded below by , and to , gives with ; as and are nonnegative, claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives .
Step 1 (Claim 1, symmetry). Let be the swap of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §swap. By that clause, applied to , every gives with , so ; applied to it gives . Hence , the two sets have the same greatest lower bound, and its nonnegative square root is unique by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root; so by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance.
Step 2 (Claim 2, separation: equal measures). Suppose . By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §pushforward, has quadratic cost , so by Step 0. Being the square of a real number, , so and therefore .
Step 3 (Claim 2, separation: zero distance). Suppose . By Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Borel Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §existence there is with . Let be , which is nonnegative and Borel as recorded in Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost, and whose integral against is . By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing, applied to the measure space and to , we have for -almost every ; that is, by A Property Holding Almost Everywhere and Null Set of a Measure, there is with such that for every . For such the nonnegative real number has square and hence is , so and by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §metric and condition 2 of Metric Space.
Now let . The sets and belong to , since are Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §product-sigma. For we have , so if and only if ; hence the Borel set equals . The set is the disjoint union of and , and , so by Basic Properties of a Measure §additivity and Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone, applied to the measure , ; in the same way . By Couplings of Two Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling and the definition of the push-forward in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward,
As was arbitrary and are both defined on , . Together with Step 2 this proves claim 2.
Step 4 (Claim 3, triangle inequality). Let with be given; the following choices are made in this order. First, by the approximation (A) of Step 0 choose and with
both costs are finite by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §cost-finite. Second, by Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §quantisation, applied to and , choose a Borel map whose image is a finite set and with ; then is a nonnegative real number and by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.
Put , a Borel measure on with , so by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pushforward; by the first sentence of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §quantisation, . By the first assertion of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §modification, applied to the coupling and the map , the measure belongs to , and since and , and . By the last assertion of the same clause, applied to the coupling and the map , the measure belongs to , and since and , and . By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §gluing, applied to the measures , , , the finite set and the couplings and , there is with . Since , Step 0 applies to , and combining the inequalities above gives
Write . The display holds for every real ; if held, the choice would give , which is impossible. Hence , which is claim 3.
Step 5 (Claim 4, the metric). By Metric Space, is a metric on if it is a real-valued function on pairs of elements of satisfying, for all , conditions 1 to 4 there. is real-valued and nonnegative by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance, which is condition 1; condition 2 is claim 2 (Steps 2 and 3); condition 3 is claim 1 (Step 1); and condition 4, with in the roles of , is claim 3 (Step 4). Hence is a metric space.
Loading…