TheoremBase

The vector-space and norm laws pass from functions to classes. For a Cauchy sequence, least indices give a subsequence with increments below 2^-k; monotone convergence bounds the sum of the increments a.e., which yields an a.e. limit and a dominating function, and dominated convergence gives convergence in the p-seminorm. Completeness picks representatives by countable choice.

Proof

Throughout, every element of Lp(μ)L^{p}(\mu) is [f][f] for some f∈Lp(μ)f\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu), and [f]=[g][f]=[g] if and only if f(x)=g(x)f(x)=g(x) for almost every xx (Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection (iv), Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection (v), Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection (i), Almost-Everywhere Equality on the p-Integrable Functions (i)).

A real normed space. The zero function 00 lies in Lp(μ)\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu): ∣0∣p|0|^{p} is the zero function by Real Powers (ii), with integral 00 by Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (v). Let f,g,h∈Lp(μ)f,g,h\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) and λ,ν∈R\lambda,\nu\in\mathbb{R}. By The Lebesgue Space Lᵖ(μ) (ii), each vector-space law for classes is the class of the corresponding law for functions, which holds pointwise; for instance

([f]+[g])+[h]=[(f+g)+h]=[f+(g+h)]=[f]+([g]+[h]),λ([f]+[g])=[λf+λg]=λ[f]+λ[g],([f]+[g])+[h]=[(f+g)+h]=[f+(g+h)]=[f]+([g]+[h]),\qquad \lambda([f]+[g])=[\lambda f+\lambda g]=\lambda[f]+\lambda[g],

and in the same way [f]+[g]=[g]+[f][f]+[g]=[g]+[f], λ(ν[f])=(λν)[f]\lambda(\nu[f])=(\lambda\nu)[f], 1[f]=[f]1[f]=[f] and (λ+ν)[f]=λ[f]+ν[f](\lambda+\nu)[f]=\lambda[f]+\nu[f]. Since [f]+[0]=[f+0]=[f][f]+[0]=[f+0]=[f], the class [0][0] satisfies Vector Space over a Field (iii). If z∈Lp(μ)z\in L^{p}(\mu) satisfies F+z=FF+z=F for every F∈Lp(μ)F\in L^{p}(\mu), then z=z+[0]=[0]+z=[0]z=z+[0]=[0]+z=[0], and [f]+[−f]=[f+(−f)]=[0]=z[f]+[-f]=[f+(-f)]=[0]=z; this is Vector Space over a Field (iv). Hence Lp(μ)L^{p}(\mu) is a real vector space (Vector Space over a Field (ix), Vector Space over a Field (x)), with zero vector [0][0] and with −[f]=[−f]-[f]=[-f] (The Zero Vector, Negatives and Differences in a Vector Space (i), The Zero Vector, Negatives and Differences in a Vector Space (ii)). By The Zero Vector, Negatives and Differences in a Vector Space (iii),

[f]−[g]=[f]+[−g]=[f+(−g)]=[f−g].[f]-[g]=[f]+[-g]=[f+(-g)]=[f-g].

For the norm, ∥[f]∥p=∥f∥p≥0\|[f]\|_{p}=\|f\|_{p}\ge0 by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii) and Properties of Real Powers (ii). If ∥[f]∥p=0\|[f]\|_{p}=0, then f(x)=0f(x)=0 for almost every xx by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (vii), so [f]=[0][f]=[0]. By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (iii) and Minkowski's Inequality (ii),

∥λ[f]∥p=∥λf∥p=∣λ∣ ∥[f]∥p,∥[f]+[g]∥p=∥f+g∥p≤∥[f]∥p+∥[g]∥p.\|\lambda[f]\|_{p}=\|\lambda f\|_{p}=|\lambda|\,\|[f]\|_{p},\qquad \|[f]+[g]\|_{p}=\|f+g\|_{p}\le\|[f]\|_{p}+\|[g]\|_{p}.

These are the conditions of Norms and Real Normed Spaces (v), so (Lp(μ),∥⋅∥p)(L^{p}(\mu),\|\cdot\|_{p}) is a real normed space (Norms and Real Normed Spaces (vi)). This proves (i).

For (ii) and (iii), let (fm)(f_{m}) be Cauchy for the pp-seminorm. For j∈N0j\in\mathbb{N}_{0} write 2−j2^{-j} for the power (1/2)j(1/2)^{j}; thus 2−j>02^{-j}>0, 20=12^{0}=1 and, for k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N},

21−k=2⋅2−k,2−(k+1)=12 2−k<2−k.2^{1-k}=2\cdot2^{-k},\qquad 2^{-(k+1)}=\tfrac12\,2^{-k}<2^{-k}.

Step 1: a fast subsequence. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} let AkA_{k} be the set of n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} such that ∥fm−fl∥p<2−k\|f_{m}-f_{l}\|_{p}<2^{-k} for all m,l≥nm,l\ge n. By hypothesis AkA_{k} has an element, so it has a least element nkn_{k} (Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (xv)); no choice is involved. Since 2−(k+1)<2−k2^{-(k+1)}<2^{-k}, we have Ak+1⊆AkA_{k+1}\subseteq A_{k} and so nk≤nk+1n_{k}\le n_{k+1}. Put mk=nk+km_{k}=n_{k}+k. Then mk<mk+1m_{k}<m_{k+1} and mk≥nkm_{k}\ge n_{k} (Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (ix), Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (xi)), so (mk)(m_{k}) is strictly increasing (Monotone Sequences (i)), and since mk+1>mk≥nkm_{k+1}>m_{k}\ge n_{k},

∥fmk+1−fmk∥p<2−k(k∈N).\|f_{m_{k+1}}-f_{m_{k}}\|_{p}<2^{-k}\qquad(k\in\mathbb{N}).

Step 2: the dominating function. Put dk=fmk+1−fmkd_{k}=f_{m_{k+1}}-f_{m_{k}}, an element of Lp(μ)\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) by Minkowski's Inequality (i), and let G1=∣fm1∣G_{1}=|f_{m_{1}}| and Gk+1=∣fm1∣+∑j=1k∣dj∣G_{k+1}=|f_{m_{1}}|+\sum_{j=1}^{k}|d_{j}|, so that Gk+1=Gk+∣dk∣G_{k+1}=G_{k}+|d_{k}| and 0≤Gk≤Gk+10\le G_{k}\le G_{k+1}. Let C=∥fm1∥p+1C=\|f_{m_{1}}\|_{p}+1. We show by induction on kk (Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (xiii)) that

Gk∈Lp(μ),∥Gk∥p≤C−21−k,∣fmk(x)∣≤Gk(x)(x∈X).G_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu),\qquad \|G_{k}\|_{p}\le C-2^{1-k},\qquad |f_{m_{k}}(x)|\le G_{k}(x)\quad(x\in X).

For k=1k=1 this holds by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (iv), as 20=12^{0}=1. If it holds for kk, then ∣dk∣∈Lp(μ)|d_{k}|\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) with ∥∣dk∣∥p=∥dk∥p\||d_{k}|\|_{p}=\|d_{k}\|_{p} (Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (iv)), so Gk+1∈Lp(μ)G_{k+1}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) (Minkowski's Inequality (i)) and, by Minkowski's Inequality (ii) and Step 1,

∥Gk+1∥p≤∥Gk∥p+∥dk∥p<C−2⋅2−k+2−k=C−2−k;\|G_{k+1}\|_{p}\le\|G_{k}\|_{p}+\|d_{k}\|_{p}<C-2\cdot2^{-k}+2^{-k}=C-2^{-k};

and ∣fmk+1(x)∣≤∣fmk(x)∣+∣dk(x)∣≤Gk+1(x)|f_{m_{k+1}}(x)|\le|f_{m_{k}}(x)|+|d_{k}(x)|\le G_{k+1}(x) by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (xi). In particular ∥Gk∥p≤C\|G_{k}\|_{p}\le C for every kk.

The functions ∣Gk∣p|G_{k}|^{p} lie in M+\mathcal{M}^{+} (Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i)), form a pointwise nondecreasing sequence (Properties of Real Powers (vi)), and satisfy ∫∣Gk∣p dμ=∥Gk∥pp≤Cp\int|G_{k}|^{p}\,d\mu=\|G_{k}\|_{p}^{p}\le C^{p} (Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (ii), Properties of Real Powers (vi)). Let H:X→[0,∞]H:X\to[0,\infty] be H(x)=sup⁡k∣Gk(x)∣pH(x)=\sup_{k}|G_{k}(x)|^{p} (Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (iii)). By Monotone Convergence Theorem (i) and Monotone Convergence Theorem (ii), H∈M+H\in\mathcal{M}^{+} and

∫H dμ=sup⁡k∫∣Gk∣p dμ≤Cp<∞.\int H\,d\mu=\sup_{k}\int|G_{k}|^{p}\,d\mu\le C^{p}<\infty .

By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (v) the set Z={x∈X:H(x)=∞}Z=\{x\in X:H(x)=\infty\} belongs to F\mathcal{F} and μ(Z)=0\mu(Z)=0; so does X∖ZX\setminus Z belong to F\mathcal{F} (σ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i)). For x∈X∖Zx\in X\setminus Z, H(x)H(x) is a real number and ∣Gk(x)∣p≤H(x)|G_{k}(x)|^{p}\le H(x), hence, by Properties of Real Powers (vii) and Properties of Real Powers (vi),

Gk(x)≤H(x)1/p(k∈N, x∈X∖Z).G_{k}(x)\le H(x)^{1/p}\qquad(k\in\mathbb{N},\ x\in X\setminus Z).

Let g:X→Rg:X\to\mathbb{R} be g(x)=sup⁡kGk(x)g(x)=\sup_{k}G_{k}(x) for x∈X∖Zx\in X\setminus Z and g(x)=0g(x)=0 for x∈Zx\in Z. For A∈FA\in\mathcal{F} the indicator function 1A\mathbf{1}_{A} is measurable, its superlevel sets being ∅\emptyset, AA or XX (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (v)). So gg is the pointwise supremum of the measurable functions Gk1X∖ZG_{k}\mathbf{1}_{X\setminus Z} (Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (i)), which are bounded above at every point, so gg is measurable by Suprema, Pointwise Limits and the Convergence Set of Measurable Real-Valued Maps (i). Since 0≤g(x)≤H(x)1/p0\le g(x)\le H(x)^{1/p} off ZZ and g=0g=0 on ZZ, we get ∣g∣p≤H|g|^{p}\le H (Properties of Real Powers (vi), Properties of Real Powers (vii), Real Powers (ii)), so ∫∣g∣p dμ≤∫H dμ<∞\int|g|^{p}\,d\mu\le\int H\,d\mu<\infty by Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (iii), and g∈Lp(μ)g\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu). Moreover

∣fmk(x)∣≤Gk(x)≤g(x)(k∈N, x∈X∖Z).|f_{m_{k}}(x)|\le G_{k}(x)\le g(x)\qquad(k\in\mathbb{N},\ x\in X\setminus Z).

Step 3: the limit function. Let x∈X∖Zx\in X\setminus Z. The partial sums ∑j=1k∣dj(x)∣=Gk+1(x)−∣fm1(x)∣\sum_{j=1}^{k}|d_{j}(x)|=G_{k+1}(x)-|f_{m_{1}}(x)| are bounded above by g(x)g(x), so the series ∑j∣dj(x)∣\sum_{j}|d_{j}(x)| converges (Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (i)); hence ∑jdj(x)\sum_{j}d_{j}(x) converges absolutely and so converges (Series of Real Numbers with Nonnegative Terms, Comparison, Absolute Convergence and the Geometric Series (iii)), and as dj(x)=fmj+1(x)−fmj(x)d_{j}(x)=f_{m_{j+1}}(x)-f_{m_{j}}(x), the sequence (fmk(x))k(f_{m_{k}}(x))_{k} is convergent (Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers: Linearity, Null Terms, the Cauchy Criterion, Index Shifts, Tails, Order and Telescoping (vii)).

Let DD be the set of x∈Xx\in X at which (fmk(x))k(f_{m_{k}}(x))_{k} is convergent; D∈FD\in\mathcal{F} by Suprema, Pointwise Limits and the Convergence Set of Measurable Real-Valued Maps (iii), and X∖Z⊆DX\setminus Z\subseteq D. Define f:X→Rf:X\to\mathbb{R} by f(x)=lim⁡kfmk(x)f(x)=\lim_{k}f_{m_{k}}(x) for x∈Dx\in D, the limit, and f(x)=0f(x)=0 for x∉Dx\notin D. Then fmk1D→ff_{m_{k}}\mathbf{1}_{D}\to f at every point (Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (i) off DD), and the functions fmk1Df_{m_{k}}\mathbf{1}_{D} are measurable (Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (i)), so ff is measurable by Suprema, Pointwise Limits and the Convergence Set of Measurable Real-Valued Maps (ii). For x∈X∖Zx\in X\setminus Z we have fmk(x)→f(x)f_{m_{k}}(x)\to f(x) and ∣fmk(x)∣≤g(x)|f_{m_{k}}(x)|\le g(x) for every kk, hence ∣f(x)∣≤g(x)|f(x)|\le g(x) (Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (viii), Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (x)). As μ(Z)=0\mu(Z)=0, these hold for μ\mu-almost every xx (Null Sets and Properties Holding Almost Everywhere (i), A Property Holding Almost Everywhere (i)), and f∈Lp(μ)f\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (v). This proves (iii).

Step 4: convergence of the subsequence. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} let uk=∣fmk−f∣pu_{k}=|f_{m_{k}}-f|^{p}, a measurable function with nonnegative values (Minkowski's Inequality (i), Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (i)). Let x∈X∖Zx\in X\setminus Z. Then ∣fmk(x)−f(x)∣→0|f_{m_{k}}(x)-f(x)|\to0 (Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (vi), Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers: Uniqueness, Boundedness, Constants, Tails, Arithmetic, Quotients, Absolute Values, Finite Sums, Order, Squeezing, Domination and Subsequences (viii)); given ε>0\varepsilon>0, the number ε1/p\varepsilon^{1/p} is positive, and ∣fmk(x)−f(x)∣<ε1/p|f_{m_{k}}(x)-f(x)|<\varepsilon^{1/p} gives 0≤uk(x)<ε0\le u_{k}(x)<\varepsilon (Properties of Real Powers (vi), Properties of Real Powers (vii)), so uk(x)→0u_{k}(x)\to0. Moreover, by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (xi),

∣fmk(x)−f(x)∣≤∣fmk(x)∣+∣f(x)∣≤2g(x),souk(x)≤∣2g(x)∣p|f_{m_{k}}(x)-f(x)|\le|f_{m_{k}}(x)|+|f(x)|\le2g(x),\qquad\text{so}\qquad u_{k}(x)\le|2g(x)|^{p}

(Properties of Real Powers (vi)). Here 2g∈Lp(μ)2g\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (iii), so ∣2g∣p∈L1(μ)|2g|^{p}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (ii). By The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (viii), applied to (uk)(u_{k}), the limit 00 and the dominating function ∣2g∣p|2g|^{p}, and by Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (ii),

∥fmk−f∥pp=∫uk dμ→0.\|f_{m_{k}}-f\|_{p}^{p}=\int u_{k}\,d\mu\to0 .

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, there is therefore KK with ∥fmk−f∥pp<εp\|f_{m_{k}}-f\|_{p}^{p}<\varepsilon^{p}, hence ∥fmk−f∥p<ε\|f_{m_{k}}-f\|_{p}<\varepsilon (Properties of Real Powers (vi)), for k≥Kk\ge K; that is, ∥fmk−f∥p→0\|f_{m_{k}}-f\|_{p}\to0.

Step 5: convergence of the whole sequence. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. First take NN with ∥fm−fl∥p<ε/2\|f_{m}-f_{l}\|_{p}<\varepsilon/2 for all m,l≥Nm,l\ge N, then KK with ∥fmk−f∥p<ε/2\|f_{m_{k}}-f\|_{p}<\varepsilon/2 for k≥Kk\ge K, and put k=N+Kk=N+K; then k≥Kk\ge K and mk≥k≥Nm_{k}\ge k\ge N (Monotone Sequences and Subsequences: Comparison of All Terms, Growth of the Indices, and Subsequences of Subsequences (ii), Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers (ix)). For every m≥Nm\ge N, since fm−f=(fm−fmk)+(fmk−f)f_{m}-f=(f_{m}-f_{m_{k}})+(f_{m_{k}}-f), Minkowski's Inequality (ii) gives

∥fm−f∥p≤∥fm−fmk∥p+∥fmk−f∥p<ε\|f_{m}-f\|_{p}\le\|f_{m}-f_{m_{k}}\|_{p}+\|f_{m_{k}}-f\|_{p}<\varepsilon

(Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (vii)). Hence ∥fm−f∥p→0\|f_{m}-f\|_{p}\to0 (Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers (i)), which is (ii).

Completeness. Assume the axiom of dependent choice, write VV for the real normed space (Lp(μ),∥⋅∥p)(L^{p}(\mu),\|\cdot\|_{p}) of (i), and let (Fm)(F_{m}) be a Cauchy sequence for its norm metric dVd_{V}. Each FmF_{m} is a subset of Lp(μ)\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) with an element (Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection (v), Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection (iv)), so countable choice, which follows from dependent choice by Countable Choice Follows from Dependent Choice (i), gives a sequence (fm)(f_{m}) in Lp(μ)\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) with fm∈Fmf_{m}\in F_{m}, that is Fm=[fm]F_{m}=[f_{m}], for every mm; this is the only use of choice. By (i),

dV(Fm,Fl)=∥[fm]−[fl]∥p=∥fm−fl∥p,d_{V}(F_{m},F_{l})=\|[f_{m}]-[f_{l}]\|_{p}=\|f_{m}-f_{l}\|_{p},

so (fm)(f_{m}) is Cauchy for the pp-seminorm, and (ii) gives f∈Lp(μ)f\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mu) with dV(Fm,[f])=∥fm−f∥p→0d_{V}(F_{m},[f])=\|f_{m}-f\|_{p}\to0. Thus (Fm)(F_{m}) converges to [f][f] (Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space (i)), the metric space (Lp(μ),dV)(L^{p}(\mu),d_{V}) is complete (Complete Metric Space (i)), and (Lp(μ),∥⋅∥p)(L^{p}(\mu),\|\cdot\|_{p}) is a real Banach space. This proves (iv).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…