TheoremBase

Sandwich the functions between their penalty envelopes, apply the fixed-level comparison, and let the level tend to zero; for continuity, compare a solution with itself at a small level and use the semicontinuity of the two envelopes on a sublevel set of the free energy.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Step 0 (Sandwich). Let w:Σd2→Rw:\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and δ>0\delta>0 real. The function w∘κd−δEw\circ\kappa_{d}-\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D} is bounded above near each point by The Penalty Envelopes of a Bounded Function on the Domain of the Wall-Confined Free Energy §upper, so Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §bounds, for the nonempty set D\mathcal{D} in the metric space (Σd,R,W2)(\Sigma_{d,R},W_{2}) of The Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall, Envelope Form: Standing Notation §metric, gives w(κd(μ))−δ E(μ)≤wδ−(μ)w(\kappa_{d}(\mu))-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le w^{-}_{\delta}(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}; likewise The Penalty Envelopes of a Bounded Function on the Domain of the Wall-Confined Free Energy §lower and Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §bounds give wδ+(μ)≤w(κd(μ))+δ E(μ)w^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)\le w(\kappa_{d}(\mu))+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu). Moreover wδ−w^{-}_{\delta} is upper semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} by Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §usc, and wδ+w^{+}_{\delta} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} by Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §lsc.

Step 1 (Common data). Let uu be a bounded envelope subsolution with shift range δu\delta_{u} and vv a bounded envelope supersolution with shift range δv\delta_{v}, and put δ0=min⁡{δu,δv}\delta_{0}=\min\{\delta_{u},\delta_{v}\} and b=max⁡{bu,bv}b=\max\{b_{u},b_{v}\} with ∣u∣≤bu|u|\le b_{u} and ∣v∣≤bv|v|\le b_{v}. Every δ\delta with 0<δ≤δ00<\delta\le\delta_{0} satisfies δ≤δu\delta\le\delta_{u} and δ≤δv\delta\le\delta_{v}, so the conditions of Envelope Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §sub and Envelope Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §super for all such δ\delta are among those assumed: uu is an envelope subsolution and vv an envelope supersolution with shift range δ0\delta_{0}, and ∣u∣≤b|u|\le b, ∣v∣≤b|v|\le b. The hypotheses of Comparison at a Fixed Level for Envelope Viscosity Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §fixed-level on the setting, on D\mathcal{D} and on H\mathcal{H} are those of the present theorem; b≥0b\ge0 because a bound of a bounded function is nonnegative, and δ0>0\delta_{0}>0 as the least of two positive reals. Let ϵ:(0,δ0]→[0,∞)\epsilon:(0,\delta_{0}]\to[0,\infty) be the function of that lemma for these bb and δ0\delta_{0}.

Claim 1 (Comparison). Fix μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}. For every δ∈(0,δ0]\delta\in(0,\delta_{0}], Step 0 and Comparison at a Fixed Level for Envelope Viscosity Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §fixed-level give

u(κd(μ))−δ E(μ)≤uδ−(μ)≤vδ+(μ)+ϵ(δ)≤v(κd(μ))+δ E(μ)+ϵ(δ),u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)+\epsilon(\delta)\le v(\kappa_{d}(\mu))+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\epsilon(\delta),

that is, u(κd(μ))≤v(κd(μ))+2δ E(μ)+ϵ(δ)u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))\le v(\kappa_{d}(\mu))+2\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\epsilon(\delta). Let η>0\eta>0 be real. Since ϵ(δ)→0\epsilon(\delta)\to0 as δ→0\delta\to0 in the sense of Comparison at a Fixed Level for Envelope Viscosity Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §fixed-level, there is a real δ1>0\delta_{1}>0 with ϵ(δ)<η/2\epsilon(\delta)<\eta/2 for every δ\delta in (0,δ0](0,\delta_{0}] with δ<δ1\delta<\delta_{1}. Choose a real δ\delta with 0<δ≤δ00<\delta\le\delta_{0}, δ<δ1\delta<\delta_{1} and 2δ ∣E(μ)∣<η/22\delta\,|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|<\eta/2 (for instance half the least of δ0\delta_{0}, δ1\delta_{1} and η/(4∣E(μ)∣+4)\eta/(4|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|+4)). Then u(κd(μ))≤v(κd(μ))+ηu(\kappa_{d}(\mu))\le v(\kappa_{d}(\mu))+\eta. As η>0\eta>0 was arbitrary, u(κd(μ))≤v(κd(μ))u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))\le v(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above.

Claim 2 (Uniqueness). Each of u,vu,v is by Envelope Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §solution both an envelope subsolution and an envelope supersolution with its shift range. Claim 1 applied to the pair (u,v)(u,v) and to the pair (v,u)(v,u) gives u(κd(μ))≤v(κd(μ))u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))\le v(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) and v(κd(μ))≤u(κd(μ))v(\kappa_{d}(\mu))\le u(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, hence equality by antisymmetry of the order.

Claim 3 (Continuity on energy sublevel sets). Let uu be a bounded envelope solution with shift range δ0\delta_{0} and ∣u∣≤b|u|\le b, let cc be real and Sc={μ∈D:E(μ)≤c}S_{c}=\{\mu\in\mathcal{D}:\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le c\}; if ScS_{c} is empty there is nothing to prove. By Envelope Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §solution, uu is both an envelope subsolution and an envelope supersolution with shift range δ0\delta_{0}, so, as in Step 1, Comparison at a Fixed Level for Envelope Viscosity Solutions of the Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall §fixed-level applies with v=uv=u for these bb and δ0\delta_{0} and gives a function ϵ\epsilon on (0,δ0](0,\delta_{0}] tending to 00 with

uδ−(λ)≤uδ+(λ)+ϵ(δ)for every λ∈D and δ∈(0,δ0].(C)u^{-}_{\delta}(\lambda)\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\lambda)+\epsilon(\delta)\qquad\text{for every }\lambda\in\mathcal{D}\text{ and }\delta\in(0,\delta_{0}].\tag{C}

Fix μ∈Sc\mu\in S_{c} and a real η>0\eta>0. Let δ1>0\delta_{1}>0 be such that ϵ(δ)<η/3\epsilon(\delta)<\eta/3 for every δ∈(0,δ0]\delta\in(0,\delta_{0}] with δ<δ1\delta<\delta_{1}, and let δ\delta be half the least of δ0\delta_{0}, δ1\delta_{1} and η/(3∣c∣+3∣E(μ)∣+3)\eta/(3|c|+3|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|+3); then δ∈(0,δ0]\delta\in(0,\delta_{0}], ϵ(δ)<η/3\epsilon(\delta)<\eta/3 and δ (∣c∣+∣E(μ)∣)<η/3\delta\,(|c|+|\mathcal{E}(\mu)|)<\eta/3. By Step 0 and the definition of upper semicontinuity (Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space) there is a real r1>0r_{1}>0 with uδ−(ν)<uδ−(μ)+η/3u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)<u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)+\eta/3 for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(μ,ν)<r1W_{2}(\mu,\nu)<r_{1}, and by Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space there is a real r2>0r_{2}>0 with uδ+(μ)−η/3<uδ+(ν)u^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)-\eta/3<u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(μ,ν)<r2W_{2}(\mu,\nu)<r_{2}. Let ν∈Sc\nu\in S_{c} with W2(μ,ν)<min⁡{r1,r2}W_{2}(\mu,\nu)<\min\{r_{1},r_{2}\}. Since E(ν)≤c≤∣c∣\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le c\le|c| and δ>0\delta>0, Step 0 and (C) at μ\mu give

u(κd(ν))≤uδ−(ν)+δ E(ν)<uδ−(μ)+η3+δ∣c∣≤uδ+(μ)+ϵ(δ)+η3+δ∣c∣≤u(κd(μ))+δ E(μ)+ϵ(δ)+η3+δ∣c∣<u(κd(μ))+η,u(\kappa_{d}(\nu))\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)<u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)+\tfrac{\eta}{3}+\delta|c|\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)+\epsilon(\delta)+\tfrac{\eta}{3}+\delta|c|\le u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\epsilon(\delta)+\tfrac{\eta}{3}+\delta|c|<u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))+\eta,

and, since −δ E(ν)≥−δ∣c∣-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\ge-\delta|c|,

u(κd(ν))≥uδ+(ν)−δ E(ν)>uδ+(μ)−η3−δ∣c∣≥uδ−(μ)−ϵ(δ)−η3−δ∣c∣≥u(κd(μ))−δ E(μ)−ϵ(δ)−η3−δ∣c∣>u(κd(μ))−η.u(\kappa_{d}(\nu))\ge u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)>u^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)-\tfrac{\eta}{3}-\delta|c|\ge u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-\epsilon(\delta)-\tfrac{\eta}{3}-\delta|c|\ge u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu)-\epsilon(\delta)-\tfrac{\eta}{3}-\delta|c|>u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))-\eta .

Hence ∣u(κd(ν))−u(κd(μ))∣<η|u(\kappa_{d}(\nu))-u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))|<\eta for every ν∈Sc\nu\in S_{c} with W2(μ,ν)<min⁡{r1,r2}W_{2}(\mu,\nu)<\min\{r_{1},r_{2}\}. As μ∈Sc\mu\in S_{c} and η>0\eta>0 were arbitrary, the function μ↦u(κd(μ))\mu\mapsto u(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) on ScS_{c}, with the restriction of W2W_{2} and the metric of R\mathbb{R} fixed in The Discounted HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall, Envelope Form: Standing Notation §metric, is continuous.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…