TheoremBase

Congruence holds because the two restrictions to the index set are equal maps; the product map is a map given by an expression; the diagonal index sets are finite sets given by a predicative condition, and the diagonal sums are defined set symbols in n, so they form a sequence.

Proof

The addition of R\mathbb{R} is an associative and commutative binary operation on R\mathbb{R} with neutral element 00, by Addition on ℝ Is an Associative and Commutative Binary Operation (i), Addition on ℝ Is an Associative and Commutative Binary Operation (ii) and The Structure of ℝ as a Field and an Ordered Ring (vi), so sums over every finite set, empty or not, are defined by Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval (i) and Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval (ii).

Proof of (i). By Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval (iii), ∑x∈Af(x)\sum_{x\in A}f(x) and ∑x∈Af′(x)\sum_{x\in A}f'(x) are the sums over AA of the restrictions f∣Af|_{A} and f′∣Af'|_{A}. These are maps A→RA\to\mathbb{R} with f∣A(x)=f(x)f|_{A}(x)=f(x) and f′∣A(x)=f′(x)f'|_{A}(x)=f'(x) for x∈Ax\in A, by Domains and Restrictions of Maps (ii) and Domains and Restrictions of Maps (iii). As f(x)=f′(x)f(x)=f'(x) for every x∈Ax\in A, f∣A=f′∣Af|_{A}=f'|_{A} by Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (iv), so the two sums are the sum over AA of one and the same map, and are equal.

Proof of (ii). For x∈Ax\in A and y∈By\in B, f(x)∈Rf(x)\in\mathbb{R} and h(y)∈Rh(y)\in\mathbb{R} by Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (ii), so f(x) h(y)∈Rf(x)\,h(y)\in\mathbb{R}, the multiplication ⋅\cdot being a binary operation on R\mathbb{R} by Arithmetic and Order Rules in the Real Numbers, Stated for ℝ (i). The expression f(x) h(y)f(x)\,h(y) is built from the values of ff and hh and the value of the multiplication of R\mathbb{R}, defined set symbols that are used properly for x∈Ax\in A and y∈By\in B and are eliminated as in Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols (x) and Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols (xi), the latter applying because ⋅\cdot is a binary operation on the set R\mathbb{R}. By Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (ii), with R\mathbb{R}, AA and BB for its bb, cc and dd, there is exactly one map m:A×B→Rm:A\times B\to\mathbb{R} with m((x,y))=f(x) h(y)m((x,y))=f(x)\,h(y), written m(x,y)m(x,y) as in Sets and Maps: Ordinary Notation (v), for all x∈Ax\in A and y∈By\in B.

Proof of (iii). Let m:N×N→Rm:\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R} be the map of (ii) for A=B=NA=B=\mathbb{N}, f=af=a and h=bh=b, so m(i,j)=aibjm(i,j)=a_{i}b_{j}.

The index sets. Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By Intervals of Natural Numbers: Initial Segments, Adding One Element, Splitting and Shifting (i), [n]={k∈N:k≤n}⊆N[n]=\{k\in\mathbb{N}:k\le n\}\subseteq\mathbb{N}, so [n]×[n]⊆N×N⊆N0×N0[n]\times[n]\subseteq\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\subseteq\mathbb{N}_{0}\times\mathbb{N}_{0}; [n][n] is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vii), and [n]×[n][n]\times[n] is finite by Adding an Element to, Subsets of, and Unions and Cartesian Products of Finite Sets Are Finite (iii). Let +:N0×N0→N0+:\mathbb{N}_{0}\times\mathbb{N}_{0}\to\mathbb{N}_{0} be the addition of N0\mathbb{N}_{0}, a binary operation on N0\mathbb{N}_{0} by The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion (iv). Under the guard x∈[n]×[n]x\in[n]\times[n], the variable xx is a term of type N0×N0\mathbb{N}_{0}\times\mathbb{N}_{0} by Typed Terms under a Predicative Guard: Variables, Parameters, Values of Maps and Ordered Pairs, and Predicative Equations and Memberships between Them (i), so +(x)+(x) is a term of type N0\mathbb{N}_{0} by Typed Terms under a Predicative Guard: Variables, Parameters, Values of Maps and Ordered Pairs, and Predicative Equations and Memberships between Them (iii), and n+1∈N0n+1\in\mathbb{N}_{0} is a term of type N0\mathbb{N}_{0} by Typed Terms under a Predicative Guard: Variables, Parameters, Values of Maps and Ordered Pairs, and Predicative Equations and Memberships between Them (ii). By Typed Terms under a Predicative Guard: Variables, Parameters, Values of Maps and Ordered Pairs, and Predicative Equations and Memberships between Them (vii), Tn={x∈[n]×[n]:+(x)=n+1}T_{n}=\{x\in[n]\times[n]:+(x)=n+1\} is a set, whose elements are the pairs (i,j)(i,j) with i,j∈[n]i,j\in[n] and i+j=n+1i+j=n+1; that is, Tn={(i,j)∈[n]×[n]:i+j=n+1}T_{n}=\{(i,j)\in[n]\times[n]:i+j=n+1\}. As a subset of [n]×[n][n]\times[n], TnT_{n} is finite by Adding an Element to, Subsets of, and Unions and Cartesian Products of Finite Sets Are Finite (ii), and it is contained in N×N\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}, the domain of mm. So ∑(i,j)∈Tnm(i,j)\sum_{(i,j)\in T_{n}}m(i,j), the sum displayed in the statement, is defined by Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval (iii), as the sum over TnT_{n} of the restriction m∣Tnm|_{T_{n}}, a map Tn→RT_{n}\to\mathbb{R} by Domains and Restrictions of Maps (ii), and lies in R\mathbb{R} by Iterated Operations and Operations over Finite Sets Take Values in the Underlying Set (ii).

The sequence. The sums are now described by one formula, uniformly in nn. Let XX, FF, YY, RR and PP be parameters with the values R\mathbb{R}, the addition of R\mathbb{R}, N\mathbb{N}, the order ≤\le of N0\mathbb{N}_{0} and the addition ++ of N0\mathbb{N}_{0}, let oo and gg be parameters with the values 11 and mm, let γ(n)\gamma(n) be the formula n∈Yn\in Y, and let

θ1(z,n): ∀x (x∈z⇔(x∈Y∧(x,n)∈R)),θ2(D,z): ∀x (x∈D⇔∃u ∃v (u∈z∧v∈z∧x=(u,v))),θ3(T,D,n): ∀x (x∈T⇔(x∈D∧∃s ((x,s)∈P∧((n,o),s)∈P))).\begin{aligned} \theta_{1}(z,n)&:\ \forall x\,\bigl(x\in z\Leftrightarrow(x\in Y\wedge(x,n)\in R)\bigr),\\ \theta_{2}(D,z)&:\ \forall x\,\bigl(x\in D\Leftrightarrow\exists u\,\exists v\,(u\in z\wedge v\in z\wedge x=(u,v))\bigr),\\ \theta_{3}(T,D,n)&:\ \forall x\,\bigl(x\in T\Leftrightarrow(x\in D\wedge\exists s\,((x,s)\in P\wedge((n,o),s)\in P))\bigr). \end{aligned}

They are predicative by Predicativity under Renaming of Set Variables by Variables, of Formulas with Ordered Pairs, and of Formulas for Relations, Functions, Maps, Injectivity, Surjectivity and Bijectivity (iii), Predicativity under Renaming of Set Variables by Variables, of Formulas with Ordered Pairs, and of Formulas for Relations, Functions, Maps, Injectivity, Surjectivity and Bijectivity (ii), Predicativity under Renaming of Set Variables by Variables, of Formulas with Ordered Pairs, and of Formulas for Relations, Functions, Maps, Injectivity, Surjectivity and Bijectivity (iv) and Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols (i). Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Each θi\theta_{i} has the form ∀x (x∈z⇔ψ)\forall x\,(x\in z\Leftrightarrow\psi) in its first variable, so by extensionality at most one set satisfies it for given values of the others. The set [n][n] satisfies θ1(z,n)\theta_{1}(z,n) by Intervals of Natural Numbers: Initial Segments, Adding One Element, Splitting and Shifting (i), k≤nk\le n meaning (k,n)∈≤(k,n)\in{\le}; the set [n]×[n][n]\times[n] satisfies θ2(D,[n])\theta_{2}(D,[n]) by The Cartesian Product of Two Classes (i); and TnT_{n} satisfies θ3(T,[n]×[n],n)\theta_{3}(T,[n]\times[n],n), since for x∈[n]×[n]⊆N0×N0x\in[n]\times[n]\subseteq\mathbb{N}_{0}\times\mathbb{N}_{0} and every set ss, (x,s)∈+(x,s)\in{+} if and only if +(x)=s+(x)=s by Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (i), and ((n,1),s)∈+((n,1),s)\in{+} if and only if s=n+1s=n+1 by Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols (xi), as n,1∈N0n,1\in\mathbb{N}_{0} by Natural Numbers as Indices: ℕ ⊆ ℕ₀, 1 ∈ ℕ₀, and the Two Readings of an Operation from 1 to n (i) and Natural Numbers as Indices: ℕ ⊆ ℕ₀, 1 ∈ ℕ₀, and the Two Readings of an Operation from 1 to n (ii). Let fop\mathrm{fop} be the formula of Iterated Operations over Finite Sets Are Given by a Predicative Formula (i), with the parameters XX, FF, YY, RR and PP above (the addition of R\mathbb{R} is associative and commutative with neutral element 00, as recorded at the start), and let θ(w,n)\theta(w,n) be

∃z ∃D ∃T (θ1(z,n)∧θ2(D,z)∧θ3(T,D,n)∧fop(w,T,g)),\exists z\,\exists D\,\exists T\,\bigl(\theta_{1}(z,n)\wedge\theta_{2}(D,z)\wedge\theta_{3}(T,D,n)\wedge\mathrm{fop}(w,T,g)\bigr),

bound variables renamed apart and TT and gg put for CC and gg of fop\mathrm{fop} as in Predicativity under Renaming of Set Variables by Variables, of Formulas with Ordered Pairs, and of Formulas for Relations, Functions, Maps, Injectivity, Surjectivity and Bijectivity (i); it is predicative by Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols (i), no quantifier being applied to a class variable. The renaming puts gg for a set variable of fop\mathrm{fop}, and it keeps the meaning because the value mm of gg is a set: N×N\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N} is a set by Membership in a Cartesian Product, and the Cartesian Product of Two Sets Is a Set (ii), so the map m:N×N→Rm:\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R} is an element of RN×N\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}} by The Elements of the Class of Functions from a Set to a Set, and This Class Is a Set (i), and hence a set by Classes, Membership, Sets and Proper Classes (i). For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, the only sets zz, DD and TT satisfying the first three conjuncts are [n][n], [n]×[n][n]\times[n] and TnT_{n}, so θ(w,n)\theta(w,n) holds if and only if fop(w,Tn,m)\mathrm{fop}(w,T_{n},m), that is, by Iterated Operations over Finite Sets Are Given by a Predicative Formula (i), TnT_{n} being finite and mm a map from N×N⊇Tn\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\supseteq T_{n} to R\mathbb{R}, if and only if w=∑(i,j)∈Tnm(i,j)w=\sum_{(i,j)\in T_{n}}m(i,j). So for every set nn satisfying γ\gamma exactly one set ww satisfies θ(w,n)\theta(w,n); with γ\gamma and θ\theta as in Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols (ii) (k=1k=1), t(n)=∑(i,j)∈Tnm(i,j)t(n)=\sum_{(i,j)\in T_{n}}m(i,j) is a defined set symbol used properly for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, eliminated as there. By Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (i), with N\mathbb{N} and R\mathbb{R} for its aa and bb, there is a map c:N→Rc:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R} with c(n)=t(n)c(n)=t(n) for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}; it is a sequence in R\mathbb{R} by Sequences (i), with the stated terms.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…