TheoremBase

Periodicity comes from translation invariance of the Lebesgue integral together with periodicity of the extension, and smoothness from the general convolution lemma. The uniform bound is obtained by covering a ball by finitely many cells, and the approximation estimate uses the unit mass of the mollifier kernel to write the difference as an average of increments of the function.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement of this theorem. Throughout, u~\tilde{u} is the periodic extension of uu, and by Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus (i) the map Οˆβ‹†u\psi\star u is the convolution of ψ\psi with u~\tilde{u} in the sense of that lemma; as recorded in Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus, the pair (ψ,u~)(\psi,\tilde{u}) satisfies the hypotheses of that lemma, so all of its claims are available here. We write BΛ‰(z,r)\bar{B}(z,r) for the closed ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and use that the Euclidean distance satisfies dE(a,b)=βˆ₯aβˆ’bβˆ₯d_{E}(a,b)=\lVert a-b\rVert, by claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square.

Step 1. Proof of claim 1.

By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel (ii) the map Οˆβ‹†u\psi\star u is continuous on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Periodicity. Let x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and m∈Znm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}, and let g:Rnβ†’Rg:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be given by g(y)=ψ(x+mβˆ’y) u~(y)g(y)=\psi(x+m-y)\,\tilde{u}(y), which is measurable and integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel (i) applied at the point x+mx+m. By claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on ℝⁿ, applied with a=ma=m, the map z↦g(z+m)z\mapsto g(z+m) is integrable and

∫Rng(z+m) dΞ»n(z)=∫Rng dΞ»n=(Οˆβ‹†u)(x+m).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g(z+m)\,d\lambda_{n}(z)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g\,d\lambda_{n}=(\psi\star u)(x+m).

For every zz we have g(z+m)=ψ(xβˆ’z) u~(z+m)=ψ(xβˆ’z) u~(z)g(z+m)=\psi(x-z)\,\tilde{u}(z+m)=\psi(x-z)\,\tilde{u}(z), the second equality because u~\tilde{u} is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (i). Hence the left-hand side is (Οˆβ‹†u)(x)(\psi\star u)(x), and (Οˆβ‹†u)(x+m)=(Οˆβ‹†u)(x)(\psi\star u)(x+m)=(\psi\star u)(x). So Οˆβ‹†u\psi\star u is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic, and being continuous it lies in CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes (iii).

Smoothness. Let kk be a natural number and let ψ\psi be of class CkC^{k} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; then ψ\psi is of class C1C^{1} by claim 2 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself. By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel (iv) each βˆ‚iψ\partial_{i}\psi is continuous and vanishes at every yy with R<βˆ₯yβˆ₯R<\lVert y\rVert, so βˆ‚iψ\partial_{i}\psi may serve as the kernel in Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus (i) and (βˆ‚iψ)⋆u(\partial_{i}\psi)\star u is the periodic convolution of βˆ‚iψ\partial_{i}\psi with uu; the same clause gives

βˆ‚i(Οˆβ‹†u)=(βˆ‚iψ)⋆u(i∈[n]).\partial_{i}(\psi\star u)=(\partial_{i}\psi)\star u\qquad(i\in[n]).

By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel (v) the map Οˆβ‹†u\psi\star u is of class CkC^{k} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; it is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic by the previous paragraph, hence lies in CperkC^{k}_{\mathrm{per}} by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes (iii). If ψ\psi is smooth then Οˆβ‹†u\psi\star u is smooth by the same clause, and therefore lies in Cper∞C^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}.

Step 2. Proof of claim 2.

Suppose [uβ€²]=[u][u']=[u] in Lp(Tn)L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), that is, u=uβ€²u=u' Ξ»Q\lambda_{Q}-almost everywhere on QQ by The Lebesgue Space Lα΅–(ΞΌ) (i). Both uu and uβ€²u' are measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii), so The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (iii) gives u~=u~β€²\tilde{u}=\tilde{u}' Ξ»n\lambda_{n}-almost everywhere on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. Fix x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Then ψ(xβˆ’y)u~(y)=ψ(xβˆ’y)u~β€²(y)\psi(x-y)\tilde{u}(y)=\psi(x-y)\tilde{u}'(y) for almost every yy, and both maps are measurable and integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel (i). By the last assertion of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii) their integrals coincide, that is, (Οˆβ‹†u)(x)=(Οˆβ‹†uβ€²)(x)(\psi\star u)(x)=(\psi\star u')(x). As xx was arbitrary, claim 2 follows.

Step 3. Proof of claim 3.

By Minkowski's Inequality (ii) the set Lp(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is a linear subspace of the space of real-valued maps on QQ, so u+c uβ€²βˆˆLp(Tn)u+c\,u'\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). Its periodic extension is u~+c u~β€²\tilde{u}+c\,\tilde{u}' by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (ii). The map ψ+cβ€‰Οˆβ€²\psi+c\,\psi' is continuous by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space and vanishes at every yy with R<βˆ₯yβˆ₯R<\lVert y\rVert, since ψ\psi and Οˆβ€²\psi' both do. Both identities of claim 3 are now exactly the two identities of Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel (iii), read with w=u~w=\tilde{u} and wβ€²=u~β€²w'=\tilde{u}'.

Step 4. Proof of claim 4.

The kernel is bounded. Put S={y∈Rn:ψ(y)β‰ 0}S=\{y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\psi(y)\ne0\}. If R<βˆ₯yβˆ₯R<\lVert y\rVert then ψ(y)=0\psi(y)=0, so SβŠ†BΛ‰(0,R)S\subseteq\bar{B}(0,R). The support of ψ\psi is the closure of SS, that is, the intersection of all closed sets containing SS; since BΛ‰(0,R)\bar{B}(0,R) is closed and bounded by Elementary Properties of the Closed Ball in a Metric Space, that support is closed and bounded, hence compact by The Heine-Borel Theorem in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and Compactness of Closed Balls and the Unit Sphere, so ψ\psi is compactly supported and therefore bounded by claim 1 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Bounded and Integrable. Fix a real MM with 0≀M0\le M and ∣ψ(y)βˆ£β‰€M|\psi(y)|\le M for every yy.

A finite index set. By The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers choose a natural number NN with R+1≀NR+1\le N, and put

G={k∈Zn:βˆ’N≀ki≀NΒ forΒ everyΒ i∈[n]}.G=\{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}:-N\le k_{i}\le N\ \text{for every}\ i\in[n]\}.

Let J={j∈Z:βˆ’N≀j≀N}J=\{j\in\mathbb{Z}:-N\le j\le N\}. The initial segment [2N+1][2N+1] is finite by claim 1 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and the map sending l∈[2N+1]l\in[2N+1] to lβˆ’Nβˆ’1l-N-1 is onto JJ: its values are integers by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers and satisfy βˆ’N≀lβˆ’Nβˆ’1≀N-N\le l-N-1\le N because 1≀l≀2N+11\le l\le 2N+1, while a given j∈Jj\in J is the value at l=j+N+1l=j+N+1, which lies in [2N+1][2N+1] and is a natural number by claim 1 of Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers. So JJ is finite by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and GG, the set of nn-tuples with all entries in JJ, is finite by claim 3 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets. Let cc be its number of elements.

The covering. Fix x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and let a∈Zna\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} have iith coordinate ⌊xiβŒ‹\lfloor x_{i}\rfloor, the integer part. Let y∈BΛ‰(x,R)y\in\bar{B}(x,R) and let m∈Znm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} be the unique lattice vector with yβˆ’m∈Qy-m\in Q, given by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (ii); by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space (iii), mi=⌊yiβŒ‹m_{i}=\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor for every ii. By claim 4 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square we have ∣yiβˆ’xiβˆ£β‰€βˆ₯yβˆ’xβˆ₯≀R|y_{i}-x_{i}|\le\lVert y-x\rVert\le R. From ⌊yiβŒ‹β‰€yi<⌊yiβŒ‹+1\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor\le y_{i}<\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor+1 and the same for xix_{i} we get

miβˆ’ai=⌊yiβŒ‹βˆ’βŒŠxiβŒ‹<yiβˆ’(xiβˆ’1)≀R+1≀N,miβˆ’ai>(yiβˆ’1)βˆ’xiβ‰₯βˆ’Rβˆ’1β‰₯βˆ’N,m_{i}-a_{i}=\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor-\lfloor x_{i}\rfloor<y_{i}-(x_{i}-1)\le R+1\le N,\qquad m_{i}-a_{i}>(y_{i}-1)-x_{i}\ge-R-1\ge-N,

so k=mβˆ’ak=m-a lies in GG and y∈Q+m=Q+(a+k)y\in Q+m=Q+(a+k). Hence BΛ‰(x,R)βŠ†β‹ƒk∈G(Q+(a+k))\bar{B}(x,R)\subseteq\bigcup_{k\in G}\bigl(Q+(a+k)\bigr).

The bound. The map ∣u~∣|\tilde{u}| is the periodic extension of ∣u∣|u|, and ∣u∣|u| is integrable with respect to λQ\lambda_{Q} by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (iv) together with Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral. By The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (v), applied to ∣u∣|u| with h=a+kh=a+k,

∫Rn1Q+(a+k)β€‰βˆ£u~βˆ£β€‰dΞ»n=∫Tn∣uβˆ£β€‰dx=βˆ₯uβˆ₯1(k∈G).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{Q+(a+k)}\,|\tilde{u}|\,d\lambda_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|u|\,dx=\lVert u\rVert_{1}\qquad(k\in G).

If yβˆ‰BΛ‰(x,R)y\notin\bar{B}(x,R) then R<βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯R<\lVert x-y\rVert and ψ(xβˆ’y)=0\psi(x-y)=0; and by the covering, for y∈BΛ‰(x,R)y\in\bar{B}(x,R) we have 1Q+(a+k)(y)=1\mathbf{1}_{Q+(a+k)}(y)=1 for at least one k∈Gk\in G. Since all terms are nonnegative, it follows that

∣ψ(xβˆ’y)βˆ£β€‰βˆ£u~(y)βˆ£β‰€Mβˆ‘k∈G1Q+(a+k)(y)β€‰βˆ£u~(y)∣forΒ everyΒ y∈Rn.|\psi(x-y)|\,|\tilde{u}(y)|\le M\sum_{k\in G}\mathbf{1}_{Q+(a+k)}(y)\,|\tilde{u}(y)|\qquad\text{for every }y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Integrating and using claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion for monotonicity and for the finitely many summands,

∫Rn∣ψ(xβˆ’y) u~(y)βˆ£β€‰dΞ»n(y)≀M c βˆ₯uβˆ₯1≀M c βˆ₯uβˆ₯p,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}|\psi(x-y)\,\tilde{u}(y)|\,d\lambda_{n}(y)\le M\,c\,\lVert u\rVert_{1}\le M\,c\,\lVert u\rVert_{p},

the last step by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (iv). Finally, for an integrable gg we have βˆ’βˆ£gβˆ£β‰€gβ‰€βˆ£g∣-|g|\le g\le|g| pointwise by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give ∣∫g dΞ»nβˆ£β‰€βˆ«βˆ£gβˆ£β€‰dΞ»n\bigl|\int g\,d\lambda_{n}\bigr|\le\int|g|\,d\lambda_{n}; applied to g(y)=ψ(xβˆ’y)u~(y)g(y)=\psi(x-y)\tilde{u}(y) this yields

∣(Οˆβ‹†u)(x)βˆ£β‰€M c βˆ₯uβˆ₯p.|(\psi\star u)(x)|\le M\,c\,\lVert u\rVert_{p}.

Put C=M cC=M\,c, a nonnegative real number determined by nn, RR and ψ\psi alone. As xx was arbitrary, the first assertion of claim 4 holds.

Consequence. The map Οˆβ‹†u\psi\star u is continuous by claim 1, hence measurable with respect to B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by claims 3(a) and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, so for every Borel subset AA of R\mathbb{R} the set {y∈Q:(Οˆβ‹†u)(y)∈A}\{y\in Q:(\psi\star u)(y)\in A\} equals the intersection of {x∈Rn:(Οˆβ‹†u)(x)∈A}∈B(Rn)\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:(\psi\star u)(x)\in A\}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) with Q∈B(Rn)Q\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}); that intersection lies in B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and is contained in QQ, hence lies in BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}. So the restriction (Οˆβ‹†u)∣Q(\psi\star u)|_{Q} is measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}. Writing t=Cβˆ₯uβˆ₯pt=C\lVert u\rVert_{p}, we have ∣(Οˆβ‹†u)∣Qβˆ£β‰€t|(\psi\star u)|_{Q}|\le t pointwise on QQ, hence ∣∣(Οˆβ‹†u)∣Q∣∣p≀tp\bigl||(\psi\star u)|_{Q}|\bigr|^{p}\le t^{p} by Properties of Real Powers (v), and therefore

∫Q∣(Οˆβ‹†u)∣Q∣p dΞ»Q≀tp λQ(Q)=tp<∞\int_{Q}\bigl|(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\bigr|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}\le t^{p}\,\lambda_{Q}(Q)=t^{p}<\infty

by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set, using Ξ»Q(Q)=1\lambda_{Q}(Q)=1 from The Flat Torus: Standing Notation (iii). So (Οˆβ‹†u)∣Q∈Lp(Tn)(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (ii), and by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm (iii) together with Properties of Real Powers (v) and Properties of Real Powers (vi),

βˆ₯(Οˆβ‹†u)∣Qβˆ₯p≀(tp)1/p=t=C βˆ₯uβˆ₯p.\bigl\lVert(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\bigr\rVert_{p}\le(t^{p})^{1/p}=t=C\,\lVert u\rVert_{p}.

Step 5. Proof of claim 5.

Let ρ\rho be a mollifier kernel of radius δ\delta and let w∈Cperw\in C_{\mathrm{per}}, so that w∣Q∈Lp(Tn)w|_{Q}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus (i) and the periodic extension of w∣Qw|_{Q} is ww itself by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell (i). Fix x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}.

By claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on ℝⁿ, applied with a=xa=x to the integrable map ρ\rho of Mollifier Kernel of Radius Ξ΄\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, the map y↦ρ(xβˆ’y)y\mapsto\rho(x-y) is integrable with

∫Rnρ(xβˆ’y) dΞ»n(y)=∫Rnρ dΞ»n=1,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho\,d\lambda_{n}=1,

the last equality being the unit-mass condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius Ξ΄\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. The map y↦ρ(xβˆ’y)w(y)y\mapsto\rho(x-y)w(y) is integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel (i), so by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion,

(ρ⋆(w∣Q))(x)βˆ’w(x)=∫Rnρ(xβˆ’y) w(y) dΞ»n(y)βˆ’w(x)∫Rnρ(xβˆ’y) dΞ»n(y)=∫Rnρ(xβˆ’y)(w(y)βˆ’w(x)) dΞ»n(y).\bigl(\rho\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)(x)-w(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\,w(y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)-w(x)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\bigl(w(y)-w(x)\bigr)\,d\lambda_{n}(y).

Let y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. If Ξ΄<βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯\delta<\lVert x-y\rVert then ρ(xβˆ’y)=0\rho(x-y)=0 by the support condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius Ξ΄\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so the integrand vanishes; otherwise βˆ₯xβˆ’yβˆ₯≀δ\lVert x-y\rVert\le\delta and ∣w(y)βˆ’w(x)βˆ£β‰€Ξ·|w(y)-w(x)|\le\eta by hypothesis. Since 0≀ρ(xβˆ’y)0\le\rho(x-y) by the nonnegativity condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius Ξ΄\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, in both cases

∣ρ(xβˆ’y)(w(y)βˆ’w(x))∣=ρ(xβˆ’y)β€‰βˆ£w(y)βˆ’w(x)βˆ£β‰€Ξ·β€‰Ο(xβˆ’y),\bigl|\rho(x-y)\bigl(w(y)-w(x)\bigr)\bigr|=\rho(x-y)\,|w(y)-w(x)|\le\eta\,\rho(x-y),

using claims 1 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the first giving ∣ρ(xβˆ’y)∣=ρ(xβˆ’y)|\rho(x-y)|=\rho(x-y) from nonnegativity of the kernel, and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Applying the bound ∣∫gβˆ£β‰€βˆ«βˆ£g∣\bigl|\int g\bigr|\le\int|g| established in step 4, then claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion for monotonicity and the scalar Ξ·\eta,

∣(ρ⋆(w∣Q))(x)βˆ’w(x)βˆ£β‰€βˆ«Rnη ρ(xβˆ’y) dΞ»n(y)=Ξ·.\Bigl|\bigl(\rho\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)(x)-w(x)\Bigr|\le\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\eta\,\rho(x-y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)=\eta .

As xx was arbitrary, claim 5 follows. β– \blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…