TheoremBase

Proof of Properties of Periodic Convolution on the Torus

theoremthm:periodic-convolution-torus-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 12,785 chars · 39 deps · depth 26 Reason: Phase C: proof of the periodicity, smoothness, linearity, uniform bound and approximation properties of periodic convolution on the torus.

Periodicity comes from translation invariance of the Lebesgue integral together with periodicity of the extension, and smoothness from the general convolution lemma. The uniform bound is obtained by covering a ball by finitely many cells, and the approximation estimate uses the unit mass of the mollifier kernel to write the difference as an average of increments of the function.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement of this theorem. Throughout, u~\tilde{u} is the periodic extension of uu, and by Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus §convolution the map ψu\psi\star u is the convolution of ψ\psi with u~\tilde{u} in the sense of that lemma; as recorded in Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus, the pair (ψ,u~)(\psi,\tilde{u}) satisfies the hypotheses of that lemma, so all of its claims are available here. We write Bˉ(z,r)\bar{B}(z,r) for the closed ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and use that the Euclidean distance satisfies dE(a,b)=abd_{E}(a,b)=\lVert a-b\rVert, by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Step 1. Proof of claim 1.

By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §continuous the map ψu\psi\star u is continuous on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Periodicity. Let xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and mZnm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}, and let g:RnRg:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be given by g(y)=ψ(x+my)u~(y)g(y)=\psi(x+m-y)\,\tilde{u}(y), which is measurable and integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §defined applied at the point x+mx+m. By claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied with a=ma=m, the map zg(z+m)z\mapsto g(z+m) is integrable and

Rng(z+m)dλn(z)=Rngdλn=(ψu)(x+m).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g(z+m)\,d\lambda_{n}(z)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g\,d\lambda_{n}=(\psi\star u)(x+m).

For every zz we have g(z+m)=ψ(xz)u~(z+m)=ψ(xz)u~(z)g(z+m)=\psi(x-z)\,\tilde{u}(z+m)=\psi(x-z)\,\tilde{u}(z), the second equality because u~\tilde{u} is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §extension. Hence the left-hand side is (ψu)(x)(\psi\star u)(x), and (ψu)(x+m)=(ψu)(x)(\psi\star u)(x+m)=(\psi\star u)(x). So ψu\psi\star u is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic, and being continuous it lies in CperC_{\mathrm{per}} by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes.

Smoothness. Let kk be a natural number and let ψ\psi be of class CkC^{k} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; then ψ\psi is of class C1C^{1} by claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §derivative each iψ\partial_{i}\psi is continuous and vanishes at every yy with R<yR<\lVert y\rVert, so iψ\partial_{i}\psi may serve as the kernel in Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus §convolution and (iψ)u(\partial_{i}\psi)\star u is the periodic convolution of iψ\partial_{i}\psi with uu; the same clause gives

i(ψu)=(iψ)u(i[n]).\partial_{i}(\psi\star u)=(\partial_{i}\psi)\star u\qquad(i\in[n]).

By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §smooth the map ψu\psi\star u is of class CkC^{k} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; it is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic by the previous paragraph, hence lies in CperkC^{k}_{\mathrm{per}} by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes. If ψ\psi is smooth then ψu\psi\star u is smooth by the same clause, and therefore lies in CperC^{\infty}_{\mathrm{per}}.

Step 2. Proof of claim 2.

Suppose [u]=[u][u']=[u] in Lp(Tn)L^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), that is, u=uu=u' λQ\lambda_{Q}-almost everywhere on QQ by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §equivalence. Both uu and uu' are measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q} by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space, so The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §almost-everywhere gives u~=u~\tilde{u}=\tilde{u}' λn\lambda_{n}-almost everywhere on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. Fix xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Then ψ(xy)u~(y)=ψ(xy)u~(y)\psi(x-y)\tilde{u}(y)=\psi(x-y)\tilde{u}'(y) for almost every yy, and both maps are measurable and integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §defined. By the last assertion of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison their integrals coincide, that is, (ψu)(x)=(ψu)(x)(\psi\star u)(x)=(\psi\star u')(x). As xx was arbitrary, claim 2 follows.

Step 3. Proof of claim 3.

By Minkowski's Inequality and the Seminormed Space of Power-Integrable Functions §vector-space the set Lp(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) is a linear subspace of the space of real-valued maps on QQ, so u+cuLp(Tn)u+c\,u'\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}). Its periodic extension is u~+cu~\tilde{u}+c\,\tilde{u}' by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §linear. The map ψ+cψ\psi+c\,\psi' is continuous by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space and vanishes at every yy with R<yR<\lVert y\rVert, since ψ\psi and ψ\psi' both do. Both identities of claim 3 are now exactly the two identities of Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §linear, read with w=u~w=\tilde{u} and w=u~w'=\tilde{u}'.

Step 4. Proof of claim 4.

The kernel is bounded. Put S={yRn:ψ(y)0}S=\{y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\psi(y)\ne0\}. If R<yR<\lVert y\rVert then ψ(y)=0\psi(y)=0, so SBˉ(0,R)S\subseteq\bar{B}(0,R). The support of ψ\psi is the closure of SS, that is, the intersection of all closed sets containing SS; since Bˉ(0,R)\bar{B}(0,R) is closed and bounded by Elementary Properties of the Closed Ball in a Metric Space, that support is closed and bounded, hence compact by Heine-Borel Theorem in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so ψ\psi is compactly supported and therefore bounded by claim 1 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Bounded and Integrable. Fix a real MM with 0M0\le M and ψ(y)M|\psi(y)|\le M for every yy.

A finite index set. By The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers choose a natural number NN with R+1NR+1\le N, and put

G={kZn:NkiN for every i[n]}.G=\{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}:-N\le k_{i}\le N\ \text{for every}\ i\in[n]\}.

Let J={jZ:NjN}J=\{j\in\mathbb{Z}:-N\le j\le N\}. The initial segment [2N+1][2N+1] is finite by claim 1 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and the map sending l[2N+1]l\in[2N+1] to lN1l-N-1 is onto JJ: its values are integers by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Order and Discreteness of the Integers and satisfy NlN1N-N\le l-N-1\le N because 1l2N+11\le l\le 2N+1, while a given jJj\in J is the value at l=j+N+1l=j+N+1, which lies in [2N+1][2N+1] and is a natural number by claim 1 of Arithmetic, Order and Discreteness of the Integers. So JJ is finite by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and GG, the set of nn-tuples with all entries in JJ, is finite by claim 3 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets. Let cc be its number of elements.

The covering. Fix xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and let aZna\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} have iith coordinate xi\lfloor x_{i}\rfloor, the integer part. Let yBˉ(x,R)y\in\bar{B}(x,R) and let mZnm\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} be the unique lattice vector with ymQy-m\in Q, given by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §tiling; by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap, mi=yim_{i}=\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor for every ii. By claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n we have yixiyxR|y_{i}-x_{i}|\le\lVert y-x\rVert\le R. From yiyi<yi+1\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor\le y_{i}<\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor+1 and the same for xix_{i} we get

miai=yixi<yi(xi1)R+1N,miai>(yi1)xiR1N,m_{i}-a_{i}=\lfloor y_{i}\rfloor-\lfloor x_{i}\rfloor<y_{i}-(x_{i}-1)\le R+1\le N,\qquad m_{i}-a_{i}>(y_{i}-1)-x_{i}\ge-R-1\ge-N,

so k=mak=m-a lies in GG and yQ+m=Q+(a+k)y\in Q+m=Q+(a+k). Hence Bˉ(x,R)kG(Q+(a+k))\bar{B}(x,R)\subseteq\bigcup_{k\in G}\bigl(Q+(a+k)\bigr).

The bound. The map u~|\tilde{u}| is the periodic extension of u|u|, and u|u| is integrable with respect to λQ\lambda_{Q} by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §finite-measure together with Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. By The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §local, applied to u|u| with h=a+kh=a+k,

Rn1Q+(a+k)u~dλn=Tnudx=u1(kG).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{Q+(a+k)}\,|\tilde{u}|\,d\lambda_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{T}^{n}}|u|\,dx=\lVert u\rVert_{1}\qquad(k\in G).

If yBˉ(x,R)y\notin\bar{B}(x,R) then R<xyR<\lVert x-y\rVert and ψ(xy)=0\psi(x-y)=0; and by the covering, for yBˉ(x,R)y\in\bar{B}(x,R) we have 1Q+(a+k)(y)=1\mathbf{1}_{Q+(a+k)}(y)=1 for at least one kGk\in G. Since all terms are nonnegative, it follows that

ψ(xy)u~(y)MkG1Q+(a+k)(y)u~(y)for every yRn.|\psi(x-y)|\,|\tilde{u}(y)|\le M\sum_{k\in G}\mathbf{1}_{Q+(a+k)}(y)\,|\tilde{u}(y)|\qquad\text{for every }y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Integrating and using claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral for monotonicity and for the finitely many summands,

Rnψ(xy)u~(y)dλn(y)Mcu1Mcup,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}|\psi(x-y)\,\tilde{u}(y)|\,d\lambda_{n}(y)\le M\,c\,\lVert u\rVert_{1}\le M\,c\,\lVert u\rVert_{p},

the last step by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §finite-measure. Finally, for an integrable gg we have ggg-|g|\le g\le|g| pointwise by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give gdλngdλn\bigl|\int g\,d\lambda_{n}\bigr|\le\int|g|\,d\lambda_{n}; applied to g(y)=ψ(xy)u~(y)g(y)=\psi(x-y)\tilde{u}(y) this yields

(ψu)(x)Mcup.|(\psi\star u)(x)|\le M\,c\,\lVert u\rVert_{p}.

Put C=McC=M\,c, a nonnegative real number determined by nn, RR and ψ\psi alone. As xx was arbitrary, the first assertion of claim 4 holds.

Consequence. The map ψu\psi\star u is continuous by claim 1, hence measurable with respect to B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by claims 3(a) and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, so for every Borel subset AA of R\mathbb{R} the set {yQ:(ψu)(y)A}\{y\in Q:(\psi\star u)(y)\in A\} equals the intersection of {xRn:(ψu)(x)A}B(Rn)\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:(\psi\star u)(x)\in A\}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) with QB(Rn)Q\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}); that intersection lies in B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and is contained in QQ, hence lies in BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}. So the restriction (ψu)Q(\psi\star u)|_{Q} is measurable with respect to BQ\mathcal{B}_{Q}. Writing t=Cupt=C\lVert u\rVert_{p}, we have (ψu)Qt|(\psi\star u)|_{Q}|\le t pointwise on QQ, hence (ψu)Qptp\bigl||(\psi\star u)|_{Q}|\bigr|^{p}\le t^{p} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone, and therefore

Q(ψu)QpdλQtpλQ(Q)=tp<\int_{Q}\bigl|(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\bigr|^{p}\,d\lambda_{Q}\le t^{p}\,\lambda_{Q}(Q)=t^{p}<\infty

by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set, using λQ(Q)=1\lambda_{Q}(Q)=1 from The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §measure. So (ψu)QLp(Tn)(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space, and by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm together with Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §inverse,

(ψu)Qp(tp)1/p=t=Cup.\bigl\lVert(\psi\star u)|_{Q}\bigr\rVert_{p}\le(t^{p})^{1/p}=t=C\,\lVert u\rVert_{p}.

Step 5. Proof of claim 5.

Let ρ\rho be a mollifier kernel of radius δ\delta and let wCperw\in C_{\mathrm{per}}, so that wQLp(Tn)w|_{Q}\in\mathcal{L}^{p}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) by Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus §member and the periodic extension of wQw|_{Q} is ww itself by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §extension. Fix xRnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}.

By claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied with a=xa=x to the integrable map ρ\rho of Mollifier Kernel of Radius δ\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, the map yρ(xy)y\mapsto\rho(x-y) is integrable with

Rnρ(xy)dλn(y)=Rnρdλn=1,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho\,d\lambda_{n}=1,

the last equality being the unit-mass condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius δ\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. The map yρ(xy)w(y)y\mapsto\rho(x-y)w(y) is integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §defined, so by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,

(ρ(wQ))(x)w(x)=Rnρ(xy)w(y)dλn(y)w(x)Rnρ(xy)dλn(y)=Rnρ(xy)(w(y)w(x))dλn(y).\bigl(\rho\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)(x)-w(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\,w(y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)-w(x)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho(x-y)\bigl(w(y)-w(x)\bigr)\,d\lambda_{n}(y).

Let yRny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. If δ<xy\delta<\lVert x-y\rVert then ρ(xy)=0\rho(x-y)=0 by the support condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius δ\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so the integrand vanishes; otherwise xyδ\lVert x-y\rVert\le\delta and w(y)w(x)η|w(y)-w(x)|\le\eta by hypothesis. Since 0ρ(xy)0\le\rho(x-y) by the nonnegativity condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius δ\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, in both cases

ρ(xy)(w(y)w(x))=ρ(xy)w(y)w(x)ηρ(xy),\bigl|\rho(x-y)\bigl(w(y)-w(x)\bigr)\bigr|=\rho(x-y)\,|w(y)-w(x)|\le\eta\,\rho(x-y),

using claims 1 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the first giving ρ(xy)=ρ(xy)|\rho(x-y)|=\rho(x-y) from nonnegativity of the kernel, and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Applying the bound gg\bigl|\int g\bigr|\le\int|g| established in step 4, then claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral for monotonicity and the scalar η\eta,

(ρ(wQ))(x)w(x)Rnηρ(xy)dλn(y)=η.\Bigl|\bigl(\rho\star(w|_{Q})\bigr)(x)-w(x)\Bigr|\le\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\eta\,\rho(x-y)\,d\lambda_{n}(y)=\eta .

As xx was arbitrary, claim 5 follows. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…