Periodicity comes from translation invariance of the Lebesgue integral together with periodicity of the extension, and smoothness from the general convolution lemma. The uniform bound is obtained by covering a ball by finitely many cells, and the approximation estimate uses the unit mass of the mollifier kernel to write the difference as an average of increments of the function.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement of this theorem. Throughout, is the periodic extension of , and by Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus §convolution the map is the convolution of with in the sense of that lemma; as recorded in Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus, the pair satisfies the hypotheses of that lemma, so all of its claims are available here. We write for the closed ball in and use that the Euclidean distance satisfies , by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on .
Step 1. Proof of claim 1.
By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §continuous the map is continuous on .
Periodicity. Let and , and let be given by , which is measurable and integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §defined applied at the point . By claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on , applied with , the map is integrable and
For every we have , the second equality because is -periodic by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §extension. Hence the left-hand side is , and . So is -periodic, and being continuous it lies in by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes.
Smoothness. Let be a natural number and let be of class on ; then is of class by claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and Maps are Continuous. By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §derivative each is continuous and vanishes at every with , so may serve as the kernel in Periodic Convolution and Mollification on the Torus §convolution and is the periodic convolution of with ; the same clause gives
By Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §smooth the map is of class on ; it is -periodic by the previous paragraph, hence lies in by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes. If is smooth then is smooth by the same clause, and therefore lies in .
Step 2. Proof of claim 2.
Suppose in , that is, -almost everywhere on by The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §equivalence. Both and are measurable with respect to by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space, so The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §almost-everywhere gives -almost everywhere on . Fix . Then for almost every , and both maps are measurable and integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §defined. By the last assertion of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison their integrals coincide, that is, . As was arbitrary, claim 2 follows.
Step 3. Proof of claim 3.
By Minkowski's Inequality and the Seminormed Space of Power-Integrable Functions §vector-space the set is a linear subspace of the space of real-valued maps on , so . Its periodic extension is by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §linear. The map is continuous by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space and vanishes at every with , since and both do. Both identities of claim 3 are now exactly the two identities of Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §linear, read with and .
Step 4. Proof of claim 4.
The kernel is bounded. Put . If then , so . The support of is the closure of , that is, the intersection of all closed sets containing ; since is closed and bounded by Elementary Properties of the Closed Ball in a Metric Space, that support is closed and bounded, hence compact by Heine-Borel Theorem in , so is compactly supported and therefore bounded by claim 1 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on is Bounded and Integrable. Fix a real with and for every .
A finite index set. By The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers choose a natural number with , and put
Let . The initial segment is finite by claim 1 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and the map sending to is onto : its values are integers by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Order and Discreteness of the Integers and satisfy because , while a given is the value at , which lies in and is a natural number by claim 1 of Arithmetic, Order and Discreteness of the Integers. So is finite by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Finite Sets, and , the set of -tuples with all entries in , is finite by claim 3 of Finiteness of Cartesian Products, Tuple Sets, and Permutation Sets. Let be its number of elements.
The covering. Fix and let have th coordinate , the integer part. Let and let be the unique lattice vector with , given by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §tiling; by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap, for every . By claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on we have . From and the same for we get
so lies in and . Hence .
The bound. The map is the periodic extension of , and is integrable with respect to by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §finite-measure together with Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. By The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §local, applied to with ,
If then and ; and by the covering, for we have for at least one . Since all terms are nonnegative, it follows that
Integrating and using claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral for monotonicity and for the finitely many summands,
the last step by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §finite-measure. Finally, for an integrable we have pointwise by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give ; applied to this yields
Put , a nonnegative real number determined by , and alone. As was arbitrary, the first assertion of claim 4 holds.
Consequence. The map is continuous by claim 1, hence measurable with respect to by claims 3(a) and 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, so for every Borel subset of the set equals the intersection of with ; that intersection lies in and is contained in , hence lies in . So the restriction is measurable with respect to . Writing , we have pointwise on , hence by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone, and therefore
by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set, using from The Flat Torus: Standing Notation §measure. So by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space, and by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm together with Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §monotone and Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §inverse,
Step 5. Proof of claim 5.
Let be a mollifier kernel of radius and let , so that by Continuous Periodic Functions are Power-Integrable and Dense on the Torus §member and the periodic extension of is itself by The Periodic Extension of a Function on the Unit Cell §extension. Fix .
By claim 3 of Translation and Reflection Invariance of Lebesgue Measure on , applied with to the integrable map of Mollifier Kernel of Radius on , the map is integrable with
the last equality being the unit-mass condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius on . The map is integrable by Convolution of a Locally Integrable Function with a Compactly Supported Kernel §defined, so by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral,
Let . If then by the support condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius on , so the integrand vanishes; otherwise and by hypothesis. Since by the nonnegativity condition of Mollifier Kernel of Radius on , in both cases
using claims 1 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the first giving from nonnegativity of the kernel, and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Applying the bound established in step 4, then claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral for monotonicity and the scalar ,
As was arbitrary, claim 5 follows.
Loading…
Prerequisites
598cc7cf-9690-4370-8ce1-9b1b291f55ab