TheoremBase

Proof of Distance Functions Give Explicit Slope-Based Solutions of the Eikonal and Discounted Hopf-Lax Equations

propositionprop:distance-slope-solutions-metric-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 13,040 chars · 20 deps · depth 17 Reason: Proof that distance functions give explicit slope-based solutions.

The subsolution inequalities follow from the nonexpansiveness of the distance function through the difference-quotient upper bound for slopes, and the supersolution inequalities from interpolation points along which the distance decreases almost at unit rate, through the difference-quotient lower bound.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

For x∈Xx\in X let Sx={d(x,k):k∈K}S_{x}=\{d(x,k):k\in K\}, so that D(x)=inf⁡SxD(x)=\inf S_{x} by Distance from a Point to a Nonempty Subset of a Metric Space; SxS_{x} is nonempty because KK is, and bounded below by 00. For a real aa we write [a]−=max⁡{−a,0}[a]_{-}=\max\{-a,0\} as in Local Slope, Super-Slope, Sub-Slope and Upper Slope Envelope of a Locally Lipschitz Function on a Metric Space, so that [ψ(y)−ψ(x)]−=max⁡{ψ(x)−ψ(y),0}[\psi(y)-\psi(x)]_{-}=\max\{\psi(x)-\psi(y),0\}; by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, ψ(x)−ψ(y)≤[ψ(y)−ψ(x)]−\psi(x)-\psi(y)\le[\psi(y)-\psi(x)]_{-}. The slope pair of a locally Lipschitz ψ\psi at xx used below is always (∣∇−ψ∣(x),[⋅]−)(|\nabla^{-}\psi|(x),[\cdot]_{-}), in the sense of Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances.

Step 1 (properties of DD). By claims 1 to 4 of The Distance to a Set is Nonexpansive (with A=KA=K), for all x,y∈Xx,y\in X and every k∈Kk\in K,

0≤D(x),D(x)≤d(x,k),D(x)≤d(x,y)+D(y),∣D(x)−D(y)∣≤d(x,y).(1.1)0\le D(x),\qquad D(x)\le d(x,k),\qquad D(x)\le d(x,y)+D(y),\qquad |D(x)-D(y)|\le d(x,y). \tag{1.1}

Step 2 (points of almost steepest descent of DD). We show: if x∈Xx\in X satisfies 0<D(x)0<D(x), then for all reals ε′>0\varepsilon'>0 and R>0R>0 there is y∈Xy\in X with

0<d(x,y)<Rand(1−ε′) d(x,y)≤D(x)−D(y).(2.1)0<d(x,y)<R\qquad\text{and}\qquad(1-\varepsilon')\,d(x,y)\le D(x)-D(y). \tag{2.1}

The choices are made in the order tt, kk, yy. Let t=min⁡{1/2, R/(2(1+ε′)D(x))}t=\min\{1/2,\,R/(2(1+\varepsilon')D(x))\}, so that 0<t≤10<t\le1, and let η=ε′t D(x)\eta=\varepsilon' t\,D(x), a positive real. By claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R}, applied to SxS_{x} with η\eta, there is k∈Kk\in K with d(x,k)<D(x)+ηd(x,k)<D(x)+\eta; by (1.1), 0<D(x)≤d(x,k)0<D(x)\le d(x,k). By Metric Space with Interpolation Points §interpolation there is an interpolation point yy of xx and kk at parameter tt: d(x,y)≤t d(x,k)d(x,y)\le t\,d(x,k) and d(y,k)≤(1−t) d(x,k)d(y,k)\le(1-t)\,d(x,k). The triangle inequality gives d(x,k)≤d(x,y)+d(y,k)≤d(x,y)+(1−t) d(x,k)d(x,k)\le d(x,y)+d(y,k)\le d(x,y)+(1-t)\,d(x,k), so t d(x,k)≤d(x,y)t\,d(x,k)\le d(x,y), and therefore d(x,y)=t d(x,k)>0d(x,y)=t\,d(x,k)>0. Moreover d(x,y)<t (1+ε′t) D(x)≤t (1+ε′) D(x)≤R/2<Rd(x,y)<t\,(1+\varepsilon' t)\,D(x)\le t\,(1+\varepsilon')\,D(x)\le R/2<R. Finally, by (1.1), D(y)≤d(y,k)≤(1−t) d(x,k)D(y)\le d(y,k)\le(1-t)\,d(x,k), so

D(x)−D(y)≥t d(x,k)−(d(x,k)−D(x))>d(x,y)−η=d(x,y)−ε′t D(x)≥d(x,y)−ε′t d(x,k)=(1−ε′) d(x,y).D(x)-D(y)\ge t\,d(x,k)-\bigl(d(x,k)-D(x)\bigr)>d(x,y)-\eta=d(x,y)-\varepsilon' t\,D(x)\ge d(x,y)-\varepsilon' t\,d(x,k)=(1-\varepsilon')\,d(x,y).

Part 1. Here Ω=X∖K\Omega=X\setminus K is open, and by The Eikonal Equation on an Open Subset of a Metric Space the eikonal equation ∣∇u∣=1|\nabla u|=\mathbf{1} in Ω\Omega is H=0H=0 with H(x,r,p)=p−1H(x,r,p)=p-1. Write DΩD_{\Omega} for the restriction of DD to Ω\Omega.

Step 3 (semicontinuity). Let x∈Ωx\in\Omega and τ\tau a positive real. For every y∈Ωy\in\Omega with d(x,y)<τd(x,y)<\tau, (1.1) gives ∣D(y)−D(x)∣≤d(x,y)<τ|D(y)-D(x)|\le d(x,y)<\tau, hence D(y)<D(x)+τD(y)<D(x)+\tau and D(x)−τ<D(y)D(x)-\tau<D(y). So DΩD_{\Omega} is upper and lower semicontinuous on Ω\Omega.

Step 4 (Part 1, subsolution). Let ψ1∈C‾(Ω)\psi_{1}\in\underline{\mathcal{C}}(\Omega), let ψ2:Ω→R\psi_{2}:\Omega\to\mathbb{R} be locally Lipschitz on Ω\Omega, and let x∈Ωx\in\Omega be a point at which DΩ−ψ1−ψ2D_{\Omega}-\psi_{1}-\psi_{2} has a local maximum relative to Ω\Omega, with a radius r1>0r_{1}>0. For y∈Ωy\in\Omega with d(x,y)<r1d(x,y)<r_{1} we have D(y)−ψ1(y)−ψ2(y)≤D(x)−ψ1(x)−ψ2(x)D(y)-\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{2}(y)\le D(x)-\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{2}(x), so by (1.1)

ψ1(x)−ψ1(y)≤D(x)−D(y)+ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)≤d(x,y)+∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣.\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{1}(y)\le D(x)-D(y)+\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)\le d(x,y)+|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)| .

The right-hand side is nonnegative, so claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements gives [ψ1(y)−ψ1(x)]−≤d(x,y)+∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣≤(1+ε) d(x,y)+∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣[\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{1}(x)]_{-}\le d(x,y)+|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)|\le(1+\varepsilon)\,d(x,y)+|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)| for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 and every y∈Ωy\in\Omega with 0<d(x,y)<r10<d(x,y)<r_{1}. Hence Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §upper-bound, applied with ψ=ψ1\psi=\psi_{1}, φ=ψ2\varphi=\psi_{2}, c=1c=1 and r=r1r=r_{1} for every ε\varepsilon, gives ∣∇−ψ1∣(x)≤1+∣∇ψ2∣(x)|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x)\le1+|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x). Since ψ1∈C‾(Ω)\psi_{1}\in\underline{\mathcal{C}}(\Omega), Test Classes for Slope-Based Viscosity Solutions on a Metric Space §sub-class gives ∣∇ψ1∣(x)=∣∇−ψ1∣(x)|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)=|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x), and Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §order gives ∣∇ψ2∣(x)≤∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x)\le|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x); so ∣∇ψ1∣(x)−∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)≤1|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)-|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x)\le1. As also 0≤10\le1, claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements gives max⁡{∣∇ψ1∣(x)−∣∇ψ2∣∗(x),0}≤1\max\{|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)-|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x),0\}\le1, that is, H(x,D(x),max⁡{∣∇ψ1∣(x)−∣∇ψ2∣∗(x),0})≤0H\bigl(x,D(x),\max\{|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)-|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x),0\}\bigr)\le0. Together with Step 3, DΩD_{\Omega} is an s-subsolution of H=0H=0 in Ω\Omega by Slope-Based Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions on a Metric Space §subsolution.

Step 5 (Part 1, supersolution). Let ψ1∈C‾(Ω)\psi_{1}\in\overline{\mathcal{C}}(\Omega), let ψ2:Ω→R\psi_{2}:\Omega\to\mathbb{R} be locally Lipschitz on Ω\Omega, and let x∈Ωx\in\Omega be a point at which DΩ−ψ1−ψ2D_{\Omega}-\psi_{1}-\psi_{2} has a local minimum relative to Ω\Omega, with a radius r1>0r_{1}>0. Since Ω\Omega is open, there is a real r2>0r_{2}>0 with Bd(x,r2)⊆ΩB_{d}(x,r_{2})\subseteq\Omega. No k∈Kk\in K lies in Ω\Omega, so no k∈Kk\in K lies in the open ball Bd(x,r2)B_{d}(x,r_{2}), that is, r2≤d(x,k)r_{2}\le d(x,k) for every k∈Kk\in K; thus r2r_{2} is a lower bound of SxS_{x}, and since D(x)D(x) is the greatest lower bound of SxS_{x}, 0<r2≤D(x)0<r_{2}\le D(x).

We verify the hypothesis of Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §lower-bound for ψ=ψ1\psi=\psi_{1}, φ=ψ2\varphi=\psi_{2} and c=1c=1. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and r>0r>0 be reals. Step 2, applied with ε′=ε\varepsilon'=\varepsilon and R=min⁡{r,r1,r2}R=\min\{r,r_{1},r_{2}\}, gives y∈Xy\in X with 0<d(x,y)<R0<d(x,y)<R and (1−ε) d(x,y)≤D(x)−D(y)(1-\varepsilon)\,d(x,y)\le D(x)-D(y); then y∈Bd(x,r2)⊆Ωy\in B_{d}(x,r_{2})\subseteq\Omega and d(x,y)<r1d(x,y)<r_{1}, so D(x)−ψ1(x)−ψ2(x)≤D(y)−ψ1(y)−ψ2(y)D(x)-\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{2}(x)\le D(y)-\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{2}(y), and therefore

[ψ1(y)−ψ1(x)]−≥ψ1(x)−ψ1(y)≥D(x)−D(y)−∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣≥(1−ε) d(x,y)−∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣.[\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{1}(x)]_{-}\ge\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{1}(y)\ge D(x)-D(y)-|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)|\ge(1-\varepsilon)\,d(x,y)-|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)| .

So Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §lower-bound gives 1−∣∇ψ2∣(x)≤∣∇−ψ1∣(x)1-|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x)\le|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x). By Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §order, ∣∇−ψ1∣(x)≤∣∇ψ1∣(x)|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x)\le|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x) and ∣∇ψ2∣(x)≤∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x)\le|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x), so 1≤∣∇ψ1∣(x)+∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)1\le|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)+|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x), that is, H(x,D(x),∣∇ψ1∣(x)+∣∇ψ2∣∗(x))≥0H\bigl(x,D(x),|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)+|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x)\bigr)\ge0. (Only local Lipschitz continuity of ψ1\psi_{1} was used.) Together with Step 3, DΩD_{\Omega} is an s-supersolution of H=0H=0 in Ω\Omega by Slope-Based Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions on a Metric Space §supersolution, and with Step 4 an s-solution by Slope-Based Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions on a Metric Space §solution. This proves claim 1.

Part 2. Here Ω=X\Omega=X, u(x)=a D(x)2u(x)=a\,D(x)^{2} and f(x)=b D(x)2f(x)=b\,D(x)^{2}, and by The Discounted Stationary Hopf-Lax Equation on an Open Subset of a Metric Space the equation is H=0H=0 with H(x,r,p)=ρ r+12p2−b D(x)2H(x,r,p)=\rho\,r+\frac{1}{2}p^{2}-b\,D(x)^{2}, a Hamiltonian on XX; by Slope-Based Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions on a Metric Space §hamiltonian, H(x,r,p)≤H(x,r,p′)H(x,r,p)\le H(x,r,p') whenever p,p′∈Tp,p'\in T and p≤p′p\le p'.

Step 6 (the constant aa). Since 0≤ρ20\le\rho^{2} and 0≤b0\le b, the real ρ2+8b\rho^{2}+8b is nonnegative, and by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root s=ρ2+8bs=\sqrt{\rho^{2}+8b} is the unique real with 0≤s0\le s and s2=ρ2+8bs^{2}=\rho^{2}+8b. As ρ2≤s2\rho^{2}\le s^{2} with 0≤ρ0\le\rho and 0≤s0\le s, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ρ≤s\rho\le s, so a=14(s−ρ)≥0a=\frac{1}{4}(s-\rho)\ge0. Moreover ρ+2a=12(s+ρ)\rho+2a=\frac{1}{2}(s+\rho), so

ρa+2a2=a(ρ+2a)=18(s−ρ)(s+ρ)=18(s2−ρ2)=b.\rho a+2a^{2}=a(\rho+2a)=\tfrac{1}{8}(s-\rho)(s+\rho)=\tfrac{1}{8}(s^{2}-\rho^{2})=b .

Consequently, for every x∈Xx\in X,

H(x,u(x),2aD(x))=ρa D(x)2+2a2D(x)2−b D(x)2=0.(6.1)H\bigl(x,u(x),2aD(x)\bigr)=\rho a\,D(x)^{2}+2a^{2}D(x)^{2}-b\,D(x)^{2}=0 . \tag{6.1}

Step 7 (two estimates for uu). For x,y∈Xx,y\in X we have u(x)−u(y)=a(D(x)−D(y))(D(x)+D(y))u(x)-u(y)=a\bigl(D(x)-D(y)\bigr)\bigl(D(x)+D(y)\bigr), and by (1.1) D(x)−D(y)≤d(x,y)D(x)-D(y)\le d(x,y) and D(x)+D(y)≤2D(x)+d(x,y)D(x)+D(y)\le2D(x)+d(x,y), both right-hand sides being nonnegative. If D(y)≤D(x)D(y)\le D(x), multiplying these bounds for nonnegative factors gives (D(x)−D(y))(D(x)+D(y))≤d(x,y)(2D(x)+d(x,y))\bigl(D(x)-D(y)\bigr)\bigl(D(x)+D(y)\bigr)\le d(x,y)\bigl(2D(x)+d(x,y)\bigr); if D(x)<D(y)D(x)<D(y) the left-hand side is negative. Since 0≤a0\le a,

u(x)−u(y)≤a d(x,y)(2D(x)+d(x,y))and, symmetrically,∣u(x)−u(y)∣≤a d(x,y)(2D(x)+d(x,y)),(7.1)u(x)-u(y)\le a\,d(x,y)\bigl(2D(x)+d(x,y)\bigr)\qquad\text{and, symmetrically,}\qquad|u(x)-u(y)|\le a\,d(x,y)\bigl(2D(x)+d(x,y)\bigr), \tag{7.1}

the second because ∣u(x)−u(y)∣=a ∣D(x)−D(y)∣ (D(x)+D(y))|u(x)-u(y)|=a\,|D(x)-D(y)|\,\bigl(D(x)+D(y)\bigr) and (1.1). Now let x∈Xx\in X and τ\tau a positive real, and let δ0=min⁡{1,τ/(a(2D(x)+1)+1)}\delta_{0}=\min\{1,\tau/(a(2D(x)+1)+1)\}. For y∈Xy\in X with d(x,y)<δ0d(x,y)<\delta_{0}, (7.1) gives ∣u(x)−u(y)∣≤a(2D(x)+1) d(x,y)≤a(2D(x)+1) δ0<τ|u(x)-u(y)|\le a(2D(x)+1)\,d(x,y)\le a(2D(x)+1)\,\delta_{0}<\tau. Hence u(y)<u(x)+τu(y)<u(x)+\tau and u(x)−τ<u(y)u(x)-\tau<u(y), so uu is upper and lower semicontinuous on XX.

Step 8 (Part 2, subsolution). Let ψ1∈C‾(X)\psi_{1}\in\underline{\mathcal{C}}(X), let ψ2:X→R\psi_{2}:X\to\mathbb{R} be locally Lipschitz on XX, and let x∈Xx\in X be a point at which u−ψ1−ψ2u-\psi_{1}-\psi_{2} has a local maximum relative to XX, with a radius r1>0r_{1}>0. For y∈Xy\in X with d(x,y)<r1d(x,y)<r_{1}, u(y)−ψ1(y)−ψ2(y)≤u(x)−ψ1(x)−ψ2(x)u(y)-\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{2}(y)\le u(x)-\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{2}(x), so by (7.1)

ψ1(x)−ψ1(y)≤u(x)−u(y)+∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣≤(2aD(x)+a d(x,y)) d(x,y)+∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣,\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{1}(y)\le u(x)-u(y)+|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)|\le\bigl(2aD(x)+a\,d(x,y)\bigr)\,d(x,y)+|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)| ,

and since the right-hand side is nonnegative, claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements bounds [ψ1(y)−ψ1(x)]−[\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{1}(x)]_{-} by the same quantity. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, let r=min⁡{r1,ε/(a+1)}r=\min\{r_{1},\varepsilon/(a+1)\}; for y∈Xy\in X with 0<d(x,y)<r0<d(x,y)<r we have a d(x,y)≤εa\,d(x,y)\le\varepsilon, hence [ψ1(y)−ψ1(x)]−≤(2aD(x)+ε) d(x,y)+∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣[\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{1}(x)]_{-}\le\bigl(2aD(x)+\varepsilon\bigr)\,d(x,y)+|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)|. So Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §upper-bound, with ψ=ψ1\psi=\psi_{1}, φ=ψ2\varphi=\psi_{2} and the nonnegative real c=2aD(x)c=2aD(x), gives ∣∇−ψ1∣(x)≤2aD(x)+∣∇ψ2∣(x)|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x)\le2aD(x)+|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x). By Test Classes for Slope-Based Viscosity Solutions on a Metric Space §sub-class, ∣∇ψ1∣(x)=∣∇−ψ1∣(x)|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)=|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x), and by Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §order, ∣∇ψ2∣(x)≤∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x)\le|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x); so ∣∇ψ1∣(x)−∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)≤2aD(x)|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)-|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x)\le2aD(x), and as 0≤2aD(x)0\le2aD(x), claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements gives q=max⁡{∣∇ψ1∣(x)−∣∇ψ2∣∗(x),0}≤2aD(x)q=\max\{|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)-|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x),0\}\le2aD(x). Both lie in TT, so monotonicity of HH and (6.1) give H(x,u(x),q)≤H(x,u(x),2aD(x))=0H(x,u(x),q)\le H\bigl(x,u(x),2aD(x)\bigr)=0. With Step 7, uu is an s-subsolution of H=0H=0 in XX by Slope-Based Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions on a Metric Space §subsolution.

Step 9 (Part 2, supersolution). Let ψ1∈C‾(X)\psi_{1}\in\overline{\mathcal{C}}(X), let ψ2:X→R\psi_{2}:X\to\mathbb{R} be locally Lipschitz on XX, let x∈Xx\in X be a point at which u−ψ1−ψ2u-\psi_{1}-\psi_{2} has a local minimum relative to XX, with a radius r1>0r_{1}>0, and let q=∣∇ψ1∣(x)+∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)∈Tq=|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x)+|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x)\in T. If D(x)=0D(x)=0, then u(x)=0u(x)=0 and H(x,u(x),q)=12q2≥0H(x,u(x),q)=\frac{1}{2}q^{2}\ge0.

Suppose 0<D(x)0<D(x). We verify the hypothesis of Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §lower-bound for ψ=ψ1\psi=\psi_{1}, φ=ψ2\varphi=\psi_{2} and c=2aD(x)c=2aD(x). Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 and r>0r>0 be reals; choose, in this order, ε′=min⁡{1,ε/(2(2aD(x)+1))}\varepsilon'=\min\{1,\varepsilon/(2(2aD(x)+1))\} and R=min⁡{r,r1,D(x),ε/(2(a+1))}R=\min\{r,r_{1},D(x),\varepsilon/(2(a+1))\}, and let yy be given by Step 2 for these ε′\varepsilon' and RR, with h=d(x,y)h=d(x,y). Then 0<h<R0<h<R and 0≤(1−ε′)h≤D(x)−D(y)0\le(1-\varepsilon')h\le D(x)-D(y), while (1.1) gives 2D(x)−h≤D(x)+D(y)2D(x)-h\le D(x)+D(y) with 0<D(x)<2D(x)−h0<D(x)<2D(x)-h. Multiplying these lower bounds of nonnegative factors and using 0≤a0\le a,

u(x)−u(y)=a(D(x)−D(y))(D(x)+D(y))≥a(1−ε′)h (2D(x)−h)≥h(2aD(x)−2aD(x) ε′−a h).u(x)-u(y)=a\bigl(D(x)-D(y)\bigr)\bigl(D(x)+D(y)\bigr)\ge a(1-\varepsilon')h\,(2D(x)-h)\ge h\bigl(2aD(x)-2aD(x)\,\varepsilon'-a\,h\bigr).

Here 2aD(x) ε′≤ε2⋅2aD(x)2aD(x)+1≤ε22aD(x)\,\varepsilon'\le\frac{\varepsilon}{2}\cdot\frac{2aD(x)}{2aD(x)+1}\le\frac{\varepsilon}{2} and a h≤aa+1⋅ε2≤ε2a\,h\le\frac{a}{a+1}\cdot\frac{\varepsilon}{2}\le\frac{\varepsilon}{2}, so u(x)−u(y)≥(2aD(x)−ε)hu(x)-u(y)\ge\bigl(2aD(x)-\varepsilon\bigr)h. Since d(x,y)<r1d(x,y)<r_{1}, u(x)−ψ1(x)−ψ2(x)≤u(y)−ψ1(y)−ψ2(y)u(x)-\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{2}(x)\le u(y)-\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{2}(y), and therefore

[ψ1(y)−ψ1(x)]−≥ψ1(x)−ψ1(y)≥u(x)−u(y)−∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣≥(2aD(x)−ε) d(x,y)−∣ψ2(y)−ψ2(x)∣,[\psi_{1}(y)-\psi_{1}(x)]_{-}\ge\psi_{1}(x)-\psi_{1}(y)\ge u(x)-u(y)-|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)|\ge\bigl(2aD(x)-\varepsilon\bigr)\,d(x,y)-|\psi_{2}(y)-\psi_{2}(x)| ,

with 0<d(x,y)<r0<d(x,y)<r. So Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §lower-bound gives 2aD(x)−∣∇ψ2∣(x)≤∣∇−ψ1∣(x)2aD(x)-|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x)\le|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x), and Elementary Properties of Local Slopes: Order, Negation, Bounds from Difference Quotients, Lipschitz Functions and Squared Distances §order gives ∣∇−ψ1∣(x)≤∣∇ψ1∣(x)|\nabla^{-}\psi_{1}|(x)\le|\nabla\psi_{1}|(x) and ∣∇ψ2∣(x)≤∣∇ψ2∣∗(x)|\nabla\psi_{2}|(x)\le|\nabla\psi_{2}|^{*}(x); hence 2aD(x)≤q2aD(x)\le q. Both lie in TT, so monotonicity of HH and (6.1) give H(x,u(x),q)≥H(x,u(x),2aD(x))=0H(x,u(x),q)\ge H\bigl(x,u(x),2aD(x)\bigr)=0. (Only local Lipschitz continuity of ψ1\psi_{1} was used.)

With Step 7, uu is an s-supersolution of H=0H=0 in XX by Slope-Based Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions on a Metric Space §supersolution, and with Step 8 an s-solution by Slope-Based Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions on a Metric Space §solution. This proves claim 2.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…