TheoremBase

Proof of Asymptotic Lower Bound for the Recentred N-Agent Cost by the Fluctuation LQG Value, under Law-Transported Injection Certificates

theoremthm:n-agent-cost-lqg-lower-bound-2026c
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of thm:n-agent-cost-lqg-lower-bound-2026c: the 2026b proof with claim 1 simplified under (I0), claim 2 transferring the filtering error to the certificate space by claim 5 of the law-invariance lemma and applying the mixture-weight certificate lemma with varkappa=(q-eps)^2; claims 3-4 unchanged up to naming the driving system.

Proof

Claim 1.

The initial covariance. By hypothesis (I0) the matrix Π0\Pi_{0} is the zero matrix, which is symmetric and positive semidefinite, x(Π0x)=0x\cdot(\Pi_{0}x)=0 for every xRlx\in\mathbb{R}^{l}.

The coefficient families. Every entry of tEt=Ett\mapsto E_{t}=\mathcal{E}_{t} is continuous on [0,T][0,T] by conclusion (a) of the completion-of-squares theorem. Every entry of tΘtt\mapsto\Theta^{\star}_{t} is continuous by clause (c) of the covariance deviation lemma, and every Θt\Theta^{\star}_{t} is positive semidefinite, hence symmetric, by claim 3 of the covariance positivity lemma.

Under (OC) each Θ~t\tilde{\Theta}^{\star}_{t} is the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries b~υ(St)β~min>0\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})\ge\tilde{\beta}_{\min}>0; the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries 1/b~υ(St)1/\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t}) is its inverse, as the index formula for the matrix product shows, and its entries are continuous in tt by the continuity of the reciprocal of a nonvanishing continuous function. Consequently

D~tγδ=υ=1l~E~tυγE~tυδb~υ(St),\tilde{D}^{\gamma\delta}_{t}=\sum_{\upsilon=1}^{\tilde{l}}\frac{\tilde{\mathcal{E}}^{\upsilon\gamma}_{t}\,\tilde{\mathcal{E}}^{\upsilon\delta}_{t}}{\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})},

which is symmetric in (γ,δ)(\gamma,\delta) and continuous in tt by the continuity of sums and products; and for xRlx\in\mathbb{R}^{l},

x(D~tx)=υ=1l~((E~tx)υ)2b~υ(St)  0,x\cdot(\tilde{D}_{t}x)=\sum_{\upsilon=1}^{\tilde{l}}\frac{\bigl((\tilde{\mathcal{E}}_{t}x)^{\upsilon}\bigr)^{2}}{\tilde{b}^{\upsilon}(S_{t})}\ \ge\ 0,

so every D~t\tilde{D}_{t} is positive semidefinite. The Riccati existence theorem therefore applies on [0,T][0,T] with kk there equal to ll, A=EA=\mathcal{E}, C=ΘC=\Theta^{\star}, D=D~D=\tilde{D} and P0=Π0P_{0}=\Pi_{0}, and yields the unique Π\Pi with continuous entries, every Πt\Pi_{t} being symmetric and satisfying 0Πt0\preceq\Pi_{t}, that is, positive semidefinite.

The weight Ξ\Xi. Every Ξt\Xi_{t} is symmetric positive semidefinite with continuous entries by claim 2 of the cascade filtering lemma. Fix tt. Under (H1), conclusion (a) of the completion-of-squares theorem gives that RtR_{t} is symmetric positive definite, so Rt1R_{t}^{-1} is symmetric positive definite by Invertibility of Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices, and by the Cholesky factorisation there is a real matrix LtL_{t} with mm rows and mm columns and Rt1=LtLtR_{t}^{-1}=L_{t}L_{t}^{\top}. Put Bt=WtLtB_{t}=W_{t}L_{t}, a real matrix with ll rows and mm columns (this matrix always carries a time subscript and is distinct from the control matrix Bt\mathsf{B}_{t} and from the rate bound BB of the common data), and let bt,1,,bt,mRlb_{t,1},\dots,b_{t,m}\in\mathbb{R}^{l} be its columns, so that (Bt)γj=bt,jγ(B_{t})_{\gamma j}=b^{\gamma}_{t,j}. Then

Ξt=WtLtLtWt=BtBt,that isΞtγδ=j=1mbt,jγbt,jδ,\Xi_{t}=W_{t}L_{t}L_{t}^{\top}W_{t}^{\top}=B_{t}B_{t}^{\top},\qquad\text{that is}\qquad\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{t}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}b^{\gamma}_{t,j}b^{\delta}_{t,j},

by the index formula for the matrix product and the transpose. Hence, for every real matrix M\mathcal{M} with ll rows and ll columns,

γ=1lδ=1lΞtγδMγδ=j=1mγ,δbt,jγbt,jδMγδ=j=1mbt,j(Mbt,j),\sum_{\gamma=1}^{l}\sum_{\delta=1}^{l}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{t}\,\mathcal{M}^{\gamma\delta}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\sum_{\gamma,\delta}b^{\gamma}_{t,j}b^{\delta}_{t,j}\mathcal{M}^{\gamma\delta}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}b_{t,j}\cdot\bigl(\mathcal{M}\,b_{t,j}\bigr),

called the column identity below. Taking M=Πt\mathcal{M}=\Pi_{t} shows γ,δΞtγδΠtγδ0\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{t}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{t}\ge0, every Πt\Pi_{t} being positive semidefinite. That function of tt is a finite sum of products of continuous functions, hence continuous, and therefore Lebesgue integrable on [0,T][0,T] by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval. This proves claim 1.

Claim 2. Fix s[0,T]s\in[0,T], cRlc\in\mathbb{R}^{l} and η>0\eta>0, and put κ=c(Πsc)\kappa=c\cdot(\Pi_{s}c), a nonnegative real by claim 1.

The filtering error of XsX'_{s}. Let N1N\ge1 and put Δs=Xsss=N(SsΦs)\Delta_{s}=X'_{s}-\mathfrak{s}_{s}=\sqrt{N}\,(S_{s}-\Phi_{s}). Each component Δsγ\Delta^{\gamma}_{s} is Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}-measurable, being the constant NSsγ\sqrt{N}S^{\gamma}_{s} minus the Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}-measurable random variable NΦsγ\sqrt{N}\Phi^{\gamma}_{s} (claim 3 of the realized-flow adaptedness lemma), and is square-integrable as the difference of the square-integrable XsγX'^{\gamma}_{s} and ssγ\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{s}. By the second immediate consequence recorded in the conditional-expectation definition, Δsγ\Delta^{\gamma}_{s} is a conditional expectation of itself given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}. Let MsγM^{\gamma}_{s} be the conditional expectation of ssγ\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{s} chosen in the definition of εsγ=ssγMsγ\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}=\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{s}-M^{\gamma}_{s}. By claim 1 of the conditional expectation properties lemma, Msγ+ΔsγM^{\gamma}_{s}+\Delta^{\gamma}_{s} is a conditional expectation of ssγ+Δsγ=Xsγ\mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{s}+\Delta^{\gamma}_{s}=X'^{\gamma}_{s} given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}, so by the uniqueness part of the existence and uniqueness theorem every conditional expectation M~γ\tilde{M}^{\gamma} of XsγX'^{\gamma}_{s} given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s} satisfies M~γ=Msγ+Δsγ\tilde{M}^{\gamma}=M^{\gamma}_{s}+\Delta^{\gamma}_{s} almost surely, whence

XsγM~γ = ssγ+ΔsγMsγΔsγ = εsγalmost surely.X'^{\gamma}_{s}-\tilde{M}^{\gamma}\ =\ \mathfrak{s}^{\gamma}_{s}+\Delta^{\gamma}_{s}-M^{\gamma}_{s}-\Delta^{\gamma}_{s}\ =\ \varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\qquad\text{almost surely.}

This is the first assertion of claim 2.

The quadratic form of the filtering error. At every point of Ωag\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}} one has γ,δcγcδεsγεsδ=(cεs)2\sum_{\gamma,\delta}c^{\gamma}c^{\delta}\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s}=(c\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}, where cεs=γcγεsγc\cdot\varepsilon_{s}=\sum_{\gamma}c^{\gamma}\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}; each product εsγεsδ\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s} is integrable, the factors being square-integrable (closure properties of square-integrability), so by the linearity of the integral

E[γ,δcγcδεsγεsδ]=E[(cεs)2]  0,(2.1)\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\sum_{\gamma,\delta}c^{\gamma}c^{\delta}\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s}\Bigr]=\mathbb{E}\bigl[(c\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}\bigr]\ \ge\ 0, \tag{2.1}

the inequality being the nonnegativity of the expectation of a nonnegative random variable. Let M~γ\tilde{M}^{\gamma} be conditional expectations of XsγX'^{\gamma}_{s} given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s} and put cM~=γcγM~γc\cdot\tilde{M}=\sum_{\gamma}c^{\gamma}\tilde{M}^{\gamma}. By the first assertion of claim 2, cεs=cXscM~c\cdot\varepsilon_{s}=c\cdot X'_{s}-c\cdot\tilde{M} almost surely, and by claim 1 of the conditional expectation properties lemma, applied finitely many times, cM~c\cdot\tilde{M} is a conditional expectation of the square-integrable random variable cXsc\cdot X'_{s} given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}. Almost surely equal integrable random variables have equal expectations, so

E[(cεs)2]=E[(cXsE[cXsGs])2],(2.2)\mathbb{E}\bigl[(c\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}\bigr]=\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\bigl(c\cdot X'_{s}-\mathbb{E}[c\cdot X'_{s}\mid\mathcal{G}_{s}]\bigr)^{2}\Bigr], \tag{2.2}

the right-hand side being independent of the choice of the conditional expectation by the uniqueness part of the existence and uniqueness theorem.

The fourth moment. By The Empirical State Measure Deviates from the Realized Mean-Field Flow by at Most the Noise Majorant, Xs=NΣsΦsNQ|X'_{s}|=\sqrt{N}\,|\Sigma_{s}-\Phi_{s}|\le\sqrt{N}\,Q at every point of Ω0\Omega_{0}, and Pag(Ω0)=1P^{\mathrm{ag}}(\Omega_{0})=1 by the definition of the solution. Hence Xs4N2Q4|X'_{s}|^{4}\le N^{2}Q^{4} almost surely, and by the monotonicity of the integral (a null set not affecting integrals) and claim 2 of the pre-stopping envelope lemma,

E[Xs4]  N2E[Q4]  N2cQκ0N2 = cQκ0  cQκ,\mathbb{E}\bigl[|X'_{s}|^{4}\bigr]\ \le\ N^{2}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[Q^{4}\bigr]\ \le\ N^{2}\,c_{Q}\,\kappa_{0}\,N^{-2}\ =\ c_{Q}\kappa_{0}\ \le\ c_{Q}\kappa^{\sharp},

the last step by hypothesis (I'). This is the moment bound of claim 2. In particular Xs2|X'_{s}|^{2} is square-integrable.

Apply Adjoint Energy Identity for the Kalman Covariance Riccati Equation with the endpoints 00 and TT in the roles of aa and bb there, kk there equal to ll, the data E\mathcal{E}, Θ\Theta^{\star}, D~\tilde{D}, Π0\Pi_{0} and Π\Pi of claim 1, the time ss and the vector x=cx=c. It produces an assignment λ\lambda with continuous components and λ(s)=c\lambda(s)=c, and by its claim 2 the assignment uΠuλ(u)u\mapsto\Pi_{u}\lambda(u) has continuous components and satisfies the integral equation defining ψλ\psi_{\lambda} — that lemma writes its integrals as Riemann integrals of continuous functions, which coincide with the Lebesgue integrals over compact intervals used here by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval; by the uniqueness in claim 3 of the variation of constants theorem, ψλ(u)=Πuλ(u)\psi_{\lambda}(u)=\Pi_{u}\lambda(u) for every uu. Its claim 3 then gives

cψλ(s)=c(Πsc)=κandAs(λ)=κ,c\cdot\psi_{\lambda}(s)=c\cdot(\Pi_{s}c)=\kappa\qquad\text{and}\qquad\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda)=\kappa,

the second because the energy displayed there is exactly As(λ)\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda) once ψλ=Πλ\psi_{\lambda}=\Pi\lambda is substituted, its Riemann integral again agreeing with the Lebesgue integral in the definition of As(λ)\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda) by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval (the integrand is continuous by claim 3 of Adjoint Energy Identity for the Kalman Covariance Riccati Equation).

Suppose first κ=0\kappa=0; this is the case whenever s=0s=0, because Π0\Pi_{0} is the zero matrix by (I0). Then (2.1) gives, for every N1N\ge1,

E[γ,δcγcδεsγεsδ]  0=κ  κη,\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\sum_{\gamma,\delta}c^{\gamma}c^{\delta}\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s}\Bigr]\ \ge\ 0=\kappa\ \ge\ \kappa-\eta ,

and N3=1N_{3}=1 serves.

Suppose now κ>0\kappa>0; then s>0s>0, since κ=0\kappa=0 when s=0s=0. Put

ϵ=min{κ8, κ8, η3+4κ}>0,q=κϵκ+ϵ>0\epsilon=\min\Bigl\{\frac{\kappa}{8},\ \frac{\sqrt{\kappa}}{8},\ \frac{\eta}{3+4\sqrt{\kappa}}\Bigr\}>0,\qquad q=\frac{\kappa-\epsilon}{\sqrt{\kappa+\epsilon}}>0

(positive because ϵκ/8<κ\epsilon\le\kappa/8<\kappa), with \sqrt{\cdot} the nonnegative square root, which is nondecreasing on [0,)[0,\infty) (for 0xy0\le x\le y one has xy\sqrt{x}\le\sqrt{y}, since x>y0\sqrt{x}>\sqrt{y}\ge0 would give x>yx>y on squaring). Three elementary estimates follow from 0<ϵκ/80<\epsilon\le\kappa/8 and ϵκ/8\epsilon\le\sqrt{\kappa}/8. First, (κ3ϵ)(κ+ϵ)=κ22κϵ3ϵ2κ22κϵ+ϵ2=(κϵ)2(\kappa-3\epsilon)(\kappa+\epsilon)=\kappa^{2}-2\kappa\epsilon-3\epsilon^{2}\le\kappa^{2}-2\kappa\epsilon+\epsilon^{2}=(\kappa-\epsilon)^{2}, so, dividing by κ+ϵ>0\kappa+\epsilon>0, q2κ3ϵq^{2}\ge\kappa-3\epsilon. Second, ϵ3κ\epsilon\le3\kappa gives ϵ23κϵ\epsilon^{2}\le3\kappa\epsilon, hence (κϵ)2=κ22κϵ+ϵ2κ2+κϵ=κ(κ+ϵ)(\kappa-\epsilon)^{2}=\kappa^{2}-2\kappa\epsilon+\epsilon^{2}\le\kappa^{2}+\kappa\epsilon=\kappa(\kappa+\epsilon), so q2κq^{2}\le\kappa and qκq\le\sqrt{\kappa}. Third, (2κ)2=4κκ+ϵ(2\sqrt{\kappa})^{2}=4\kappa\ge\kappa+\epsilon, so 2κκ+ϵ2\sqrt{\kappa}\ge\sqrt{\kappa+\epsilon}, whence, using κϵ7κ/8\kappa-\epsilon\ge7\kappa/8 and κ/κ=κ\kappa/\sqrt{\kappa}=\sqrt{\kappa},

q  κϵ2κ  7κ16κ = 716κ  2ϵ,q\ \ge\ \frac{\kappa-\epsilon}{2\sqrt{\kappa}}\ \ge\ \frac{7\kappa}{16\sqrt{\kappa}}\ =\ \frac{7}{16}\sqrt{\kappa}\ \ge\ 2\epsilon ,

the last step because 2ϵκ/4716κ2\epsilon\le\sqrt{\kappa}/4\le\tfrac{7}{16}\sqrt{\kappa} by ϵκ/8\epsilon\le\sqrt{\kappa}/8. Now put ϰ=(qϵ)2\varkappa=(q-\epsilon)^{2}; since qϵϵ>0q-\epsilon\ge\epsilon>0, the uniqueness of the nonnegative square root gives ϰ=qϵϵ\sqrt{\varkappa}=q-\epsilon\ge\epsilon, and ϰ>0\varkappa>0. Apply (VT') with this ss, this cc, this profile λ\lambda and this ϵ\epsilon, obtaining N2N_{2}; put N3=N2N_{3}=N_{2}, let NN3N\ge N_{3}, and let (Ω,F,P)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P'), Y\mathsf{Y}, Y\mathcal{Y}, ϱ0\varrho_{0}, dd, ϑ1,,ϑd\vartheta_{1},\dots,\vartheta_{d}, D\mathsf{D}', XX^{\dagger}, pp, GG, α\alpha, zz, a1,,ada_{1},\dots,a_{d} be data as provided by (VT'), satisfying its conditions (a), (C1), (C2'), (C3) and (C4'). Write E\mathbb{E}' for the expectation on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P').

Transfer of the filtering error to the certificate space. By (a), the map (cXs,W(s))(c\cdot X'_{s},W^{(s)}) is measurable with respect to Fag\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}} and B(R)Rs\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{R}_{s}. Hence W(s)W^{(s)} is measurable with respect to Fag\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}} and Rs\mathcal{R}_{s}: for ERsE\in\mathcal{R}_{s} the set R×E\mathbb{R}\times E belongs to the product σ\sigma-algebra B(R)Rs\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})\otimes\mathcal{R}_{s}, being a product of measurable sets, and its preimage under (cXs,W(s))(c\cdot X'_{s},W^{(s)}) is (W(s))1(E)(W^{(s)})^{-1}(E). In the same way D\mathsf{D}', regarded as Rs\mathbf{R}_{s}-valued, is measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F}' and Rs\mathcal{R}_{s}, by the first assertion of (a). Put G=σ(D)={D1(E):ERs}\mathcal{G}'=\sigma(\mathsf{D}')=\{\mathsf{D}'^{-1}(E):E\in\mathcal{R}_{s}\}. By claim 1 of Factorisation of Random Variables Through a Measurable Map, the Variational Form of the Mean-Square Filtering Error, and Its Invariance Under the Joint Law, applied on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P') with the measurable space (Rs,Rs)(\mathbf{R}_{s},\mathcal{R}_{s}) and the map D\mathsf{D}', G\mathcal{G}' is a σ\sigma-algebra on Ω\Omega' with GF\mathcal{G}'\subseteq\mathcal{F}'; it is D\mathsf{D}'-generated up to null sets in the sense of that lemma, since σ(D)GF\sigma(\mathsf{D}')\subseteq\mathcal{G}'\subseteq\mathcal{F}' and every AGA\in\mathcal{G}' admits A=Aσ(D)A'=A\in\sigma(\mathsf{D}'), whose symmetric difference with AA is empty. By (C0), Gs\mathcal{G}_{s} is W(s)W^{(s)}-generated up to null sets in (Ωag,Fag,Pag)(\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}},\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}},P^{\mathrm{ag}}) for the same measurable space (Rs,Rs)(\mathbf{R}_{s},\mathcal{R}_{s}). Claim 5 of Factorisation of Random Variables Through a Measurable Map, the Variational Form of the Mean-Square Filtering Error, and Its Invariance Under the Joint Law therefore applies with (Ωag,Fag,Pag)(\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}},\mathcal{F}^{\mathrm{ag}},P^{\mathrm{ag}}), the measurable space (Rs,Rs)(\mathbf{R}_{s},\mathcal{R}_{s}), the map W(s)W^{(s)} in the role of D\mathsf{D}, the square-integrable random variable cXsc\cdot X'_{s} (square-integrable by (a)) in the role of XX and Gs\mathcal{G}_{s} in the role of G\mathcal{G} on one side, and (Ω,F,P)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P'), D\mathsf{D}', XX^{\dagger} in the role of XX' and G\mathcal{G}' on the other; its hypothesis on the image measures is the law identity of (a). It gives

E[(cXsE[cXsGs])2]=E[(XE[XG])2].(2.3)\mathbb{E}\Bigl[\bigl(c\cdot X'_{s}-\mathbb{E}[c\cdot X'_{s}\mid\mathcal{G}_{s}]\bigr)^{2}\Bigr]=\mathbb{E}'\Bigl[\bigl(X^{\dagger}-\mathbb{E}'[X^{\dagger}\mid\mathcal{G}']\bigr)^{2}\Bigr]. \tag{2.3}

The certificate on the copy. By (C1), G={D1(E):EY}\mathcal{G}'=\{\mathsf{D}'^{-1}(E):E\in\mathcal{Y}\}. Apply Localized Filtering Lower Bound from a Mixture-Weight van Trees Certificate on the probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega',\mathcal{F}',P') with the sub-σ\sigma-algebra G\mathcal{G}', with ll there equal to 11, the tuple (X)(X^{\dagger}) in the role of XX, the vector (1)R1(1)\in\mathbb{R}^{1} in the role of its vector cc, the event H=Ω\mathcal{H}=\Omega' (which lies in G\mathcal{G}', being D1(Rs)\mathsf{D}'^{-1}(\mathbf{R}_{s}), and has 1H1\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{H}}\equiv1), the tolerance ϵ\epsilon and the value ϰ\varkappa, and with the certificate data dd, n=dn=d, (Y,Y)(\mathsf{Y},\mathcal{Y}), ϱ0\varrho_{0}, D\mathsf{D}' in the role of D\mathsf{D} (measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F}' and Y\mathcal{Y} by (VT')), ϑ1,,ϑd\vartheta_{1},\dots,\vartheta_{d} in the role of Θ1,,Θd\Theta_{1},\dots,\Theta_{d}, the function pp, the vectors α\alpha, zz, a1,,ada_{1},\dots,a_{d} and the map GG. Its condition (C1) asks that every G\mathcal{G}'-measurable square-integrable random variable be almost surely equal to g(D)g(\mathsf{D}') for some Y\mathcal{Y}-measurable gg with g(D)g(\mathsf{D}') square-integrable; this is given by (C1) of (VT'), which even provides equality at every point. Its condition (C2') is (C2') of (VT'), and the mixture-weight information Iz\mathcal{I}_{z} of the two conditions is the same number. Its condition (C3) reads αϑ+G(D)1ΩX2ϵ\lVert\alpha\cdot\vartheta+G(\mathsf{D}')-\mathbf{1}_{\Omega'}\,X^{\dagger}\rVert_{2}\le\epsilon, which is (C3) of (VT'). For its condition (C4'): by (C4') of (VT') and the identities cψλ(s)=κc\cdot\psi_{\lambda}(s)=\kappa and As(λ)=κ\mathcal{A}_{s}(\lambda)=\kappa established above,

αz  κϵ > 0,Iz  κ+ϵ,max1jdαaj  ϵ;\alpha\cdot z\ \ge\ \kappa-\epsilon\ >\ 0,\qquad \mathcal{I}_{z}\ \le\ \kappa+\epsilon,\qquad \max_{1\le j\le d}|\alpha\cdot a_{j}|\ \le\ \epsilon ;

the nonnegative square root being nondecreasing, Izκ+ϵ\sqrt{\mathcal{I}_{z}}\le\sqrt{\kappa+\epsilon}; the factor maxjαaj+ϰ\max_{j}|\alpha\cdot a_{j}|+\sqrt{\varkappa} is nonnegative and at most ϵ+(qϵ)=q\epsilon+(q-\epsilon)=q, and κ+ϵ0\sqrt{\kappa+\epsilon}\ge0; hence

Iz(max1jdαaj+ϰ)  κ+ϵ(ϵ+(qϵ)) = κ+ϵ  q = κϵ  αz,\sqrt{\mathcal{I}_{z}}\,\Bigl(\max_{1\le j\le d}|\alpha\cdot a_{j}|+\sqrt{\varkappa}\Bigr)\ \le\ \sqrt{\kappa+\epsilon}\,\bigl(\epsilon+(q-\epsilon)\bigr)\ =\ \sqrt{\kappa+\epsilon}\;q\ =\ \kappa-\epsilon\ \le\ \alpha\cdot z ,

which together with αz>0\alpha\cdot z>0 is condition (C4') of the lemma with this ϰ\varkappa. Moreover ϰϵ\sqrt{\varkappa}\ge\epsilon was shown above.

Claim 2 of Localized Filtering Lower Bound from a Mixture-Weight van Trees Certificate is therefore available. Its claim 1, with 1Ω1\mathbf{1}_{\Omega'}\equiv1, identifies the quantity bounded there with E[(XM)2]\mathbb{E}'[(X^{\dagger}-M')^{2}] for a conditional expectation MM' of XX^{\dagger} given G\mathcal{G}', and the lemma records that this quantity does not depend on the choice of MM'; so its claim 2 gives

E[(XE[XG])2]  (ϰϵ)2=(q2ϵ)2=q24ϵq+4ϵ2  q24ϵq  κ3ϵ4ϵκ  κη,\mathbb{E}'\Bigl[\bigl(X^{\dagger}-\mathbb{E}'[X^{\dagger}\mid\mathcal{G}']\bigr)^{2}\Bigr]\ \ge\ \bigl(\sqrt{\varkappa}-\epsilon\bigr)^{2}=(q-2\epsilon)^{2}=q^{2}-4\epsilon q+4\epsilon^{2}\ \ge\ q^{2}-4\epsilon q\ \ge\ \kappa-3\epsilon-4\epsilon\sqrt{\kappa}\ \ge\ \kappa-\eta,

the third-to-last step by ϵ20\epsilon^{2}\ge0, the second-to-last by the first two elementary estimates (q2κ3ϵq^{2}\ge\kappa-3\epsilon and qκq\le\sqrt{\kappa}), and the last by the choice ϵη/(3+4κ)\epsilon\le\eta/(3+4\sqrt{\kappa}). Combining this with (2.3), (2.2) and (2.1) yields the bound of claim 2 for every NN3N\ge N_{3}. This proves claim 2.

Claim 3. Fix an admissible parameter vector π\pi satisfying the absorption condition, fix η>0\eta>0, and for k{0,,K1}k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\} and N1N\ge1 define

fN(k)(s)=E[1Tknr(s)usRsus](s[tk,tk+1]).f^{(k)}_{N}(s)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s)}\,u_{s}\cdot R_{s}u_{s}\bigr]\qquad(s\in[t_{k},t_{k+1}]).

Each fN(k)f^{(k)}_{N} is nonnegative, because usRsusrus20u_{s}\cdot R_{s}u_{s}\ge r|u_{s}|^{2}\ge0 by (H1), and is measurable on [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}] by hypothesis (MS); its integral over that block is the kk-th summand appearing in claim 7 of the ledger lemma. Define also the bad sets and their probabilities

Ck(s)=ΩagTknr(s),pN(k)(s)=Pag(Ck(s))(s[tk,tk+1])\mathcal{C}_{k}(s)=\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}}\setminus\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s),\qquad p^{(k)}_{N}(s)=P^{\mathrm{ag}}\bigl(\mathcal{C}_{k}(s)\bigr)\qquad(s\in[t_{k},t_{k+1}])

(in this claim the letter pp denotes these probabilities; the certificate density of (VT') is not used here). By claim 2 of the ledger lemma Tknr(s)Gs\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s)\in\mathcal{G}_{s}, so Ck(s)Gs\mathcal{C}_{k}(s)\in\mathcal{G}_{s}, a σ\sigma-algebra being closed under complements. By the definitions in the ledger lemma, Tk(s)\mathcal{T}_{k}(s) is the disjoint union of Tknr(s)\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s) and Tkfr(s)\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{fr}}_{k}(s), so Ck(s)\mathcal{C}_{k}(s) is the disjoint union of ΩagTk(s)\Omega^{\mathrm{ag}}\setminus\mathcal{T}_{k}(s) and Tkfr(s)\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{fr}}_{k}(s) and

pN(k)(s)=E[11Tk(s)]+E[1Tkfr(s)],p^{(k)}_{N}(s)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[1-\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}_{k}(s)}\bigr]+\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{fr}}_{k}(s)}\bigr],

a function measurable on [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}] by hypothesis (MS) and claim 2 of the arithmetic of measurable functions, with values in [0,1][0,1]. Its integral over the block is the sum of the integrals of the two summands, by the linearity of the integral (both summands are nonnegative, measurable and bounded by 11, so by monotonicity their integrals are at most tk+1tkt_{k+1}-t_{k}, the measure of the block by claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval); summing over the blocks and using claims 1(c) and 1(d) of the ledger lemma,

k=0K1[tk,tk+1]pN(k)(s)ds  TP+ZNϱ2  (TΛΥlev+ϱ2)ZN,\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}p^{(k)}_{N}(s)\,ds\ \le\ T\,\mathcal{P}+\frac{\mathcal{Z}}{N\varrho^{2}}\ \le\ \bigl(T\Lambda_{\star}\Upsilon_{\mathrm{lev}}+\varrho^{-2}\bigr)\frac{\mathcal{Z}}{N},

with PΛZΥlevN1\mathcal{P}\le\Lambda_{\star}\mathcal{Z}\,\Upsilon_{\mathrm{lev}}N^{-1} from claim 1(d). Since π\pi satisfies the absorption condition, part (a) of the asymptotic lower bound theorem provides N1N_{1} with ZZ(π)\mathcal{Z}\le\mathcal{Z}^{\sharp}(\pi) for NN1N\ge N_{1}. Put Cπ=(TΛΥlev+ϱ2)Z(π)C_{\pi}=(T\Lambda_{\star}\Upsilon_{\mathrm{lev}}+\varrho^{-2})\,\mathcal{Z}^{\sharp}(\pi), a real number that does not depend on NN: ϱ\varrho is a component of π\pi; Λ\Lambda_{\star} and the level sum Υlev=k=0K1Lk2\Upsilon_{\mathrm{lev}}=\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}L_{k}^{-2} of the ledger lemma are given by the explicit formulas Λ=max(4Ca2K22T0,λc,λo)\Lambda_{\star}=\max(4C_{a}^{2}K_{2}^{2}T_{0},\lambda_{c},\lambda_{o}) and Lk=(2Ca)k+1Kε1L_{k}=(2C_{a})^{k+1-K}\varepsilon_{1} of the block cascade lemma, in which KK is determined by T0T_{0} and TT, the constant CaC_{a} by ll, Λb\Lambda_{b} and TT, and K2K_{2} is one of the constants of the ledger lemma that the asymptotic lower bound theorem records as being the same for every NN; so neither depends on NN; and Z(π)\mathcal{Z}^{\sharp}(\pi) is the real number of part (a) of that theorem. Every summand on the left being nonnegative,

[tk,tk+1]pN(k)(s)ds  CπN(k{0,,K1}, NN1).(3.1)\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}p^{(k)}_{N}(s)\,ds\ \le\ \frac{C_{\pi}}{N}\qquad(k\in\{0,\dots,K-1\},\ N\ge N_{1}). \tag{3.1}

The bad-set estimate. Fix kk, s[tk,tk+1]s\in[t_{k},t_{k+1}], cRlc\in\mathbb{R}^{l} and N1N\ge1, write C=Ck(s)\mathcal{C}=\mathcal{C}_{k}(s) and p=pN(k)(s)p=p^{(k)}_{N}(s), and let M~γ\tilde{M}^{\gamma} be conditional expectations of XsγX'^{\gamma}_{s} given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}, so that cεs=cXscM~c\cdot\varepsilon_{s}=c\cdot X'_{s}-c\cdot\tilde{M} almost surely by claim 2, where cM~=γcγM~γc\cdot\tilde{M}=\sum_{\gamma}c^{\gamma}\tilde{M}^{\gamma}. By claim 1 of the conditional expectation properties lemma, cM~c\cdot\tilde{M} is a conditional expectation of cXsc\cdot X'_{s} given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}; by claim 4 of that lemma, applied with the bounded Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}-measurable Z=1CZ=\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}, the random variables 1C(cXs)\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot X'_{s}) and 1C(cM~)\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot\tilde{M}) are square-integrable and the latter is a conditional expectation of the former given Gs\mathcal{G}_{s}; and by claim 6 of that lemma, 1C(cM~)21C(cXs)2\lVert\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot\tilde{M})\rVert_{2}\le\lVert\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot X'_{s})\rVert_{2}. Since 1C(cεs)=1C(cXs)1C(cM~)\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot\varepsilon_{s})=\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot X'_{s})-\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot\tilde{M}) almost surely, and almost surely equal random variables have the same mean-square norm, claim 2 of the triangle inequality for the mean-square norm gives 1C(cεs)221C(cXs)2\lVert\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot\varepsilon_{s})\rVert_{2}\le2\lVert\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot X'_{s})\rVert_{2}, hence

E[1C(cεs)2]  4E[1C(cXs)2]  4c2E[1CXs2]  4c21C2Xs22  4c2C4p,(3.2)\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}\bigr]\ \le\ 4\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(c\cdot X'_{s})^{2}\bigr]\ \le\ 4|c|^{2}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}\,|X'_{s}|^{2}\bigr]\ \le\ 4|c|^{2}\,\lVert\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}\rVert_{2}\,\bigl\lVert|X'_{s}|^{2}\bigr\rVert_{2}\ \le\ 4|c|^{2}\,C_{4}\,\sqrt{p}, \tag{3.2}

where C4=(cQκ)1/2C_{4}=(c_{Q}\kappa^{\sharp})^{1/2}: the second step is (cXs)2c2Xs2(c\cdot X'_{s})^{2}\le|c|^{2}|X'_{s}|^{2} pointwise, by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the dot product, together with the monotonicity of the integral; the third is claim 1 of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for the mean-square norm, applied to the square-integrable random variables 1C\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}} and Xs2|X'_{s}|^{2} (the latter by the moment bound of claim 2); the fourth uses 1C22=E[1C]=p\lVert\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}\rVert_{2}^{2}=\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}]=p and Xs222=E[Xs4]cQκ\lVert|X'_{s}|^{2}\rVert_{2}^{2}=\mathbb{E}[|X'_{s}|^{4}]\le c_{Q}\kappa^{\sharp} from claim 2, the nonnegative square root being nondecreasing.

Lower bound for the tracked density. For s[0,T]s\in[0,T] put τs=γΞsγγ\tau_{s}=\sum_{\gamma}\Xi^{\gamma\gamma}_{s}; the function sτss\mapsto\tau_{s} is continuous on [0,T][0,T] by claim 1, hence by the extreme value theorem there is a real τ\tau^{\sharp} with τsτ\tau_{s}\le\tau^{\sharp} for every s[0,T]s\in[0,T], and τ0\tau^{\sharp}\ge0 because τs=j=1mγ(bs,jγ)20\tau_{s}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\sum_{\gamma}(b^{\gamma}_{s,j})^{2}\ge0 by the factorisation Ξsγδ=jbs,jγbs,jδ\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}=\sum_{j}b^{\gamma}_{s,j}b^{\delta}_{s,j} of claim 1. Now fix kk and s[tk,tk+1]s\in[t_{k},t_{k+1}], and write H=Tknr(s)\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s) and C=Ck(s)\mathcal{C}=\mathcal{C}_{k}(s), so that 1H=11C\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{H}}=1-\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}. Since HGs\mathcal{H}\in\mathcal{G}_{s}, claim 3 of the cascade filtering lemma gives

fN(k)(s)  γ,δΞsγδE[1Hεsγεsδ]=j=1mE[1H(bs,jεs)2]=j=1m(E[(bs,jεs)2]E[1C(bs,jεs)2]),f^{(k)}_{N}(s)\ \ge\ \sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{H}}\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s}\bigr]=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{H}}(b_{s,j}\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}\bigr]=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\Bigl(\mathbb{E}\bigl[(b_{s,j}\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}\bigr]-\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}}(b_{s,j}\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}\bigr]\Bigr),

the first equality by the column identity of claim 1 applied to the matrix Mγδ=E[1Hεsγεsδ]\mathcal{M}^{\gamma\delta}=\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{H}}\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s}], by the pointwise identity (bεs)2=γ,δbγbδεsγεsδ(b\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}=\sum_{\gamma,\delta}b^{\gamma}b^{\delta}\varepsilon^{\gamma}_{s}\varepsilon^{\delta}_{s} and by the linearity of the integral, the second by 1H=11C\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{H}}=1-\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{C}} and linearity again. Now j=1mbs,j2=jγ(bs,jγ)2=τsτ\sum_{j=1}^{m}|b_{s,j}|^{2}=\sum_{j}\sum_{\gamma}(b^{\gamma}_{s,j})^{2}=\tau_{s}\le\tau^{\sharp}. Applying (3.2) to each c=bs,jc=b_{s,j} and summing,

fN(k)(s)  j=1mE[(bs,jεs)2]4C4τpN(k)(s)(s[tk,tk+1], N1).(3.3)f^{(k)}_{N}(s)\ \ge\ \sum_{j=1}^{m}\mathbb{E}\bigl[(b_{s,j}\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}\bigr]-4C_{4}\tau^{\sharp}\sqrt{p^{(k)}_{N}(s)}\qquad(s\in[t_{k},t_{k+1}],\ N\ge1). \tag{3.3}

Passage to the limit. For N1N\ge1 define on [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}]

gN(k)(s)=fN(k)(s)+4C4τpN(k)(s),g^{(k)}_{N}(s)=f^{(k)}_{N}(s)+4C_{4}\tau^{\sharp}\sqrt{p^{(k)}_{N}(s)} ,

which is measurable: the nonnegative square root is sequentially continuous on E=[0,1]E=[0,1], because for xy0x\ge y\ge0 one has (y+xy)2=x+2yxyx(\sqrt{y}+\sqrt{x-y})^{2}=x+2\sqrt{y}\sqrt{x-y}\ge x, hence xyxy|\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{y}|\le\sqrt{|x-y|} for all x,y0x,y\ge0, so that xnx<ζ2|x_{n}-x|<\zeta^{2} forces xnx<ζ|\sqrt{x_{n}}-\sqrt{x}|<\zeta; therefore pN(k)\sqrt{p^{(k)}_{N}} is measurable as the composition of the measurable function pN(k)p^{(k)}_{N}, with values in EE, with a sequentially continuous function on EE (sequentially continuous functions of measurable maps are measurable, with d=1d=1), and sums and scalar multiples of measurable functions are measurable (claim 2 of the arithmetic of measurable functions); and which is nonnegative by (3.3), since gN(k)(s)jE[(bs,jεs)2]0g^{(k)}_{N}(s)\ge\sum_{j}\mathbb{E}[(b_{s,j}\cdot\varepsilon_{s})^{2}]\ge0. Fix s[tk,tk+1]s\in[t_{k},t_{k+1}] and let η>0\eta'>0. Applying claim 2 to each of the mm vectors c=bs,jc=b_{s,j} with tolerance η/m\eta'/m and taking the largest of the resulting thresholds, there is NN'' such that for every NNN\ge N''

gN(k)(s)  j=1m(bs,j(Πsbs,j)ηm)=γ,δΞsγδΠsγδη,g^{(k)}_{N}(s)\ \ge\ \sum_{j=1}^{m}\Bigl(b_{s,j}\cdot(\Pi_{s}b_{s,j})-\frac{\eta'}{m}\Bigr)=\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}-\eta',

again by the column identity. As η>0\eta'>0 was arbitrary,

lim infNgN(k)(s)  γ,δΞsγδΠsγδ(s[tk,tk+1]).\liminf_{N\to\infty}g^{(k)}_{N}(s)\ \ge\ \sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\qquad(s\in[t_{k},t_{k+1}]).

By Fatou's lemma, applied to the nonnegative measurable functions gN(k)g^{(k)}_{N} on [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}] with the restricted Lebesgue measure, and then by the monotonicity of the integral together with claim 1,

lim infN[tk,tk+1]gN(k)(s)ds  [tk,tk+1]lim infNgN(k)(s)ds  [tk,tk+1]γ,δΞsγδΠsγδds.\liminf_{N\to\infty}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}g^{(k)}_{N}(s)\,ds\ \ge\ \int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\liminf_{N\to\infty}g^{(k)}_{N}(s)\,ds\ \ge\ \int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds .

The correction term vanishes in the limit: for every real θ>0\theta>0 and every real x0x\ge0 one has 2θxθ2+x2\theta\sqrt{x}\le\theta^{2}+x, because (xθ)20(\sqrt{x}-\theta)^{2}\ge0; hence, by the monotonicity and linearity of the integral and by (3.1), for NN1N\ge N_{1}

[tk,tk+1]pN(k)(s)ds  θ(tk+1tk)2+12θ[tk,tk+1]pN(k)(s)ds  θT2+Cπ2θN,\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\sqrt{p^{(k)}_{N}(s)}\,ds\ \le\ \frac{\theta\,(t_{k+1}-t_{k})}{2}+\frac{1}{2\theta}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}p^{(k)}_{N}(s)\,ds\ \le\ \frac{\theta T}{2}+\frac{C_{\pi}}{2\theta N},

the integrals being finite because the integrands are nonnegative, measurable and bounded by 11, so that by monotonicity each is at most the measure tk+1tkt_{k+1}-t_{k} of the block (claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval). Thus lim supN[tk,tk+1]pN(k)dsθT/2\limsup_{N\to\infty}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\sqrt{p^{(k)}_{N}}\,ds\le\theta T/2 for every θ>0\theta>0, so this sequence of nonnegative reals converges to 00. Since gN(k)ds=fN(k)ds+4C4τpN(k)ds\int g^{(k)}_{N}\,ds=\int f^{(k)}_{N}\,ds+4C_{4}\tau^{\sharp}\int\sqrt{p^{(k)}_{N}}\,ds over [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}] by the linearity of the integral of nonnegative measurable functions (claim 1 of the linearity theorem, an identity in [0,][0,\infty]), the second summand is finite, and the sequence of second summands converges to 00 — so that the two sequences fN(k)ds\int f^{(k)}_{N}\,ds and gN(k)ds\int g^{(k)}_{N}\,ds, with values in [0,][0,\infty], have the same limit inferior in [0,][0,\infty]

lim infN[tk,tk+1]fN(k)(s)ds = lim infN[tk,tk+1]gN(k)(s)ds  [tk,tk+1]γ,δΞsγδΠsγδds.\liminf_{N\to\infty}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}f^{(k)}_{N}(s)\,ds\ =\ \liminf_{N\to\infty}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}g^{(k)}_{N}(s)\,ds\ \ge\ \int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds .

Hence for each kk there is N(k)N^{(k)} with [tk,tk+1]fN(k)ds[tk,tk+1]γ,δΞsγδΠsγδdsη/K\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}f^{(k)}_{N}\,ds\ge\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds-\eta/K for every NN(k)N\ge N^{(k)}. Let N4N_{4} be the largest of N1,N(0),,N(K1)N_{1},N^{(0)},\dots,N^{(K-1)} and sum over kk. Since t0=0t_{0}=0, tK=Tt_{K}=T and tk<tk+1t_{k}<t_{k+1} for kK1k\le K-1 (the number of blocks KK being least with KT0TKT_{0}\ge T), the intervals [tk,tk+1][t_{k},t_{k+1}] are adjacent with union [0,T][0,T], so by the additivity of the Riemann integral of a continuous function over adjacent compact intervals (Additivity of the Riemann Integral on Adjacent Intervals), the Lebesgue integral of a continuous function over a compact interval being its Riemann integral by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval, the sum of the right-hand sides is [0,T]γ,δΞsγδΠsγδdsη\int_{[0,T]}\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds-\eta. This proves claim 3.

Claim 4. Let ε>0\varepsilon''>0. By conclusion (b) of the asymptotic lower bound theorem, applied with ε=ε/2\varepsilon'=\varepsilon''/2, there are an admissible parameter vector π\pi satisfying the absorption condition of part (a) of that theorem and a natural number N0N_{0} such that for every NN0N\ge N_{0}

JN  V0+k=0K1[tk,tk+1]E[1Tknr(s)usRsus]dsε2,\mathcal{J}_{N}\ \ge\ V_{0}+\sum_{k=0}^{K-1}\int_{[t_{k},t_{k+1}]}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{T}^{\mathrm{nr}}_{k}(s)}u_{s}\cdot R_{s}u_{s}\bigr]\,ds-\frac{\varepsilon''}{2},

the blocks and near-field tracked events being those formed from π\pi. Apply claim 3 to this π\pi (which satisfies the absorption condition) with η=ε/2\eta=\varepsilon''/2, obtaining N4N_{4}, and put N5=max(N0,N4)N_{5}=\max(N_{0},N_{4}). For NN5N\ge N_{5} the two displays combine to

JN  V0+[0,T]γ,δΞsγδΠsγδdsε2ε2,\mathcal{J}_{N}\ \ge\ V_{0}+\int_{[0,T]}\sum_{\gamma,\delta}\Xi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\Pi^{\gamma\delta}_{s}\,ds-\frac{\varepsilon''}{2}-\frac{\varepsilon''}{2},

which is claim 4.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…