TheoremBase

Realise gammacgamma_c as the law of the random series sum sqrt(ck)sqrt(c_k) xikxi_k eke_k; the head is a function of xi1xi_1..xi_n and (since the convergence event is a tail event) the tail is a function of (xikxi_k)_{k>n}, so the grouping lemma makes them independent and uniqueness of product measures gives claim 1. Claim 2 follows from PhinPhi_n o hnh_n = id.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, ρ\rho denotes the product metric on Rn×X\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X, a metric by claim 1 of The Product Metric is a Metric; since dE(u,u′)=∥u−u′∥d_{E}(u,u')=\lVert u-u'\rVert by Euclidean Space and Lebesgue Measure: Standing Notation §space, it is given by

ρ((u,w),(u′,w′))=max⁡{∥u−u′∥, ∣w−w′∣}(u,u′∈Rn, w,w′∈X).\rho\bigl((u,w),(u',w')\bigr)=\max\{\lVert u-u'\rVert,\,|w-w'|\}\qquad(u,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{n},\ w,w'\in X).

As recalled in the statement, its Borel σ\sigma-algebra is B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) by The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Product of Two Separable Metric Spaces is the Product Sigma-Algebra §product. For maps T:S1→S2T:S_{1}\to S_{2} and R:S2→S3R:S_{2}\to S_{3} between measurable spaces, each measurable, and a measure λ\lambda on S1S_{1}, one has (R∘T)−1(C)=T−1(R−1(C))(R\circ T)^{-1}(C)=T^{-1}(R^{-1}(C)) for every measurable C⊆S3C\subseteq S_{3}, so that the image measures of claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables satisfy

(R∘T)#λ=R#(T#λ).(†)(R\circ T)_{\#}\lambda=R_{\#}(T_{\#}\lambda).\tag{$\dagger$}

Step 1 (continuity of hnh_{n}). Let x,x′∈Xx,x'\in X. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, ∥pn(x)−pn(x′)∥≤∣x−x′∣\lVert p_{n}(x)-p_{n}(x')\rVert\le|x-x'|, and QnQ_{n} is Lipschitz with constant 11, so ∣Qnx−Qnx′∣≤∣x−x′∣|Q_{n}x-Q_{n}x'|\le|x-x'|. Hence ρ(hn(x),hn(x′))≤∣x−x′∣\rho(h_{n}(x),h_{n}(x'))\le|x-x'|. Given x∈Xx\in X and a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, the choice δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon gives ρ(hn(x),hn(x′))<ε\rho(h_{n}(x),h_{n}(x'))<\varepsilon whenever ∣x−x′∣<δ|x-x'|<\delta, so hnh_{n} is continuous on XX, and it is Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. This proves the first assertion of claim 1.

Step 2 (continuity of Φn\Phi_{n} and Φn∘hn=idX\Phi_{n}\circ h_{n}=\mathrm{id}_{X}). For u,u′∈Rnu,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the definition pn∗(y)=∑k=1nykekp_{n}^{*}(y)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}y_{k}e_{k} of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates gives pn∗(u)−pn∗(u′)=pn∗(u−u′)p_{n}^{*}(u)-p_{n}^{*}(u')=p_{n}^{*}(u-u'), and ∣pn∗(u−u′)∣=∥u−u′∥|p_{n}^{*}(u-u')|=\lVert u-u'\rVert by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. By the triangle inequality for the norm of XX, for (u,w),(u′,w′)∈Rn×X(u,w),(u',w')\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X,

∣Φn(u,w)−Φn(u′,w′)∣≤∣pn∗(u−u′)∣+∣w−w′∣=∥u−u′∥+∣w−w′∣≤2ρ((u,w),(u′,w′)).|\Phi_{n}(u,w)-\Phi_{n}(u',w')|\le|p_{n}^{*}(u-u')|+|w-w'|=\lVert u-u'\rVert+|w-w'|\le2\rho\bigl((u,w),(u',w')\bigr).

Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, the choice δ=ε/2\delta=\varepsilon/2 shows that Φn\Phi_{n} is continuous on Rn×X\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X, and it is Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. For x∈Xx\in X, since Pn=pn∗∘pnP_{n}=p_{n}^{*}\circ p_{n} and Qnx=x−PnxQ_{n}x=x-P_{n}x by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates,

Φn(hn(x))=pn∗(pn(x))+Qnx=Pnx+(x−Pnx)=x.\Phi_{n}(h_{n}(x))=p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))+Q_{n}x=P_{n}x+(x-P_{n}x)=x .

Step 3 (a random series with law γc\gamma_{c}). The standard normal distribution NN is a probability measure on (R,B(R))(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})) by Standard Normal Distribution. By Existence of Independent and Identically Distributed Sequences applied to NN there are a probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) and an independent and identically distributed sequence (ξk)k∈N(\xi_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} of random variables on it with common distribution NN, that is, an independent sequence of standard normal random variables. For this sequence let YmY_{m} (m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}), GG and YY be as in The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections, so that Ym(ω)=∑k=1mck ξk(ω) ekY_{m}(\omega)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)\,e_{k}. By The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §convergence, G∈FG\in\mathcal{F} and P(G)=1P(G)=1. By The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §random-element, YY is a random element of (X,d)(X,d), and ⟨Y(ω),ek⟩=ck ξk(ω)\langle Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle=\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega) for every ω∈G\omega\in G and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}; for ω∉G\omega\notin G, Y(ω)=0XY(\omega)=0_{X} by definition. By The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §unique and Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, the law PYP_{Y} of Random Element of a Metric Space and Its Law, given by PY(C)=P(Y−1(C))P_{Y}(C)=P(Y^{-1}(C)) for C∈B(X)C\in\mathcal{B}(X), equals γc\gamma_{c}, and by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure (pn)#γc=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}.

Step 4 (two independent σ\sigma-algebras). Let G1=σ(ξk:1≤k≤n)\mathcal{G}_{1}=\sigma(\xi_{k}:1\le k\le n) and G2=σ(ξk:k∈N, k>n)\mathcal{G}_{2}=\sigma(\xi_{k}:k\in\mathbb{N},\ k>n) be the generated σ\sigma-algebras, sub-σ\sigma-algebras of F\mathcal{F}. The index sets {1,…,n}\{1,\dots,n\} and {k∈N:k>n}\{k\in\mathbb{N}:k>n\} are nonempty and disjoint, so by Grouping Lemma for Independent Random Variables the family (G1,G2)(\mathcal{G}_{1},\mathcal{G}_{2}) is independent in the sense of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Random Variables and Independence of Sigma-Algebras; in particular

P(E∩E′)=P(E) P(E′)for all E∈G1, E′∈G2.(1)P(E\cap E')=P(E)\,P(E')\qquad\text{for all }E\in\mathcal{G}_{1},\ E'\in\mathcal{G}_{2}.\tag{1}

For k≤nk\le n and a Borel set B′⊆RB'\subseteq\mathbb{R} the set ξk−1(B′)\xi_{k}^{-1}(B') belongs to the generating family of G1\mathcal{G}_{1}, hence to G1\mathcal{G}_{1} by claim 2 of Intersections of Sigma-Algebras and Minimality of the Generated Sigma-Algebra; so ξk\xi_{k} is measurable with respect to G1\mathcal{G}_{1}. Likewise ξk\xi_{k} is measurable with respect to G2\mathcal{G}_{2} for k>nk>n.

Step 5 (the head is G1\mathcal{G}_{1}-measurable on GG). For ω∈Ω\omega\in\Omega and j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}, orthonormality of (ek)(e_{k}) gives ⟨Yn(ω),ej⟩=∑k=1nck ξk(ω)⟨ek,ej⟩\langle Y_{n}(\omega),e_{j}\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)\langle e_{k},e_{j}\rangle, which equals cj ξj(ω)\sqrt{c_{j}}\,\xi_{j}(\omega) if j≤nj\le n and 00 if j>nj>n. By claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions each of these functions of ω\omega is measurable with respect to G1\mathcal{G}_{1}, so by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §measurable, applied to the measurable space (Ω,G1)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}_{1}), the map YnY_{n} is measurable with respect to G1\mathcal{G}_{1} and B(X)\mathcal{B}(X). Since pnp_{n} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, the map U=pn∘Yn:Ω→RnU=p_{n}\circ Y_{n}:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}^{n} is measurable with respect to G1\mathcal{G}_{1} and B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and U(ω)=(c1 ξ1(ω),…,cn ξn(ω))U(\omega)=(\sqrt{c_{1}}\,\xi_{1}(\omega),\dots,\sqrt{c_{n}}\,\xi_{n}(\omega)). For ω∈G\omega\in G, Step 3 gives pn(Y(ω))=(⟨Y(ω),ek⟩)k=1n=U(ω)p_{n}(Y(\omega))=(\langle Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle)_{k=1}^{n}=U(\omega).

Step 6 (the tail is G2\mathcal{G}_{2}-measurable). For m>nm>n let Sm=∑k=n+1mck ξk2S_{m}=\sum_{k=n+1}^{m}c_{k}\,\xi_{k}^{2}, a function on Ω\Omega measurable with respect to G2\mathcal{G}_{2} by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Fix ω∈Ω\omega\in\Omega. The partial sums ∑k=1mckξk(ω)2\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_{k}\xi_{k}(\omega)^{2} form a nondecreasing sequence of real numbers, since ck>0c_{k}>0 by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances, so they converge if and only if they are bounded above; for m>nm>n they equal ∑k=1nckξk(ω)2+Sm(ω)\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}\xi_{k}(\omega)^{2}+S_{m}(\omega). Hence ω∈G\omega\in G if and only if there is M∈NM\in\mathbb{N} with Sm(ω)≤MS_{m}(\omega)\le M for every m>nm>n, that is,

G=⋃M∈N ⋂m>nSm−1((−∞,M])∈G2,G=\bigcup_{M\in\mathbb{N}}\ \bigcap_{m>n}S_{m}^{-1}\bigl((-\infty,M]\bigr)\in\mathcal{G}_{2},

each (−∞,M](-\infty,M] being a Borel set. Next, for x∈Xx\in X and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, orthonormality gives ⟨Qnx,ek⟩=xk−∑j=1nxj⟨ej,ek⟩\langle Q_{n}x,e_{k}\rangle=x_{k}-\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{j}\langle e_{j},e_{k}\rangle, which is 00 for k≤nk\le n and xkx_{k} for k>nk>n. Since Y(ω)=0XY(\omega)=0_{X} for ω∉G\omega\notin G and Qn0X=0X−pn∗(pn(0X))=0XQ_{n}0_{X}=0_{X}-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(0_{X}))=0_{X}, Step 3 yields, for every ω∈Ω\omega\in\Omega,

⟨QnY(ω),ek⟩=0(k≤n),⟨QnY(ω),ek⟩=1G(ω)ck ξk(ω)(k>n).\langle Q_{n}Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle=0\quad(k\le n),\qquad\langle Q_{n}Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle=\mathbf{1}_{G}(\omega)\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)\quad(k>n).

By claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and G∈G2G\in\mathcal{G}_{2}, all these functions are measurable with respect to G2\mathcal{G}_{2}, so by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §measurable, applied to (Ω,G2)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}_{2}), the map Qn∘YQ_{n}\circ Y is measurable with respect to G2\mathcal{G}_{2} and B(X)\mathcal{B}(X).

Step 7 (rectangles). Let A∈B(Rn)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X), and set E1=(pn∘Y)−1(A)E_{1}=(p_{n}\circ Y)^{-1}(A), E1′=U−1(A)E_{1}'=U^{-1}(A) and E2=(Qn∘Y)−1(B)E_{2}=(Q_{n}\circ Y)^{-1}(B). Then E1∈FE_{1}\in\mathcal{F}, since pn∘Yp_{n}\circ Y is measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; E1′∈G1E_{1}'\in\mathcal{G}_{1} by Step 5; and E2∈G2E_{2}\in\mathcal{G}_{2} by Step 6. By Step 5, E1∩G=E1′∩GE_{1}\cap G=E_{1}'\cap G. Since P(Ω∖G)=0P(\Omega\setminus G)=0, every E∈FE\in\mathcal{F} satisfies P(E)=P(E∩G)+P(E∖G)=P(E∩G)P(E)=P(E\cap G)+P(E\setminus G)=P(E\cap G), by additivity and monotonicity of PP. Therefore, using (1),

P(E1∩E2)=P(E1∩E2∩G)=P(E1′∩E2∩G)=P(E1′∩E2)=P(E1′) P(E2)=P(E1) P(E2),P(E_{1}\cap E_{2})=P(E_{1}\cap E_{2}\cap G)=P(E_{1}'\cap E_{2}\cap G)=P(E_{1}'\cap E_{2})=P(E_{1}')\,P(E_{2})=P(E_{1})\,P(E_{2}),

where the last equality uses P(E1′)=P(E1′∩G)=P(E1∩G)=P(E1)P(E_{1}')=P(E_{1}'\cap G)=P(E_{1}\cap G)=P(E_{1}). Now hn−1(A×B)=pn−1(A)∩Qn−1(B)h_{n}^{-1}(A\times B)=p_{n}^{-1}(A)\cap Q_{n}^{-1}(B), so Y−1(hn−1(A×B))=E1∩E2Y^{-1}(h_{n}^{-1}(A\times B))=E_{1}\cap E_{2}, Y−1(pn−1(A))=E1Y^{-1}(p_{n}^{-1}(A))=E_{1} and Y−1(Qn−1(B))=E2Y^{-1}(Q_{n}^{-1}(B))=E_{2}. Since PY=γcP_{Y}=\gamma_{c} by Step 3,

(hn)#γc(A×B)=PY(hn−1(A×B))=P(E1∩E2)=P(E1) P(E2)=γc(pn−1(A)) γc(Qn−1(B))=γc(n)(A) ((Qn)#γc)(B),(h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}(A\times B)=P_{Y}\bigl(h_{n}^{-1}(A\times B)\bigr)=P(E_{1}\cap E_{2})=P(E_{1})\,P(E_{2})=\gamma_{c}\bigl(p_{n}^{-1}(A)\bigr)\,\gamma_{c}\bigl(Q_{n}^{-1}(B)\bigr)=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}(A)\,\bigl((Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)(B),

the last step by (pn)#γc=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}} (Step 3).

Step 8 (claim 1). By Step 1 and claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, (hn)#γc(h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} is a measure on B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X), and (Qn)#γc(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} is a probability measure on B(X)\mathcal{B}(X), QnQ_{n} being Borel. Moreover γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} is a probability measure on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure, read with nn in place of dd as in Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations. The probability measures γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} and (Qn)#γc(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} are finite, hence σ\sigma-finite, so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure there is exactly one measure on B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) whose value on every measurable rectangle A×BA\times B is γc(n)(A) ((Qn)#γc)(B)\gamma_{c^{(n)}}(A)\,((Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c})(B), namely γc(n)⊗(Qn)#γc\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}; by Step 7, (hn)#γc(h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} is such a measure. Hence (hn)#γc=γc(n)⊗(Qn)#γc(h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}, which proves claim 1.

Step 9 (claim 2). By Step 2, Φn\Phi_{n} is continuous, hence Borel, and Φn∘hn=idX\Phi_{n}\circ h_{n}=\mathrm{id}_{X}. Since (idX)#γc=γc(\mathrm{id}_{X})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c}, (†\dagger) and claim 1 give

γc=(Φn∘hn)#γc=(Φn)#((hn)#γc)=(Φn)#(γc(n)⊗(Qn)#γc),\gamma_{c}=(\Phi_{n}\circ h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\bigl((h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\bigl(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr),

which proves claim 2.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…