Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Throughout, ρ \rho ρ denotes the product metric on R n × X \mathbb{R}^{n}\times X R n × X , a metric by claim 1 of The Product Metric is a Metric ; since d E ( u , u ′ ) = ∥ u − u ′ ∥ d_{E}(u,u')=\lVert u-u'\rVert d E ( u , u ′ ) = ∥ u − u ′ ∥ by Euclidean Space and Lebesgue Measure: Standing Notation §space , it is given by
ρ ( ( u , w ) , ( u ′ , w ′ ) ) = max { ∥ u − u ′ ∥ , ∣ w − w ′ ∣ } ( u , u ′ ∈ R n , w , w ′ ∈ X ) . \rho\bigl((u,w),(u',w')\bigr)=\max\{\lVert u-u'\rVert,\,|w-w'|\}\qquad(u,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{n},\ w,w'\in X). ρ ( ( u , w ) , ( u ′ , w ′ ) ) = max {∥ u − u ′ ∥ , ∣ w − w ′ ∣ } ( u , u ′ ∈ R n , w , w ′ ∈ X ) .
As recalled in the statement, its Borel σ \sigma σ -algebra is B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( X ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( X ) by The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Product of Two Separable Metric Spaces is the Product Sigma-Algebra §product . For maps T : S 1 → S 2 T:S_{1}\to S_{2} T : S 1 → S 2 and R : S 2 → S 3 R:S_{2}\to S_{3} R : S 2 → S 3 between measurable spaces, each measurable, and a measure λ \lambda λ on S 1 S_{1} S 1 , one has ( R ∘ T ) − 1 ( C ) = T − 1 ( R − 1 ( C ) ) (R\circ T)^{-1}(C)=T^{-1}(R^{-1}(C)) ( R ∘ T ) − 1 ( C ) = T − 1 ( R − 1 ( C )) for every measurable C ⊆ S 3 C\subseteq S_{3} C ⊆ S 3 , so that the image measures of claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables satisfy
( R ∘ T ) # λ = R # ( T # λ ) . ( † ) (R\circ T)_{\#}\lambda=R_{\#}(T_{\#}\lambda).\tag{$\dagger$} ( R ∘ T ) # λ = R # ( T # λ ) . ( † )
Step 1 (continuity of h n h_{n} h n ). Let x , x ′ ∈ X x,x'\in X x , x ′ ∈ X . By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity , ∥ p n ( x ) − p n ( x ′ ) ∥ ≤ ∣ x − x ′ ∣ \lVert p_{n}(x)-p_{n}(x')\rVert\le|x-x'| ∥ p n ( x ) − p n ( x ′ )∥ ≤ ∣ x − x ′ ∣ , and Q n Q_{n} Q n is Lipschitz with constant 1 1 1 , so ∣ Q n x − Q n x ′ ∣ ≤ ∣ x − x ′ ∣ |Q_{n}x-Q_{n}x'|\le|x-x'| ∣ Q n x − Q n x ′ ∣ ≤ ∣ x − x ′ ∣ . Hence ρ ( h n ( x ) , h n ( x ′ ) ) ≤ ∣ x − x ′ ∣ \rho(h_{n}(x),h_{n}(x'))\le|x-x'| ρ ( h n ( x ) , h n ( x ′ )) ≤ ∣ x − x ′ ∣ . Given x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X and a real ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 , the choice δ = ε \delta=\varepsilon δ = ε gives ρ ( h n ( x ) , h n ( x ′ ) ) < ε \rho(h_{n}(x),h_{n}(x'))<\varepsilon ρ ( h n ( x ) , h n ( x ′ )) < ε whenever ∣ x − x ′ ∣ < δ |x-x'|<\delta ∣ x − x ′ ∣ < δ , so h n h_{n} h n is continuous on X X X , and it is Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space . This proves the first assertion of claim 1.
Step 2 (continuity of Φ n \Phi_{n} Φ n and Φ n ∘ h n = i d X \Phi_{n}\circ h_{n}=\mathrm{id}_{X} Φ n ∘ h n = id X ). For u , u ′ ∈ R n u,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{n} u , u ′ ∈ R n the definition p n ∗ ( y ) = ∑ k = 1 n y k e k p_{n}^{*}(y)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}y_{k}e_{k} p n ∗ ( y ) = ∑ k = 1 n y k e k of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates gives p n ∗ ( u ) − p n ∗ ( u ′ ) = p n ∗ ( u − u ′ ) p_{n}^{*}(u)-p_{n}^{*}(u')=p_{n}^{*}(u-u') p n ∗ ( u ) − p n ∗ ( u ′ ) = p n ∗ ( u − u ′ ) , and ∣ p n ∗ ( u − u ′ ) ∣ = ∥ u − u ′ ∥ |p_{n}^{*}(u-u')|=\lVert u-u'\rVert ∣ p n ∗ ( u − u ′ ) ∣ = ∥ u − u ′ ∥ by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity . By the triangle inequality for the norm of X X X , for ( u , w ) , ( u ′ , w ′ ) ∈ R n × X (u,w),(u',w')\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X ( u , w ) , ( u ′ , w ′ ) ∈ R n × X ,
∣ Φ n ( u , w ) − Φ n ( u ′ , w ′ ) ∣ ≤ ∣ p n ∗ ( u − u ′ ) ∣ + ∣ w − w ′ ∣ = ∥ u − u ′ ∥ + ∣ w − w ′ ∣ ≤ 2 ρ ( ( u , w ) , ( u ′ , w ′ ) ) . |\Phi_{n}(u,w)-\Phi_{n}(u',w')|\le|p_{n}^{*}(u-u')|+|w-w'|=\lVert u-u'\rVert+|w-w'|\le2\rho\bigl((u,w),(u',w')\bigr). ∣ Φ n ( u , w ) − Φ n ( u ′ , w ′ ) ∣ ≤ ∣ p n ∗ ( u − u ′ ) ∣ + ∣ w − w ′ ∣ = ∥ u − u ′ ∥ + ∣ w − w ′ ∣ ≤ 2 ρ ( ( u , w ) , ( u ′ , w ′ ) ) .
Given a real ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 , the choice δ = ε / 2 \delta=\varepsilon/2 δ = ε /2 shows that Φ n \Phi_{n} Φ n is continuous on R n × X \mathbb{R}^{n}\times X R n × X , and it is Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space . For x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X , since P n = p n ∗ ∘ p n P_{n}=p_{n}^{*}\circ p_{n} P n = p n ∗ ∘ p n and Q n x = x − P n x Q_{n}x=x-P_{n}x Q n x = x − P n x by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates ,
Φ n ( h n ( x ) ) = p n ∗ ( p n ( x ) ) + Q n x = P n x + ( x − P n x ) = x . \Phi_{n}(h_{n}(x))=p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))+Q_{n}x=P_{n}x+(x-P_{n}x)=x . Φ n ( h n ( x )) = p n ∗ ( p n ( x )) + Q n x = P n x + ( x − P n x ) = x .
Step 3 (a random series with law γ c \gamma_{c} γ c ). The standard normal distribution N N N is a probability measure on ( R , B ( R ) ) (\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})) ( R , B ( R )) by Standard Normal Distribution . By Existence of Independent and Identically Distributed Sequences applied to N N N there are a probability space ( Ω , F , P ) (\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) ( Ω , F , P ) and an independent and identically distributed sequence ( ξ k ) k ∈ N (\xi_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} ( ξ k ) k ∈ N of random variables on it with common distribution N N N , that is, an independent sequence of standard normal random variables. For this sequence let Y m Y_{m} Y m (m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N ), G G G and Y Y Y be as in The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections , so that Y m ( ω ) = ∑ k = 1 m c k ξ k ( ω ) e k Y_{m}(\omega)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)\,e_{k} Y m ( ω ) = ∑ k = 1 m c k ξ k ( ω ) e k . By The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §convergence , G ∈ F G\in\mathcal{F} G ∈ F and P ( G ) = 1 P(G)=1 P ( G ) = 1 . By The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §random-element , Y Y Y is a random element of ( X , d ) (X,d) ( X , d ) , and ⟨ Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ = c k ξ k ( ω ) \langle Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle=\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega) ⟨ Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ = c k ξ k ( ω ) for every ω ∈ G \omega\in G ω ∈ G and k ∈ N k\in\mathbb{N} k ∈ N ; for ω ∉ G \omega\notin G ω ∈ / G , Y ( ω ) = 0 X Y(\omega)=0_{X} Y ( ω ) = 0 X by definition. By The Diagonal Gaussian Random Series in a Hilbert Space: Almost Sure Convergence, Finite-Dimensional Projections, and the Unique Measure with Diagonal Gaussian Projections §unique and Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure , the law P Y P_{Y} P Y of Random Element of a Metric Space and Its Law , given by P Y ( C ) = P ( Y − 1 ( C ) ) P_{Y}(C)=P(Y^{-1}(C)) P Y ( C ) = P ( Y − 1 ( C )) for C ∈ B ( X ) C\in\mathcal{B}(X) C ∈ B ( X ) , equals γ c \gamma_{c} γ c , and by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure ( p n ) # γ c = γ c ( n ) (p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}} ( p n ) # γ c = γ c ( n ) .
Step 4 (two independent σ \sigma σ -algebras). Let G 1 = σ ( ξ k : 1 ≤ k ≤ n ) \mathcal{G}_{1}=\sigma(\xi_{k}:1\le k\le n) G 1 = σ ( ξ k : 1 ≤ k ≤ n ) and G 2 = σ ( ξ k : k ∈ N , k > n ) \mathcal{G}_{2}=\sigma(\xi_{k}:k\in\mathbb{N},\ k>n) G 2 = σ ( ξ k : k ∈ N , k > n ) be the generated σ \sigma σ -algebras , sub-σ \sigma σ -algebras of F \mathcal{F} F . The index sets { 1 , … , n } \{1,\dots,n\} { 1 , … , n } and { k ∈ N : k > n } \{k\in\mathbb{N}:k>n\} { k ∈ N : k > n } are nonempty and disjoint, so by Grouping Lemma for Independent Random Variables the family ( G 1 , G 2 ) (\mathcal{G}_{1},\mathcal{G}_{2}) ( G 1 , G 2 ) is independent in the sense of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Random Variables and Independence of Sigma-Algebras ; in particular
P ( E ∩ E ′ ) = P ( E ) P ( E ′ ) for all E ∈ G 1 , E ′ ∈ G 2 . (1) P(E\cap E')=P(E)\,P(E')\qquad\text{for all }E\in\mathcal{G}_{1},\ E'\in\mathcal{G}_{2}.\tag{1} P ( E ∩ E ′ ) = P ( E ) P ( E ′ ) for all E ∈ G 1 , E ′ ∈ G 2 . ( 1 )
For k ≤ n k\le n k ≤ n and a Borel set B ′ ⊆ R B'\subseteq\mathbb{R} B ′ ⊆ R the set ξ k − 1 ( B ′ ) \xi_{k}^{-1}(B') ξ k − 1 ( B ′ ) belongs to the generating family of G 1 \mathcal{G}_{1} G 1 , hence to G 1 \mathcal{G}_{1} G 1 by claim 2 of Intersections of Sigma-Algebras and Minimality of the Generated Sigma-Algebra ; so ξ k \xi_{k} ξ k is measurable with respect to G 1 \mathcal{G}_{1} G 1 . Likewise ξ k \xi_{k} ξ k is measurable with respect to G 2 \mathcal{G}_{2} G 2 for k > n k>n k > n .
Step 5 (the head is G 1 \mathcal{G}_{1} G 1 -measurable on G G G ). For ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω and j ∈ N j\in\mathbb{N} j ∈ N , orthonormality of ( e k ) (e_{k}) ( e k ) gives ⟨ Y n ( ω ) , e j ⟩ = ∑ k = 1 n c k ξ k ( ω ) ⟨ e k , e j ⟩ \langle Y_{n}(\omega),e_{j}\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)\langle e_{k},e_{j}\rangle ⟨ Y n ( ω ) , e j ⟩ = ∑ k = 1 n c k ξ k ( ω ) ⟨ e k , e j ⟩ , which equals c j ξ j ( ω ) \sqrt{c_{j}}\,\xi_{j}(\omega) c j ξ j ( ω ) if j ≤ n j\le n j ≤ n and 0 0 0 if j > n j>n j > n . By claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions each of these functions of ω \omega ω is measurable with respect to G 1 \mathcal{G}_{1} G 1 , so by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §measurable , applied to the measurable space ( Ω , G 1 ) (\Omega,\mathcal{G}_{1}) ( Ω , G 1 ) , the map Y n Y_{n} Y n is measurable with respect to G 1 \mathcal{G}_{1} G 1 and B ( X ) \mathcal{B}(X) B ( X ) . Since p n p_{n} p n is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity , the map U = p n ∘ Y n : Ω → R n U=p_{n}\circ Y_{n}:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}^{n} U = p n ∘ Y n : Ω → R n is measurable with respect to G 1 \mathcal{G}_{1} G 1 and B ( R n ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) B ( R n ) by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space , and U ( ω ) = ( c 1 ξ 1 ( ω ) , … , c n ξ n ( ω ) ) U(\omega)=(\sqrt{c_{1}}\,\xi_{1}(\omega),\dots,\sqrt{c_{n}}\,\xi_{n}(\omega)) U ( ω ) = ( c 1 ξ 1 ( ω ) , … , c n ξ n ( ω )) . For ω ∈ G \omega\in G ω ∈ G , Step 3 gives p n ( Y ( ω ) ) = ( ⟨ Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ ) k = 1 n = U ( ω ) p_{n}(Y(\omega))=(\langle Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle)_{k=1}^{n}=U(\omega) p n ( Y ( ω )) = (⟨ Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ ) k = 1 n = U ( ω ) .
Step 6 (the tail is G 2 \mathcal{G}_{2} G 2 -measurable). For m > n m>n m > n let S m = ∑ k = n + 1 m c k ξ k 2 S_{m}=\sum_{k=n+1}^{m}c_{k}\,\xi_{k}^{2} S m = ∑ k = n + 1 m c k ξ k 2 , a function on Ω \Omega Ω measurable with respect to G 2 \mathcal{G}_{2} G 2 by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions . Fix ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω . The partial sums ∑ k = 1 m c k ξ k ( ω ) 2 \sum_{k=1}^{m}c_{k}\xi_{k}(\omega)^{2} ∑ k = 1 m c k ξ k ( ω ) 2 form a nondecreasing sequence of real numbers, since c k > 0 c_{k}>0 c k > 0 by Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances , so they converge if and only if they are bounded above; for m > n m>n m > n they equal ∑ k = 1 n c k ξ k ( ω ) 2 + S m ( ω ) \sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}\xi_{k}(\omega)^{2}+S_{m}(\omega) ∑ k = 1 n c k ξ k ( ω ) 2 + S m ( ω ) . Hence ω ∈ G \omega\in G ω ∈ G if and only if there is M ∈ N M\in\mathbb{N} M ∈ N with S m ( ω ) ≤ M S_{m}(\omega)\le M S m ( ω ) ≤ M for every m > n m>n m > n , that is,
G = ⋃ M ∈ N ⋂ m > n S m − 1 ( ( − ∞ , M ] ) ∈ G 2 , G=\bigcup_{M\in\mathbb{N}}\ \bigcap_{m>n}S_{m}^{-1}\bigl((-\infty,M]\bigr)\in\mathcal{G}_{2}, G = M ∈ N ⋃ m > n ⋂ S m − 1 ( ( − ∞ , M ] ) ∈ G 2 ,
each ( − ∞ , M ] (-\infty,M] ( − ∞ , M ] being a Borel set. Next, for x ∈ X x\in X x ∈ X and k ∈ N k\in\mathbb{N} k ∈ N , orthonormality gives ⟨ Q n x , e k ⟩ = x k − ∑ j = 1 n x j ⟨ e j , e k ⟩ \langle Q_{n}x,e_{k}\rangle=x_{k}-\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{j}\langle e_{j},e_{k}\rangle ⟨ Q n x , e k ⟩ = x k − ∑ j = 1 n x j ⟨ e j , e k ⟩ , which is 0 0 0 for k ≤ n k\le n k ≤ n and x k x_{k} x k for k > n k>n k > n . Since Y ( ω ) = 0 X Y(\omega)=0_{X} Y ( ω ) = 0 X for ω ∉ G \omega\notin G ω ∈ / G and Q n 0 X = 0 X − p n ∗ ( p n ( 0 X ) ) = 0 X Q_{n}0_{X}=0_{X}-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(0_{X}))=0_{X} Q n 0 X = 0 X − p n ∗ ( p n ( 0 X )) = 0 X , Step 3 yields, for every ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω ,
⟨ Q n Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ = 0 ( k ≤ n ) , ⟨ Q n Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ = 1 G ( ω ) c k ξ k ( ω ) ( k > n ) . \langle Q_{n}Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle=0\quad(k\le n),\qquad\langle Q_{n}Y(\omega),e_{k}\rangle=\mathbf{1}_{G}(\omega)\sqrt{c_{k}}\,\xi_{k}(\omega)\quad(k>n). ⟨ Q n Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ = 0 ( k ≤ n ) , ⟨ Q n Y ( ω ) , e k ⟩ = 1 G ( ω ) c k ξ k ( ω ) ( k > n ) .
By claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions and G ∈ G 2 G\in\mathcal{G}_{2} G ∈ G 2 , all these functions are measurable with respect to G 2 \mathcal{G}_{2} G 2 , so by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §measurable , applied to ( Ω , G 2 ) (\Omega,\mathcal{G}_{2}) ( Ω , G 2 ) , the map Q n ∘ Y Q_{n}\circ Y Q n ∘ Y is measurable with respect to G 2 \mathcal{G}_{2} G 2 and B ( X ) \mathcal{B}(X) B ( X ) .
Step 7 (rectangles). Let A ∈ B ( R n ) A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) A ∈ B ( R n ) and B ∈ B ( X ) B\in\mathcal{B}(X) B ∈ B ( X ) , and set E 1 = ( p n ∘ Y ) − 1 ( A ) E_{1}=(p_{n}\circ Y)^{-1}(A) E 1 = ( p n ∘ Y ) − 1 ( A ) , E 1 ′ = U − 1 ( A ) E_{1}'=U^{-1}(A) E 1 ′ = U − 1 ( A ) and E 2 = ( Q n ∘ Y ) − 1 ( B ) E_{2}=(Q_{n}\circ Y)^{-1}(B) E 2 = ( Q n ∘ Y ) − 1 ( B ) . Then E 1 ∈ F E_{1}\in\mathcal{F} E 1 ∈ F , since p n ∘ Y p_{n}\circ Y p n ∘ Y is measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space ; E 1 ′ ∈ G 1 E_{1}'\in\mathcal{G}_{1} E 1 ′ ∈ G 1 by Step 5; and E 2 ∈ G 2 E_{2}\in\mathcal{G}_{2} E 2 ∈ G 2 by Step 6. By Step 5, E 1 ∩ G = E 1 ′ ∩ G E_{1}\cap G=E_{1}'\cap G E 1 ∩ G = E 1 ′ ∩ G . Since P ( Ω ∖ G ) = 0 P(\Omega\setminus G)=0 P ( Ω ∖ G ) = 0 , every E ∈ F E\in\mathcal{F} E ∈ F satisfies P ( E ) = P ( E ∩ G ) + P ( E ∖ G ) = P ( E ∩ G ) P(E)=P(E\cap G)+P(E\setminus G)=P(E\cap G) P ( E ) = P ( E ∩ G ) + P ( E ∖ G ) = P ( E ∩ G ) , by additivity and monotonicity of P P P . Therefore, using (1),
P ( E 1 ∩ E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ∩ E 2 ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ′ ∩ E 2 ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ′ ∩ E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ′ ) P ( E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ) P ( E 2 ) , P(E_{1}\cap E_{2})=P(E_{1}\cap E_{2}\cap G)=P(E_{1}'\cap E_{2}\cap G)=P(E_{1}'\cap E_{2})=P(E_{1}')\,P(E_{2})=P(E_{1})\,P(E_{2}), P ( E 1 ∩ E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ∩ E 2 ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ′ ∩ E 2 ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ′ ∩ E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ′ ) P ( E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ) P ( E 2 ) ,
where the last equality uses P ( E 1 ′ ) = P ( E 1 ′ ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ) P(E_{1}')=P(E_{1}'\cap G)=P(E_{1}\cap G)=P(E_{1}) P ( E 1 ′ ) = P ( E 1 ′ ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ∩ G ) = P ( E 1 ) .
Now h n − 1 ( A × B ) = p n − 1 ( A ) ∩ Q n − 1 ( B ) h_{n}^{-1}(A\times B)=p_{n}^{-1}(A)\cap Q_{n}^{-1}(B) h n − 1 ( A × B ) = p n − 1 ( A ) ∩ Q n − 1 ( B ) , so Y − 1 ( h n − 1 ( A × B ) ) = E 1 ∩ E 2 Y^{-1}(h_{n}^{-1}(A\times B))=E_{1}\cap E_{2} Y − 1 ( h n − 1 ( A × B )) = E 1 ∩ E 2 , Y − 1 ( p n − 1 ( A ) ) = E 1 Y^{-1}(p_{n}^{-1}(A))=E_{1} Y − 1 ( p n − 1 ( A )) = E 1 and Y − 1 ( Q n − 1 ( B ) ) = E 2 Y^{-1}(Q_{n}^{-1}(B))=E_{2} Y − 1 ( Q n − 1 ( B )) = E 2 . Since P Y = γ c P_{Y}=\gamma_{c} P Y = γ c by Step 3,
( h n ) # γ c ( A × B ) = P Y ( h n − 1 ( A × B ) ) = P ( E 1 ∩ E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ) P ( E 2 ) = γ c ( p n − 1 ( A ) ) γ c ( Q n − 1 ( B ) ) = γ c ( n ) ( A ) ( ( Q n ) # γ c ) ( B ) , (h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}(A\times B)=P_{Y}\bigl(h_{n}^{-1}(A\times B)\bigr)=P(E_{1}\cap E_{2})=P(E_{1})\,P(E_{2})=\gamma_{c}\bigl(p_{n}^{-1}(A)\bigr)\,\gamma_{c}\bigl(Q_{n}^{-1}(B)\bigr)=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}(A)\,\bigl((Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)(B), ( h n ) # γ c ( A × B ) = P Y ( h n − 1 ( A × B ) ) = P ( E 1 ∩ E 2 ) = P ( E 1 ) P ( E 2 ) = γ c ( p n − 1 ( A ) ) γ c ( Q n − 1 ( B ) ) = γ c ( n ) ( A ) ( ( Q n ) # γ c ) ( B ) ,
the last step by ( p n ) # γ c = γ c ( n ) (p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}} ( p n ) # γ c = γ c ( n ) (Step 3).
Step 8 (claim 1). By Step 1 and claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables , ( h n ) # γ c (h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} ( h n ) # γ c is a measure on B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( X ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( X ) , and ( Q n ) # γ c (Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} ( Q n ) # γ c is a probability measure on B ( X ) \mathcal{B}(X) B ( X ) , Q n Q_{n} Q n being Borel. Moreover γ c ( n ) \gamma_{c^{(n)}} γ c ( n ) is a probability measure on B ( R n ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) B ( R n ) by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure , read with n n n in place of d d d as in Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations . The probability measures γ c ( n ) \gamma_{c^{(n)}} γ c ( n ) and ( Q n ) # γ c (Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} ( Q n ) # γ c are finite, hence σ \sigma σ -finite, so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure there is exactly one measure on B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( X ) \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) B ( R n ) ⊗ B ( X ) whose value on every measurable rectangle A × B A\times B A × B is γ c ( n ) ( A ) ( ( Q n ) # γ c ) ( B ) \gamma_{c^{(n)}}(A)\,((Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c})(B) γ c ( n ) ( A ) (( Q n ) # γ c ) ( B ) , namely γ c ( n ) ⊗ ( Q n ) # γ c \gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} γ c ( n ) ⊗ ( Q n ) # γ c ; by Step 7, ( h n ) # γ c (h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} ( h n ) # γ c is such a measure. Hence ( h n ) # γ c = γ c ( n ) ⊗ ( Q n ) # γ c (h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} ( h n ) # γ c = γ c ( n ) ⊗ ( Q n ) # γ c , which proves claim 1.
Step 9 (claim 2). By Step 2, Φ n \Phi_{n} Φ n is continuous, hence Borel, and Φ n ∘ h n = i d X \Phi_{n}\circ h_{n}=\mathrm{id}_{X} Φ n ∘ h n = id X . Since ( i d X ) # γ c = γ c (\mathrm{id}_{X})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c} ( id X ) # γ c = γ c , († \dagger † ) and claim 1 give
γ c = ( Φ n ∘ h n ) # γ c = ( Φ n ) # ( ( h n ) # γ c ) = ( Φ n ) # ( γ c ( n ) ⊗ ( Q n ) # γ c ) , \gamma_{c}=(\Phi_{n}\circ h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\bigl((h_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\bigl(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr), γ c = ( Φ n ∘ h n ) # γ c = ( Φ n ) # ( ( h n ) # γ c ) = ( Φ n ) # ( γ c ( n ) ⊗ ( Q n ) # γ c ) ,
which proves claim 2.