TheoremBase

For two points x<y of the interval the mean value theorem on an interval gives f(y)-f(x)=f'(xi)(y-x) with xi strictly between them, and each clause follows from the sign or the size of f'(xi).

Proof

The mean value step. Let x,y∈Ix,y\in I with x<yx<y. The hypotheses on ff are those of Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and on Any Interval (ii), which gives ξ∈I\xi\in I with x<ξ<yx<\xi<y and

f(y)−f(x)=f′(ξ) (y−x).f(y)-f(x)=f'(\xi)\,(y-x).

Since x,y∈Ix,y\in I and x<ξ<yx<\xi<y, ξ\xi is an inner point of II, so each hypothesis below on the values f′(x′)f'(x') at inner points x′x' applies to f′(ξ)f'(\xi). Moreover 0<y−x0<y-x (Difference and Quotient Identities in ℝ (i)).

Proof of (i). Let x,y∈Ix,y\in I with x≤yx\le y. If x=yx=y then f(x)≤f(y)f(x)\le f(y) trivially. If x<yx<y, take ξ\xi as in the mean value step; 0≤f′(ξ)0\le f'(\xi) and 0≤y−x0\le y-x give 0≤f′(ξ) (y−x)=f(y)−f(x)0\le f'(\xi)\,(y-x)=f(y)-f(x) by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (iv), so f(x)≤f(y)f(x)\le f(y) by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iv).

Proof of (ii). Let x,y∈Ix,y\in I with x<yx<y and take ξ\xi as in the mean value step. Then 0<f′(ξ)0<f'(\xi) and 0<y−x0<y-x give 0<f′(ξ) (y−x)=f(y)−f(x)0<f'(\xi)\,(y-x)=f(y)-f(x) by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (iv), so f(x)<f(y)f(x)<f(y) (Difference and Quotient Identities in ℝ (i)).

Proof of (iii). Let x,y∈Ix,y\in I with x≤yx\le y; the case x=yx=y is trivial. If x<yx<y, take ξ\xi as in the mean value step. From f′(ξ)≤0f'(\xi)\le0, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (v) gives 0≤−f′(ξ)0\le-f'(\xi), so 0≤(−f′(ξ)) (y−x)=−(f(y)−f(x))=f(x)−f(y)0\le(-f'(\xi))\,(y-x)=-(f(y)-f(x))=f(x)-f(y) by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (iv), Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (ii) for (−u) v=−(u v)(-u)\,v=-(u\,v), and Difference and Quotient Identities in ℝ (i) for the last equality, and f(y)≤f(x)f(y)\le f(x) by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (iv).

Proof of (iv). Let x,y∈Ix,y\in I with x<yx<y and take ξ\xi as in the mean value step. From f′(ξ)<0f'(\xi)<0, Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (iii) gives 0<−f′(ξ)0<-f'(\xi), so 0<(−f′(ξ)) (y−x)=−(f(y)−f(x))=f(x)−f(y)0<(-f'(\xi))\,(y-x)=-(f(y)-f(x))=f(x)-f(y) by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (iv), Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (ii) for (−u) v=−(u v)(-u)\,v=-(u\,v), and Difference and Quotient Identities in ℝ (i) for the last equality; and f(y)<f(x)f(y)<f(x) (Difference and Quotient Identities in ℝ (i)).

Proof of (v). If f′(x′)=0f'(x')=0 at every inner point x′x', then both 0≤f′(x′)0\le f'(x') and f′(x′)≤0f'(x')\le0 hold there, so (i) and (iii) apply. Let x,y∈Ix,y\in I. The order of R\mathbb{R} is total, so x≤yx\le y or y≤xy\le x; by symmetry suppose x≤yx\le y. Then f(x)≤f(y)f(x)\le f(y) by (i) and f(y)≤f(x)f(y)\le f(x) by (iii), so f(x)=f(y)f(x)=f(y) by antisymmetry of ≤\le.

Proof of (vi). Let x,y∈Ix,y\in I. If x=yx=y, both sides of the inequality are 00, as f(x)−f(x)=0f(x)-f(x)=0 and x−x=0x-x=0 (Difference and Quotient Identities in ℝ (i)) and ∣0∣=0|0|=0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x). Suppose x<yx<y and take ξ\xi as in the mean value step. By Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x), ∣f(y)−f(x)∣=∣f′(ξ)∣ ∣y−x∣|f(y)-f(x)|=|f'(\xi)|\,|y-x| and 0≤∣y−x∣0\le|y-x|; since ∣f′(ξ)∣≤M|f'(\xi)|\le M, Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares (v) gives ∣f′(ξ)∣ ∣y−x∣≤M ∣y−x∣|f'(\xi)|\,|y-x|\le M\,|y-x|. So ∣f(y)−f(x)∣≤M ∣y−x∣|f(y)-f(x)|\le M\,|y-x|. Finally suppose y<xy<x. The case just proved, with the roles of xx and yy exchanged, gives ∣f(x)−f(y)∣≤M ∣x−y∣|f(x)-f(y)|\le M\,|x-y|; and ∣f(x)−f(y)∣=∣f(y)−f(x)∣|f(x)-f(y)|=|f(y)-f(x)| and ∣x−y∣=∣y−x∣|x-y|=|y-x|, since f(x)−f(y)=−(f(y)−f(x))f(x)-f(y)=-(f(y)-f(x)) and x−y=−(y−x)x-y=-(y-x) (Difference and Quotient Identities in ℝ (i)) and ∣−z∣=∣z∣|-z|=|z| for z∈Rz\in\mathbb{R} by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field (x). So ∣f(y)−f(x)∣≤M ∣y−x∣|f(y)-f(x)|\le M\,|y-x| in every case, the order of R\mathbb{R} being total.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…