TheoremBase

Proof sketch: the recursion theorem on ℕ₀, applied in the power set of the set of real functions on U, with the step function given by a family of sections.

Proof

Throughout, RU\mathbb{R}^{U} is a set by The Elements of the Class of Functions from a Set to a Set, and This Class Is a Set (ii) and its power set P(RU)\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}) is a set by The Union Set and the Power Set of a Set (ii); subsets of RU\mathbb{R}^{U} are formed by the set-builder of the setting, the conditions that define them (continuity on UU, and the existence of partial derivatives on UU together with their membership in a given set) are predicative, and two sets with the same elements are equal.

We first fix the value at 00. Let

c={h∈RU: h is continuous on U}.c=\{h\in\mathbb{R}^{U}:\ h\text{ is continuous on }U\}.

This is a subset of RU\mathbb{R}^{U}, so c∈P(RU)c\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}); it is the set the first display requires for C0(U)\mathcal{C}^{0}(U).

Next we build the step of the recursion. Let RR be the class of pairs ((k,S),h)((k,S),h) with k∈N0k\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, S∈P(RU)S\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}) and h∈RUh\in\mathbb{R}^{U} such that, for every i∈[n]i\in[n], the partial derivative ∂ih(x)\partial_{i}h(x) exists for every x∈Ux\in U (Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n (ii)) and the partial derivative function ∂ih\partial_{i}h (Partial Derivative of a Real-Valued Function on an Open Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n (iii)) lies in SS. Applying Maps from Functional Predicative Relations, and Families of Sections (iii) to RR, with A=N0×P(RU)A=\mathbb{N}_{0}\times\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}) and b=RUb=\mathbb{R}^{U}, we obtain a function g:N0×P(RU)→P(RU)g:\mathbb{N}_{0}\times\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U})\to\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}) whose values are the sections of RR:

h∈g(k,S)  ⟺  h∈RU and, for every i∈[n], ∂ih(x) exists for every x∈U and ∂ih∈S.h\in g(k,S)\iff h\in\mathbb{R}^{U}\ \text{and, for every }i\in[n],\ \partial_{i}h(x)\text{ exists for every }x\in U\text{ and }\partial_{i}h\in S .

Now we recurse. By The Recursion Theorem on Omega (i), applied with ω=N0\omega=\mathbb{N}_{0}, a=P(RU)a=\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}), the element cc and the function gg, there is exactly one function F:N0→P(RU)F:\mathbb{N}_{0}\to\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}) with

F(0)=candF(k+1)=g(k,F(k))for every k∈N0,F(0)=c\qquad\text{and}\qquad F(k+1)=g\bigl(k,F(k)\bigr)\quad\text{for every }k\in\mathbb{N}_{0},

where the successor of kk is k+1k+1 by Natural Numbers Are the Successors in Omega: One Is Least and Not a Successor of a Natural Number, the Successor Is Injective, and N Is Closed under Addition and Multiplication (v). Put Ck(U)=F(k)\mathcal{C}^{k}(U)=F(k). Then F(0)=cF(0)=c is the first display of the lemma, and by the description of g(k,S)g(k,S) with S=F(k)S=F(k), the elements of F(k+1)F(k+1) are exactly the h∈RUh\in\mathbb{R}^{U} whose partial derivatives ∂ih\partial_{i}h exist on UU and lie in Ck(U)\mathcal{C}^{k}(U), which is the second display. So a function with the required properties exists.

Finally, uniqueness. Let F′:N0→P(RU)F':\mathbb{N}_{0}\to\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{U}) be any function satisfying both displays. The first display gives F′(0)=cF'(0)=c. For each kk, the second display and the description of g(k,S)g(k,S) with S=F′(k)S=F'(k) show that F′(k+1)F'(k+1) and g(k,F′(k))g(k,F'(k)) have the same elements, so F′(k+1)=g(k,F′(k))F'(k+1)=g(k,F'(k)). Hence F′F' satisfies the same recursion as FF, and F′=FF'=F by the uniqueness part of The Recursion Theorem on Omega (i). This proves (i).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…