TheoremBase

The supremum is a subsolution by the supremum lemma. If it failed to be a supersolution at some point, there would be a strict gap to the supersolution there, and a small bump built from the failing test function would give a larger member of the family, a contradiction.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The symmetry and the triangle inequality of WaW_{a} on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §symmetry, The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §triangle) and the rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding and scaling inequalities are used without further mention. Any two members of Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, equal or not, form a noise-connected ordered pair by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected, and Pρa⊆P2(X)\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments. For ν,ν0∈Pρa\nu,\nu_{0}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and π∈Πa(ν,ν0)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\nu_{0}), Wa(ν,ν0)2≤Ia(π)W_{a}(\nu,\nu_{0})^{2}\le I^{a}(\pi) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance, hence Wa(ν,ν0)≤Ia(π)W_{a}(\nu,\nu_{0})\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. For ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, L2(ν;Xa)L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) is a real vector space (Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields), in which gradients are added, subtracted and scaled. Being a viscosity subsolution, ff has penalty-subordinate growth from above (Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution), and it has growth from below by hypothesis; being a viscosity supersolution, gg has penalty-subordinate growth from below (Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §supersolution), and it has growth from above by hypothesis.

Claim 1. The function ff is a viscosity subsolution with f≤f≤gf\le f\le g on D\mathcal{D}, by the hypothesis f≤gf\le g, so f∈Gf\in\mathcal{G}. Let ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}. Since f∈Gf\in\mathcal{G}, f(ν)≤u(ν)f(\nu)\le u(\nu); and g(ν)g(\nu) is an upper bound of {v(ν):v∈G}\{v(\nu):v\in\mathcal{G}\}, whose least upper bound is u(ν)u(\nu), so u(ν)≤g(ν)u(\nu)\le g(\nu) (Upper Bound and Least Upper Bound). Let δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let CgC_{g} be as in Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §above for gg and δ\delta, and let CfC_{f} be as in Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §below for ff and δ\delta. Then u(ν)≤g(ν)≤Cg+δ E(ν)u(\nu)\le g(\nu)\le C_{g}+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) and −Cf−δ E(ν)≤f(ν)≤u(ν)-C_{f}-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le f(\nu)\le u(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}. As δ\delta was arbitrary, uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above and from below by those two clauses.

Claim 2, the subsolution property. The set G\mathcal{G} is nonempty and consists of viscosity subsolutions. It is uniformly subordinate from above in the sense of The Pointwise Supremum of a Uniformly Subordinate Family of Viscosity Subsolutions on the Noise Wasserstein Space is a Viscosity Subsolution §uniform-growth: for positive δ\delta and CgC_{g} as in Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §above for gg and δ\delta, v(ν)≤g(ν)≤Cg+δ E(ν)v(\nu)\le g(\nu)\le C_{g}+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every v∈Gv\in\mathcal{G} and every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}. The pair is noise-closed and D\mathcal{D} has the noise map property, and the function whose value at ν\nu is sup⁡{v(ν):v∈G}\sup\{v(\nu):v\in\mathcal{G}\} is uu, so The Pointwise Supremum of a Uniformly Subordinate Family of Viscosity Subsolutions on the Noise Wasserstein Space is a Viscosity Subsolution §subsolution, applied with G\mathcal{G} in the role of its S\mathcal{S}, shows that uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF relative to the noise penalty pair.

Claim 2, the supersolution property. Suppose, seeking a contradiction, that uu is not a viscosity supersolution. By claim 1 the penalty-subordinate growth from below required by Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §supersolution holds, so there are δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ<10<\delta<1, a noise intrinsic test function φ\varphi on D\mathcal{D}, a point μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} at which the function with value uδ+(μ)−φ(μ)u^{+}_{\delta}(\mu)-\varphi(\mu) at μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} has a local minimum relative to D\mathcal{D}, and a positive ε\varepsilon, such that, the order of R\mathbb{R} being total:

(∗)(\ast) every ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, π∈Πa(ν,μ^)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}), s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R} and q∈L2(ν;Xa)q\in L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) with Ia(π)<ε2I^{a}(\pi)<\varepsilon^{2}, ∣uδ+(ν)−uδ+(μ^)∣<ε|u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\varepsilon, ∣s−uδ+(μ^)∣<ε|s-u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\varepsilon and ∫X×X∣q(x)−∇φ(μ^)(y)∣a2 π(dz)<ε2\int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz)<\varepsilon^{2} satisfy Fδ+(ν,s,q)<−εF^{+}_{\delta}(\nu,s,q)<-\varepsilon.

Let τ\tau be a positive radius witnessing the local minimum (Local Minimum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space): uδ+(μ^)−φ(μ^)≤uδ+(ν)−φ(ν)u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\varphi(\hat{\mu})\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu) for ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(μ^,ν)<τW_{a}(\hat{\mu},\nu)<\tau. The functions u+δEu+\delta\mathcal{E} and g+δEg+\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D} are bounded below near each point (The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §plus) and ordered pointwise by claim 1, so Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §monotone, in the metric space (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}) with S=DS=\mathcal{D}, gives uδ+≤gδ+u^{+}_{\delta}\le g^{+}_{\delta} on D\mathcal{D}. The data below are chosen in the order: σ1,ε1\sigma_{1},\varepsilon_{1} (Step 1, inside an argument by contradiction); then Γ\Gamma, the radii θa,θc,θd\theta_{a},\theta_{c},\theta_{d}, then γ,α,κ,c0\gamma,\alpha,\kappa,c_{0} and ψ\psi (Step 2); the coupling π\pi and its modification are chosen afresh for each ν\nu in the test condition (Step 3).

Step 1: a strict gap at μ^\hat{\mu}. Suppose uδ+(μ^)=gδ+(μ^)u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})=g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}). For ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(μ^,ν)<τW_{a}(\hat{\mu},\nu)<\tau, gδ+(μ^)−φ(μ^)=uδ+(μ^)−φ(μ^)≤uδ+(ν)−φ(ν)≤gδ+(ν)−φ(ν)g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\varphi(\hat{\mu})=u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\varphi(\hat{\mu})\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)\le g^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu), so gδ+−φg^{+}_{\delta}-\varphi has a local minimum at μ^\hat{\mu} relative to D\mathcal{D}. By continuity of φ\varphi (Noise Intrinsic Test Functions on the Noise Wasserstein Space §continuity) there is a positive σ1≤τ\sigma_{1}\le\tau with ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ^)∣<ε|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|<\varepsilon whenever Wa(μ^,ν)<σ1W_{a}(\hat{\mu},\nu)<\sigma_{1}; put ε1=min⁡{ε,σ1}\varepsilon_{1}=\min\{\varepsilon,\sigma_{1}\}. Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §supersolution to gg with δ\delta, φ\varphi, μ^\hat{\mu} and ε1\varepsilon_{1} gives ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, π∈Πa(ν,μ^)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}), s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R} and q∈L2(ν;Xa)q\in L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) with the four closeness conditions for gg at tolerance ε1\varepsilon_{1} and −ε1≤Fδ+(ν,s,q)-\varepsilon_{1}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\nu,s,q). Since ε1≤ε\varepsilon_{1}\le\varepsilon and gδ+(μ^)=uδ+(μ^)g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})=u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}), three of the closeness conditions of (∗)(\ast) follow (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field for the cost and the discrepancy). For the fourth, ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and Wa(μ^,ν)≤Ia(π)<ε1≤σ1≤τW_{a}(\hat{\mu},\nu)\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}<\varepsilon_{1}\le\sigma_{1}\le\tau, so uδ+(ν)≤gδ+(ν)<gδ+(μ^)+ε1≤uδ+(μ^)+εu^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)\le g^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)<g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\varepsilon_{1}\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\varepsilon and uδ+(ν)≥uδ+(μ^)+φ(ν)−φ(μ^)>uδ+(μ^)−εu^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)\ge u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})>u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\varepsilon, whence ∣uδ+(ν)−uδ+(μ^)∣<ε|u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\varepsilon by Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §strict-two-sided. Then (∗)(\ast) gives Fδ+(ν,s,q)<−ε≤−ε1F^{+}_{\delta}(\nu,s,q)<-\varepsilon\le-\varepsilon_{1}, a contradiction. Hence uδ+(μ^)<gδ+(μ^)u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})<g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}), and Γ=gδ+(μ^)−uδ+(μ^)\Gamma=g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}) is positive.

Step 2: radii, parameters and the test function. Choose positive radii θa,θc,θd\theta_{a},\theta_{c},\theta_{d} as follows. By continuity of φ\varphi: ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ^)∣<min⁡{ε4,Γ4}|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|<\min\{\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4},\tfrac{\Gamma}{4}\} whenever ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and Wa(ν,μ^)<θaW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{a}. By Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §semicontinuity, gδ+g^{+}_{\delta} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D}, so by Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space: gδ+(μ^)−Γ4<gδ+(ν)g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\Gamma}{4}<g^{+}_{\delta}(\nu) whenever ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and Wa(ν,μ^)<θcW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{c}. Finally, for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and π∈Πa(ν,μ^)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}) with Ia(π)<θd2I^{a}(\pi)<\theta_{d}^{2} the discrepancy ∫X×X∣∇φ(ν)(x)−∇φ(μ^)(y)∣a2 π(dz)\int_{X\times X}|\nabla\varphi(\nu)(x)-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz) is less than (ε2)2(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2})^{2}: otherwise, with a sequence (hn)(h_{n}) of positive reals of limit 00 (Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero), there would be νn∈D\nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D} and πn∈Πa(νn,μ^)\pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) with 0≤Ia(πn)<hn20\le I^{a}(\pi_{n})<h_{n}^{2} and discrepancies Dn≥(ε2)2D_{n}\ge(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2})^{2}; then (Ia(πn))(I^{a}(\pi_{n})) has limit 00 by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §products and claim 2 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, so (πn)(\pi_{n}) is a sequence of couplings of vanishing noise cost from (νn)(\nu_{n}) to μ^\hat{\mu} (Strong and Weak Convergence of Noise Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Noise Cost §couplings), and (Dn)(D_{n}) has limit 00 by Noise Intrinsic Test Functions on the Noise Wasserstein Space §gradient-continuity at μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} and Strong and Weak Convergence of Noise Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Noise Cost §strong; claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences would give (ε2)2≤0(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2})^{2}\le0, contradicting Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field §positive-products. Put

γ=min⁡{τ,ε,θa,θc,θd},α=min⁡{ε8γ,ε4γ2,Γγ2},κ=αγ24,c0=uδ+(μ^)−φ(μ^),\gamma=\min\{\tau,\varepsilon,\theta_{a},\theta_{c},\theta_{d}\},\qquad\alpha=\min\Bigl\{\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8\gamma},\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4\gamma^{2}},\tfrac{\Gamma}{\gamma^{2}}\Bigr\},\qquad\kappa=\tfrac{\alpha\gamma^{2}}{4},\qquad c_{0}=u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\varphi(\hat{\mu}),

all of γ,α,κ\gamma,\alpha,\kappa positive by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements. By claim 1 of that lemma and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field §scaling,

2αγ≤ε4,αγ2≤ε4,κ≤ε16,κ≤Γ4.2\alpha\gamma\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4},\qquad\alpha\gamma^{2}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4},\qquad\kappa\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{16},\qquad\kappa\le\tfrac{\Gamma}{4}.

Let ψ0:Pρa→R\psi_{0}:\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}\to\mathbb{R} be ψ0(ν)=Wa(ν,μ^)2\psi_{0}(\nu)=W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}. As D\mathcal{D} has the noise map property, Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §distance, with D\mathcal{D} in the role of its QQ and μ^\hat{\mu} in the role of its ν0\nu_{0}, shows that ψ0\psi_{0} is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with ∇ψ0(ν)=2(id−Sν)\nabla\psi_{0}(\nu)=2(\mathrm{id}-S_{\nu}) for ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and any noise-optimal map SνS_{\nu} from ν\nu to μ^\hat{\mu}. By A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §constants, with D\mathcal{D} in the role of its QQ and c=c0+κc=c_{0}+\kappa, the constant function φc\varphi_{c} with value c0+κc_{0}+\kappa is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with ∇φc(ν)=0ν\nabla\varphi_{c}(\nu)=0_{\nu} for ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}. Let

ψ(ν)=φ(ν)+c0+κ−α Wa(ν,μ^)2(ν∈Pρa).\psi(\nu)=\varphi(\nu)+c_{0}+\kappa-\alpha\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}\qquad\bigl(\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}\bigr).

By Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §linear, applied first with φ1=φ\varphi_{1}=\varphi, φ2=φc\varphi_{2}=\varphi_{c} and s=t=1s=t=1, then with φ1=φ+φc\varphi_{1}=\varphi+\varphi_{c}, φ2=ψ0\varphi_{2}=\psi_{0}, s=1s=1 and t=−αt=-\alpha (each time with D\mathcal{D} in the role of its QQ), ψ\psi is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with

∇ψ(ν)=∇φ(ν)+0ν−2α (id−Sν)=∇φ(ν)+2α (Sν−id)(ν∈D),\nabla\psi(\nu)=\nabla\varphi(\nu)+0_{\nu}-2\alpha\,(\mathrm{id}-S_{\nu})=\nabla\varphi(\nu)+2\alpha\,(S_{\nu}-\mathrm{id})\qquad(\nu\in\mathcal{D}),

id−Sν\mathrm{id}-S_{\nu} denoting −(Sν−id)-(S_{\nu}-\mathrm{id}); and ψ(μ^)=φ(μ^)+c0+κ=uδ+(μ^)+κ\psi(\hat{\mu})=\varphi(\hat{\mu})+c_{0}+\kappa=u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\kappa, since Wa(μ^,μ^)=0W_{a}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu})=0 by A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §identity. For ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}, SνS_{\nu} exists: (ν,μ^)(\nu,\hat{\mu}) is uniquely noise-mapped by The Noise Map Property of a Set of Probability Measures §map-property, which provides a noise-optimal map by Noise-Optimal Maps and Uniquely Noise-Mapped Pairs §uniquely-mapped. Moreover, by The Noise-Optimal Map: Transport Cost, Stability Along Nearly Optimal Couplings and Stability Under Perturbation of the Source §cost, ∥Sν−id∥ν2=Wa(ν,μ^)2\lVert S_{\nu}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}=W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}, and, by bilinearity of the inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ν\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{\nu} of the real Hilbert space L2(ν;Xa)L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}), ∥2α(Sν−id)∥ν2=(2α)2∥Sν−id∥ν2=(2α Wa(ν,μ^))2\lVert2\alpha(S_{\nu}-\mathrm{id})\rVert_{\nu}^{2}=(2\alpha)^{2}\lVert S_{\nu}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}=\bigl(2\alpha\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})\bigr)^{2}; as both ∥2α(Sν−id)∥ν\lVert2\alpha(S_{\nu}-\mathrm{id})\rVert_{\nu} and 2α Wa(ν,μ^)2\alpha\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}) are nonnegative, claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives

∥∇ψ(ν)−∇φ(ν)∥ν=2α Wa(ν,μ^)(ν∈D).(1)\lVert\nabla\psi(\nu)-\nabla\varphi(\nu)\rVert_{\nu}=2\alpha\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})\qquad(\nu\in\mathcal{D}). \tag{1}

Step 3: the bump. We apply The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function with v=uv=u, which is a viscosity subsolution by the first part of claim 2, with λ=δ\lambda=\delta, the point μ^∈Pρa\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, the radius γ\gamma and the noise intrinsic test function ψ\psi on D\mathcal{D}; the pair is noise-closed with regular penalised maxima. We verify its three hypotheses.

Upper bound (The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function §upper-bound). Let ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(ν,μ^)<γW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma. As γ≤θa\gamma\le\theta_{a}, φ(ν)<φ(μ^)+Γ4\varphi(\nu)<\varphi(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\Gamma}{4} (Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §bounds), and 0≤α Wa(ν,μ^)20\le\alpha\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}; so ψ(ν)≤φ(ν)+c0+κ<φ(μ^)+c0+κ+Γ4\psi(\nu)\le\varphi(\nu)+c_{0}+\kappa<\varphi(\hat{\mu})+c_{0}+\kappa+\tfrac{\Gamma}{4}, and b=φ(μ^)+c0+κ+Γ4b=\varphi(\hat{\mu})+c_{0}+\kappa+\tfrac{\Gamma}{4} serves.

Annulus condition (The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function §annulus). Let ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with γ2<Wa(ν,μ^)<γ\tfrac{\gamma}{2}<W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma. As γ≤τ\gamma\le\tau, the local minimum gives uδ+(ν)≥uδ+(μ^)+φ(ν)−φ(μ^)=φ(ν)+c0u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)\ge u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})=\varphi(\nu)+c_{0}, and uδ+(ν)≤u(ν)+δ E(ν)u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)\le u(\nu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) by Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §semicontinuity; so u(ν)≥φ(ν)+c0−δ E(ν)u(\nu)\ge\varphi(\nu)+c_{0}-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu). By claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, κ=α(γ2)2≤α Wa(ν,μ^)2\kappa=\alpha(\tfrac{\gamma}{2})^{2}\le\alpha\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}, so ψ(ν)≤φ(ν)+c0\psi(\nu)\le\varphi(\nu)+c_{0} and ψ(ν)−δ E(ν)≤u(ν)\psi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le u(\nu).

Test condition (The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function §condition). Let ν∈DΣ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} with Wa(ν,μ^)<γW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma and u(ν)<ψ(ν)−δ E(ν)u(\nu)<\psi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu); then ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} (Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair). By The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §optimal there is a noise-optimal coupling π∈Πa(ν,μ^)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}), so that Ia(π)=Wa(ν,μ^)2I^{a}(\pi)=W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2} (Noise-Optimal Couplings §optimal) and Ia(π)=Wa(ν,μ^)\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}=W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}) (Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root). Let Δ=(id,id)#ν\Delta=(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})_{\#}\nu, which by A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §diagonal belongs to Πa(ν,ν)\Pi^{a}(\nu,\nu) with Ia(Δ)=0I^{a}(\Delta)=0; let ς\varsigma be a gluing of Δ\Delta and π\pi (Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §glued, with ν,ν,μ^\nu,\nu,\hat{\mu} in place of its μ,λ,ν\mu,\lambda,\nu), and let π1=(q1,q3)#ς\pi_{1}=(q_{1},q_{3})_{\#}\varsigma, which by Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §noise-triangle belongs to Πa(ν,μ^)\Pi^{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}) with Ia(π1)≤Ia(Δ)+Ia(π)=Wa(ν,μ^)\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi_{1})}\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\Delta)}+\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}=W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}). We test (∗)(\ast) with (ν,π1,ψ(ν),∇ψ(ν))(\nu,\pi_{1},\psi(\nu),\nabla\psi(\nu)).

First, Ia(π1)≤Wa(ν,μ^)<γ≤ε\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi_{1})}\le W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma\le\varepsilon, so Ia(π1)<ε2I^{a}(\pi_{1})<\varepsilon^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Secondly, by Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §semicontinuity, the hypothesis on ν\nu and 0≤αWa(ν,μ^)20\le\alpha W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2},

uδ+(ν)≤u(ν)+δ E(ν)<ψ(ν)≤φ(ν)+c0+κ=uδ+(μ^)+(φ(ν)−φ(μ^))+κ<uδ+(μ^)+ε4+ε16,u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)\le u(\nu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)<\psi(\nu)\le\varphi(\nu)+c_{0}+\kappa=u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\bigl(\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})\bigr)+\kappa<u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{16},

while the local minimum gives uδ+(ν)≥uδ+(μ^)+φ(ν)−φ(μ^)>uδ+(μ^)−ε4u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)\ge u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})>u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}; so ∣uδ+(ν)−uδ+(μ^)∣<ε|u^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\varepsilon by Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §strict-two-sided.

Thirdly, by Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §triangle and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, ∣ψ(ν)−uδ+(μ^)∣≤∣φ(ν)−φ(μ^)∣+κ+αWa(ν,μ^)2<ε4+ε16+αγ2<ε|\psi(\nu)-u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|\le|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|+\kappa+\alpha W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{16}+\alpha\gamma^{2}<\varepsilon.

Fourthly, the discrepancy. Since ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and Ia(π)=Wa(ν,μ^)2<γ2≤θd2I^{a}(\pi)=W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}<\gamma^{2}\le\theta_{d}^{2} (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field), the choice of θd\theta_{d} gives ∫X×X∣∇φ(ν)(x)−∇φ(μ^)(y)∣a2 π(dz)<(ε2)2\int_{X\times X}|\nabla\varphi(\nu)(x)-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz)<(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2})^{2}, so the square root of this discrepancy is less than ε2\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field). By A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §diagonal, the discrepancy of ∇ψ(ν)\nabla\psi(\nu) and ∇φ(ν)\nabla\varphi(\nu) along Δ\Delta is ∥∇ψ(ν)−∇φ(ν)∥ν2\lVert\nabla\psi(\nu)-\nabla\varphi(\nu)\rVert_{\nu}^{2}, whose nonnegative square root is 2αWa(ν,μ^)2\alpha W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}) by (1) and Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root. By A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §discrepancy-gluing, applied with ν,ν,μ^\nu,\nu,\hat{\mu} as its ν,λ,μ\nu,\lambda,\mu, with Δ\Delta, π\pi and ς\varsigma as its π12\pi_{12}, π23\pi_{23} and σ\sigma, and with ∇ψ(ν)\nabla\psi(\nu), ∇φ(ν)\nabla\varphi(\nu) and ∇φ(μ^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) as its qq, η\eta and θ\theta,

∫X×X∣∇ψ(ν)(x)−∇φ(μ^)(y)∣a2 π1(dz)<2α Wa(ν,μ^)+ε2≤2αγ+ε2≤ε4+ε2<ε,\sqrt{\int_{X\times X}|\nabla\psi(\nu)(x)-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi_{1}(dz)}<2\alpha\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\le2\alpha\gamma+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}<\varepsilon,

so the discrepancy of ∇ψ(ν)\nabla\psi(\nu) and ∇φ(μ^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) along π1\pi_{1} is less than ε2\varepsilon^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Therefore (∗)(\ast), with π1\pi_{1} in the role of its π\pi, s=ψ(ν)s=\psi(\nu) and q=∇ψ(ν)∈L2(ν;Xa)q=\nabla\psi(\nu)\in L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}), gives Fδ+(ν,ψ(ν),∇ψ(ν))<−ε<0F^{+}_{\delta}(\nu,\psi(\nu),\nabla\psi(\nu))<-\varepsilon<0, and the test condition holds.

Let ww be the function of The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function for these data. By The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function §subsolution it is a viscosity subsolution, and by The Bump Construction on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Local Maximum of a Viscosity Subsolution and a Penalised Noise Intrinsic Test Function §domination, u≤wu\le w on D\mathcal{D}.

Step 4: ww belongs to G\mathcal{G}. By claim 1, f≤u≤wf\le u\le w. Let ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}. If w(ν)=u(ν)w(\nu)=u(\nu) then w(ν)≤g(ν)w(\nu)\le g(\nu) by claim 1. Otherwise Wa(ν,μ^)<γW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma and w(ν)=max⁡{ψ(ν)−δ E(ν),u(ν)}w(\nu)=\max\{\psi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),u(\nu)\}. By Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §semicontinuity and the choice of θc\theta_{c},

g(ν)≥gδ+(ν)−δ E(ν)>gδ+(μ^)−Γ4−δ E(ν)=uδ+(μ^)+3Γ4−δ E(ν),g(\nu)\ge g^{+}_{\delta}(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)>g^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\Gamma}{4}-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)=u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{3\Gamma}{4}-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu),

whereas, using 0≤αWa(ν,μ^)20\le\alpha W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}, ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ^)∣<Γ4|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|<\tfrac{\Gamma}{4} and κ≤Γ4\kappa\le\tfrac{\Gamma}{4},

ψ(ν)−δ E(ν)≤uδ+(μ^)+(φ(ν)−φ(μ^))+κ−δ E(ν)<uδ+(μ^)+Γ2−δ E(ν).\psi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\bigl(\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})\bigr)+\kappa-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)<u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\Gamma}{2}-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu).

As Γ2<3Γ4\tfrac{\Gamma}{2}<\tfrac{3\Gamma}{4}, ψ(ν)−δ E(ν)<g(ν)\psi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)<g(\nu); with u(ν)≤g(ν)u(\nu)\le g(\nu) this gives w(ν)≤g(ν)w(\nu)\le g(\nu) by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements. Hence w∈Gw\in\mathcal{G}.

Step 5: the contradiction. Since w∈Gw\in\mathcal{G}, w≤uw\le u; with Step 3, w=uw=u. For ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(ν,μ^)<γW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\gamma, claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements then gives u(ν)=w(ν)≥ψ(ν)−δ E(ν)u(\nu)=w(\nu)\ge\psi(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu), that is ψ(ν)≤u(ν)+δ E(ν)\psi(\nu)\le u(\nu)+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu). By The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §plus, uδ+u^{+}_{\delta} is the lower semicontinuous envelope of u+δEu+\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D}, and Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §approximation provides a sequence (νk)k∈N(\nu_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in D\mathcal{D} converging to μ^\hat{\mu} in (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}) with (u(νk)+δ E(νk))\bigl(u(\nu_{k})+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu_{k})\bigr) converging to uδ+(μ^)u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}). Since ψ\psi is continuous on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (Noise Intrinsic Test Functions on the Noise Wasserstein Space §continuity), claim 1 of Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity shows that (ψ(νk))(\psi(\nu_{k})) converges to ψ(μ^)\psi(\hat{\mu}). Let ε0\varepsilon_{0} be positive and choose kk with Wa(νk,μ^)<γW_{a}(\nu_{k},\hat{\mu})<\gamma, ψ(μ^)−ε0<ψ(νk)\psi(\hat{\mu})-\varepsilon_{0}<\psi(\nu_{k}) and u(νk)+δ E(νk)<uδ+(μ^)+ε0u(\nu_{k})+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu_{k})<u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\varepsilon_{0}, each holding from some index on (Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space, Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §bounds). Then ψ(μ^)−ε0<ψ(νk)≤u(νk)+δ E(νk)<uδ+(μ^)+ε0\psi(\hat{\mu})-\varepsilon_{0}<\psi(\nu_{k})\le u(\nu_{k})+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu_{k})<u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\varepsilon_{0}, so ψ(μ^)≤uδ+(μ^)+2ε0\psi(\hat{\mu})\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+2\varepsilon_{0}; as ε0\varepsilon_{0} was arbitrary, ψ(μ^)≤uδ+(μ^)\psi(\hat{\mu})\le u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}) by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above. But ψ(μ^)=uδ+(μ^)+κ\psi(\hat{\mu})=u^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\kappa, so κ≤0\kappa\le0, contradicting 0<κ0<\kappa.

Hence uu is a viscosity supersolution. Being also a viscosity subsolution, and having penalty-subordinate growth from above and from below by claim 1, uu is a viscosity solution of FF relative to the noise penalty pair by Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §solution.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…