TheoremBase

Verifies the four conditions of the test-function definition for a sum and for a real multiple, using the linearity of the Frechet gradient, of the composition with a random vector and of second partial derivatives; differences follow by taking the multiplier minus one.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Let Φ=φ∘Λ\Phi=\varphi\circ\Lambda and Ξ=χ∘Λ\Xi=\chi\circ\Lambda be the lifts of φ\varphi and χ\chi, and let μ∈P2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}).

Claim 1. Since Λ(Y)=L(Y)\Lambda(Y)=\mathcal{L}(Y) for Y∈L2(Ω;Rd)Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}), the lift of φ+χ\varphi+\chi has the value φ(Λ(Y))+χ(Λ(Y))=Φ(Y)+Ξ(Y)\varphi(\Lambda(Y))+\chi(\Lambda(Y))=\Phi(Y)+\Xi(Y) at YY, and the lift of cφc\varphi the value c Φ(Y)c\,\Phi(Y); these lifts are therefore Φ+Ξ\Phi+\Xi and cΦc\Phi. We verify the four conditions of Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (i) for φ+χ\varphi+\chi and for cφc\varphi.

(a) Φ\Phi and Ξ\Xi belong to C1(L2(Ω;Rd))C^{1}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})) by condition (a) for φ\varphi and for χ\chi, the set L2(Ω;Rd)L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) being open in itself by The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iii). Hence Φ+Ξ\Phi+\Xi and cΦc\Phi belong to C1(L2(Ω;Rd))C^{1}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})), with

D(Φ+Ξ)(Y)=DΦ(Y)+DΞ(Y),D(cΦ)(Y)=c DΦ(Y)(Y∈L2(Ω;Rd)),D(\Phi+\Xi)(Y)=D\Phi(Y)+D\Xi(Y),\qquad D(c\Phi)(Y)=c\,D\Phi(Y)\qquad\bigl(Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})\bigr),

by Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (ii) and Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (iii).

(b) Let Y∈L2(Ω;Rd)Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) satisfy L(Y)=μ\mathcal{L}(Y)=\mu. By condition (b) for φ\varphi and for χ\chi and by Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (ii), DΦ(Y)=∇φ(μ)∘YD\Phi(Y)=\nabla\varphi(\mu)\circ Y and DΞ(Y)=∇χ(μ)∘YD\Xi(Y)=\nabla\chi(\mu)\circ Y. The map ζ↦ζ∘Y\zeta\mapsto\zeta\circ Y is linear by Composition of a Square-Integrable Vector Field with a Random Vector, and the Lifted Score: Isometry, Norm, Weak Identity and Second-Moment Identity (i), so by (a)

D(Φ+Ξ)(Y)=(∇φ(μ)+∇χ(μ))∘Y,D(cΦ)(Y)=(c ∇φ(μ))∘Y.D(\Phi+\Xi)(Y)=\bigl(\nabla\varphi(\mu)+\nabla\chi(\mu)\bigr)\circ Y,\qquad D(c\Phi)(Y)=\bigl(c\,\nabla\varphi(\mu)\bigr)\circ Y .

The fields ∇φ(μ)\nabla\varphi(\mu) and ∇χ(μ)\nabla\chi(\mu) lie in TμT_{\mu}, a linear subspace of L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (i), so ∇φ(μ)+∇χ(μ)\nabla\varphi(\mu)+\nabla\chi(\mu) and c ∇φ(μ)c\,\nabla\varphi(\mu) lie in TμT_{\mu} as well. Thus condition (b) holds for φ+χ\varphi+\chi and for cφc\varphi at μ\mu, with these fields, and μ\mu was an arbitrary element of P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}).

(c) Let Y∈L2(Ω;Rd)Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and let ϕY,ξY:Rd→R\phi_{Y},\xi_{Y}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be the functions ϕY(a)=Φ(Y+ca)\phi_{Y}(a)=\Phi(Y+c_{a}) and ξY(a)=Ξ(Y+ca)\xi_{Y}(a)=\Xi(Y+c_{a}) attached to Φ\Phi and to Ξ\Xi at YY in The Translation Laplacian of a Function on the Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (i); by condition (c) for φ\varphi and for χ\chi they are of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}. The functions attached in the same way to Φ+Ξ\Phi+\Xi and to cΦc\Phi are ϕY+ξY\phi_{Y}+\xi_{Y} and c ϕYc\,\phi_{Y}, of class C2C^{2} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by claim 3 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions. So condition (c) holds for φ+χ\varphi+\chi and for cφc\varphi at every point of L2(Ω;Rd)L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}).

(d) φ\varphi and χ\chi are continuous by condition (d), hence so are φ+χ\varphi+\chi and cφc\varphi by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space.

Therefore φ+χ\varphi+\chi and cφc\varphi are test functions, and by the uniqueness of the intrinsic gradient in Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (ii) the fields exhibited in (b) are the intrinsic gradients:

∇(φ+χ)(μ)=∇φ(μ)+∇χ(μ),∇(cφ)(μ)=c ∇φ(μ).\nabla(\varphi+\chi)(\mu)=\nabla\varphi(\mu)+\nabla\chi(\mu),\qquad\nabla(c\varphi)(\mu)=c\,\nabla\varphi(\mu).

For the translation Hessians, fix YY with L(Y)=μ\mathcal{L}(Y)=\mu, which exists by The Wasserstein Distance and the Mean-Square Distance of Random Vectors (iii), and keep the notation of (c). The partial derivatives of ϕY\phi_{Y} and of ξY\xi_{Y} exist at every point of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, so by claim 1 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions, ∂j(ϕY+ξY)=∂jϕY+∂jξY\partial_{j}(\phi_{Y}+\xi_{Y})=\partial_{j}\phi_{Y}+\partial_{j}\xi_{Y} and ∂j(c ϕY)=c ∂jϕY\partial_{j}(c\,\phi_{Y})=c\,\partial_{j}\phi_{Y} as functions on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, for each index jj; applying that claim once more, at 0Rd0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}, to these functions gives

∂i∂j(ϕY+ξY)(0Rd)=∂i∂jϕY(0Rd)+∂i∂jξY(0Rd),∂i∂j(c ϕY)(0Rd)=c ∂i∂jϕY(0Rd)\partial_{i}\partial_{j}(\phi_{Y}+\xi_{Y})(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=\partial_{i}\partial_{j}\phi_{Y}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})+\partial_{i}\partial_{j}\xi_{Y}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}),\qquad\partial_{i}\partial_{j}(c\,\phi_{Y})(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=c\,\partial_{i}\partial_{j}\phi_{Y}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})

for all indices ii and jj. The entries of a Hessian matrix are exactly these second partial derivatives, and matrices with the same entries are equal, so by Sum of Real Matrices, Scalar Multiple of a Real Matrix and Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space: the Intrinsic Gradient and the Translation Hessian (iii),

Hφ+χ(μ)=Hφ(μ)+Hχ(μ),Hcφ(μ)=c Hφ(μ).H_{\varphi+\chi}(\mu)=H_{\varphi}(\mu)+H_{\chi}(\mu),\qquad H_{c\varphi}(\mu)=c\,H_{\varphi}(\mu).

Claim 2. In R\mathbb{R} one has (−1)x=−(1x)=−x(-1)x=-(1x)=-x by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and the multiplicative identity axiom of the field R\mathbb{R}, and x+(−1)y=x+(−y)=x−yx+(-1)y=x+(-y)=x-y by the notation for the difference fixed in Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, so −φ=(−1)φ-\varphi=(-1)\varphi and φ−χ=φ+(−1)χ\varphi-\chi=\varphi+(-1)\chi as functions on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). By claim 1, (−1)χ(-1)\chi is a test function with intrinsic gradient (−1)∇χ(μ)(-1)\nabla\chi(\mu) and translation Hessian (−1)Hχ(μ)(-1)H_{\chi}(\mu) at μ\mu, and then φ+(−1)χ\varphi+(-1)\chi and (−1)φ(-1)\varphi are test functions with

∇(φ−χ)(μ)=∇φ(μ)+(−1)∇χ(μ),Hφ−χ(μ)=Hφ(μ)+(−1)Hχ(μ),\nabla(\varphi-\chi)(\mu)=\nabla\varphi(\mu)+(-1)\nabla\chi(\mu),\qquad H_{\varphi-\chi}(\mu)=H_{\varphi}(\mu)+(-1)H_{\chi}(\mu), ∇(−φ)(μ)=(−1)∇φ(μ),H−φ(μ)=(−1)Hφ(μ).\nabla(-\varphi)(\mu)=(-1)\nabla\varphi(\mu),\qquad H_{-\varphi}(\mu)=(-1)H_{\varphi}(\mu).

In the real vector space L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) one has (−1)ζ=−ζ(-1)\zeta=-\zeta by claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and ζ+(−1)ω=ζ+(−ω)=ζ−ω\zeta+(-1)\omega=\zeta+(-\omega)=\zeta-\omega by claim 2 of that lemma; for matrices, (−1)B(-1)B has the entries −Bij-B_{ij} by Scalar Multiple of a Real Matrix and claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, so (−1)B=−B(-1)B=-B and A+(−1)B=A−BA+(-1)B=A-B by Sum of Real Matrices and Difference of Real Matrices. Rewriting the four displayed identities accordingly gives the assertion.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…