TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout write ∫f\int f for ∫[a,b]f dλ[a,b]\int_{[a,b]}f\,d\lambda_{[a,b]}, write 0\mathbf{0} for the function on [a,b][a,b] whose value is 00 at every point, and for E⊆[a,b]E\subseteq[a,b] write 1E\mathbf{1}_E for the function equal to 11 on EE and to 00 elsewhere.

The integral of 0\mathbf{0}. The function 0\mathbf{0} is measurable and nonnegative. By the definition of the integral of a nonnegative measurable function, ∫0\int\mathbf{0} is the supremum of the numbers ∫s\int s over the simple functions ss on [a,b][a,b] with 0≤s(t)≤0(t)0\le s(t)\le\mathbf{0}(t) for every tt. The only such ss is 0\mathbf{0} itself, whose standard representation takes the single value 00 on [a,b][a,b], so that its integral is 0⋅λ[a,b]([a,b])=00\cdot\lambda_{[a,b]}([a,b])=0. The supremum of the set whose only element is 00 is 00, so ∫0=0\int\mathbf{0}=0.

Claim 1. Put D=[a,b]∖ND=[a,b]\setminus N. Then D∈B[a,b]D\in\mathcal{B}_{[a,b]}, because B[a,b]\mathcal{B}_{[a,b]} is a σ\sigma-algebra on [a,b][a,b] by claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval and hence closed under complements relative to [a,b][a,b], and λ[a,b]([a,b]∖D)=λ[a,b](N)=0\lambda_{[a,b]}([a,b]\setminus D)=\lambda_{[a,b]}(N)=0; thus DD is co-null in the sense of claim 6 of that lemma.

The absolute value is continuous from the real line to itself, hence measurable with respect to the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space together with claim 2 there, which identifies the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line as a metric space with B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). Therefore the composition ∣h∣|h|, whose value at tt is the absolute value of h(t)h(t), is measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and ∣h∣≥0|h|\ge0 by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Since h(t)=0h(t)=0 for every t∈Dt\in D, the function ∣h∣ 1D|h|\,\mathbf{1}_D has value 00 at every point of [a,b][a,b]: at t∈Dt\in D because ∣h(t)∣=0|h(t)|=0, and at t∉Dt\notin D because 1D(t)=0\mathbf{1}_D(t)=0. That is, ∣h∣ 1D=0|h|\,\mathbf{1}_D=\mathbf{0}. Applying claim 6 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval to the nonnegative measurable function ∣h∣|h| and the co-null set DD gives

∫∣h∣=∫∣h∣ 1D=∫0=0.\int|h|=\int|h|\,\mathbf{1}_D=\int\mathbf{0}=0 .

In particular ∫∣h∣\int|h| is finite, so hh is integrable by the definition of integrability.

By claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have −∣h(t)∣≤h(t)≤∣h(t)∣-|h(t)|\le h(t)\le|h(t)| for every tt, so −∣h∣≤h≤∣h∣-|h|\le h\le|h| pointwise. The functions hh, ∣h∣|h| and −∣h∣-|h| are all integrable, the last by the linearity in claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. The monotonicity in that same claim gives

∫h≤∫∣h∣,∫(−∣h∣)≤∫h,\int h\le\int|h|,\qquad \int(-|h|)\le\int h ,

and the linearity there gives ∫(−∣h∣)=−∫∣h∣\int(-|h|)=-\int|h|. Since ∫∣h∣=0\int|h|=0 and −0=0-0=0 by claim 4 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, these two inequalities read ∫h≤0\int h\le0 and 0≤∫h0\le\int h. Two real numbers each at most the other are equal, so ∫h=0\int h=0.

Claim 2. The function h=f−gh=f-g is integrable by the linearity in claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and in particular measurable. For t∈[a,b]∖Nt\in[a,b]\setminus N we have f(t)=g(t)f(t)=g(t) and hence h(t)=0h(t)=0, by claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. So claim 1 applies to hh and gives ∫(f−g)=0\int(f-g)=0. By the linearity in claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral again, ∫f−∫g=∫(f−g)=0\int f-\int g=\int(f-g)=0, and therefore ∫f=∫g\int f=\int g.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…