TheoremBase

Proof of Integrals of Functions Vanishing or Agreeing off a Null Set on a Compact Interval

lemmalem:integral-null-set-interval-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of both claims: the co-null indicator identity of the interval toolkit forces the integral of the absolute value to vanish, which gives integrability and a zero integral, and the second claim follows by applying the first to the difference.

Proof

Throughout write f\int f for [a,b]fdλ[a,b]\int_{[a,b]}f\,d\lambda_{[a,b]}, write 0\mathbf{0} for the function on [a,b][a,b] whose value is 00 at every point, and for E[a,b]E\subseteq[a,b] write 1E\mathbf{1}_E for the function equal to 11 on EE and to 00 elsewhere.

The integral of 0\mathbf{0}. The function 0\mathbf{0} is measurable and nonnegative. By the definition of the integral of a nonnegative measurable function, 0\int\mathbf{0} is the supremum of the numbers s\int s over the simple functions ss on [a,b][a,b] with 0s(t)0(t)0\le s(t)\le\mathbf{0}(t) for every tt. The only such ss is 0\mathbf{0} itself, whose standard representation takes the single value 00 on [a,b][a,b], so that its integral is 0λ[a,b]([a,b])=00\cdot\lambda_{[a,b]}([a,b])=0. The supremum of the set whose only element is 00 is 00, so 0=0\int\mathbf{0}=0.

Claim 1. Put D=[a,b]ND=[a,b]\setminus N. Then DB[a,b]D\in\mathcal{B}_{[a,b]}, because B[a,b]\mathcal{B}_{[a,b]} is a σ\sigma-algebra on [a,b][a,b] by claim 1 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval and hence closed under complements relative to [a,b][a,b], and λ[a,b]([a,b]D)=λ[a,b](N)=0\lambda_{[a,b]}([a,b]\setminus D)=\lambda_{[a,b]}(N)=0; thus DD is co-null in the sense of claim 6 of that lemma.

The absolute value is continuous from the real line to itself, hence measurable with respect to the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space together with claim 2 there, which identifies the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line as a metric space with B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). Therefore the composition h|h|, whose value at tt is the absolute value of h(t)h(t), is measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and h0|h|\ge0 by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Since h(t)=0h(t)=0 for every tDt\in D, the function h1D|h|\,\mathbf{1}_D has value 00 at every point of [a,b][a,b]: at tDt\in D because h(t)=0|h(t)|=0, and at tDt\notin D because 1D(t)=0\mathbf{1}_D(t)=0. That is, h1D=0|h|\,\mathbf{1}_D=\mathbf{0}. Applying claim 6 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval to the nonnegative measurable function h|h| and the co-null set DD gives

h=h1D=0=0.\int|h|=\int|h|\,\mathbf{1}_D=\int\mathbf{0}=0 .

In particular h\int|h| is finite, so hh is integrable by the definition of integrability.

By claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field we have h(t)h(t)h(t)-|h(t)|\le h(t)\le|h(t)| for every tt, so hhh-|h|\le h\le|h| pointwise. The functions hh, h|h| and h-|h| are all integrable, the last by the linearity in claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. The monotonicity in that same claim gives

hh,(h)h,\int h\le\int|h|,\qquad \int(-|h|)\le\int h ,

and the linearity there gives (h)=h\int(-|h|)=-\int|h|. Since h=0\int|h|=0 and 0=0-0=0 by claim 4 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, these two inequalities read h0\int h\le0 and 0h0\le\int h. Two real numbers each at most the other are equal, so h=0\int h=0.

Claim 2. The function h=fgh=f-g is integrable by the linearity in claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and in particular measurable. For t[a,b]Nt\in[a,b]\setminus N we have f(t)=g(t)f(t)=g(t) and hence h(t)=0h(t)=0, by claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. So claim 1 applies to hh and gives (fg)=0\int(f-g)=0. By the linearity in claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral again, fg=(fg)=0\int f-\int g=\int(f-g)=0, and therefore f=g\int f=\int g.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…