TheoremBase

Proof of Levy's Upward Theorem in Mean Square

theoremthm:levy-upward-mean-square-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the mean-square Levy upward theorem: projection-increment Pythagoras, Riesz-Fischer relative to the limit sigma-algebra, and pi-lambda identification of the limit.

Proof

Fix conditional expectations YnY_n of XX given Gn\mathcal{G}_n for each n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and a conditional expectation Y∞Y_\infty of XX given G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty, as in Conditional Expectation of a Square-Integrable Random Variable. All norms, inner products, and expectations below are those of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product.

Step 1: The sequence (Yn)(Y_n) is Cauchy in mean square. Let m≀nm\le n. Since GmβŠ†Gn\mathcal{G}_m\subseteq\mathcal{G}_n, both YmY_m and YnY_n are Gn\mathcal{G}_n-measurable and square-integrable, hence so is Z=Ynβˆ’YmZ=Y_n-Y_m by the closure properties recorded in Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product. The orthogonality property (property 2 of Existence and Uniqueness of Conditional Expectation for Square-Integrable Random Variables, which every conditional expectation satisfies by the equivalence stated there) gives E[(Xβˆ’Yn)Z]=0\mathbb{E}[(X-Y_n)Z]=0. Writing Xβˆ’Ym=(Xβˆ’Yn)+ZX-Y_m=(X-Y_n)+Z and expanding with the bilinearity of the mean-square inner product from Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product,

βˆ₯Xβˆ’Ymβˆ₯22=βˆ₯Xβˆ’Ynβˆ₯22+2 E[(Xβˆ’Yn)Z]+βˆ₯Zβˆ₯22=βˆ₯Xβˆ’Ynβˆ₯22+βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Ymβˆ₯22.\lVert X-Y_m\rVert_{2}^{2}=\lVert X-Y_n\rVert_{2}^{2}+2\,\mathbb{E}[(X-Y_n)Z]+\lVert Z\rVert_{2}^{2}=\lVert X-Y_n\rVert_{2}^{2}+\lVert Y_n-Y_m\rVert_{2}^{2}.

Set dn=βˆ₯Xβˆ’Ynβˆ₯22β‰₯0d_n=\lVert X-Y_n\rVert_{2}^{2}\ge0. The display shows dmβ‰₯dnd_m\ge d_n for m≀nm\le n, so the set {dn:n∈N}\{d_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\} is bounded below by 00 and has a greatest lower bound Lβ‰₯0L\ge0, which exists by the least upper bound property applied to the set of lower bounds. Given a real Ξ΅>0\varepsilon>0, since L+Ξ΅2L+\varepsilon^{2} is not a lower bound there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with dN<L+Ξ΅2d_N<L+\varepsilon^{2}. For n,mβ‰₯Nn,m\ge N with, say, m≀nm\le n, monotonicity of (dn)(d_n) and the display give

βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Ymβˆ₯22=dmβˆ’dn≀dNβˆ’L<Ξ΅2.\lVert Y_n-Y_m\rVert_{2}^{2}=d_m-d_n\le d_N-L<\varepsilon^{2}.

Hence (Yn)n∈N(Y_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is Cauchy in mean square.

Step 2: A mean-square limit measurable with respect to the limit information. Each YnY_n is Gn\mathcal{G}_n-measurable and GnβŠ†G∞\mathcal{G}_n\subseteq\mathcal{G}_\infty, so each YnY_n is G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty-measurable. By mean-square completeness relative to a sub-Οƒ\sigma-algebra, applied with the sub-Οƒ\sigma-algebra G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty, there exists a G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty-measurable square-integrable random variable Yβ€²Y' with βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Yβ€²βˆ₯2β†’0\lVert Y_n-Y'\rVert_{2}\to0.

Step 3: Yβ€²Y' is a conditional expectation of XX given G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty. It remains to verify the averaging property (iii) of Conditional Expectation of a Square-Integrable Random Variable. For an event A∈FA\in\mathcal{F} the indicator 1A\mathbf{1}_{A} is a nonnegative simple function, hence a square-integrable random variable with βˆ₯1Aβˆ₯2≀1\lVert\mathbf{1}_{A}\rVert_{2}\le1.

First let Aβˆˆβ‹ƒnGnA\in\bigcup_{n}\mathcal{G}_n, say A∈GmA\in\mathcal{G}_m. For every nβ‰₯mn\ge m we have A∈GnA\in\mathcal{G}_n, so the averaging property of YnY_n gives E[X1A]=E[Yn1A]\mathbb{E}[X\mathbf{1}_{A}]=\mathbb{E}[Y_n\mathbf{1}_{A}]. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,

∣E[Yn1A]βˆ’E[Yβ€²1A]∣=∣E[(Ynβˆ’Yβ€²)1A]βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Yβ€²βˆ₯2 βˆ₯1Aβˆ₯2≀βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Yβ€²βˆ₯2⟢0,\bigl|\mathbb{E}[Y_n\mathbf{1}_{A}]-\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{A}]\bigr|=\bigl|\mathbb{E}[(Y_n-Y')\mathbf{1}_{A}]\bigr|\le\lVert Y_n-Y'\rVert_{2}\,\lVert\mathbf{1}_{A}\rVert_{2}\le\lVert Y_n-Y'\rVert_{2}\longrightarrow0,

using the linearity of expectation from Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. Hence E[Yβ€²1A]=E[X1A]\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{A}]=\mathbb{E}[X\mathbf{1}_{A}] for every Aβˆˆβ‹ƒnGnA\in\bigcup_n\mathcal{G}_n.

Now extend to G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty by Dynkin's Ο€\pi-Ξ»\lambda theorem. The family P=⋃nGn\mathcal{P}=\bigcup_n\mathcal{G}_n is a Ο€\pi-system: it is nonempty (Ω∈G1\Omega\in\mathcal{G}_1), and if A∈GjA\in\mathcal{G}_j and B∈GkB\in\mathcal{G}_k then both lie in Gmax⁑(j,k)\mathcal{G}_{\max(j,k)} by the nondecreasing hypothesis, so A∩B∈Gmax⁑(j,k)βŠ†PA\cap B\in\mathcal{G}_{\max(j,k)}\subseteq\mathcal{P}. Let

L={A∈G∞:Β E[Yβ€²1A]=E[X1A]}.\mathcal{L}=\bigl\{A\in\mathcal{G}_\infty:\ \mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{A}]=\mathbb{E}[X\mathbf{1}_{A}]\bigr\}.

We check that L\mathcal{L} is a Ξ»\lambda-system in the sense of Dynkin's Pi-Lambda Theorem. (1) Ω∈PβŠ†L\Omega\in\mathcal{P}\subseteq\mathcal{L}. (2) If A,B∈LA,B\in\mathcal{L} with AβŠ†BA\subseteq B, then pointwise 1Bβˆ–A=1Bβˆ’1A\mathbf{1}_{B\setminus A}=\mathbf{1}_{B}-\mathbf{1}_{A}, and the linearity of expectation from Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral (applied to the integrable products, which are integrable by Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product) gives E[Yβ€²1Bβˆ–A]=E[Yβ€²1B]βˆ’E[Yβ€²1A]=E[X1B]βˆ’E[X1A]=E[X1Bβˆ–A]\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{B\setminus A}]=\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{B}]-\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{A}]=\mathbb{E}[X\mathbf{1}_{B}]-\mathbb{E}[X\mathbf{1}_{A}]=\mathbb{E}[X\mathbf{1}_{B\setminus A}], so Bβˆ–A∈LB\setminus A\in\mathcal{L}. (3) Let (Ak)k∈N(A_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be a nondecreasing sequence in L\mathcal{L} with union AA; note A∈G∞A\in\mathcal{G}_\infty since G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra. The sets A1A_1 and Ak+1βˆ–AkA_{k+1}\setminus A_k (k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}) are pairwise disjoint with union AA, so countable additivity of the probability measure PP gives P(A)=P(A1)+βˆ‘kP(Ak+1βˆ–Ak)P(A)=P(A_1)+\sum_{k}P(A_{k+1}\setminus A_k), and the partial sums telescope to P(Ak)P(A_k); hence P(Aβˆ–Ak)=P(A)βˆ’P(Ak)β†’0P(A\setminus A_k)=P(A)-P(A_k)\to0. Since pointwise 1Aβˆ’1Ak=1Aβˆ–Ak\mathbf{1}_{A}-\mathbf{1}_{A_k}=\mathbf{1}_{A\setminus A_k} and βˆ₯1Aβˆ–Akβˆ₯22=P(Aβˆ–Ak)\lVert\mathbf{1}_{A\setminus A_k}\rVert_{2}^{2}=P(A\setminus A_k), the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields

∣E[Yβ€²1A]βˆ’E[Yβ€²1Ak]βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Yβ€²βˆ₯2 βˆ₯1Aβˆ–Akβˆ₯2⟢0,\bigl|\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{A}]-\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{A_k}]\bigr|\le\lVert Y'\rVert_{2}\,\lVert\mathbf{1}_{A\setminus A_k}\rVert_{2}\longrightarrow0,

and the same bound with XX in place of Yβ€²Y'. Passing to the limit in E[Yβ€²1Ak]=E[X1Ak]\mathbb{E}[Y'\mathbf{1}_{A_k}]=\mathbb{E}[X\mathbf{1}_{A_k}] gives A∈LA\in\mathcal{L}. By Dynkin's Pi-Lambda Theorem, G∞=Οƒ(P)βŠ†L\mathcal{G}_\infty=\sigma(\mathcal{P})\subseteq\mathcal{L}. Together with Step 2, Yβ€²Y' satisfies (i)-(iii) of Conditional Expectation of a Square-Integrable Random Variable for the sub-Οƒ\sigma-algebra G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty, so Yβ€²Y' is a conditional expectation of XX given G∞\mathcal{G}_\infty.

Step 4: Conclusion. By the uniqueness assertion of Existence and Uniqueness of Conditional Expectation for Square-Integrable Random Variables, P(Y∞=Yβ€²)=1P(Y_\infty=Y')=1, and then βˆ₯Yβ€²βˆ’Y∞βˆ₯2=0\lVert Y'-Y_\infty\rVert_{2}=0 by the null-equivalence statement of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product. The triangle inequality gives

βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Y∞βˆ₯2≀βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Yβ€²βˆ₯2+βˆ₯Yβ€²βˆ’Y∞βˆ₯2=βˆ₯Ynβˆ’Yβ€²βˆ₯2⟢0,\lVert Y_n-Y_\infty\rVert_{2}\le\lVert Y_n-Y'\rVert_{2}+\lVert Y'-Y_\infty\rVert_{2}=\lVert Y_n-Y'\rVert_{2}\longrightarrow0,

which is the asserted limit. β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…