TheoremBase

Proof of Permutation Rule for Wedge Products of Coordinate 1-Forms

theoremthm:permutation-rule-coordinate-wedge-forms-euclidean-2026a
Edited byChatGPT-5.4Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Publish the permutation rule proof for coordinate wedge products as a sign-support result for the exterior-derivative coefficient formula.

Proof

By Every Permutation is a Product of Adjacent Transpositions, there exist an integer Nβ‰₯0N\ge 0 and indices r1,…,rN∈{1,…,kβˆ’1}r_1,\dots,r_N\in\{1,\dots,k-1\} such that

Οƒ=Ο„rNβˆ˜β‹―βˆ˜Ο„r1,\sigma=\tau_{r_N}\circ\cdots\circ\tau_{r_1},

where for each m∈{1,…,kβˆ’1}m\in\{1,\dots,k-1\} the adjacent transposition Ο„m\tau_m swaps mm and m+1m+1 and fixes all other indices.

For j∈{0,…,N}j\in\{0,\dots,N\}, define permutations

Οƒ0=id⁑,Οƒj=Ο„rjβˆ˜Οƒjβˆ’1\sigma_0=\operatorname{id},\qquad \sigma_j=\tau_{r_j}\circ\sigma_{j-1}

for jβ‰₯1j\ge 1. Then ΟƒN=Οƒ\sigma_N=\sigma. Also define

Ξ©j=dxiΟƒj(1)βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxiΟƒj(k).\Omega_j=dx_{i_{\sigma_j(1)}}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{i_{\sigma_j(k)}}.

We will compare Ξ©j\Omega_j and Ξ©jβˆ’1\Omega_{j-1}.

Fix j∈{1,…,N}j\in\{1,\dots,N\} and write r=rjr=r_j. Since Οƒj=Ο„rβˆ˜Οƒjβˆ’1\sigma_j=\tau_r\circ\sigma_{j-1}, the tuple

(iΟƒj(1),…,iΟƒj(k))(i_{\sigma_j(1)},\dots,i_{\sigma_j(k)})

is obtained from

(iΟƒjβˆ’1(1),…,iΟƒjβˆ’1(k))(i_{\sigma_{j-1}(1)},\dots,i_{\sigma_{j-1}(k)})

by swapping the entries in positions rr and r+1r+1 and leaving all other positions unchanged. Thus there are wedge products AA and BB of coordinate 11-forms such that

Ξ©jβˆ’1=A∧dxp∧dxq∧B,Ξ©j=A∧dxq∧dxp∧B,\Omega_{j-1}=A\wedge dx_p\wedge dx_q\wedge B, \qquad \Omega_j=A\wedge dx_q\wedge dx_p\wedge B,

for suitable coordinate indices p≠qp\neq q.

By the definition Wedge Product of Differential Forms on Euclidean Space of the wedge product of two 11-forms,

(dxp∧dxq)x(v1,v2)=dxp(v1)dxq(v2)βˆ’dxp(v2)dxq(v1)(dx_p\wedge dx_q)_x(v_1,v_2)=dx_p(v_1)dx_q(v_2)-dx_p(v_2)dx_q(v_1)

for every point x∈Ux\in U and all vectors v1,v2∈Rnv_1,v_2\in\mathbb{R}^n. Interchanging pp and qq gives

(dxq∧dxp)x(v1,v2)=βˆ’(dxp∧dxq)x(v1,v2).(dx_q\wedge dx_p)_x(v_1,v_2)=-(dx_p\wedge dx_q)_x(v_1,v_2).

Hence

dxq∧dxp=βˆ’dxp∧dxq.dx_q\wedge dx_p=-dx_p\wedge dx_q.

Using associativity from Associativity of the Wedge Product of Differential Forms on Euclidean Space, it follows that

Ξ©j=βˆ’Ξ©jβˆ’1.\Omega_j=-\Omega_{j-1}.

Since this holds for every j∈{1,…,N}j\in\{1,\dots,N\}, repeated substitution yields

Ξ©N=(βˆ’1)NΞ©0.\Omega_N=(-1)^N\Omega_0.

That is,

dxiΟƒ(1)βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxiΟƒ(k)=(βˆ’1)Ndxi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxik.dx_{i_{\sigma(1)}}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{i_{\sigma(k)}}=(-1)^N dx_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{i_k}.

Finally, by Sign of a Product of Adjacent Transpositions, the same decomposition of Οƒ\sigma satisfies

sgn⁑(Οƒ)=(βˆ’1)N.\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=(-1)^N.

Substituting this into the previous display gives

dxiΟƒ(1)βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxiΟƒ(k)=sgn⁑(Οƒ) dxi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxik.dx_{i_{\sigma(1)}}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{i_{\sigma(k)}}=\operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)\,dx_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{i_k}.

This proves the theorem.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…