TheoremBase

A Cauchy sequence is tight, so by Prokhorov's theorem a subsequence converges weakly to some measure; lower semicontinuity of the cost along optimal couplings to a fixed late term shows that this weak limit lies in the space and is the metric limit. For the noise space the comparison W2W_2 <= sqrt(abar) WaW_a makes a Wa−CauchyW_a-Cauchy sequence W2−CauchyW_2-Cauchy, and the lower semicontinuity of WaW_a with its closed-under-limit clause concludes.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, the notation is that of Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation, whose clause Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §background puts the notation of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation in force; couplings are written γk\gamma_{k}, the letters π1,π2\pi_{1},\pi_{2} being the coordinate maps of X×XX\times X. Square roots are the nonnegative ones of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root; the monotonicity of s↦ss\mapsto\sqrt{s} on [0,∞)[0,\infty) follows from claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, and the identity s2=s\sqrt{s^{2}}=s for s≥0s\ge0 from the uniqueness in that theorem, both results being in force by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background. A strictly increasing sequence in N\mathbb{N} composed with a strictly increasing sequence in N\mathbb{N} is strictly increasing by claim 2 of A Subsequence of a Subsequence is a Subsequence.

Preliminaries. We use three elementary facts.

Claim (subsequences). Let YY be XX or X×XX\times X, let κn,κ∈P(Y)\kappa_{n},\kappa\in\mathcal{P}(Y) for n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with κn⇒κ\kappa_{n}\Rightarrow\kappa, and let (nk)k∈N(n_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} be strictly increasing in N\mathbb{N}. Then κnk⇒κ\kappa_{n_{k}}\Rightarrow\kappa. Indeed, fix a bounded continuous f:Y→Rf:Y\to\mathbb{R}. By Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space the real sequence (∫Yf dκn)n(\int_{Y}f\,d\kappa_{n})_{n} converges to ∫Yf dκ\int_{Y}f\,d\kappa in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, which is convergence in the real line of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line in the sense of Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space, both definitions requiring ∣∫Yf dκn−∫Yf dκ∣<ε|\int_{Y}f\,d\kappa_{n}-\int_{Y}f\,d\kappa|<\varepsilon for all large nn. By A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit the subsequence (∫Yf dκnk)k(\int_{Y}f\,d\kappa_{n_{k}})_{k} converges to the same limit; as ff was arbitrary, κnk⇒κ\kappa_{n_{k}}\Rightarrow\kappa. Likewise, a constant sequence with all terms κ∈P(Y)\kappa\in\mathcal{P}(Y) converges weakly to κ\kappa, its integrals forming a constant sequence, which converges by Constant Sequences and Index-Shifted Sequences of Real Numbers §constant.

Claim (tight subfamilies). A subset of a tight set of Borel measures on (Y,d)(Y,d) is tight, the compact set supplied for the larger set by Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §tight serving for the subset; so a sequence whose terms lie in a tight set is tight in the sense of Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence.

Claim (Prokhorov). (X,d)(X,d) and (X×X,d)(X\times X,d) are metric spaces by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space and Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pairs, the members of P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) and P(X×X)\mathcal{P}(X\times X) are Borel measures of total mass 11 by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §measures, and ⇒\Rightarrow is the weak convergence of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §weak. Hence, by Prokhorov's Theorem on a Metric Space: a Tight Sequence of Borel Probability Measures Has a Weakly Convergent Subsequence §subsequence, every tight sequence in P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) or in P(X×X)\mathcal{P}(X\times X) has a subsequence converging weakly to a member of P(X)\mathcal{P}(X), respectively P(X×X)\mathcal{P}(X\times X).

Step 1 (claim 1). Let (μn)n∈N(\mu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a Cauchy sequence in (P2(X),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(X),W_{2}), in the sense of Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space. By Cauchy Sequences in the Quadratic Wasserstein Space and Weakly Convergent Sequences on a Hilbert Space are Tight §tight it is tight in (X,d)(X,d), so by Claim (Prokhorov) there are a strictly increasing (nk)k∈N(n_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) with μnk⇒μ\mu_{n_{k}}\Rightarrow\mu.

Claim (tail estimate). For every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} such that, for every m≥Nm\ge N, μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) and W2(μm,μ)≤ε/2W_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu)\le\varepsilon/2.

Proof of the claim. Fix ε>0\varepsilon>0, and by Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space choose NN with W2(μm,μl)<ε/2W_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu_{l})<\varepsilon/2 for all m,l≥Nm,l\ge N. Fix m≥Nm\ge N. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} put rk=nN+kr_{k}=n_{N+k}; the sequence (rk)k(r_{k})_{k} is strictly increasing, rk≥N+k≥Nr_{k}\ge N+k\ge N by Strictly Increasing Sequences of Natural Numbers Dominate Their Index, and μrk⇒μ\mu_{r_{k}}\Rightarrow\mu by Claim (subsequences), being a subsequence of (μnk)k(\mu_{n_{k}})_{k}. For each kk choose, by Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Borel Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §existence, a coupling γk∈Π(μm,μrk)\gamma_{k}\in\Pi(\mu_{m},\mu_{r_{k}}) with I(γk)=W2(μm,μrk)2I(\gamma_{k})=W_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu_{r_{k}})^{2} (a countable sequence of choices, in the order of kk); then 0≤I(γk)<ε2/40\le I(\gamma_{k})<\varepsilon^{2}/4 for every kk, so (I(γk))k(I(\gamma_{k}))_{k} is a bounded sequence of real numbers.

The set {μm}\{\mu_{m}\} is tight by Ulam's Theorem: a Finite Borel Measure on a Complete Separable Metric Space is Tight §tight, (X,d)(X,d) being complete and separable by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space; the set {μrk:k∈N}\{\mu_{r_{k}}:k\in\mathbb{N}\} is tight by Claim (tight subfamilies), being contained in the tight set {μn:n∈N}\{\mu_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}. By Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Tightness, Closedness under Weak Convergence, and Lower Semicontinuity of the Quadratic Cost §tight the set of all couplings of μm\mu_{m} with some μrk\mu_{r_{k}} is tight in X×XX\times X; it contains every γk\gamma_{k}, so (γk)k(\gamma_{k})_{k} is tight by Claim (tight subfamilies). By Claim (Prokhorov) there are a strictly increasing (ki)i∈N(k_{i})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} and γ∈P(X×X)\gamma\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X) with γki⇒γ\gamma_{k_{i}}\Rightarrow\gamma. By Claim (subsequences), the constant sequence with terms μm\mu_{m} converges weakly to μm\mu_{m} and μrki⇒μ\mu_{r_{k_{i}}}\Rightarrow\mu. Now Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Tightness, Closedness under Weak Convergence, and Lower Semicontinuity of the Quadratic Cost §closed, applied with the marginals μm\mu_{m} and μrki\mu_{r_{k_{i}}} and the couplings γki∈Π(μm,μrki)\gamma_{k_{i}}\in\Pi(\mu_{m},\mu_{r_{k_{i}}}), gives γ∈Π(μm,μ)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu_{m},\mu). Every I(γki)I(\gamma_{k_{i}}) is a real number and (I(γki))i(I(\gamma_{k_{i}}))_{i} is bounded, so Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Tightness, Closedness under Weak Convergence, and Lower Semicontinuity of the Quadratic Cost §lsc gives I(γ)<∞I(\gamma)<\infty and I(γ)≤lim inf⁡iI(γki)I(\gamma)\le\liminf_{i}I(\gamma_{k_{i}}); and lim inf⁡iI(γki)≤lim sup⁡iI(γki)≤ε2/4\liminf_{i}I(\gamma_{k_{i}})\le\limsup_{i}I(\gamma_{k_{i}})\le\varepsilon^{2}/4 by claims 1 and 2 of Basic Properties of the Limit Inferior and Limit Superior of a Bounded Real Sequence.

Since μm∈P2(X)\mu_{m}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X), γ∈Π(μm,μ)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu_{m},\mu) and I(γ)<∞I(\gamma)<\infty, the converse part of Couplings on a Hilbert Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, the Lipschitz Bound and the Moment Bound §cost-finite gives μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X). Then W2(μm,μ)W_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu) is defined and W2(μm,μ)2≤I(γ)≤ε2/4W_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu)^{2}\le I(\gamma)\le\varepsilon^{2}/4 by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on a Hilbert Space §distance; taking square roots, W2(μm,μ)≤ε/2W_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu)\le\varepsilon/2. This proves the claim.

By the claim (with ε=1\varepsilon=1, say) μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X), and for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is NN with W2(μm,μ)≤ε/2<εW_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu)\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon for all m≥Nm\ge N. By Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space, (μn)n(\mu_{n})_{n} converges to μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) in the metric space (P2(X),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(X),W_{2}) of The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment on a Hilbert Space §metric. As the Cauchy sequence was arbitrary, (P2(X),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(X),W_{2}) is complete by Complete Metric Space.

Step 2 (claim 2). Let (μn)n∈N(\mu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a Cauchy sequence in the metric space (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}) of The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §metric. Every μn\mu_{n} belongs to P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments.

Claim (W_2-Cauchy). (μn)n(\mu_{n})_{n} is a Cauchy sequence in (P2(X),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(X),W_{2}). Indeed, aˉ>0\bar{a}>0 by Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §weights, so aˉ>0\sqrt{\bar{a}}>0. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose by Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space an NN with Wa(μm,μl)<ε/aˉW_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu_{l})<\varepsilon/\sqrt{\bar{a}} for all m,l≥Nm,l\ge N; then The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §comparison gives W2(μm,μl)≤aˉ Wa(μm,μl)<εW_{2}(\mu_{m},\mu_{l})\le\sqrt{\bar{a}}\,W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu_{l})<\varepsilon for all m,l≥Nm,l\ge N.

By the claim and Cauchy Sequences in the Quadratic Wasserstein Space and Weakly Convergent Sequences on a Hilbert Space are Tight §tight, (μn)n(\mu_{n})_{n} is tight in (X,d)(X,d), and by Claim (Prokhorov) there are a strictly increasing (nk)k∈N(n_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) with μnk⇒μ\mu_{n_{k}}\Rightarrow\mu.

Fix ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose by Cauchy Sequence in a Metric Space an NN with Wa(μm,μl)<ε/2W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu_{l})<\varepsilon/2 for all m,l≥Nm,l\ge N, and fix m≥Nm\ge N. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} put rk=nN+kr_{k}=n_{N+k}, so that (rk)k(r_{k})_{k} is strictly increasing, rk≥Nr_{k}\ge N by Strictly Increasing Sequences of Natural Numbers Dominate Their Index, and μrk⇒μ\mu_{r_{k}}\Rightarrow\mu by Claim (subsequences); the constant sequence with terms μm\mu_{m} converges weakly to μm\mu_{m} by the same claim. All μm\mu_{m} and μrk\mu_{r_{k}} lie in Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, and 0≤Wa(μm,μrk)<ε/20\le W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu_{r_{k}})<\varepsilon/2 for every kk, so the sequence (Wa(μm,μrk))k(W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu_{r_{k}}))_{k} is bounded. By The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §lsc, applied with the constant sequence μm\mu_{m} in the role of (μj)(\mu_{j}), the sequence (μrk)k(\mu_{r_{k}})_{k} in the role of (νj)(\nu_{j}), and the limits μm\mu_{m} and μ\mu, the pair (μm,μ)(\mu_{m},\mu) is noise-connected and Wa(μm,μ)≤lim inf⁡kWa(μm,μrk)W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu)\le\liminf_{k}W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu_{r_{k}}), which is at most lim sup⁡kWa(μm,μrk)≤ε/2\limsup_{k}W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu_{r_{k}})\le\varepsilon/2 by claims 1 and 2 of Basic Properties of the Limit Inferior and Limit Superior of a Bounded Real Sequence. Since μm∈Pρa\mu_{m}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §closed-under-limit gives μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}.

Thus μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, and for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is NN with Wa(μm,μ)≤ε/2<εW_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu)\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon for every m≥Nm\ge N, where Wa(μm,μ)W_{a}(\mu_{m},\mu) is the value of the metric of The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §metric at (μm,μ)(\mu_{m},\mu). By Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space, (μn)n(\mu_{n})_{n} converges to μ∈Pρa\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} in (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}), and as the Cauchy sequence was arbitrary, (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}) is complete by Complete Metric Space.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…