Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. For L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuples of one tracial W*-probability space, sums and real multiples are those of H d H^{d} H d and ⟨ ⋅ , ⋅ ⟩ 2 \langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{2} ⟨ ⋅ , ⋅ ⟩ 2 is the inner product of H d H^{d} H d , with norm ∥ ⋅ ∥ 2 \lVert\cdot\rVert_{2} ∥ ⋅ ∥ 2 , by Sums, Real Multiples and the Pairing of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space §operations and Sums, Real Multiples and the Pairing of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space §pairing ; so the pairing is bilinear over R \mathbb{R} R , and a tuple of norm 0 0 0 is the zero tuple. Lifts satisfy f M ( Y ) = f ( l a w ( Y ) ) f_{M}(Y)=f(\mathrm{law}(Y)) f M ( Y ) = f ( law ( Y )) by Lifts of Functions on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws to Square-Integrable Tuples §lift ; in particular ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ( Y ) = ( φ 1 ) M ( Y ) + ( φ 2 ) M ( Y ) (\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})_{M}(Y)=(\varphi_{1})_{M}(Y)+(\varphi_{2})_{M}(Y) ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ( Y ) = ( φ 1 ) M ( Y ) + ( φ 2 ) M ( Y ) for every L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuple Y Y Y .
Step 0 (law invariance). Let A A A and A ′ A' A ′ be L 2 L^{2} L 2 k k k -tuples of two (possibly different) tracial W*-probability spaces with l a w ( A ) = l a w ( A ′ ) \mathrm{law}(A)=\mathrm{law}(A') law ( A ) = law ( A ′ ) , and let T , S T,S T , S be affine data from k k k to d d d variables with zero constant part. By the entrywise formula of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations , the pair ( T A , S A ) (TA,SA) ( T A , S A ) equals U A UA U A , where U U U is the affine datum from k k k to 2 d 2d 2 d variables whose first d d d rows are those of T T T and whose last d d d rows are those of S S S ; likewise ( T A ′ , S A ′ ) = U A ′ (TA',SA')=UA' ( T A ′ , S A ′ ) = U A ′ . By Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §push-forward , l a w ( T A ) = T # l a w ( A ) = T # l a w ( A ′ ) = l a w ( T A ′ ) \mathrm{law}(TA)=T_{\#}\mathrm{law}(A)=T_{\#}\mathrm{law}(A')=\mathrm{law}(TA') law ( T A ) = T # law ( A ) = T # law ( A ′ ) = law ( T A ′ ) and similarly l a w ( U A ) = l a w ( U A ′ ) \mathrm{law}(UA)=\mathrm{law}(UA') law ( U A ) = law ( U A ′ ) . By Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §moments , applied to T A TA T A and to U A UA U A and to their primed counterparts,
∥ T A ∥ 2 2 = M ^ ( l a w ( T A ) ) = ∥ T A ′ ∥ 2 2 , ⟨ T A , S A ⟩ 2 = ∑ j = 1 d m j , d + j ( l a w ( U A ) ) = ⟨ T A ′ , S A ′ ⟩ 2 . \lVert TA\rVert_{2}^{2}=\widehat{M}(\mathrm{law}(TA))=\lVert TA'\rVert_{2}^{2},\qquad\langle TA,SA\rangle_{2}=\sum_{j=1}^{d}\mathrm{m}_{j,d+j}(\mathrm{law}(UA))=\langle TA',SA'\rangle_{2}. ∥ T A ∥ 2 2 = M ( law ( T A )) = ∥ T A ′ ∥ 2 2 , ⟨ T A , S A ⟩ 2 = j = 1 ∑ d m j , d + j ( law ( U A )) = ⟨ T A ′ , S A ′ ⟩ 2 .
Also f M ( T A ) = f ( l a w ( T A ) ) = f ( l a w ( T A ′ ) ) f_{M}(TA)=f(\mathrm{law}(TA))=f(\mathrm{law}(TA')) f M ( T A ) = f ( law ( T A )) = f ( law ( T A ′ )) for every f : Σ d 2 → R f:\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R} f : Σ d 2 → R , where the second lift is taken in the space of A ′ A' A ′ . Every sub-tuple, sum and difference of blocks of a tuple used below is of the form T A TA T A with such a datum T T T , by the same entrywise formula. So norms, pairings and lift values of such combinations depend only on the law of A A A .
Step 1 (the summed law is a plan at λ \lambda λ ). l a w ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) ∈ Σ 2 d 2 \mathrm{law}(X,P_{1}+P_{2})\in\Sigma^{2}_{2d} law ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) ∈ Σ 2 d 2 by Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §law . By Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §push-forward , p r # 1 l a w ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) = l a w ( p r 1 ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) ) = l a w ( X ) = λ \mathrm{pr}^{1}_{\#}\mathrm{law}(X,P_{1}+P_{2})=\mathrm{law}(\mathrm{pr}^{1}(X,P_{1}+P_{2}))=\mathrm{law}(X)=\lambda pr # 1 law ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) = law ( pr 1 ( X , P 1 + P 2 )) = law ( X ) = λ , since the entries of p r 1 ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) \mathrm{pr}^{1}(X,P_{1}+P_{2}) pr 1 ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) are those of X X X (Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations , Affine Data and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Polynomials §coordinate ). Hence l a w ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) \mathrm{law}(X,P_{1}+P_{2}) law ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) is a plan at λ \lambda λ by Plans at a Square-Integrable Noncommutative Law §plan .
Step 2 (Claim 1, superjets). Fix a real η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 . By Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §superjet and Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §super , applied to φ i \varphi_{i} φ i , the plan l a w ( X , P i ) \mathrm{law}(X,P_{i}) law ( X , P i ) and slack δ i \delta_{i} δ i with the positive number η / 2 \eta/2 η /2 in place of η \eta η , there are reals r i > 0 r_{i}>0 r i > 0 (i = 1 , 2 i=1,2 i = 1 , 2 ), depending only on η \eta η , such that for every tracial W*-probability space ( K , N , Ψ ) (K,N,\Psi) ( K , N , Ψ ) and all L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuples A , B , A ′ A,B,A' A , B , A ′ of it with l a w ( A , B ) = l a w ( X , P i ) \mathrm{law}(A,B)=\mathrm{law}(X,P_{i}) law ( A , B ) = law ( X , P i ) and ∥ A ′ − A ∥ 2 < r i \lVert A'-A\rVert_{2}<r_{i} ∥ A ′ − A ∥ 2 < r i ,
( φ i ) N ( A ′ ) ≤ φ i ( λ ) + ⟨ B , A ′ − A ⟩ 2 + ( δ i + η / 2 ) ∥ A ′ − A ∥ 2 . (\varphi_{i})_{N}(A')\le\varphi_{i}(\lambda)+\langle B,A'-A\rangle_{2}+(\delta_{i}+\eta/2)\lVert A'-A\rVert_{2}. ( φ i ) N ( A ′ ) ≤ φ i ( λ ) + ⟨ B , A ′ − A ⟩ 2 + ( δ i + η /2 ) ∥ A ′ − A ∥ 2 .
Put r = min { r 1 , r 2 } > 0 r=\min\{r_{1},r_{2}\}>0 r = min { r 1 , r 2 } > 0 . Now let ( H ~ , M ~ , Ω ~ ) (\tilde H,\tilde M,\tilde\Omega) ( H ~ , M ~ , Ω ~ ) be any tracial W*-probability space and X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ \tilde X,\tilde P,\tilde X' X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ any L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuples of it with l a w ( X ~ , P ~ ) = l a w ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) \mathrm{law}(\tilde X,\tilde P)=\mathrm{law}(X,P_{1}+P_{2}) law ( X ~ , P ~ ) = law ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) and ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 < r \lVert\tilde X'-\tilde X\rVert_{2}<r ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 < r .
Gluing. Put π 1 = l a w ( ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) , ( P 1 , P 2 ) ) ∈ Σ 4 d 2 \pi_{1}=\mathrm{law}((X,P_{1}+P_{2}),(P_{1},P_{2}))\in\Sigma^{2}_{4d} π 1 = law (( X , P 1 + P 2 ) , ( P 1 , P 2 )) ∈ Σ 4 d 2 and π 2 = l a w ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) ∈ Σ 3 d 2 \pi_{2}=\mathrm{law}(\tilde X,\tilde P,\tilde X')\in\Sigma^{2}_{3d} π 2 = law ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) ∈ Σ 3 d 2 . With k = 2 d k=2d k = 2 d and the data F 2 d , F d F^{2d},F^{d} F 2 d , F d of Gluing Two Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws along a Common Marginal , which select the first 2 d 2d 2 d entries, Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §push-forward gives F # 2 d π 1 = l a w ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) = l a w ( X ~ , P ~ ) = F # d π 2 F^{2d}_{\#}\pi_{1}=\mathrm{law}(X,P_{1}+P_{2})=\mathrm{law}(\tilde X,\tilde P)=F^{d}_{\#}\pi_{2} F # 2 d π 1 = law ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) = law ( X ~ , P ~ ) = F # d π 2 . By Gluing Two Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws along a Common Marginal §glue (with k = 2 d k=2d k = 2 d , m = 2 d m=2d m = 2 d , n = d n=d n = d and these π 1 , π 2 \pi_{1},\pi_{2} π 1 , π 2 ) there are a tracial W*-probability space ( H ^ , M ^ , Ω ^ ) (\hat H,\hat M,\hat\Omega) ( H ^ , M ^ , Ω ^ ) , an L 2 L^{2} L 2 2 d 2d 2 d -tuple ( X ^ , P ^ ) (\hat X,\hat P) ( X ^ , P ^ ) (written by its two blocks of d d d entries), an L 2 L^{2} L 2 2 d 2d 2 d -tuple ( Y 1 , Y 2 ) (Y_{1},Y_{2}) ( Y 1 , Y 2 ) and an L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuple X ^ ′ \hat X' X ^ ′ of it with
l a w ( ( X ^ , P ^ ) , ( Y 1 , Y 2 ) ) = l a w ( ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) , ( P 1 , P 2 ) ) , l a w ( X ^ , P ^ , X ^ ′ ) = l a w ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) . \mathrm{law}((\hat X,\hat P),(Y_{1},Y_{2}))=\mathrm{law}((X,P_{1}+P_{2}),(P_{1},P_{2})),\qquad\mathrm{law}(\hat X,\hat P,\hat X')=\mathrm{law}(\tilde X,\tilde P,\tilde X'). law (( X ^ , P ^ ) , ( Y 1 , Y 2 )) = law (( X , P 1 + P 2 ) , ( P 1 , P 2 )) , law ( X ^ , P ^ , X ^ ′ ) = law ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) .
Consequences of law invariance. By Step 0 applied to the first equality of laws: ∥ P ^ − Y 1 − Y 2 ∥ 2 = ∥ ( P 1 + P 2 ) − P 1 − P 2 ∥ 2 = 0 \lVert\hat P-Y_{1}-Y_{2}\rVert_{2}=\lVert(P_{1}+P_{2})-P_{1}-P_{2}\rVert_{2}=0 ∥ P ^ − Y 1 − Y 2 ∥ 2 = ∥( P 1 + P 2 ) − P 1 − P 2 ∥ 2 = 0 , so P ^ = Y 1 + Y 2 \hat P=Y_{1}+Y_{2} P ^ = Y 1 + Y 2 ; and l a w ( X ^ , Y i ) = l a w ( X , P i ) \mathrm{law}(\hat X,Y_{i})=\mathrm{law}(X,P_{i}) law ( X ^ , Y i ) = law ( X , P i ) for i = 1 , 2 i=1,2 i = 1 , 2 (push-forward under the datum selecting the corresponding blocks, Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §push-forward ). By Step 0 applied to the second equality of laws: ∥ X ^ ′ − X ^ ∥ 2 = ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 < r \lVert\hat X'-\hat X\rVert_{2}=\lVert\tilde X'-\tilde X\rVert_{2}<r ∥ X ^ ′ − X ^ ∥ 2 = ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 < r , ⟨ P ^ , X ^ ′ − X ^ ⟩ 2 = ⟨ P ~ , X ~ ′ − X ~ ⟩ 2 \langle\hat P,\hat X'-\hat X\rangle_{2}=\langle\tilde P,\tilde X'-\tilde X\rangle_{2} ⟨ P ^ , X ^ ′ − X ^ ⟩ 2 = ⟨ P ~ , X ~ ′ − X ~ ⟩ 2 , and ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ^ ( X ^ ′ ) = ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ~ ( X ~ ′ ) (\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})_{\hat M}(\hat X')=(\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})_{\tilde M}(\tilde X') ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ^ ( X ^ ′ ) = ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ~ ( X ~ ′ ) .
Adding the inequalities. The triples ( X ^ , Y i , X ^ ′ ) (\hat X,Y_{i},\hat X') ( X ^ , Y i , X ^ ′ ) in ( H ^ , M ^ , Ω ^ ) (\hat H,\hat M,\hat\Omega) ( H ^ , M ^ , Ω ^ ) are admissible in the displayed inequality for i = 1 , 2 i=1,2 i = 1 , 2 , since l a w ( X ^ , Y i ) = l a w ( X , P i ) \mathrm{law}(\hat X,Y_{i})=\mathrm{law}(X,P_{i}) law ( X ^ , Y i ) = law ( X , P i ) and ∥ X ^ ′ − X ^ ∥ 2 < r ≤ r i \lVert\hat X'-\hat X\rVert_{2}<r\le r_{i} ∥ X ^ ′ − X ^ ∥ 2 < r ≤ r i . Adding the two resulting inequalities, and using the additivity of lifts, bilinearity of the pairing and Y 1 + Y 2 = P ^ Y_{1}+Y_{2}=\hat P Y 1 + Y 2 = P ^ ,
( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ^ ( X ^ ′ ) ≤ ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) + ⟨ P ^ , X ^ ′ − X ^ ⟩ 2 + ( δ 1 + δ 2 + η ) ∥ X ^ ′ − X ^ ∥ 2 . (\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})_{\hat M}(\hat X')\le(\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})(\lambda)+\langle\hat P,\hat X'-\hat X\rangle_{2}+(\delta_{1}+\delta_{2}+\eta)\lVert\hat X'-\hat X\rVert_{2}. ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ^ ( X ^ ′ ) ≤ ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) + ⟨ P ^ , X ^ ′ − X ^ ⟩ 2 + ( δ 1 + δ 2 + η ) ∥ X ^ ′ − X ^ ∥ 2 .
By the consequences of law invariance, each term equals its counterpart for ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) (\tilde X,\tilde P,\tilde X') ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) , so
( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ~ ( X ~ ′ ) ≤ ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) + ⟨ P ~ , X ~ ′ − X ~ ⟩ 2 + ( δ 1 + δ 2 + η ) ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 . (\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})_{\tilde M}(\tilde X')\le(\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})(\lambda)+\langle\tilde P,\tilde X'-\tilde X\rangle_{2}+(\delta_{1}+\delta_{2}+\eta)\lVert\tilde X'-\tilde X\rVert_{2}. ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ~ ( X ~ ′ ) ≤ ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) + ⟨ P ~ , X ~ ′ − X ~ ⟩ 2 + ( δ 1 + δ 2 + η ) ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 .
As η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 was arbitrary and r r r depends only on η \eta η , the plan l a w ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) \mathrm{law}(X,P_{1}+P_{2}) law ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) at λ \lambda λ (Step 1) is a plan superdifferential of φ 1 + φ 2 \varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2} φ 1 + φ 2 at λ \lambda λ with slack δ 1 + δ 2 \delta_{1}+\delta_{2} δ 1 + δ 2 in the sense of Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §super , that is, it lies in J δ 1 + δ 2 + ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) J^{+}_{\delta_{1}+\delta_{2}}(\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})(\lambda) J δ 1 + δ 2 + ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) by Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §superjet .
Step 3 (Claim 2, subjets). The argument of Step 2 applies verbatim with Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §sub and Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §subjet in place of Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §super and Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §superjet : the inequalities are reversed and the slack terms ( δ i + η / 2 ) ∥ A ′ − A ∥ 2 (\delta_{i}+\eta/2)\lVert A'-A\rVert_{2} ( δ i + η /2 ) ∥ A ′ − A ∥ 2 enter with a minus sign, so adding them gives
( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ~ ( X ~ ′ ) ≥ ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) + ⟨ P ~ , X ~ ′ − X ~ ⟩ 2 − ( δ 1 + δ 2 + η ) ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 (\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})_{\tilde M}(\tilde X')\ge(\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})(\lambda)+\langle\tilde P,\tilde X'-\tilde X\rangle_{2}-(\delta_{1}+\delta_{2}+\eta)\lVert\tilde X'-\tilde X\rVert_{2} ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) M ~ ( X ~ ′ ) ≥ ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) + ⟨ P ~ , X ~ ′ − X ~ ⟩ 2 − ( δ 1 + δ 2 + η ) ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2
for every admissible realisation ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) (\tilde X,\tilde P,\tilde X') ( X ~ , P ~ , X ~ ′ ) with ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 < r \lVert\tilde X'-\tilde X\rVert_{2}<r ∥ X ~ ′ − X ~ ∥ 2 < r . Hence l a w ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) ∈ J δ 1 + δ 2 − ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) \mathrm{law}(X,P_{1}+P_{2})\in J^{-}_{\delta_{1}+\delta_{2}}(\varphi_{1}+\varphi_{2})(\lambda) law ( X , P 1 + P 2 ) ∈ J δ 1 + δ 2 − ( φ 1 + φ 2 ) ( λ ) .