TheoremBase

Proof of A Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis is Separable

lemmalem:orthonormal-basis-separable-hilbert-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Β· 5,627 chars Β· 20 deps Β· depth 18 Reason: Proof of the new lemma that a real Hilbert space with an orthonormal basis is separable.

Countability of the set of rational combinations follows from countability of the tuple spaces and a countable union; density follows by first truncating the expansion of a vector and then approximating the finitely many coefficients by rationals, the error being controlled by a geometric series.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let [n][n] be the initial segment determined by nn, let e(n)e^{(n)} be the nn-tuple with components e1,…,ene_{1},\dots,e_{n}, and let DnD_{n} be the set of those z∈Hz\in H for which there is q∈Qnq\in\mathbb{Q}^{n} with z=βˆ‘k=1nqkekz=\sum_{k=1}^{n}q_{k}e_{k}, so that DD is the union of the sets DnD_{n} over n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. The tuple e(n)e^{(n)} is orthonormal, since its components are components of the orthonormal sequence (ek)k∈N(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and distinct indices in [n][n] are distinct in N\mathbb{N}.

Claim 1, countability. Fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By claim 3 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable the set Qn\mathbb{Q}^{n} is countable, and DnD_{n} is the set of values of the map Qnβ†’H\mathbb{Q}^{n}\to H sending qq to βˆ‘k=1nqkek\sum_{k=1}^{n}q_{k}e_{k}, so DnD_{n} is countable by claim 4 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets. Hence DD, the union of the countable sets DnD_{n} over n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, is countable by A Countable Union of Countable Sets is Countable.

Claim 1, density. Let x∈Hx\in H and let Ξ΅\varepsilon be a positive real number, and put ck=⟨x,ek⟩c_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle for k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space Β§expansion the series βˆ‘k=1∞ckek\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}e_{k} converges in HH with sum xx, so there is n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} such that the point w=βˆ‘k=1nckekw=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}e_{k} satisfies ∣xβˆ’w∣<Ξ΅2|x-w|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}.

For k∈[n]k\in[n] the real number (12)kΞ΅24\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k}\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4} is positive, so by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root there is a nonnegative real Ξ·k\eta_{k} with Ξ·k2=(12)kΞ΅24\eta_{k}^{2}=\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k}\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}; and Ξ·k\eta_{k} is positive, since Ξ·k=0\eta_{k}=0 would give Ξ·k2=0\eta_{k}^{2}=0 by claim 4 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, contrary to the positivity of that number. By claim 2 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers the set of rational qq with ∣ckβˆ’q∣<Ξ·k|c_{k}-q|<\eta_{k} is nonempty for each k∈[n]k\in[n], so, these being finitely many nonempty sets, there is q∈Qnq\in\mathbb{Q}^{n} with ∣ckβˆ’qk∣<Ξ·k|c_{k}-q_{k}|<\eta_{k} for every k∈[n]k\in[n]. Put v=βˆ‘k=1nqkekv=\sum_{k=1}^{n}q_{k}e_{k}, a point of DnD_{n} and hence of DD.

For k∈[n]k\in[n], claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives ∣ckβˆ’qk∣∈{ckβˆ’qk,qkβˆ’ck}|c_{k}-q_{k}|\in\{c_{k}-q_{k},q_{k}-c_{k}\} and 0β‰€βˆ£ckβˆ’qk∣0\le|c_{k}-q_{k}|, so in either case ∣ckβˆ’qk∣2=(ckβˆ’qk)2|c_{k}-q_{k}|^{2}=(c_{k}-q_{k})^{2}; by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field applied to 0β‰€βˆ£ckβˆ’qk∣<Ξ·k0\le|c_{k}-q_{k}|<\eta_{k},

(ckβˆ’qk)2<Ξ·k2=(12)kΞ΅24.(c_{k}-q_{k})^{2}<\eta_{k}^{2}=\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k}\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}.

Write Ξ²k=(12)kΞ΅24βˆ’(ckβˆ’qk)2\beta_{k}=\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k}\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}-(c_{k}-q_{k})^{2}, which is nonnegative for k∈[n]k\in[n] by the last display. By claim 2 of Properties of Finite Sums,

βˆ‘k=1n(12)kΞ΅24=βˆ‘k=1n(ckβˆ’qk)2+βˆ‘k=1nΞ²k,\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k}\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(c_{k}-q_{k})^{2}+\sum_{k=1}^{n}\beta_{k},

and the second sum on the right is nonnegative by claim 5 of that lemma, so claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives

βˆ‘k=1n(ckβˆ’qk)2β‰€βˆ‘k=1n(12)kΞ΅24=Ξ΅24βˆ‘k=1n(12)k,\sum_{k=1}^{n}(c_{k}-q_{k})^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k}\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}=\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k},

the last step by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums. The terms (12)k\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k} are nonnegative and, by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series Β§geometric with r=12r=\tfrac{1}{2}, the series βˆ‘k=1∞(12)k\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k} converges with sum 11; so Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series Β§dominates gives βˆ‘k=1n(12)k≀1\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)^{k}\le1, and multiplying by the nonnegative number Ξ΅24\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4} with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

βˆ‘k=1n(ckβˆ’qk)2≀Ρ24=(Ξ΅2)2.\sum_{k=1}^{n}(c_{k}-q_{k})^{2}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}=\Bigl(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\Bigr)^{2}.

Now, by claim 2 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors applied to the maps k↦(ckβˆ’qk)ekk\mapsto(c_{k}-q_{k})e_{k} and k↦qkekk\mapsto q_{k}e_{k} on [n][n], together with the distributive law of the vector space HH,

w=βˆ‘k=1nckek=βˆ‘k=1n((ckβˆ’qk)ek+qkek)=βˆ‘k=1n(ckβˆ’qk)ek+v,w=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}e_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl((c_{k}-q_{k})e_{k}+q_{k}e_{k}\bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(c_{k}-q_{k})e_{k}+v ,

so wβˆ’v=βˆ‘k=1n(ckβˆ’qk)ekw-v=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(c_{k}-q_{k})e_{k}, and Inner Products Against Finite Sums, and Orthonormal Families, in a Real Inner Product Space Β§norm, applied to the orthonormal tuple e(n)e^{(n)} and the coefficients ckβˆ’qkc_{k}-q_{k}, gives

∣wβˆ’v∣2=βˆ‘k=1n(ckβˆ’qk)2≀(Ξ΅2)2.|w-v|^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(c_{k}-q_{k})^{2}\le\Bigl(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\Bigr)^{2}.

Both ∣wβˆ’v∣|w-v| and Ξ΅2\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} are nonnegative, so ∣wβˆ’vβˆ£β‰€Ξ΅2|w-v|\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}: otherwise Ξ΅2<∣wβˆ’v∣\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}<|w-v| and claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field would give (Ξ΅2)2<∣wβˆ’v∣2\bigl(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\bigr)^{2}<|w-v|^{2}, contradicting the last display by trichotomy.

Since dd is a metric by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity Β§metric and d(y,z)=∣yβˆ’z∣d(y,z)=|y-z| for y,z∈Hy,z\in H, the triangle inequality and claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field give

d(x,v)≀d(x,w)+d(w,v)=∣xβˆ’w∣+∣wβˆ’v∣<Ξ΅2+Ξ΅2=Ξ΅.d(x,v)\le d(x,w)+d(w,v)=|x-w|+|w-v|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon .

Thus every open ball about xx meets DD, so xx lies in the closure of DD by Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls. As x∈Hx\in H was arbitrary, the closure of DD is HH, that is, DD is dense in HH.

Claim 2. By claim 1 the set DD is a countable dense subset of HH, which is exactly the condition for (H,d)(H,d) to be separable in the sense of Separable Metric Space.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…