TheoremBase

For two factors the functions are normalised by their seminorms and Young's inequality is integrated; the case of finitely many factors follows by induction, the remaining factors being collected into a single function whose seminorm is estimated by the rescaling identity.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement above.

We record three facts used repeatedly. First, for h∈L1h\in\mathcal{L}^{1} one has βˆ₯hβˆ₯1=∫X∣hβˆ£β€‰dΞΌ\lVert h\rVert_{1}=\int_{X}|h|\,d\mu, because (∣h(x)∣)1=∣h(x)∣(|h(x)|)^{1}=|h(x)| and t1=tt^{1}=t for nonnegative tt, by Properties of Real Powers (ii). Second, for nonnegative real numbers a1,…,ana_{1},\dots,a_{n} and a positive real cc,

(∏k=1nak)c=∏k=1nak c,\Bigl(\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\Bigr)^{c}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{\,c},

by induction on nn: for n=1n=1 both sides are a1ca_{1}^{c} by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Products, and the induction step follows from that same recursion together with Properties of Real Powers (iii). Third, and by the same induction using claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, the absolute value of a finite product of real numbers is the product of their absolute values.

Claim 1. The map fgfg is measurable by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps, and ∣fg∣=∣fβˆ£β€‰βˆ£g∣|fg|=|f|\,|g| pointwise by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Write A=βˆ₯fβˆ₯pA=\lVert f\rVert_{p} and B=βˆ₯gβˆ₯qB=\lVert g\rVert_{q}, nonnegative real numbers.

Suppose first that A=0A=0. By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (v) we have f=0f=0 almost everywhere, hence ∣fg∣=0|fg|=0 almost everywhere, so ∫X∣fgβˆ£β€‰dΞΌ=0\int_{X}|fg|\,d\mu=0 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iv). Thus fg∈L1fg\in\mathcal{L}^{1} and βˆ₯fgβˆ₯1=0≀AB\lVert fg\rVert_{1}=0\le AB, the product ABAB being nonnegative. The case B=0B=0 is identical.

Suppose now that 0<A0<A and 0<B0<B. Let FF and GG be the maps xβ†¦βˆ£f(x)∣/Ax\mapsto |f(x)|/A and xβ†¦βˆ£g(x)∣/Bx\mapsto |g(x)|/B; they are measurable and nonnegative. For every xx, Properties of Real Powers (iii) gives (F(x))p=(1/A)p(∣f(x)∣)p(F(x))^{p}=(1/A)^{p}(|f(x)|)^{p}, and (1/A)pAp=(Aβˆ’1A)p=1p(1/A)^{p}A^{p}=(A^{-1}A)^{p}=1^{p} by the same claim, while 1p=exp⁑(plog⁑1)=exp⁑(0)=11^{p}=\exp(p\log 1)=\exp(0)=1 by Real Powers (i), by log⁑1=0\log 1=0 in claim 2 of Real Powers Through the Exponential, and Elementary Asymptotic Tools: Monotonicity, Null Sequences of Negative Powers, Exponential Domination, Integer Rounding, and Square-Root and Exponential Inequalities and by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function; so (1/A)p=1/Ap(1/A)^{p}=1/A^{p}. Using the homogeneity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion and Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (i),

∫XFp dΞΌ=1Ap∫X∣f∣p dΞΌ=1Ap Ap=1,\int_{X}F^{p}\,d\mu=\frac{1}{A^{p}}\int_{X}|f|^{p}\,d\mu=\frac{1}{A^{p}}\,A^{p}=1 ,

and in the same way ∫XGq dΞΌ=1\int_{X}G^{q}\,d\mu=1.

By Conjugate Exponents and Young's Inequality (ii), applied at each xx to the nonnegative numbers F(x)F(x) and G(x)G(x),

F(x)G(x)≀(F(x))pp+(G(x))qq(x∈X).F(x)G(x)\le\frac{(F(x))^{p}}{p}+\frac{(G(x))^{q}}{q}\qquad(x\in X).

All the maps appearing here are measurable and nonnegative, so the monotonicity, additivity and homogeneity in claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion give

∫XFG dμ≀1p∫XFp dΞΌ+1q∫XGq dΞΌ=1p+1q=1.\int_{X}FG\,d\mu\le\frac{1}{p}\int_{X}F^{p}\,d\mu+\frac{1}{q}\int_{X}G^{q}\,d\mu=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1 .

Finally FGFG is the map x↦1AB∣f(x)βˆ£β€‰βˆ£g(x)∣=1AB∣(fg)(x)∣x\mapsto\frac{1}{AB}|f(x)|\,|g(x)|=\frac{1}{AB}|(fg)(x)|, so by homogeneity again ∫XFG dΞΌ=1AB∫X∣fgβˆ£β€‰dΞΌ\int_{X}FG\,d\mu=\frac{1}{AB}\int_{X}|fg|\,d\mu. Multiplying the previous display by the positive number ABAB gives ∫X∣fgβˆ£β€‰dμ≀AB\int_{X}|fg|\,d\mu\le AB; in particular this integral is finite, so fg∈L1fg\in\mathcal{L}^{1}, and βˆ₯fgβˆ₯1=∫X∣fgβˆ£β€‰dμ≀βˆ₯fβˆ₯pβˆ₯gβˆ₯q\lVert fg\rVert_{1}=\int_{X}|fg|\,d\mu\le\lVert f\rVert_{p}\lVert g\rVert_{q}.

Claim 2. We argue by induction on nn, the assertion for a given nn being understood as quantified over all admissible exponents and functions.

For n=1n=1 the hypothesis reads 1/p1=11/p_{1}=1, so p1=1p_{1}=1, and F=f1F=f_{1} by claim 1 of Properties of Finite Products. Hence F∈L1F\in\mathcal{L}^{1} and βˆ₯Fβˆ₯1=βˆ₯f1βˆ₯p1\lVert F\rVert_{1}=\lVert f_{1}\rVert_{p_{1}}, which is ∏k=11βˆ₯fkβˆ₯pk\prod_{k=1}^{1}\lVert f_{k}\rVert_{p_{k}} by the same claim.

Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} and assume the assertion for nn. Let exponents p1,…,pn+1p_{1},\dots,p_{n+1}, each at least 11, with βˆ‘k=1n+11/pk=1\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}1/p_{k}=1, and functions fk∈Lpkf_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{p_{k}} be given. Each summand 1/pk1/p_{k} is positive, and there are at least two of them, so each satisfies 1/pk<11/p_{k}<1 and hence 1<pk1<p_{k}. Define rr by

1r=βˆ‘k=1n1pk=1βˆ’1pn+1,\frac{1}{r}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{p_{k}}=1-\frac{1}{p_{n+1}} ,

which is positive and at most 11; thus 1≀r1\le r, and pn+1p_{n+1} and rr are conjugate exponents. Put h=∏k=1nfkh=\prod_{k=1}^{n}f_{k}, the pointwise finite product, which is measurable by claim 3 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps.

For each k∈[n]k\in[n] set sk=pk/rs_{k}=p_{k}/r. Then 1/pkβ‰€βˆ‘i=1n1/pi=1/r1/p_{k}\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}1/p_{i}=1/r, so r≀pkr\le p_{k} and 1≀sk1\le s_{k}; moreover βˆ‘k=1n1/sk=rβˆ‘k=1n1/pk=1\sum_{k=1}^{n}1/s_{k}=r\sum_{k=1}^{n}1/p_{k}=1. By Elementary Properties of the p-Seminorm (vi), applied with the exponents rr and sks_{k}, whose product is pkβ‰₯1p_{k}\ge 1, the map ∣fk∣r|f_{k}|^{r} lies in Lsk\mathcal{L}^{s_{k}} and

βˆ₯β€‰βˆ£fk∣r βˆ₯sk=(βˆ₯fkβˆ₯pk)r.\bigl\lVert\,|f_{k}|^{r}\,\bigr\rVert_{s_{k}}=\bigl(\lVert f_{k}\rVert_{p_{k}}\bigr)^{r}.

By the two elementary product identities recorded at the start, ∣h(x)∣r=(∏k=1n∣fk(x)∣)r=∏k=1n(∣fk(x)∣)r|h(x)|^{r}=\bigl(\prod_{k=1}^{n}|f_{k}(x)|\bigr)^{r}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(|f_{k}(x)|\bigr)^{r} for every xx, so the pointwise product of the nn functions ∣fk∣r|f_{k}|^{r} is ∣h∣r|h|^{r}. The inductive hypothesis, applied to these nn functions and the exponents sks_{k}, therefore gives ∣h∣r∈L1|h|^{r}\in\mathcal{L}^{1} and

∫X∣h∣r dΞΌβ‰€βˆk=1nβˆ₯β€‰βˆ£fk∣r βˆ₯sk=∏k=1n(βˆ₯fkβˆ₯pk)r.\int_{X}|h|^{r}\,d\mu\le\prod_{k=1}^{n}\bigl\lVert\,|f_{k}|^{r}\,\bigr\rVert_{s_{k}}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(\lVert f_{k}\rVert_{p_{k}}\bigr)^{r}.

In particular ∫X∣h∣r dΞΌ\int_{X}|h|^{r}\,d\mu is finite, so h∈Lrh\in\mathcal{L}^{r}, and applying Properties of Real Powers (v) with the positive exponent 1/r1/r and then the product identity and Properties of Real Powers (iv),

βˆ₯hβˆ₯r=(∫X∣h∣r dΞΌ)1/rβ‰€βˆk=1n((βˆ₯fkβˆ₯pk)r)1/r=∏k=1nβˆ₯fkβˆ₯pk.\lVert h\rVert_{r}=\Bigl(\int_{X}|h|^{r}\,d\mu\Bigr)^{1/r}\le\prod_{k=1}^{n}\Bigl(\bigl(\lVert f_{k}\rVert_{p_{k}}\bigr)^{r}\Bigr)^{1/r}=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\lVert f_{k}\rVert_{p_{k}} .

By the recursion in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Products, the pointwise product FF of f1,…,fn+1f_{1},\dots,f_{n+1} equals h fn+1h\,f_{n+1}. Applying claim 1 above to h∈Lrh\in\mathcal{L}^{r} and fn+1∈Lpn+1f_{n+1}\in\mathcal{L}^{p_{n+1}}, which carry conjugate exponents, gives F∈L1F\in\mathcal{L}^{1} and

βˆ₯Fβˆ₯1≀βˆ₯hβˆ₯r βˆ₯fn+1βˆ₯pn+1≀(∏k=1nβˆ₯fkβˆ₯pk)βˆ₯fn+1βˆ₯pn+1=∏k=1n+1βˆ₯fkβˆ₯pk,\lVert F\rVert_{1}\le\lVert h\rVert_{r}\,\lVert f_{n+1}\rVert_{p_{n+1}}\le\Bigl(\prod_{k=1}^{n}\lVert f_{k}\rVert_{p_{k}}\Bigr)\lVert f_{n+1}\rVert_{p_{n+1}}=\prod_{k=1}^{n+1}\lVert f_{k}\rVert_{p_{k}},

the last step again by the recursion in claim 1 of Properties of Finite Products, and the middle step being legitimate because βˆ₯fn+1βˆ₯pn+1\lVert f_{n+1}\rVert_{p_{n+1}} is nonnegative. This is the assertion for n+1n+1, and the induction is complete.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…