Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We write W W W for W a W_{a} W a , a metric on P ρ a \mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} P ρ a by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §metric , and recall ρ ∈ P ρ a \rho\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} ρ ∈ P ρ a (The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §reference ) and D Σ ⊆ D ⊆ P ρ a \mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} D Σ ⊆ D ⊆ P ρ a (Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair ). For n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N let ϵ n = 1 n \epsilon_{n}=\tfrac{1}{n} ϵ n = n 1 (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers ), so that 0 < ϵ n ≤ 1 0<\epsilon_{n}\le1 0 < ϵ n ≤ 1 ; the real sequences ( ϵ n ) n (\epsilon_{n})_{n} ( ϵ n ) n and ( ϵ n 2 ) n (\epsilon_{n}^{2})_{n} ( ϵ n 2 ) n converge to 0 0 0 by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences , and a real sequence ( t n ) n (t_{n})_{n} ( t n ) n with 0 ≤ t n < ϵ n 2 0\le t_{n}<\epsilon_{n}^{2} 0 ≤ t n < ϵ n 2 , or with 0 ≤ t n < ϵ n 0\le t_{n}<\epsilon_{n} 0 ≤ t n < ϵ n , for every n n n converges to 0 0 0 by Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences . Square roots are the nonnegative square roots of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root , and elementary real arithmetic and order are used through The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background . For σ ∈ P ( X ) \sigma\in\mathcal{P}(X) σ ∈ P ( X ) , L 2 ( σ ; X a ) L^{2}(\sigma;X^{a}) L 2 ( σ ; X a ) is a real Hilbert space (Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields ), whose zero element 0 σ 0_{\sigma} 0 σ has norm 0 0 0 . Throughout, δ \delta δ with 0 < δ < 1 0<\delta<1 0 < δ < 1 and the noise intrinsic test function φ \varphi φ on D \mathcal{D} D are those of the statement.
Step 0 (Common data). (a) By Basic Properties of a Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pair: Lower Bound, Lower Semicontinuity, Complete Sublevel Sets and Bounded Distances §bounded-below fix e 0 ∈ R e_{0}\in\mathbb{R} e 0 ∈ R with e 0 ≤ E ( σ ) e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\sigma) e 0 ≤ E ( σ ) for every σ ∈ D \sigma\in\mathcal{D} σ ∈ D ; by Basic Properties of a Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pair: Lower Bound, Lower Semicontinuity, Complete Sublevel Sets and Bounded Distances §lsc , E \mathcal{E} E is lower semicontinuous on D \mathcal{D} D relative to D \mathcal{D} D in ( P ρ a , W ) (\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W) ( P ρ a , W ) .
(b) By Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §nonempty fix ν 0 ∈ D Σ \nu_{0}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ν 0 ∈ D Σ , and let η 0 = ( ν 0 , 0 , 0 ν 0 ) \eta_{0}=(\nu_{0},0,0_{\nu_{0}}) η 0 = ( ν 0 , 0 , 0 ν 0 ) , the second entry the real 0 0 0 and the third the zero element of L 2 ( ν 0 ; X a ) L^{2}(\nu_{0};X^{a}) L 2 ( ν 0 ; X a ) . Then ( ν 0 , 0 ν 0 ) ∈ V a ( D Σ ) (\nu_{0},0_{\nu_{0}})\in\mathcal{V}^{a}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}) ( ν 0 , 0 ν 0 ) ∈ V a ( D Σ ) (The Bundle of Noise Fields over a Set of Measures, First-Order Equation Operators on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §bundle ), so η 0 \eta_{0} η 0 is a test datum for F F F and F δ − ( η 0 ) F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0}) F δ − ( η 0 ) and F δ + ( η 0 ) F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0}) F δ + ( η 0 ) are real numbers. As ∥ 0 ν 0 ∥ ν 0 = 0 \lVert0_{\nu_{0}}\rVert_{\nu_{0}}=0 ∥ 0 ν 0 ∥ ν 0 = 0 , η 0 \eta_{0} η 0 is R R R -bounded for every real R R R with R > W ( ν 0 , ρ ) + ∣ E ( ν 0 ) ∣ R>W(\nu_{0},\rho)+|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})| R > W ( ν 0 , ρ ) + ∣ E ( ν 0 ) ∣ .
(c) (Norms along a coupling.) Let ν , μ ∈ P ( X ) \nu,\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) ν , μ ∈ P ( X ) , π ∈ Π ( ν , μ ) \pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu) π ∈ Π ( ν , μ ) , q ∈ L 2 ( ν ; X a ) q\in L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) q ∈ L 2 ( ν ; X a ) and η ∈ L 2 ( μ ; X a ) \eta\in L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) η ∈ L 2 ( μ ; X a ) , and write Δ \Delta Δ for the discrepancy ∫ X × X ∣ q ( x ) − η ( y ) ∣ a 2 π ( d z ) \int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\eta(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz) ∫ X × X ∣ q ( x ) − η ( y ) ∣ a 2 π ( d z ) . By Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §discrepancy (with μ \mu μ as its fixed measure, and ν \nu ν , π \pi π , q q q , η \eta η ), Δ = ∥ q ∥ ν 2 − 2 K a ( q , η , π ) + ∥ η ∥ μ 2 \Delta=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}-2\,\mathcal{K}^{a}(q,\eta,\pi)+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2} Δ = ∥ q ∥ ν 2 − 2 K a ( q , η , π ) + ∥ η ∥ μ 2 , and by Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §cross-bound , K a ( q , η , π ) ≤ ∥ q ∥ ν ∥ η ∥ μ \mathcal{K}^{a}(q,\eta,\pi)\le\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu} K a ( q , η , π ) ≤ ∥ q ∥ ν ∥ η ∥ μ . Hence, with t = ∥ q ∥ ν − ∥ η ∥ μ t=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}-\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu} t = ∥ q ∥ ν − ∥ η ∥ μ , ∣ t ∣ 2 = t 2 = ∥ q ∥ ν 2 − 2 ∥ q ∥ ν ∥ η ∥ μ + ∥ η ∥ μ 2 ≤ Δ = ( Δ ) 2 |t|^{2}=t^{2}=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}-2\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\le\Delta=(\sqrt{\Delta})^{2} ∣ t ∣ 2 = t 2 = ∥ q ∥ ν 2 − 2 ∥ q ∥ ν ∥ η ∥ μ + ∥ η ∥ μ 2 ≤ Δ = ( Δ ) 2 , and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣ t ∣ ≤ Δ |t|\le\sqrt{\Delta} ∣ t ∣ ≤ Δ . Therefore
∥ q ∥ ν ≤ ( ∫ X × X ∣ q ( x ) − η ( y ) ∣ a 2 π ( d z ) ) 1 / 2 + ∥ η ∥ μ . ( 0.1 ) \lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\le\Bigl(\int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\eta(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz)\Bigr)^{1/2}+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}.\qquad(0.1) ∥ q ∥ ν ≤ ( ∫ X × X ∣ q ( x ) − η ( y ) ∣ a 2 π ( d z ) ) 1/2 + ∥ η ∥ μ . ( 0.1 )
(d) (Distances along a coupling of finite noise cost.) Let ν , μ ∈ P ρ a \nu,\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} ν , μ ∈ P ρ a and π ∈ Π a ( ν , μ ) \pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\mu) π ∈ Π a ( ν , μ ) . By The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance , the pair being noise-connected (The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected ), W ( ν , μ ) 2 ≤ I a ( π ) = ( I a ( π ) ) 2 W(\nu,\mu)^{2}\le I^{a}(\pi)=(\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)})^{2} W ( ν , μ ) 2 ≤ I a ( π ) = ( I a ( π ) ) 2 , so W ( ν , μ ) ≤ I a ( π ) W(\nu,\mu)\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)} W ( ν , μ ) ≤ I a ( π ) by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field ; and the triangle inequality The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §triangle gives
W ( ν , ρ ) ≤ W ( ν , μ ) + W ( μ , ρ ) ≤ I a ( π ) + W ( μ , ρ ) . ( 0.2 ) W(\nu,\rho)\le W(\nu,\mu)+W(\mu,\rho)\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}+W(\mu,\rho).\qquad(0.2) W ( ν , ρ ) ≤ W ( ν , μ ) + W ( μ , ρ ) ≤ I a ( π ) + W ( μ , ρ ) . ( 0.2 )
Step 1 (Clause subsolution: viscosity data). Let u u u and μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ be as in clause subsolution, and write r ^ = u δ − ( μ ^ ) \hat{r}=u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}) r ^ = u δ − ( μ ^ ) and g = ∇ φ ( μ ^ ) g=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) g = ∇ φ ( μ ^ ) , which lies in T μ ^ a ⊆ L 2 ( μ ^ ; X a ) T^{a}_{\hat{\mu}}\subseteq L^{2}(\hat{\mu};X^{a}) T μ ^ a ⊆ L 2 ( μ ^ ; X a ) by property (b) of noise intrinsic test functions . By Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §above with the positive weight δ 2 \tfrac{\delta}{2} 2 δ , fix C 1 ∈ R C_{1}\in\mathbb{R} C 1 ∈ R with u ( σ ) ≤ C 1 + δ 2 E ( σ ) u(\sigma)\le C_{1}+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\sigma) u ( σ ) ≤ C 1 + 2 δ E ( σ ) for every σ ∈ D \sigma\in\mathcal{D} σ ∈ D . Since E \mathcal{E} E is lower semicontinuous (Step 0(a)) and 0 ≤ δ 2 ≤ δ 0\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}\le\delta 0 ≤ 2 δ ≤ δ , Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §bound with C = C 1 C=C_{1} C = C 1 and η = δ 2 \eta=\tfrac{\delta}{2} η = 2 δ gives
u δ − ( σ ) ≤ C 1 − δ 2 E ( σ ) ( σ ∈ D ) . ( 1.1 ) u^{-}_{\delta}(\sigma)\le C_{1}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\sigma)\qquad(\sigma\in\mathcal{D}).\qquad(1.1) u δ − ( σ ) ≤ C 1 − 2 δ E ( σ ) ( σ ∈ D ) . ( 1.1 )
Let n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N . Since u u u is a viscosity subsolution and u δ − − φ u^{-}_{\delta}-\varphi u δ − − φ has a local maximum relative to D \mathcal{D} D at μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ , Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution with this δ \delta δ , φ \varphi φ , μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ and ε = ϵ n \varepsilon=\epsilon_{n} ε = ϵ n provides ν n ∈ D Σ \nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ν n ∈ D Σ , π n ∈ Π a ( ν n , μ ^ ) \pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) π n ∈ Π a ( ν n , μ ^ ) , s n ∈ R s_{n}\in\mathbb{R} s n ∈ R and q n ∈ L 2 ( ν n ; X a ) q_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu_{n};X^{a}) q n ∈ L 2 ( ν n ; X a ) with
I a ( π n ) < ϵ n 2 , ∣ u δ − ( ν n ) − r ^ ∣ < ϵ n , ∣ s n − r ^ ∣ < ϵ n , ∫ X × X ∣ q n ( x ) − g ( y ) ∣ a 2 π n ( d z ) < ϵ n 2 , F δ − ( ν n , s n , q n ) ≤ ϵ n ; I^{a}(\pi_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad\bigl|u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})-\hat{r}\bigr|<\epsilon_{n},\quad|s_{n}-\hat{r}|<\epsilon_{n},\quad\int_{X\times X}|q_{n}(x)-g(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi_{n}(dz)<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n})\le\epsilon_{n}; I a ( π n ) < ϵ n 2 , u δ − ( ν n ) − r ^ < ϵ n , ∣ s n − r ^ ∣ < ϵ n , ∫ X × X ∣ q n ( x ) − g ( y ) ∣ a 2 π n ( d z ) < ϵ n 2 , F δ − ( ν n , s n , q n ) ≤ ϵ n ;
by Axiom of Countable Choice we choose such data for every n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N . Put ξ n = ( ν n , s n , q n ) \xi_{n}=(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n}) ξ n = ( ν n , s n , q n ) , a test datum for F F F since ( ν n , q n ) ∈ V a ( D Σ ) (\nu_{n},q_{n})\in\mathcal{V}^{a}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}) ( ν n , q n ) ∈ V a ( D Σ ) .
Step 2 (Uniform bounds). Let n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N . By claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field , I a ( π n ) < ϵ n ≤ 1 \sqrt{I^{a}(\pi_{n})}<\epsilon_{n}\le1 I a ( π n ) < ϵ n ≤ 1 , and the discrepancy of q n q_{n} q n and g g g along π n \pi_{n} π n has square root below ϵ n ≤ 1 \epsilon_{n}\le1 ϵ n ≤ 1 . Since ν n , μ ^ ∈ P ρ a \nu_{n},\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} ν n , μ ^ ∈ P ρ a , (0.2) with π n \pi_{n} π n gives W ( ν n , ρ ) < W ( μ ^ , ρ ) + 1 W(\nu_{n},\rho)<W(\hat{\mu},\rho)+1 W ( ν n , ρ ) < W ( μ ^ , ρ ) + 1 ; since π n ∈ Π a ( ν n , μ ^ ) ⊆ Π ( ν n , μ ^ ) \pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu})\subseteq\Pi(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) π n ∈ Π a ( ν n , μ ^ ) ⊆ Π ( ν n , μ ^ ) (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings ), (0.1) with π n \pi_{n} π n gives ∥ q n ∥ ν n < ∥ g ∥ μ ^ + 1 \lVert q_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}<\lVert g\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+1 ∥ q n ∥ ν n < ∥ g ∥ μ ^ + 1 . Also ∣ s n ∣ < ∣ r ^ ∣ + 1 |s_{n}|<|\hat{r}|+1 ∣ s n ∣ < ∣ r ^ ∣ + 1 . For the penalty, ν n ∈ D Σ ⊆ D \nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D} ν n ∈ D Σ ⊆ D , so e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ) e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ) by Step 0(a), and r ^ − 1 < u δ − ( ν n ) ≤ C 1 − δ 2 E ( ν n ) \hat{r}-1<u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})\le C_{1}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) r ^ − 1 < u δ − ( ν n ) ≤ C 1 − 2 δ E ( ν n ) by Step 1 and (1.1); multiplying by the positive 2 δ − 1 2\delta^{-1} 2 δ − 1 , E ( ν n ) < 2 δ − 1 ( C 1 − r ^ + 1 ) \mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})<2\delta^{-1}(C_{1}-\hat{r}+1) E ( ν n ) < 2 δ − 1 ( C 1 − r ^ + 1 ) . With
A 1 = ∣ e 0 ∣ + 2 δ − 1 ( ∣ C 1 ∣ + ∣ r ^ ∣ + 1 ) + 1 A_{1}=|e_{0}|+2\delta^{-1}\bigl(|C_{1}|+|\hat{r}|+1\bigr)+1 A 1 = ∣ e 0 ∣ + 2 δ − 1 ( ∣ C 1 ∣ + ∣ r ^ ∣ + 1 ) + 1
we get − A 1 < e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ) < A 1 -A_{1}<e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})<A_{1} − A 1 < e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ) < A 1 , that is, ∣ E ( ν n ) ∣ < A 1 |\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})|<A_{1} ∣ E ( ν n ) ∣ < A 1 . None of these bounds depends on n n n .
Step 3 (Admissibility and the score bound). Let
R 1 = W ( μ ^ , ρ ) + ∥ g ∥ μ ^ + ∣ r ^ ∣ + A 1 + W ( ν 0 , ρ ) + ∣ E ( ν 0 ) ∣ + ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ + 3 , R_{1}=W(\hat{\mu},\rho)+\lVert g\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+|\hat{r}|+A_{1}+W(\nu_{0},\rho)+|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})|+|F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|+3, R 1 = W ( μ ^ , ρ ) + ∥ g ∥ μ ^ + ∣ r ^ ∣ + A 1 + W ( ν 0 , ρ ) + ∣ E ( ν 0 ) ∣ + ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ + 3 ,
a sum of nonnegative reals and 3 3 3 , hence positive, and exceeding each of the bounds of Step 2 as well as W ( ν 0 , ρ ) + ∣ E ( ν 0 ) ∣ W(\nu_{0},\rho)+|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})| W ( ν 0 , ρ ) + ∣ E ( ν 0 ) ∣ and 1 + ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ 1+|F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})| 1 + ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ . By Step 2 every ξ n \xi_{n} ξ n is R 1 R_{1} R 1 -bounded (Test Data for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §bounded ), and η 0 \eta_{0} η 0 is R 1 R_{1} R 1 -bounded by Step 0(b). Since F δ − ( ξ n ) ≤ ϵ n ≤ 1 F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})\le\epsilon_{n}\le1 F δ − ( ξ n ) ≤ ϵ n ≤ 1 ,
F δ − ( ξ n ) − F δ + ( η 0 ) ≤ 1 + ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ < R 1 , F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})\le1+|F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|<R_{1}, F δ − ( ξ n ) − F δ + ( η 0 ) ≤ 1 + ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ < R 1 ,
so ξ n ∈ S δ , R 1 − \xi_{n}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R_{1}} ξ n ∈ S δ , R 1 − , with η 0 \eta_{0} η 0 as the R 1 R_{1} R 1 -bounded datum required by Test Data for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §admissible . As 0 < δ < 1 0<\delta<1 0 < δ < 1 and 0 < R 1 0<R_{1} 0 < R 1 , the shift-coercivity condition (The Shift-Coercivity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §coercivity ) provides a score bound C ≥ 0 C\ge0 C ≥ 0 for F F F at ( δ , R 1 ) (\delta,R_{1}) ( δ , R 1 ) , so
∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ C ( n ∈ N ) . \lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le C\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}). ∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ C ( n ∈ N ) .
Step 4 (Closed score; μ ^ ∈ D Σ \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} μ ^ ∈ D Σ ). Since 0 ≤ I a ( π n ) < ϵ n 2 0\le I^{a}(\pi_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2} 0 ≤ I a ( π n ) < ϵ n 2 for every n n n , lim n → ∞ I a ( π n ) = 0 \lim_{n\to\infty}I^{a}(\pi_{n})=0 lim n → ∞ I a ( π n ) = 0 , so ( π n ) n (\pi_{n})_{n} ( π n ) n is a sequence of couplings of vanishing noise cost from the sequence ( ν n ) n (\nu_{n})_{n} ( ν n ) n in P ρ a \mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} P ρ a to μ ^ ∈ P ρ a \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} μ ^ ∈ P ρ a , where μ ^ ∈ D \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} μ ^ ∈ D . By Noise Penalty Pairs with Closed Score Along Noise Couplings §closed at the nonnegative level C C C , applied to the sequence ( ν n ) n (\nu_{n})_{n} ( ν n ) n in D Σ \mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} D Σ (Step 3), to μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ and to ( π n ) n (\pi_{n})_{n} ( π n ) n , we get μ ^ ∈ D Σ \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} μ ^ ∈ D Σ , the first assertion of clause subsolution, and that ( Σ ( ν n ) ) n (\Sigma(\nu_{n}))_{n} ( Σ ( ν n ) ) n converges weakly to Σ ( μ ^ ) \Sigma(\hat{\mu}) Σ ( μ ^ ) along ( π n ) n (\pi_{n})_{n} ( π n ) n .
Step 5 (Shift-semicontinuity; the inequality). As μ ^ ∈ D Σ \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} μ ^ ∈ D Σ and g ∈ L 2 ( μ ^ ; X a ) g\in L^{2}(\hat{\mu};X^{a}) g ∈ L 2 ( μ ^ ; X a ) , ξ = ( μ ^ , r ^ , g ) \xi=(\hat{\mu},\hat{r},g) ξ = ( μ ^ , r ^ , g ) is a test datum for F F F . Put R 2 = R 1 + C R_{2}=R_{1}+C R 2 = R 1 + C , positive. Every ξ n \xi_{n} ξ n is R 2 R_{2} R 2 -bounded (as R 1 ≤ R 2 R_{1}\le R_{2} R 1 ≤ R 2 ) and ∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ C ≤ R 2 \lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le C\le R_{2} ∥ Σ ( ν n ) ∥ ν n ≤ C ≤ R 2 . Further: π n ∈ Π a ( ν n , μ ^ ) \pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) π n ∈ Π a ( ν n , μ ^ ) and ( π n ) n (\pi_{n})_{n} ( π n ) n has vanishing noise cost (Step 4); ( q n ) n (q_{n})_{n} ( q n ) n converges strongly to g g g along ( π n ) n (\pi_{n})_{n} ( π n ) n , the discrepancies lying in [ 0 , ϵ n 2 ) [0,\epsilon_{n}^{2}) [ 0 , ϵ n 2 ) ; ( Σ ( ν n ) ) n (\Sigma(\nu_{n}))_{n} ( Σ ( ν n ) ) n converges weakly to Σ ( μ ^ ) \Sigma(\hat{\mu}) Σ ( μ ^ ) along ( π n ) n (\pi_{n})_{n} ( π n ) n (Step 4); and ( s n ) n (s_{n})_{n} ( s n ) n converges to r ^ \hat{r} r ^ since ∣ s n − r ^ ∣ < ϵ n |s_{n}-\hat{r}|<\epsilon_{n} ∣ s n − r ^ ∣ < ϵ n and ( ϵ n ) n (\epsilon_{n})_{n} ( ϵ n ) n converges to 0 0 0 , by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences . So ( ξ n ) n (\xi_{n})_{n} ( ξ n ) n converges to ξ \xi ξ along ( π n ) n (\pi_{n})_{n} ( π n ) n with score bounded by R 2 R_{2} R 2 . By the shift-semicontinuity condition (The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity ), F F F is shift-semicontinuous at ( δ , R 2 ) (\delta,R_{2}) ( δ , R 2 ) . Let ε \varepsilon ε be positive; by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is N ∈ N N\in\mathbb{N} N ∈ N with ϵ N < ε \epsilon_{N}<\varepsilon ϵ N < ε , and for n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N , ϵ n ≤ ϵ N \epsilon_{n}\le\epsilon_{N} ϵ n ≤ ϵ N , so F δ − ( ξ n ) ≤ ϵ n ≤ 0 + ε F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})\le\epsilon_{n}\le0+\varepsilon F δ − ( ξ n ) ≤ ϵ n ≤ 0 + ε . The first implication of The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §level with c = 0 c=0 c = 0 gives F δ − ( ξ ) ≤ 0 F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)\le0 F δ − ( ξ ) ≤ 0 , that is,
F δ − ( μ ^ , u δ − ( μ ^ ) , ∇ φ ( μ ^ ) ) ≤ 0. F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(\hat{\mu},\,u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}),\,\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})\bigr)\le0 . F δ − ( μ ^ , u δ − ( μ ^ ) , ∇ φ ( μ ^ ) ) ≤ 0.
Step 6 (Clause supersolution). Let v v v and ν ^ \hat{\nu} ν ^ be as in clause supersolution, and write r ^ ′ = v δ + ( ν ^ ) \hat{r}'=v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}) r ^ ′ = v δ + ( ν ^ ) and g ′ = ∇ φ ( ν ^ ) ∈ L 2 ( ν ^ ; X a ) g'=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu})\in L^{2}(\hat{\nu};X^{a}) g ′ = ∇ φ ( ν ^ ) ∈ L 2 ( ν ^ ; X a ) (property (b) of noise intrinsic test functions ). We repeat Steps 1 to 5 with the following changes.
(a) By Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §below with the weight δ 2 \tfrac{\delta}{2} 2 δ , fix C 2 ∈ R C_{2}\in\mathbb{R} C 2 ∈ R with − C 2 − δ 2 E ( σ ) ≤ v ( σ ) -C_{2}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\sigma)\le v(\sigma) − C 2 − 2 δ E ( σ ) ≤ v ( σ ) for σ ∈ D \sigma\in\mathcal{D} σ ∈ D ; the second part of Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §bound , with C = C 2 C=C_{2} C = C 2 , η = δ 2 \eta=\tfrac{\delta}{2} η = 2 δ and Step 0(a), gives − C 2 + δ 2 E ( σ ) ≤ v δ + ( σ ) -C_{2}+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\sigma)\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\sigma) − C 2 + 2 δ E ( σ ) ≤ v δ + ( σ ) for σ ∈ D \sigma\in\mathcal{D} σ ∈ D .
(b) As v v v is a viscosity supersolution and v δ + − φ v^{+}_{\delta}-\varphi v δ + − φ has a local minimum relative to D \mathcal{D} D at ν ^ \hat{\nu} ν ^ , Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §supersolution with ε = ϵ n \varepsilon=\epsilon_{n} ε = ϵ n , and Axiom of Countable Choice , give for every n ∈ N n\in\mathbb{N} n ∈ N data ν n ′ ∈ D Σ \nu'_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ν n ′ ∈ D Σ , π n ′ ∈ Π a ( ν n ′ , ν ^ ) \pi'_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu'_{n},\hat{\nu}) π n ′ ∈ Π a ( ν n ′ , ν ^ ) , t n ∈ R t_{n}\in\mathbb{R} t n ∈ R and q n ′ ∈ L 2 ( ν n ′ ; X a ) q'_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu'_{n};X^{a}) q n ′ ∈ L 2 ( ν n ′ ; X a ) satisfying the bounds of Step 1 with ν n , π n , s n , q n , u δ − , r ^ , g \nu_{n},\pi_{n},s_{n},q_{n},u^{-}_{\delta},\hat{r},g ν n , π n , s n , q n , u δ − , r ^ , g replaced by ν n ′ , π n ′ , t n , q n ′ , v δ + , r ^ ′ , g ′ \nu'_{n},\pi'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n},v^{+}_{\delta},\hat{r}',g' ν n ′ , π n ′ , t n , q n ′ , v δ + , r ^ ′ , g ′ , and − ϵ n ≤ F δ + ( ζ n ) -\epsilon_{n}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\zeta_{n}) − ϵ n ≤ F δ + ( ζ n ) for the test datum ζ n = ( ν n ′ , t n , q n ′ ) \zeta_{n}=(\nu'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n}) ζ n = ( ν n ′ , t n , q n ′ ) .
(c) The bounds of Step 2 hold in the same way, with W ( ν ^ , ρ ) W(\hat{\nu},\rho) W ( ν ^ , ρ ) and ∥ g ′ ∥ ν ^ \lVert g'\rVert_{\hat{\nu}} ∥ g ′ ∥ ν ^ in place of W ( μ ^ , ρ ) W(\hat{\mu},\rho) W ( μ ^ , ρ ) and ∥ g ∥ μ ^ \lVert g\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} ∥ g ∥ μ ^ , except that the penalty bound now reads: e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ′ ) e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n}) e 0 ≤ E ( ν n ′ ) , and − C 2 + δ 2 E ( ν n ′ ) ≤ v δ + ( ν n ′ ) < r ^ ′ + 1 -C_{2}+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n})<\hat{r}'+1 − C 2 + 2 δ E ( ν n ′ ) ≤ v δ + ( ν n ′ ) < r ^ ′ + 1 by (a), so E ( ν n ′ ) < 2 δ − 1 ( C 2 + r ^ ′ + 1 ) \mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})<2\delta^{-1}(C_{2}+\hat{r}'+1) E ( ν n ′ ) < 2 δ − 1 ( C 2 + r ^ ′ + 1 ) and ∣ E ( ν n ′ ) ∣ < A 2 = ∣ e 0 ∣ + 2 δ − 1 ( ∣ C 2 ∣ + ∣ r ^ ′ ∣ + 1 ) + 1 |\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})|<A_{2}=|e_{0}|+2\delta^{-1}(|C_{2}|+|\hat{r}'|+1)+1 ∣ E ( ν n ′ ) ∣ < A 2 = ∣ e 0 ∣ + 2 δ − 1 ( ∣ C 2 ∣ + ∣ r ^ ′ ∣ + 1 ) + 1 .
(d) With R 1 ′ R'_{1} R 1 ′ defined as R 1 R_{1} R 1 but from ν ^ \hat{\nu} ν ^ , g ′ g' g ′ , r ^ ′ \hat{r}' r ^ ′ , A 2 A_{2} A 2 and with ∣ F δ − ( η 0 ) ∣ |F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})| ∣ F δ − ( η 0 ) ∣ in place of ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ |F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})| ∣ F δ + ( η 0 ) ∣ , every ζ n \zeta_{n} ζ n and η 0 \eta_{0} η 0 are R 1 ′ R'_{1} R 1 ′ -bounded, and F δ − ( η 0 ) − F δ + ( ζ n ) ≤ ∣ F δ − ( η 0 ) ∣ + ϵ n < R 1 ′ F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\zeta_{n})\le|F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|+\epsilon_{n}<R'_{1} F δ − ( η 0 ) − F δ + ( ζ n ) ≤ ∣ F δ − ( η 0 ) ∣ + ϵ n < R 1 ′ ; so ζ n ∈ S δ , R 1 ′ + \zeta_{n}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R'_{1}} ζ n ∈ S δ , R 1 ′ + , with η 0 \eta_{0} η 0 as the R 1 ′ R'_{1} R 1 ′ -bounded datum required by Test Data for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §admissible . A score bound C ′ ≥ 0 C'\ge0 C ′ ≥ 0 for F F F at ( δ , R 1 ′ ) (\delta,R'_{1}) ( δ , R 1 ′ ) (The Shift-Coercivity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §coercivity ) applies to the elements of S δ , R 1 ′ + S^{+}_{\delta,R'_{1}} S δ , R 1 ′ + by The Shift-Coercivity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §bound , so ∥ Σ ( ν n ′ ) ∥ ν n ′ ≤ C ′ \lVert\Sigma(\nu'_{n})\rVert_{\nu'_{n}}\le C' ∥ Σ ( ν n ′ ) ∥ ν n ′ ≤ C ′ for every n n n .
(e) As in Step 4, Noise Penalty Pairs with Closed Score Along Noise Couplings §closed at the level C ′ C' C ′ gives ν ^ ∈ D Σ \hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ν ^ ∈ D Σ and the weak convergence of ( Σ ( ν n ′ ) ) n (\Sigma(\nu'_{n}))_{n} ( Σ ( ν n ′ ) ) n to Σ ( ν ^ ) \Sigma(\hat{\nu}) Σ ( ν ^ ) along ( π n ′ ) n (\pi'_{n})_{n} ( π n ′ ) n ; so ζ = ( ν ^ , r ^ ′ , g ′ ) \zeta=(\hat{\nu},\hat{r}',g') ζ = ( ν ^ , r ^ ′ , g ′ ) is a test datum and, as in Step 5, ( ζ n ) n (\zeta_{n})_{n} ( ζ n ) n converges to ζ \zeta ζ along ( π n ′ ) n (\pi'_{n})_{n} ( π n ′ ) n with score bounded by R 2 ′ = R 1 ′ + C ′ R'_{2}=R'_{1}+C' R 2 ′ = R 1 ′ + C ′ . For positive ε \varepsilon ε and N N N as in Step 5, 0 − ε ≤ − ϵ n ≤ F δ + ( ζ n ) 0-\varepsilon\le-\epsilon_{n}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\zeta_{n}) 0 − ε ≤ − ϵ n ≤ F δ + ( ζ n ) for n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N , and the second implication of The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §level at ( δ , R 2 ′ ) (\delta,R'_{2}) ( δ , R 2 ′ ) with c = 0 c=0 c = 0 gives
0 ≤ F δ + ( ν ^ , v δ + ( ν ^ ) , ∇ φ ( ν ^ ) ) . ■ 0\le F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(\hat{\nu},\,v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}),\,\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu})\bigr).\qquad\blacksquare 0 ≤ F δ + ( ν ^ , v δ + ( ν ^ ) , ∇ φ ( ν ^ ) ) . ■