TheoremBase

The viscosity definition supplies approximate data along couplings of vanishing noise cost; uniform bounds make them admissible, so shift-coercivity bounds their scores, closedness of the score puts the touching point in the score domain, and shift-semicontinuity passes the inequality to the limit.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We write WW for WaW_{a}, a metric on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §metric, and recall ρ∈Pρa\rho\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §reference) and DΣ⊆D⊆Pρa\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair). For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let ϵn=1n\epsilon_{n}=\tfrac{1}{n} (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers), so that 0<ϵn≤10<\epsilon_{n}\le1; the real sequences (ϵn)n(\epsilon_{n})_{n} and (ϵn2)n(\epsilon_{n}^{2})_{n} converge to 00 by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, and a real sequence (tn)n(t_{n})_{n} with 0≤tn<ϵn20\le t_{n}<\epsilon_{n}^{2}, or with 0≤tn<ϵn0\le t_{n}<\epsilon_{n}, for every nn converges to 00 by Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences. Square roots are the nonnegative square roots of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root, and elementary real arithmetic and order are used through The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background. For σ∈P(X)\sigma\in\mathcal{P}(X), L2(σ;Xa)L^{2}(\sigma;X^{a}) is a real Hilbert space (Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields), whose zero element 0σ0_{\sigma} has norm 00. Throughout, δ\delta with 0<δ<10<\delta<1 and the noise intrinsic test function φ\varphi on D\mathcal{D} are those of the statement.

Step 0 (Common data). (a) By Basic Properties of a Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pair: Lower Bound, Lower Semicontinuity, Complete Sublevel Sets and Bounded Distances §bounded-below fix e0∈Re_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with e0≤E(σ)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\sigma) for every σ∈D\sigma\in\mathcal{D}; by Basic Properties of a Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pair: Lower Bound, Lower Semicontinuity, Complete Sublevel Sets and Bounded Distances §lsc, E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D} in (Pρa,W)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W).

(b) By Noise Penalty Pairs on the Noise Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §nonempty fix ν0∈DΣ\nu_{0}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, and let η0=(ν0,0,0ν0)\eta_{0}=(\nu_{0},0,0_{\nu_{0}}), the second entry the real 00 and the third the zero element of L2(ν0;Xa)L^{2}(\nu_{0};X^{a}). Then (ν0,0ν0)∈Va(DΣ)(\nu_{0},0_{\nu_{0}})\in\mathcal{V}^{a}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}) (The Bundle of Noise Fields over a Set of Measures, First-Order Equation Operators on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §bundle), so η0\eta_{0} is a test datum for FF and Fδ−(η0)F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0}) and Fδ+(η0)F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0}) are real numbers. As ∥0ν0∥ν0=0\lVert0_{\nu_{0}}\rVert_{\nu_{0}}=0, η0\eta_{0} is RR-bounded for every real RR with R>W(ν0,ρ)+∣E(ν0)∣R>W(\nu_{0},\rho)+|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})|.

(c) (Norms along a coupling.) Let ν,μ∈P(X)\nu,\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X), π∈Π(ν,μ)\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\mu), q∈L2(ν;Xa)q\in L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) and η∈L2(μ;Xa)\eta\in L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}), and write Δ\Delta for the discrepancy ∫X×X∣q(x)−η(y)∣a2 π(dz)\int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\eta(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz). By Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §discrepancy (with μ\mu as its fixed measure, and ν\nu, π\pi, qq, η\eta), Δ=∥q∥ν2−2 Ka(q,η,π)+∥η∥μ2\Delta=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}-2\,\mathcal{K}^{a}(q,\eta,\pi)+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}, and by Noise Displacement and Cross Pairings Along Couplings: Bounds, Linearity, Displacement Couplings, Polarisation and a Vanishing Criterion §cross-bound, Ka(q,η,π)≤∥q∥ν∥η∥μ\mathcal{K}^{a}(q,\eta,\pi)\le\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}. Hence, with t=∥q∥ν−∥η∥μt=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}-\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}, ∣t∣2=t2=∥q∥ν2−2∥q∥ν∥η∥μ+∥η∥μ2≤Δ=(Δ)2|t|^{2}=t^{2}=\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}-2\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\le\Delta=(\sqrt{\Delta})^{2}, and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣t∣≤Δ|t|\le\sqrt{\Delta}. Therefore

∥q∥ν≤(∫X×X∣q(x)−η(y)∣a2 π(dz))1/2+∥η∥μ.(0.1)\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}\le\Bigl(\int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\eta(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz)\Bigr)^{1/2}+\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}.\qquad(0.1)

(d) (Distances along a coupling of finite noise cost.) Let ν,μ∈Pρa\nu,\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and π∈Πa(ν,μ)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\mu). By The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance, the pair being noise-connected (The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected), W(ν,μ)2≤Ia(π)=(Ia(π))2W(\nu,\mu)^{2}\le I^{a}(\pi)=(\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)})^{2}, so W(ν,μ)≤Ia(π)W(\nu,\mu)\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; and the triangle inequality The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §triangle gives

W(ν,ρ)≤W(ν,μ)+W(μ,ρ)≤Ia(π)+W(μ,ρ).(0.2)W(\nu,\rho)\le W(\nu,\mu)+W(\mu,\rho)\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}+W(\mu,\rho).\qquad(0.2)

Step 1 (Clause subsolution: viscosity data). Let uu and μ^\hat{\mu} be as in clause subsolution, and write r^=uδ−(μ^)\hat{r}=u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}) and g=∇φ(μ^)g=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}), which lies in Tμ^a⊆L2(μ^;Xa)T^{a}_{\hat{\mu}}\subseteq L^{2}(\hat{\mu};X^{a}) by property (b) of noise intrinsic test functions. By Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §above with the positive weight δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2}, fix C1∈RC_{1}\in\mathbb{R} with u(σ)≤C1+δ2 E(σ)u(\sigma)\le C_{1}+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\sigma) for every σ∈D\sigma\in\mathcal{D}. Since E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous (Step 0(a)) and 0≤δ2≤δ0\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}\le\delta, Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §bound with C=C1C=C_{1} and η=δ2\eta=\tfrac{\delta}{2} gives

uδ−(σ)≤C1−δ2 E(σ)(σ∈D).(1.1)u^{-}_{\delta}(\sigma)\le C_{1}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\sigma)\qquad(\sigma\in\mathcal{D}).\qquad(1.1)

Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Since uu is a viscosity subsolution and uδ−−φu^{-}_{\delta}-\varphi has a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D} at μ^\hat{\mu}, Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution with this δ\delta, φ\varphi, μ^\hat{\mu} and ε=ϵn\varepsilon=\epsilon_{n} provides νn∈DΣ\nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, πn∈Πa(νn,μ^)\pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}), sn∈Rs_{n}\in\mathbb{R} and qn∈L2(νn;Xa)q_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu_{n};X^{a}) with

Ia(πn)<ϵn2,∣uδ−(νn)−r^∣<ϵn,∣sn−r^∣<ϵn,∫X×X∣qn(x)−g(y)∣a2 πn(dz)<ϵn2,Fδ−(νn,sn,qn)≤ϵn;I^{a}(\pi_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad\bigl|u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})-\hat{r}\bigr|<\epsilon_{n},\quad|s_{n}-\hat{r}|<\epsilon_{n},\quad\int_{X\times X}|q_{n}(x)-g(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi_{n}(dz)<\epsilon_{n}^{2},\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n})\le\epsilon_{n};

by Axiom of Countable Choice we choose such data for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Put ξn=(νn,sn,qn)\xi_{n}=(\nu_{n},s_{n},q_{n}), a test datum for FF since (νn,qn)∈Va(DΣ)(\nu_{n},q_{n})\in\mathcal{V}^{a}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}).

Step 2 (Uniform bounds). Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, Ia(πn)<ϵn≤1\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi_{n})}<\epsilon_{n}\le1, and the discrepancy of qnq_{n} and gg along πn\pi_{n} has square root below ϵn≤1\epsilon_{n}\le1. Since νn,μ^∈Pρa\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, (0.2) with πn\pi_{n} gives W(νn,ρ)<W(μ^,ρ)+1W(\nu_{n},\rho)<W(\hat{\mu},\rho)+1; since πn∈Πa(νn,μ^)⊆Π(νn,μ^)\pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu})\subseteq\Pi(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings), (0.1) with πn\pi_{n} gives ∥qn∥νn<∥g∥μ^+1\lVert q_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}<\lVert g\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+1. Also ∣sn∣<∣r^∣+1|s_{n}|<|\hat{r}|+1. For the penalty, νn∈DΣ⊆D\nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}\subseteq\mathcal{D}, so e0≤E(νn)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) by Step 0(a), and r^−1<uδ−(νn)≤C1−δ2E(νn)\hat{r}-1<u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{n})\le C_{1}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) by Step 1 and (1.1); multiplying by the positive 2δ−12\delta^{-1}, E(νn)<2δ−1(C1−r^+1)\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})<2\delta^{-1}(C_{1}-\hat{r}+1). With

A1=∣e0∣+2δ−1(∣C1∣+∣r^∣+1)+1A_{1}=|e_{0}|+2\delta^{-1}\bigl(|C_{1}|+|\hat{r}|+1\bigr)+1

we get −A1<e0≤E(νn)<A1-A_{1}<e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})<A_{1}, that is, ∣E(νn)∣<A1|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})|<A_{1}. None of these bounds depends on nn.

Step 3 (Admissibility and the score bound). Let

R1=W(μ^,ρ)+∥g∥μ^+∣r^∣+A1+W(ν0,ρ)+∣E(ν0)∣+∣Fδ+(η0)∣+3,R_{1}=W(\hat{\mu},\rho)+\lVert g\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+|\hat{r}|+A_{1}+W(\nu_{0},\rho)+|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})|+|F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|+3,

a sum of nonnegative reals and 33, hence positive, and exceeding each of the bounds of Step 2 as well as W(ν0,ρ)+∣E(ν0)∣W(\nu_{0},\rho)+|\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})| and 1+∣Fδ+(η0)∣1+|F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|. By Step 2 every ξn\xi_{n} is R1R_{1}-bounded (Test Data for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §bounded), and η0\eta_{0} is R1R_{1}-bounded by Step 0(b). Since Fδ−(ξn)≤ϵn≤1F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})\le\epsilon_{n}\le1,

Fδ−(ξn)−Fδ+(η0)≤1+∣Fδ+(η0)∣<R1,F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})\le1+|F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|<R_{1},

so ξn∈Sδ,R1−\xi_{n}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R_{1}}, with η0\eta_{0} as the R1R_{1}-bounded datum required by Test Data for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §admissible. As 0<δ<10<\delta<1 and 0<R10<R_{1}, the shift-coercivity condition (The Shift-Coercivity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §coercivity) provides a score bound C≥0C\ge0 for FF at (δ,R1)(\delta,R_{1}), so

∥Σ(νn)∥νn≤C(n∈N).\lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le C\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}).

Step 4 (Closed score; μ^∈DΣ\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}). Since 0≤Ia(πn)<ϵn20\le I^{a}(\pi_{n})<\epsilon_{n}^{2} for every nn, lim⁡n→∞Ia(πn)=0\lim_{n\to\infty}I^{a}(\pi_{n})=0, so (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n} is a sequence of couplings of vanishing noise cost from the sequence (νn)n(\nu_{n})_{n} in Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} to μ^∈Pρa\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, where μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}. By Noise Penalty Pairs with Closed Score Along Noise Couplings §closed at the nonnegative level CC, applied to the sequence (νn)n(\nu_{n})_{n} in DΣ\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} (Step 3), to μ^\hat{\mu} and to (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n}, we get μ^∈DΣ\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, the first assertion of clause subsolution, and that (Σ(νn))n(\Sigma(\nu_{n}))_{n} converges weakly to Σ(μ^)\Sigma(\hat{\mu}) along (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n}.

Step 5 (Shift-semicontinuity; the inequality). As μ^∈DΣ\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and g∈L2(μ^;Xa)g\in L^{2}(\hat{\mu};X^{a}), ξ=(μ^,r^,g)\xi=(\hat{\mu},\hat{r},g) is a test datum for FF. Put R2=R1+CR_{2}=R_{1}+C, positive. Every ξn\xi_{n} is R2R_{2}-bounded (as R1≤R2R_{1}\le R_{2}) and ∥Σ(νn)∥νn≤C≤R2\lVert\Sigma(\nu_{n})\rVert_{\nu_{n}}\le C\le R_{2}. Further: πn∈Πa(νn,μ^)\pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) and (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n} has vanishing noise cost (Step 4); (qn)n(q_{n})_{n} converges strongly to gg along (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n}, the discrepancies lying in [0,ϵn2)[0,\epsilon_{n}^{2}); (Σ(νn))n(\Sigma(\nu_{n}))_{n} converges weakly to Σ(μ^)\Sigma(\hat{\mu}) along (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n} (Step 4); and (sn)n(s_{n})_{n} converges to r^\hat{r} since ∣sn−r^∣<ϵn|s_{n}-\hat{r}|<\epsilon_{n} and (ϵn)n(\epsilon_{n})_{n} converges to 00, by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences. So (ξn)n(\xi_{n})_{n} converges to ξ\xi along (πn)n(\pi_{n})_{n} with score bounded by R2R_{2}. By the shift-semicontinuity condition (The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity), FF is shift-semicontinuous at (δ,R2)(\delta,R_{2}). Let ε\varepsilon be positive; by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ϵN<ε\epsilon_{N}<\varepsilon, and for n≥Nn\ge N, ϵn≤ϵN\epsilon_{n}\le\epsilon_{N}, so Fδ−(ξn)≤ϵn≤0+εF^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{n})\le\epsilon_{n}\le0+\varepsilon. The first implication of The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §level with c=0c=0 gives Fδ−(ξ)≤0F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)\le0, that is,

Fδ−(μ^, uδ−(μ^), ∇φ(μ^))≤0.F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(\hat{\mu},\,u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu}),\,\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})\bigr)\le0 .

Step 6 (Clause supersolution). Let vv and ν^\hat{\nu} be as in clause supersolution, and write r^′=vδ+(ν^)\hat{r}'=v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}) and g′=∇φ(ν^)∈L2(ν^;Xa)g'=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu})\in L^{2}(\hat{\nu};X^{a}) (property (b) of noise intrinsic test functions). We repeat Steps 1 to 5 with the following changes.

(a) By Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §below with the weight δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2}, fix C2∈RC_{2}\in\mathbb{R} with −C2−δ2E(σ)≤v(σ)-C_{2}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\sigma)\le v(\sigma) for σ∈D\sigma\in\mathcal{D}; the second part of Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §bound, with C=C2C=C_{2}, η=δ2\eta=\tfrac{\delta}{2} and Step 0(a), gives −C2+δ2E(σ)≤vδ+(σ)-C_{2}+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\sigma)\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\sigma) for σ∈D\sigma\in\mathcal{D}.

(b) As vv is a viscosity supersolution and vδ+−φv^{+}_{\delta}-\varphi has a local minimum relative to D\mathcal{D} at ν^\hat{\nu}, Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §supersolution with ε=ϵn\varepsilon=\epsilon_{n}, and Axiom of Countable Choice, give for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} data νn′∈DΣ\nu'_{n}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, πn′∈Πa(νn′,ν^)\pi'_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu'_{n},\hat{\nu}), tn∈Rt_{n}\in\mathbb{R} and qn′∈L2(νn′;Xa)q'_{n}\in L^{2}(\nu'_{n};X^{a}) satisfying the bounds of Step 1 with νn,πn,sn,qn,uδ−,r^,g\nu_{n},\pi_{n},s_{n},q_{n},u^{-}_{\delta},\hat{r},g replaced by νn′,πn′,tn,qn′,vδ+,r^′,g′\nu'_{n},\pi'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n},v^{+}_{\delta},\hat{r}',g', and −ϵn≤Fδ+(ζn)-\epsilon_{n}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\zeta_{n}) for the test datum ζn=(νn′,tn,qn′)\zeta_{n}=(\nu'_{n},t_{n},q'_{n}).

(c) The bounds of Step 2 hold in the same way, with W(ν^,ρ)W(\hat{\nu},\rho) and ∥g′∥ν^\lVert g'\rVert_{\hat{\nu}} in place of W(μ^,ρ)W(\hat{\mu},\rho) and ∥g∥μ^\lVert g\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}, except that the penalty bound now reads: e0≤E(νn′)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n}), and −C2+δ2E(νn′)≤vδ+(νn′)<r^′+1-C_{2}+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\nu'_{n})<\hat{r}'+1 by (a), so E(νn′)<2δ−1(C2+r^′+1)\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})<2\delta^{-1}(C_{2}+\hat{r}'+1) and ∣E(νn′)∣<A2=∣e0∣+2δ−1(∣C2∣+∣r^′∣+1)+1|\mathcal{E}(\nu'_{n})|<A_{2}=|e_{0}|+2\delta^{-1}(|C_{2}|+|\hat{r}'|+1)+1.

(d) With R1′R'_{1} defined as R1R_{1} but from ν^\hat{\nu}, g′g', r^′\hat{r}', A2A_{2} and with ∣Fδ−(η0)∣|F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})| in place of ∣Fδ+(η0)∣|F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|, every ζn\zeta_{n} and η0\eta_{0} are R1′R'_{1}-bounded, and Fδ−(η0)−Fδ+(ζn)≤∣Fδ−(η0)∣+ϵn<R1′F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\zeta_{n})\le|F^{-}_{\delta}(\eta_{0})|+\epsilon_{n}<R'_{1}; so ζn∈Sδ,R1′+\zeta_{n}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R'_{1}}, with η0\eta_{0} as the R1′R'_{1}-bounded datum required by Test Data for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §admissible. A score bound C′≥0C'\ge0 for FF at (δ,R1′)(\delta,R'_{1}) (The Shift-Coercivity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §coercivity) applies to the elements of Sδ,R1′+S^{+}_{\delta,R'_{1}} by The Shift-Coercivity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §bound, so ∥Σ(νn′)∥νn′≤C′\lVert\Sigma(\nu'_{n})\rVert_{\nu'_{n}}\le C' for every nn.

(e) As in Step 4, Noise Penalty Pairs with Closed Score Along Noise Couplings §closed at the level C′C' gives ν^∈DΣ\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} and the weak convergence of (Σ(νn′))n(\Sigma(\nu'_{n}))_{n} to Σ(ν^)\Sigma(\hat{\nu}) along (πn′)n(\pi'_{n})_{n}; so ζ=(ν^,r^′,g′)\zeta=(\hat{\nu},\hat{r}',g') is a test datum and, as in Step 5, (ζn)n(\zeta_{n})_{n} converges to ζ\zeta along (πn′)n(\pi'_{n})_{n} with score bounded by R2′=R1′+C′R'_{2}=R'_{1}+C'. For positive ε\varepsilon and NN as in Step 5, 0−ε≤−ϵn≤Fδ+(ζn)0-\varepsilon\le-\epsilon_{n}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(\zeta_{n}) for n≥Nn\ge N, and the second implication of The Shift-Semicontinuity Condition for a First-Order Equation Operator on the Noise Wasserstein Space §level at (δ,R2′)(\delta,R'_{2}) with c=0c=0 gives

0≤Fδ+(ν^, vδ+(ν^), ∇φ(ν^)).■0\le F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(\hat{\nu},\,v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}),\,\nabla\varphi(\hat{\nu})\bigr).\qquad\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…