TheoremBase

Exponent laws and the product rule come from the splitting and termwise rules for iterated products, factorisation from telescoping, and the order clauses from inductions using the ordered-ring axioms; monotonicity in the exponent writes n = m + d and compares xdx^d with 1, and Bernoulli's inequality is proved by induction.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied to the data indicated where it is cited.

In the commutative ring RR, multiplication is associative and commutative by the ring laws, and 11 is a neutral element of it, since x⋅1=x=1⋅xx\cdot1=x=1\cdot x (unique by A Binary Operation Has at Most One Neutral Element §unique, so it is the 11 of Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero §zero). Inductions below run over the set of those n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} for which the claim holds, and conclude by induction from 11 on N\mathbb{N}, The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §induction; an element of N0\mathbb{N}_{0} is 00 or lies in N\mathbb{N} by The Natural Numbers with Zero and Their Embedding into the Integers §naturals.

Preliminaries. (R) For x∈Rx\in R and n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, xn+1=xnxx^{n+1}=x^{n}x. For n≥1n\ge1 this is Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §recursion for the constant map k↦xk\mapsto x on [n+1][n+1], together with Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero §power. For n=0n=0, the same clause gives x1=∏k=11x=x=1⋅x=x0xx^{1}=\prod_{k=1}^{1}x=x=1\cdot x=x^{0}x by Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero §zero.

For u,v,w∈Ru,v,w\in R the ring laws give the following. (Z) u⋅0=0u\cdot0=0: indeed u⋅0=u⋅(0+0)=u⋅0+u⋅0u\cdot0=u\cdot(0+0)=u\cdot0+u\cdot0, and adding −(u⋅0)-(u\cdot0) gives 0=u⋅00=u\cdot0. (N) (−u)v=−(uv)(-u)v=-(uv), by the uniqueness in Additive and Multiplicative Inverses Are Unique §negative, since uv+(−u)v=(u+(−u))v=0⋅v=v⋅0=0uv+(-u)v=(u+(-u))v=0\cdot v=v\cdot0=0 by commutativity and (Z). Hence (u−v)w=uw−vw(u-v)w=uw-vw. (D) −(u−v)=v−u-(u-v)=v-u, by the same uniqueness, since (u−v)+(v−u)=0(u-v)+(v-u)=0.

Exponents. If m=0m=0 or n=0n=0, then xm+n=xmxnx^{m+n}=x^{m}x^{n} because x0=1x^{0}=1 and 0+n=n0+n=n, m+0=mm+0=m (Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero). If m,n≥1m,n\ge1, it is Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §splitting for the constant map k↦xk\mapsto x on [m+n][m+n]. For the second law, if n=0n=0, then (xm)0=1=x0=xm⋅0(x^{m})^{0}=1=x^{0}=x^{m\cdot0} by Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero. For n≥1n\ge1 we induct on nn: (xm)1=xm=xm⋅1(x^{m})^{1}=x^{m}=x^{m\cdot1} by (R) and Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §one, and if (xm)n=xmn(x^{m})^{n}=x^{mn}, then (R), the induction hypothesis, the first law and Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §successor give

(xm)n+1=(xm)nxm=xmnxm=xmn+m=xm(n+1).(x^{m})^{n+1}=(x^{m})^{n}x^{m}=x^{mn}x^{m}=x^{mn+m}=x^{m(n+1)}.

Product. For n=0n=0, (xy)0=1=1⋅1=x0y0(xy)^{0}=1=1\cdot1=x^{0}y^{0}. For n≥1n\ge1, the identity (xy)n=xnyn(xy)^{n}=x^{n}y^{n} is Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §termwise for the constant maps k↦xk\mapsto x and k↦yk\mapsto y on [n][n]. Next, x1=xx^{1}=x by (R). For 1n=11^{n}=1: 10=11^{0}=1, and 1n+1=1n⋅1=1n1^{n+1}=1^{n}\cdot1=1^{n} by (R), so 1n=11^{n}=1 for all n≥1n\ge1 by induction from 11=11^{1}=1. Finally, if n≥1n\ge1, write n=p+1n=p+1 with p∈N0p\in\mathbb{N}_{0} (p=0p=0 if n=1n=1, and otherwise by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §predecessor). Then 0n=0p⋅0=00^{n}=0^{p}\cdot0=0 by (R) and (Z).

Factorisation. Let n≥1n\ge1. All differences of exponents below are differences in N0\mathbb{N}_{0}, and each identity between them is checked from that definition, which characterises q−pq-p for p≤qp\le q as the unique j∈N0j\in\mathbb{N}_{0} with p+j=qp+j=q, using the laws of Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §associative, Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §commutative and Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero. For k∈[n+1]k\in[n+1] we have 1≤k≤n+11\le k\le n+1 by Intervals of Natural Numbers: Initial Segments, Adding One Element, Splitting and Shifting §segment, 11 being the least natural number, so k−1k-1 and (n+1)−k(n+1)-k are defined; put dk=xk−1y(n+1)−kd_{k}=x^{k-1}y^{(n+1)-k}. Let k∈[n]k\in[n], so 1≤k≤n1\le k\le n, and k−1k-1 and n−kn-k are defined. Then (k−1)+1=k(k-1)+1=k, since 1+((k−1)+1)=(1+(k−1))+1=k+11+\big((k-1)+1\big)=\big(1+(k-1)\big)+1=k+1 and the difference is unique, and in the same way (n−k)+1=(n+1)−k(n-k)+1=(n+1)-k, (k+1)−1=k(k+1)-1=k and (n+1)−(k+1)=n−k(n+1)-(k+1)=n-k, the last because (k+1)+(n−k)=(k+(n−k))+1=n+1(k+1)+(n-k)=\big(k+(n-k)\big)+1=n+1. Hence dk+1=xkyn−kd_{k+1}=x^{k}y^{n-k}, and by (R), xk−1x=xkx^{k-1}x=x^{k} and yn−ky=y(n+1)−ky^{n-k}y=y^{(n+1)-k}. So (R), commutativity and (N) give

(x−y) xk−1yn−k=xkyn−k−xk−1y(n+1)−k=dk+1−dk.(x-y)\,x^{k-1}y^{n-k}=x^{k}y^{n-k}-x^{k-1}y^{(n+1)-k}=d_{k+1}-d_{k}.

Finally (n+1)−1=n(n+1)-1=n, (n+1)−(n+1)=0(n+1)-(n+1)=0 and 1−1=01-1=0, since 1+n=n+11+n=n+1 and p+0=pp+0=p, so dn+1=xny0d_{n+1}=x^{n}y^{0} and d1=x0ynd_{1}=x^{0}y^{n}. Hence Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §distributive and Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §telescoping give

(x−y)∑k=1nxk−1yn−k=∑k=1n(dk+1−dk)=dn+1−d1=xny0−x0yn=xn−yn.(x-y)\sum_{k=1}^{n}x^{k-1}y^{n-k}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(d_{k+1}-d_{k})=d_{n+1}-d_{1}=x^{n}y^{0}-x^{0}y^{n}=x^{n}-y^{n}.

Reciprocal. A field is a commutative ring, so the clauses above apply to FF. If x≠0x\neq0, then the product clause gives xn(x−1)n=(x x−1)n=1n=1x^{n}(x^{-1})^{n}=(x\,x^{-1})^{n}=1^{n}=1. As 0⋅z=z⋅0=00\cdot z=z\cdot0=0 by (Z) and 0≠10\neq1 by Fields §field for every z∈Fz\in F, this forces xn≠0x^{n}\neq0, and then (xn)−1=(x−1)n(x^{n})^{-1}=(x^{-1})^{n} by the uniqueness in Additive and Multiplicative Inverses Are Unique §reciprocal.

Geometric. Let x≠1x\neq1 and n≥1n\ge1. The factorisation clause with 11 in place of yy, together with 1n=11^{n}=1 and 1n−k=11^{n-k}=1 from the product clause, gives xn−1=(x−1)Sx^{n}-1=(x-1)S for S=∑k=1nxk−1S=\sum_{k=1}^{n}x^{k-1}. By (D) and (N), 1−xn=−((x−1)S)=(−(x−1))S=(1−x)S1-x^{n}=-\big((x-1)S\big)=\big(-(x-1)\big)S=(1-x)S. Moreover 1−x≠01-x\neq0, since otherwise 1=(1−x)+x=x1=(1-x)+x=x. Hence

S=S(1−x)(1−x)−1=(1−xn)(1−x)−1=1−xn1−x.S=S(1-x)(1-x)^{-1}=(1-x^{n})(1-x)^{-1}=\frac{1-x^{n}}{1-x}.

From now on FF is an ordered field, so the clauses above and the rules of Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field apply.

Sign. Let x≥0x\ge0. Then x0=1>0x^{0}=1>0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares, and x1=x≥0x^{1}=x\ge0. If xn≥0x^{n}\ge0, then xn+1=xnx≥0x^{n+1}=x^{n}x\ge0 by (R) and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring, so xn≥0x^{n}\ge0 for all nn by induction. If x>0x>0, then also xn≠0x^{n}\neq0 by the reciprocal clause, so xn>0x^{n}>0. For the absolute value, ∣1∣=1|1|=1 by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, which settles n=0n=0. For n≥1n\ge1, the map u↦∣u∣u\mapsto|u| satisfies ∣uv∣=∣u∣ ∣v∣|uv|=|u|\,|v| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, so Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §homomorphism with ∗=⋄=⋅\ast=\diamond=\cdot gives ∣xn∣=∏k=1n∣x∣=∣x∣n|x^{n}|=\prod_{k=1}^{n}|x|=|x|^{n}.

Monotone. Let 0≤x<y0\le x<y, so y>0y>0. We induct on nn; the case n=1n=1 is the hypothesis. Suppose xn<ynx^{n}<y^{n}. Since xn≥0x^{n}\ge0 by the sign clause and y−x≥0y-x\ge0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum, Ordered Rings §ordered-ring gives 0≤xn(y−x)=xny−xnx0\le x^{n}(y-x)=x^{n}y-x^{n}x, so xnx≤xnyx^{n}x\le x^{n}y by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum. Also xny<ynyx^{n}y<y^{n}y by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product. Hence xn+1=xnx<yny=yn+1x^{n+1}=x^{n}x<y^{n}y=y^{n+1} by (R) and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed, applied to xnx≤xnyx^{n}x\le x^{n}y and xny<ynyx^{n}y<y^{n}y.

Monotone-iff. Let n≥1n\ge1 and x,y≥0x,y\ge0. If x≤yx\le y, then x<yx<y or x=yx=y, and xn≤ynx^{n}\le y^{n} by the monotone clause in the first case and trivially in the second. Conversely, suppose xn≤ynx^{n}\le y^{n} but not x≤yx\le y. Then y<xy<x because the order is total, so yn<xny^{n}<x^{n} by the monotone clause, contradicting xn≤ynx^{n}\le y^{n}. If xn=ynx^{n}=y^{n}, then xn≤ynx^{n}\le y^{n} and yn≤xny^{n}\le x^{n}, so x≤yx\le y and y≤xy\le x, hence x=yx=y; the converse is trivial.

Base below one. Let 0≤x≤10\le x\le1. For every n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, xn≥0x^{n}\ge0 by the sign clause and 1−x≥01-x\ge0, so xn−xn+1=xn(1−x)≥0x^{n}-x^{n+1}=x^{n}(1-x)\ge0 by (R) and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring; that is, xn+1≤xnx^{n+1}\le x^{n}, and xn+1≥0x^{n+1}\ge0 by the sign clause. It remains to show xn≤1x^{n}\le1. This holds for n=0n=0, and for n≥1n\ge1 by induction: x1=x≤1x^{1}=x\le1, and xn+1≤xn≤1x^{n+1}\le x^{n}\le1.

Base above one. Let x≥1x\ge1, so x>0x>0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares. For every n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, xn>0x^{n}>0 by the sign clause and x−1≥0x-1\ge0, so xn+1−xn=xn(x−1)≥0x^{n+1}-x^{n}=x^{n}(x-1)\ge0, that is, xn≤xn+1x^{n}\le x^{n+1}. It remains to show 1≤xn1\le x^{n}. This holds for n=0n=0, and for n≥1n\ge1 by induction: x1=x≥1x^{1}=x\ge1, and 1≤xn≤xn+11\le x^{n}\le x^{n+1}.

Exponent monotone. Let m∈N0m\in\mathbb{N}_{0} with m≤nm\le n. By Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §difference there is d∈N0d\in\mathbb{N}_{0} with n=m+dn=m+d, so xn=xmxdx^{n}=x^{m}x^{d} by the exponents clause. If m<nm<n, then d≠0d\neq0, since m+0=mm+0=m by Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero; so d∈Nd\in\mathbb{N} by The Natural Numbers with Zero and Their Embedding into the Integers §naturals, and d≥1d\ge1 by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §least.

Let x≥1x\ge1. By the base-above-one clause, 1≤xm1\le x^{m} and 1≤xd1\le x^{d}; as 0<10<1 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares, xm>0x^{m}>0. Hence Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product with z=xmz=x^{m} gives xm=1⋅xm≤xdxm=xnx^{m}=1\cdot x^{m}\le x^{d}x^{m}=x^{n}, using commutativity. If moreover x>1x>1 and m<nm<n, then d≥1d\ge1 and 0≤1<x0\le1<x, so the monotone clause, with 11 and xx in place of xx and yy, and the product clause give 1=1d<xd1=1^{d}<x^{d}; the same rule then gives xm=1⋅xm<xdxm=xnx^{m}=1\cdot x^{m}<x^{d}x^{m}=x^{n}.

Let 0≤x≤10\le x\le1. Then xm≥0x^{m}\ge0 by the sign clause, and xd≤1x^{d}\le1 by the base-below-one clause, so 1−xd≥01-x^{d}\ge0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum. By (N) and commutativity, xm−xn=1⋅xm−xdxm=(1−xd) xmx^{m}-x^{n}=1\cdot x^{m}-x^{d}x^{m}=(1-x^{d})\,x^{m}, which is ≥0\ge0 by Ordered Rings §ordered-ring; that is, xn≤xmx^{n}\le x^{m} by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum.

Bernoulli. Let x≥−1x\ge-1, so 1+x≥01+x\ge0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum. By Commutative Rings, Fields and Ordered Fields: Standard Notation §numerals, the factor nn stands for its image nFn_{F} in FF. By the same clause, 0F0_{F} and 1F1_{F} are the zero and the unit of FF and the image of a sum is the sum of the images, so (n+1)F=nF+1(n+1)_{F}=n_{F}+1 for every n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}; and 0≤n0\le n in FF, that is 0≤nF0\le n_{F}, by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §naturals. For n=0n=0, (1+x)0=1=1+0⋅x=1+0F x(1+x)^{0}=1=1+0\cdot x=1+0_{F}\,x, as 0⋅x=x⋅0=00\cdot x=x\cdot0=0 by commutativity and (Z). For n≥1n\ge1 we induct: (1+x)1=1+x=1+1⋅x=1+1F x(1+x)^{1}=1+x=1+1\cdot x=1+1_{F}\,x. Suppose (1+x)n≥1+n x(1+x)^{n}\ge1+n\,x. Then ((1+x)n−(1+n x))(1+x)≥0\big((1+x)^{n}-(1+n\,x)\big)(1+x)\ge0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring, so by (R) and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum,

(1+x)n+1=(1+x)n(1+x)≥(1+n x)(1+x)=1+(n+1) x+n (x x)≥1+(n+1) x,(1+x)^{n+1}=(1+x)^{n}(1+x)\ge(1+n\,x)(1+x)=1+(n+1)\,x+n\,(x\,x)\ge1+(n+1)\,x,

where the middle equality expands the product by the ring laws, using nF x+x=(nF+1) x=(n+1)F xn_{F}\,x+x=(n_{F}+1)\,x=(n+1)_{F}\,x, and the last step uses n (x x)≥0n\,(x\,x)\ge0, which holds by 0≤nF0\le n_{F}, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring, together with Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…