TheoremBase

The diagonal quadratic changes along a mode by a one-term family, giving its mode derivatives, while the weak part's mode derivatives come from its gradient and Hessian on H−3H^{-3}; linearity of mode derivatives combines them. The generator and gradient-energy families are dominated termwise by summable families (inverse squared weights, x(k)2/mukx(k)^2/mu_k, and the H−3H^{-3} coefficients of the gradient), the renormalised operator follows from the penalised cutoff identity and limit laws, and linear combinations are handled by combining curvature families and C2C^2 weak parts.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Conventions. Elementary arithmetic, order, absolute values, squares and finite sums of real numbers are used freely under The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background. By The Wick-Square Problem on the Torus: Standing Notation §modes, 1≤μk1\le\mu_{k}, so 0<μk0<\mu_{k} and 1/μkl′≤1/μkl1/\mu_{k}^{l'}\le1/\mu_{k}^{l} whenever l≤l′l\le l'. The vector operations of H−1H^{-1} and of H−3H^{-3} are the pointwise ones (The Negative-Order Sobolev Spaces of the Torus §space). By Lattice Sums of the Fourier Weights of the Torus, and the Negative Sobolev Norms as Lattice Sums §sobolev, a family cc lies in H−l(Tn)H^{-l}(\mathbb{T}^{n}) (l∈Nl\in\mathbb{N}) exactly when k↦c(k)2/μklk\mapsto c(k)^{2}/\mu_{k}^{l} is cube-summable; in particular (The Wick-Square Problem on the Torus: Standing Notation §state-space) k↦x(k)2/μkk\mapsto x(k)^{2}/\mu_{k} is cube-summable for every x∈H−1x\in H^{-1}. Since n≤3<4=2⋅2n\le3<4=2\cdot2 (The Wick-Square Problem on the Torus: Standing Notation §dimension), k↦1/μk2k\mapsto1/\mu_{k}^{2} is cube-summable by Lattice Sums of the Fourier Weights of the Torus, and the Negative Sobolev Norms as Lattice Sums §convergent with s=2s=2. Let Q(y)=∑k∈Znη(k) y(k)2Q(y)=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}\eta(k)\,y(k)^{2} for y∈H−1y\in H^{-1}, a lattice sum that exists by Regular Functions for the Wick-Square Problem: Diagonal Quadratics of Curvature of Order the Inverse Squared Weight, plus Twice Differentiable Functions on the Sobolev Space of Order -3; by Regular Functions for the Wick-Square Problem: Diagonal Quadratics of Curvature of Order the Inverse Squared Weight, plus Twice Differentiable Functions on the Sobolev Space of Order -3 §curvature, for every mode kk

∣η(k)∣≤Cμk2,μk ∣η(k)∣≤Cμk.(P1)|\eta(k)|\le\frac{C}{\mu_{k}^{2}},\qquad\mu_{k}\,|\eta(k)|\le\frac{C}{\mu_{k}}.\qquad(\mathrm{P}1)

For x∈H−1x\in H^{-1} we write zx=Dϕ(x)∈H−3z_{x}=D\phi(x)\in H^{-3} and bx=D2ϕ(x)∈Sym(H−3)b_{x}=D^{2}\phi(x)\in\mathrm{Sym}(H^{-3}) (Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §on-set, The Second Derivative and the Hessian on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §on-set). By The Sobolev Triple of Order Two for the Wick-Square Problem: the Domain Is the Sobolev Space of Order -1, Unit Families Are Square-Summable, the Gradient Form and the Riccati Drift §pairings, whose space HH is H−3H^{-3} with ⟨⋅,⋅⟩H=⟨⋅,⋅⟩H−3\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{H}=\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{H^{-3}},

⟨zx,ek⟩H−3=zx(k)μk3(k∈Zn).(P2)\langle z_{x},e_{k}\rangle_{H^{-3}}=\frac{z_{x}(k)}{\mu_{k}^{3}}\qquad(k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}).\qquad(\mathrm{P}2)

Step 1 (The diagonal part along a mode). Let y∈H−1y\in H^{-1}, k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}; then y+tek∈H−1y+te_{k}\in H^{-1} (The Wick-Square Problem on the Torus: Standing Notation §units), with value y(k′)y(k') at k′≠kk'\ne k and y(k)+ty(k)+t at kk. The family δ(k′)=η(k′)(y+tek)(k′)2−η(k′)y(k′)2\delta(k')=\eta(k')(y+te_{k})(k')^{2}-\eta(k')y(k')^{2} is the difference of the two cube-summable families defining Q(y+tek)Q(y+te_{k}) and Q(y)Q(y); it vanishes off {k}\{k\} and δ(k)=2η(k)y(k) t+η(k) t2\delta(k)=2\eta(k)y(k)\,t+\eta(k)\,t^{2}. By Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §finite-support its lattice sum is δ(k)\delta(k), and by Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §linear

Q(y+tek)=Q(y)+2η(k)y(k) t+η(k) t2.Q(y+te_{k})=Q(y)+2\eta(k)y(k)\,t+\eta(k)\,t^{2}.

Step 2 (Clause derivatives). The diagonal part. Fix x∈H−1x\in H^{-1} and kk. By Step 1 the section of QQ at xx along kk (Derivatives of a Function on the Sobolev Space of Order -1 along the Fourier Modes) is p(t)=Q(x)+2η(k)x(k) t+η(k) t2p(t)=Q(x)+2\eta(k)x(k)\,t+\eta(k)\,t^{2}. The maps t↦tt\mapsto t and t↦t2t\mapsto t^{2} are differentiable at every point of R\mathbb{R} with derivatives 11 and 2t2t (claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line), and constants have derivative 00 (claim 1 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives); by claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, pp is differentiable at every tt with p′(t)=2η(k)x(k)+2η(k) tp'(t)=2\eta(k)x(k)+2\eta(k)\,t, and, by the same claims, p′p' is differentiable at 00 with (p′)′(0)=2η(k)(p')'(0)=2\eta(k). So QQ is twice differentiable along the modes (Derivatives of a Function on the Sobolev Space of Order -1 along the Fourier Modes §twice) with ∂kQ(x)=2η(k)x(k)\partial_{k}Q(x)=2\eta(k)x(k) and ∂k2Q(x)=2η(k)\partial_{k}^{2}Q(x)=2\eta(k) (Derivatives of a Function on the Sobolev Space of Order -1 along the Fourier Modes §derivatives).

The weak part. By Mode Derivatives of Linear Combinations and of Restrictions of Twice Differentiable Functions on a Negative Sobolev Space §sobolev with m=3m=3 and Φ=ϕ\Phi=\phi, the restriction ϕ∣H−1\phi|_{H^{-1}} is twice differentiable along the modes with ∂k(ϕ∣H−1)(x)=⟨Dϕ(x),ek⟩H−3\partial_{k}(\phi|_{H^{-1}})(x)=\langle D\phi(x),e_{k}\rangle_{H^{-3}} and ∂k2(ϕ∣H−1)(x)=D2ϕ(x)(ek,ek)\partial_{k}^{2}(\phi|_{H^{-1}})(x)=D^{2}\phi(x)(e_{k},e_{k}).

The sum. By the identity of Regular Functions for the Wick-Square Problem: Diagonal Quadratics of Curvature of Order the Inverse Squared Weight, plus Twice Differentiable Functions on the Sobolev Space of Order -3, ψ=1⋅Q+1⋅ϕ∣H−1\psi=1\cdot Q+1\cdot\phi|_{H^{-1}} pointwise on H−1H^{-1}. By Mode Derivatives of Linear Combinations and of Restrictions of Twice Differentiable Functions on a Negative Sobolev Space §linear with a=b=1a=b=1, ψ\psi is twice differentiable along the modes and, for all xx and kk,

∂kψ(x)=2η(k)x(k)+⟨Dϕ(x),ek⟩H−3,∂k2ψ(x)=2η(k)+D2ϕ(x)(ek,ek).\partial_{k}\psi(x)=2\eta(k)x(k)+\langle D\phi(x),e_{k}\rangle_{H^{-3}},\qquad\partial_{k}^{2}\psi(x)=2\eta(k)+D^{2}\phi(x)(e_{k},e_{k}).

Step 3 (Clause generator). Fix x∈H−1x\in H^{-1} and let

h(k)=ν η(k)−2μkη(k) x(k)2,e(k)=ν2 bx(ek,ek)−μk x(k) ⟨zx,ek⟩H−3.h(k)=\nu\,\eta(k)-2\mu_{k}\eta(k)\,x(k)^{2},\qquad e(k)=\tfrac{\nu}{2}\,b_{x}(e_{k},e_{k})-\mu_{k}\,x(k)\,\langle z_{x},e_{k}\rangle_{H^{-3}} .

hh is cube-summable. By (P1), ∣h(k)∣≤ν∣η(k)∣+2x(k)2μk∣η(k)∣≤νC/μk2+2C x(k)2/μk|h(k)|\le\nu|\eta(k)|+2x(k)^{2}\mu_{k}|\eta(k)|\le\nu C/\mu_{k}^{2}+2C\,x(k)^{2}/\mu_{k}. The right-hand family is cube-summable by the Conventions and Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §linear, so hh is cube-summable by Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §comparison.

ee is cube-summable. By Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity §bound (for the norm ∥⋅∥\lVert\cdot\rVert of Sym(H−3)\mathrm{Sym}(H^{-3}) fixed in Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §forms) and Lattice Sums of the Fourier Weights of the Torus, and the Negative Sobolev Norms as Lattice Sums §units with m=3m=3, ∣bx(ek,ek)∣≤∥bx∥ ∣ek∣H−32=∥bx∥/μk3≤∥bx∥/μk2|b_{x}(e_{k},e_{k})|\le\lVert b_{x}\rVert\,|e_{k}|_{H^{-3}}^{2}=\lVert b_{x}\rVert/\mu_{k}^{3}\le\lVert b_{x}\rVert/\mu_{k}^{2}. By (P2), μkx(k)⟨zx,ek⟩H−3=x(k)zx(k)/μk2\mu_{k}x(k)\langle z_{x},e_{k}\rangle_{H^{-3}}=x(k)z_{x}(k)/\mu_{k}^{2}. Hence

∣e(k)∣≤ν2∥bx∥ 1μk2+∣x(k)zx(k)∣μk2.|e(k)|\le\tfrac{\nu}{2}\lVert b_{x}\rVert\,\frac{1}{\mu_{k}^{2}}+\frac{|x(k)z_{x}(k)|}{\mu_{k}^{2}} .

The family k↦∣x(k)zx(k)∣/μk2k\mapsto|x(k)z_{x}(k)|/\mu_{k}^{2} is cube-summable by The Sobolev Triple of Order Two for the Wick-Square Problem: the Domain Is the Sobolev Space of Order -1, Unit Families Are Square-Summable, the Gradient Form and the Riccati Drift §pairings (as x∈H−1x\in H^{-1} and zx∈H−3z_{x}\in H^{-3}), and k↦1/μk2k\mapsto1/\mu_{k}^{2} by the Conventions; so the right-hand family is cube-summable (Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §linear) and ee is cube-summable by Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §comparison. These are the two families of clause generator.

The limit. By Step 2, for every mode kk,

ν2 ∂k2ψ(x)−μk x(k) ∂kψ(x)=ν2(2η(k)+bx(ek,ek))−μkx(k)(2η(k)x(k)+⟨zx,ek⟩H−3)=h(k)+e(k),\tfrac{\nu}{2}\,\partial_{k}^{2}\psi(x)-\mu_{k}\,x(k)\,\partial_{k}\psi(x)=\tfrac{\nu}{2}\bigl(2\eta(k)+b_{x}(e_{k},e_{k})\bigr)-\mu_{k}x(k)\bigl(2\eta(k)x(k)+\langle z_{x},e_{k}\rangle_{H^{-3}}\bigr)=h(k)+e(k),

so by The Free-Field Generator with a Mode Cutoff §generator and Cube Sums of Families on the Integer Lattice §cube-sums, LNψ(x)L_{N}\psi(x) is the NNth cube sum of h+eh+e. By Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §linear, h+eh+e is cube-summable with lattice sum ∑kh(k)+∑ke(k)\sum_{k}h(k)+\sum_{k}e(k), i.e. (Cube Sums of Families on the Integer Lattice §lattice-sum) (LNψ(x))N∈N(L_{N}\psi(x))_{N\in\mathbb{N}} converges to this number. By The Free-Field Generator with a Mode Cutoff §limit, LψL\psi is defined at xx and Lψ(x)=∑kh(k)+∑ke(k)L\psi(x)=\sum_{k}h(k)+\sum_{k}e(k).

Step 4 (Clause gradient). Let θ∈R\theta\in\mathbb{R} and χ=θP+ψ\chi=\theta P+\psi. By The Cutoff Wick Square is Minus the Free-Field Generator of the Gaussian Penalty, and the Penalised Form of the Cutoff Operators §derivatives, PP is twice differentiable along the modes with ∂kP(x)=βx(k)/μk\partial_{k}P(x)=\beta x(k)/\mu_{k}; by Step 2 so is ψ\psi. By Mode Derivatives of Linear Combinations and of Restrictions of Twice Differentiable Functions on a Negative Sobolev Space §linear with a=θa=\theta, b=1b=1, χ\chi is twice differentiable along the modes, and with Step 2 and (P2), for x∈H−1x\in H^{-1} and every kk,

∂kχ(x)=λk x(k)+zx(k)μk3,λk=θβμk+2η(k).\partial_{k}\chi(x)=\lambda_{k}\,x(k)+\frac{z_{x}(k)}{\mu_{k}^{3}},\qquad\lambda_{k}=\frac{\theta\beta}{\mu_{k}}+2\eta(k).

Fix x∈H−1x\in H^{-1} and let w(k)=(∂kχ(x))2≥0w(k)=(\partial_{k}\chi(x))^{2}\ge0. Put K=∣θ∣β+2C≥0K=|\theta|\beta+2C\ge0. By (P1), ∣λk∣≤∣θ∣β/μk+2C/μk2≤K/μk|\lambda_{k}|\le|\theta|\beta/\mu_{k}+2C/\mu_{k}^{2}\le K/\mu_{k}, so λk2≤K2/μk2\lambda_{k}^{2}\le K^{2}/\mu_{k}^{2}. Using (u+v)2≤2u2+2v2(u+v)^{2}\le2u^{2}+2v^{2},

0≤w(k)≤2λk2x(k)2+2 zx(k)2μk6≤2K2 x(k)2μk+2 zx(k)2μk3.0\le w(k)\le2\lambda_{k}^{2}x(k)^{2}+2\,\frac{z_{x}(k)^{2}}{\mu_{k}^{6}}\le2K^{2}\,\frac{x(k)^{2}}{\mu_{k}}+2\,\frac{z_{x}(k)^{2}}{\mu_{k}^{3}} .

The right-hand family is cube-summable: k↦x(k)2/μkk\mapsto x(k)^{2}/\mu_{k} by the Conventions, k↦zx(k)2/μk3k\mapsto z_{x}(k)^{2}/\mu_{k}^{3} by the Conventions with l=3l=3 since zx∈H−3z_{x}\in H^{-3}, and Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §linear. As ∣w(k)∣=w(k)|w(k)|=w(k), Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §comparison shows that ww is cube-summable. By The Gradient Energy with a Mode Cutoff §gradient and Cube Sums of Families on the Integer Lattice §cube-sums, ∣DNχ(x)∣2|D_{N}\chi(x)|^{2} is the NNth cube sum of ww, so (∣DNχ(x)∣2)N∈N(|D_{N}\chi(x)|^{2})_{N\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ∑kw(k)\sum_{k}w(k) (Cube Sums of Families on the Integer Lattice §lattice-sum); by The Gradient Energy with a Mode Cutoff §limit, ∣Dχ(x)∣2|D\chi(x)|^{2} is defined and equals ∑k∈Znw(k)\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}w(k), limits being unique (Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background).

Step 5 (Clause operator). Let gg, D\mathcal{D} and FF be as in clause operator, and χ=P+ψ\chi=P+\psi, which equals 1⋅P+ψ1\cdot P+\psi pointwise. By Step 4 with θ=1\theta=1, χ\chi is twice differentiable along the modes and, for every x∈H−1x\in H^{-1}, (∣DNχ(x)∣2)N(|D_{N}\chi(x)|^{2})_{N} converges to ∣Dχ(x)∣2|D\chi(x)|^{2}. Since χ(u)−P(u)=ψ(u)\chi(u)-P(u)=\psi(u) for every u∈H−1u\in H^{-1}, the function χ−P\chi-P is ψ\psi, and The Cutoff Wick Square is Minus the Free-Field Generator of the Gaussian Penalty, and the Penalised Form of the Cutoff Operators §penalised gives, for every N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} and x∈H−1x\in H^{-1},

FN[χ](x)=γ χ(x)−LNψ(x)+12 ∣DNχ(x)∣2−g(x).F_{N}[\chi](x)=\gamma\,\chi(x)-L_{N}\psi(x)+\tfrac12\,|D_{N}\chi(x)|^{2}-g(x).

Fix x∈H−1x\in H^{-1}. By Step 3 and The Free-Field Generator with a Mode Cutoff §limit, (LNψ(x))N(L_{N}\psi(x))_{N} converges to Lψ(x)L\psi(x); constant sequences converge to their value (Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers). By Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §sums and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar, (FN[χ](x))N(F_{N}[\chi](x))_{N} converges to γχ(x)−Lψ(x)+12∣Dχ(x)∣2−g(x)\gamma\chi(x)-L\psi(x)+\tfrac12|D\chi(x)|^{2}-g(x). Hence (χ,x)∈D(\chi,x)\in\mathcal{D} by The Renormalised Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Operator of the Wick-Square Problem as the Limit of the Wick-Ordered Cutoff Operators §domain, and F[χ](x)F[\chi](x) is this limit by The Renormalised Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Operator of the Wick-Square Problem as the Limit of the Wick-Ordered Cutoff Operators §operator, which is the asserted formula.

Step 6 (Clause linear). Combinations. Let ψ1,ψ2\psi_{1},\psi_{2} be regular, with witnessing data ηi\eta_{i}, CiC_{i}, ϕi\phi_{i} (i=1,2i=1,2) as in Regular Functions for the Wick-Square Problem: Diagonal Quadratics of Curvature of Order the Inverse Squared Weight, plus Twice Differentiable Functions on the Sobolev Space of Order -3, and let a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R}. Put η=aη1+bη2\eta=a\eta_{1}+b\eta_{2} (pointwise), C=∣a∣C1+∣b∣C2≥0C=|a|C_{1}+|b|C_{2}\ge0 and ϕ=aϕ1+bϕ2\phi=a\phi_{1}+b\phi_{2}. For every kk, μk2∣η(k)∣≤∣a∣ μk2∣η1(k)∣+∣b∣ μk2∣η2(k)∣≤C\mu_{k}^{2}|\eta(k)|\le|a|\,\mu_{k}^{2}|\eta_{1}(k)|+|b|\,\mu_{k}^{2}|\eta_{2}(k)|\le C, so η\eta is a curvature family with curvature bound CC (Regular Functions for the Wick-Square Problem: Diagonal Quadratics of Curvature of Order the Inverse Squared Weight, plus Twice Differentiable Functions on the Sobolev Space of Order -3 §curvature). The space H−3H^{-3} is open in itself (Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §topology), so by Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §scalar (twice) and Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §sum, ϕ\phi is of class C2C^{2} on H−3H^{-3}, a weak part in the sense of Regular Functions for the Wick-Square Problem: Diagonal Quadratics of Curvature of Order the Inverse Squared Weight, plus Twice Differentiable Functions on the Sobolev Space of Order -3 §weak-part. For x∈H−1x\in H^{-1}, Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §linear gives

aψ1(x)+bψ2(x)=∑k∈Zn(aη1(k)+bη2(k))x(k)2+aϕ1(x)+bϕ2(x)=∑k∈Znη(k) x(k)2+ϕ(x),a\psi_{1}(x)+b\psi_{2}(x)=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}\bigl(a\eta_{1}(k)+b\eta_{2}(k)\bigr)x(k)^{2}+a\phi_{1}(x)+b\phi_{2}(x)=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}}\eta(k)\,x(k)^{2}+\phi(x),

so aψ1+bψ2a\psi_{1}+b\psi_{2} is regular.

Constants. Let c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and let ψ\psi have constant value cc on H−1H^{-1}. Take η\eta the zero family with curvature bound 00, and ϕ\phi the constant function with value cc on H−3H^{-3}, which is of class C2C^{2} on H−3H^{-3} by Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §constant. For x∈H−1x\in H^{-1}, the family k↦0⋅x(k)2k\mapsto0\cdot x(k)^{2} is the zero family, which is 00 times the cube-summable family k↦x(k)2/μkk\mapsto x(k)^{2}/\mu_{k}; so its lattice sum is 00 by Lattice Sums along Cubes: Linearity, Nonnegative Families, Absolute Summability, Comparison and Finitely Supported Families §linear, and ∑kη(k)x(k)2+ϕ(x)=0+c=ψ(x)\sum_{k}\eta(k)x(k)^{2}+\phi(x)=0+c=\psi(x). Hence ψ\psi is regular.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…