TheoremBase

Shows first that the image of n+1 is the image of n plus one, then proves the sum and product rules by induction on the second argument, deriving x·0=0 in the ring along the way.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named where it is cited.

Throughout, x,y,zx,y,z range over RR, and we use the identities of Commutative Rings §ring: (x+y)+z=x+(y+z)(x+y)+z=x+(y+z), x+y=y+xx+y=y+x, x+0=xx+0=x, xy=yxxy=yx, x⋅1=xx\cdot1=x, x(y+z)=xy+xzx(y+z)=xy+xz, and for every xx some w∈Rw\in R with x+w=0x+w=0. Computations with elements of N0\mathbb{N}_{0} use the laws of The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §laws. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} the image nRn_{R} is the finite sum, for the addition of RR, of the constant map k↦1k\mapsto1 on [n][n], by The Image of a Natural Number in a Commutative Ring §image; the constant maps on the various [n][n] all have the value 11 of RR.

Constants. By The Image of a Natural Number in a Commutative Ring §image, 0R=00_{R}=0. Since 1∈N1\in\mathbb{N} by The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §sets, 1R=∑k=1111_{R}=\sum_{k=1}^{1}1, and the first part of Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §recursion, applied with n=1n=1 to the constant map on [1][1], gives 1R=11_{R}=1.

Successor step. We show (n+1)R=nR+1(n+1)_{R}=n_{R}+1 for every n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}. If n=0n=0, then n+1=0+1=1n+1=0+1=1 in N0\mathbb{N}_{0}, and 0+1=1+0=10+1=1+0=1 in RR; so, by the constants clause, (0+1)R=1R=1=0+1=0R+1(0+1)_{R}=1_{R}=1=0+1=0_{R}+1, where the sum 0+10+1 in the first term is formed in N0\mathbb{N}_{0} and the sum 0+10+1 in the fourth term in RR. If n≠0n\neq0, then n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} by The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §sets, and n+1∈Nn+1\in\mathbb{N} by The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §operations. Let cc be the constant map k↦1k\mapsto1 on [n+1][n+1]. The second part of Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §recursion, applied to cc, gives

(n+1)R=∑k=1n+1ck=(∑k=1nck)+cn+1=nR+1,(n+1)_{R}=\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}c_{k}=\Big(\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}\Big)+c_{n+1}=n_{R}+1,

because ∑k=1nck\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k} is the finite sum of c∣[n]c|_{[n]} by Iterated Operations: Finite Sums and Finite Products §restriction, which applies as [n]⊆[n+1][n]\subseteq[n+1] by Intervals of Natural Numbers: Initial Segments, Adding One Element, Splitting and Shifting §successor, and c∣[n]c|_{[n]} is the constant map k↦1k\mapsto1 on [n][n], whose finite sum is nRn_{R}; and cn+1=1c_{n+1}=1.

Sum. Fix m∈N0m\in\mathbb{N}_{0}; we prove (m+n)R=mR+nR(m+n)_{R}=m_{R}+n_{R} for every n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0} by induction from 00, The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §induction. For n=0n=0, (m+0)R=mR=mR+0=mR+0R(m+0)_{R}=m_{R}=m_{R}+0=m_{R}+0_{R}. If the claim holds for nn, then, using m+(n+1)=(m+n)+1m+(n+1)=(m+n)+1, the successor step twice, the induction hypothesis and associativity in RR,

(m+(n+1))R=((m+n)+1)R=(m+n)R+1=(mR+nR)+1=mR+(nR+1)=mR+(n+1)R.(m+(n+1))_{R}=((m+n)+1)_{R}=(m+n)_{R}+1=(m_{R}+n_{R})+1=m_{R}+(n_{R}+1)=m_{R}+(n+1)_{R}.

Zero factor in RR. For every x∈Rx\in R, x⋅0=0x\cdot0=0. Indeed 0+0=00+0=0, so x⋅0=x(0+0)=x⋅0+x⋅0x\cdot0=x(0+0)=x\cdot0+x\cdot0. Let w∈Rw\in R with x⋅0+w=0x\cdot0+w=0. Then

0=x⋅0+w=(x⋅0+x⋅0)+w=x⋅0+(x⋅0+w)=x⋅0+0=x⋅0.0=x\cdot0+w=(x\cdot0+x\cdot0)+w=x\cdot0+(x\cdot0+w)=x\cdot0+0=x\cdot0.

Product. Fix m∈N0m\in\mathbb{N}_{0}; we prove (mn)R=mR nR(mn)_{R}=m_{R}\,n_{R} for every n∈N0n\in\mathbb{N}_{0} by induction from 00, The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §induction. For n=0n=0, m⋅0=0m\cdot0=0 in N0\mathbb{N}_{0}, so (m⋅0)R=0R=0=mR⋅0=mR 0R(m\cdot0)_{R}=0_{R}=0=m_{R}\cdot0=m_{R}\,0_{R} by the zero factor in RR. If the claim holds for nn, then, using m(n+1)=mn+m⋅1=mn+mm(n+1)=mn+m\cdot1=mn+m in N0\mathbb{N}_{0}, the sum clause, the induction hypothesis, x⋅1=xx\cdot1=x, distributivity in RR and the successor step,

(m(n+1))R=(mn+m)R=(mn)R+mR=mR nR+mR⋅1=mR(nR+1)=mR (n+1)R.(m(n+1))_{R}=(mn+m)_{R}=(mn)_{R}+m_{R}=m_{R}\,n_{R}+m_{R}\cdot1=m_{R}(n_{R}+1)=m_{R}\,(n+1)_{R}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…