Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary ordered-field arithmetic and order, and the elementary properties of finite sums and squares, are used without further comment, as provided by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background . For i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] put
p i = λ 0 2 + a c i , D i = p i 2 + 2 θ β i . p_{i}=\frac{\lambda_{0}}{2}+\frac{a}{c_{i}},\qquad D_{i}=p_{i}^{2}+2\theta\beta_{i}. p i = 2 λ 0 + c i a , D i = p i 2 + 2 θ β i .
Clause 1. Fix i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] . Expanding the square,
D i − ( λ 0 2 ) 2 = ( a c i ) 2 + λ 0 a c i + 2 θ β i , D_{i}-\Bigl(\frac{\lambda_{0}}{2}\Bigr)^{2}=\Bigl(\frac{a}{c_{i}}\Bigr)^{2}+\lambda_{0}\,\frac{a}{c_{i}}+2\theta\beta_{i}, D i − ( 2 λ 0 ) 2 = ( c i a ) 2 + λ 0 c i a + 2 θ β i ,
which is positive by hypothesis. Hence D i > ( λ 0 / 2 ) 2 ≥ 0 D_{i}>(\lambda_{0}/2)^{2}\ge0 D i > ( λ 0 /2 ) 2 ≥ 0 ; so the radicand D i = ( λ 0 / 2 + a / c i ) 2 + 2 θ β i D_{i}=(\lambda_{0}/2+a/c_{i})^{2}+2\theta\beta_{i} D i = ( λ 0 /2 + a / c i ) 2 + 2 θ β i of clause 1 is positive, and D i \sqrt{D_{i}} D i is the unique nonnegative real number whose square is D i D_{i} D i , by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root . Since 0 ≤ λ 0 / 2 0\le\lambda_{0}/2 0 ≤ λ 0 /2 , 0 ≤ D i 0\le\sqrt{D_{i}} 0 ≤ D i and ( λ 0 / 2 ) 2 < D i = ( D i ) 2 (\lambda_{0}/2)^{2}<D_{i}=(\sqrt{D_{i}})^{2} ( λ 0 /2 ) 2 < D i = ( D i ) 2 , claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives
λ 0 2 < D i . (A) \frac{\lambda_{0}}{2}<\sqrt{D_{i}}.\tag{A} 2 λ 0 < D i . ( A )
For s ∈ R s\in\mathbb{R} s ∈ R put t s = θ s + p i t_{s}=\theta s+p_{i} t s = θ s + p i . Since θ ≠ 0 \theta\ne0 θ = 0 , multiplying by 2 θ 2\theta 2 θ and then adding p i 2 p_{i}^{2} p i 2 shows
θ 2 s 2 + p i s = β i ⟺ θ 2 s 2 + 2 θ p i s = 2 θ β i ⟺ t s 2 = D i , \frac{\theta}{2}\,s^{2}+p_{i}\,s=\beta_{i}\iff\theta^{2}s^{2}+2\theta p_{i}\,s=2\theta\beta_{i}\iff t_{s}^{2}=D_{i}, 2 θ s 2 + p i s = β i ⟺ θ 2 s 2 + 2 θ p i s = 2 θ β i ⟺ t s 2 = D i ,
and moreover a / c i + θ s = t s − λ 0 / 2 a/c_{i}+\theta s=t_{s}-\lambda_{0}/2 a / c i + θ s = t s − λ 0 /2 .
Existence: for b i = θ − 1 ( D i − p i ) b_{i}=\theta^{-1}(\sqrt{D_{i}}-p_{i}) b i = θ − 1 ( D i − p i ) we have t b i = D i t_{b_{i}}=\sqrt{D_{i}} t b i = D i , so t b i 2 = D i t_{b_{i}}^{2}=D_{i} t b i 2 = D i and the equation of clause 1 holds, and a / c i + θ b i = D i − λ 0 / 2 > 0 a/c_{i}+\theta b_{i}=\sqrt{D_{i}}-\lambda_{0}/2>0 a / c i + θ b i = D i − λ 0 /2 > 0 by (A). Uniqueness: if s ∈ R s\in\mathbb{R} s ∈ R satisfies the equation and a / c i + θ s > 0 a/c_{i}+\theta s>0 a / c i + θ s > 0 , then t s = ( a / c i + θ s ) + λ 0 / 2 > 0 t_{s}=(a/c_{i}+\theta s)+\lambda_{0}/2>0 t s = ( a / c i + θ s ) + λ 0 /2 > 0 and t s 2 = D i t_{s}^{2}=D_{i} t s 2 = D i , so t s = D i t_{s}=\sqrt{D_{i}} t s = D i by the uniqueness part of Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root , that is s = θ − 1 ( D i − p i ) = b i s=\theta^{-1}(\sqrt{D_{i}}-p_{i})=b_{i} s = θ − 1 ( D i − p i ) = b i . This is the formula of clause 1.
Clause 2. By clause 1, a / c i + θ b i > 0 a/c_{i}+\theta b_{i}>0 a / c i + θ b i > 0 for every i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] , and a > 0 a>0 a > 0 ; so c i ′ = a ( a / c i + θ b i ) − 1 c'_{i}=a\,(a/c_{i}+\theta b_{i})^{-1} c i ′ = a ( a / c i + θ b i ) − 1 is positive for every i i i , and c ′ c' c ′ is a variance vector by The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §variances . Moreover
1 c i ′ = 1 a ( a c i + θ b i ) = 1 c i + θ a b i ( i ∈ [ d ] ) . \frac{1}{c'_{i}}=\frac{1}{a}\Bigl(\frac{a}{c_{i}}+\theta b_{i}\Bigr)=\frac{1}{c_{i}}+\frac{\theta}{a}\,b_{i}\qquad(i\in[d]). c i ′ 1 = a 1 ( c i a + θ b i ) = c i 1 + a θ b i ( i ∈ [ d ]) .
Let x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d . By The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling , the i i i th component of a S c ′ ( x ) a\,S_{c'}(x) a S c ′ ( x ) is a x i / c i ′ = a x i / c i + θ b i x i a\,x_{i}/c'_{i}=a\,x_{i}/c_{i}+\theta b_{i}x_{i} a x i / c i ′ = a x i / c i + θ b i x i , which is the i i i th component of a S c ( x ) + θ ( b 1 x 1 , … , b d x d ) a\,S_{c}(x)+\theta(b_{1}x_{1},\dots,b_{d}x_{d}) a S c ( x ) + θ ( b 1 x 1 , … , b d x d ) ; and by the same clause
∣ x ∣ c ′ 2 − ∣ x ∣ c 2 = ∑ i = 1 d x i 2 ( 1 c i ′ − 1 c i ) = θ a ∑ i = 1 d b i x i 2 . |x|_{c'}^{2}-|x|_{c}^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{d}x_{i}^{2}\Bigl(\frac{1}{c'_{i}}-\frac{1}{c_{i}}\Bigr)=\frac{\theta}{a}\sum_{i=1}^{d}b_{i}x_{i}^{2}. ∣ x ∣ c ′ 2 − ∣ x ∣ c 2 = i = 1 ∑ d x i 2 ( c i ′ 1 − c i 1 ) = a θ i = 1 ∑ d b i x i 2 .
Clause 3. Let B B B be the diagonal real d × d d\times d d × d matrix with diagonal entries b 1 , … , b d b_{1},\dots,b_{d} b 1 , … , b d ; it is symmetric, so B ∈ S ( d ) B\in\mathcal{S}(d) B ∈ S ( d ) . For z ∈ R d z\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z ∈ R d , B z = ( b 1 z 1 , … , b d z d ) Bz=(b_{1}z_{1},\dots,b_{d}z_{d}) B z = ( b 1 z 1 , … , b d z d ) by the definition of the matrix-vector product, and 1 2 z ⋅ ( B z ) = 1 2 ∑ i = 1 d b i z i 2 = u 0 ( z ) \tfrac12\,z\cdot(Bz)=\tfrac12\sum_{i=1}^{d}b_{i}z_{i}^{2}=u_{0}(z) 2 1 z ⋅ ( B z ) = 2 1 ∑ i = 1 d b i z i 2 = u 0 ( z ) by the definition of the dot product. Hence Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C 2 C^2 C 2 , Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic , applied with n = d n=d n = d (note 1 ≤ d 1\le d 1 ≤ d by The Wasserstein Space and Its Lift to Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Standing Notation §data ), the matrix B B B , linear coefficient 0 0 0 and constant term 0 0 0 , shows that u 0 u_{0} u 0 is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d with D u 0 ( x ) = B x = ( b 1 x 1 , … , b d x d ) Du_{0}(x)=Bx=(b_{1}x_{1},\dots,b_{d}x_{d}) D u 0 ( x ) = B x = ( b 1 x 1 , … , b d x d ) and Hessian matrix D 2 u 0 ( x ) = B D^{2}u_{0}(x)=B D 2 u 0 ( x ) = B for every x x x ; the entries of the Hessian matrix being the iterated partial derivatives (Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function ), ∂ j ∂ i u 0 ( x ) \partial_{j}\partial_{i}u_{0}(x) ∂ j ∂ i u 0 ( x ) is b i b_{i} b i if i = j i=j i = j and 0 0 0 otherwise (B B B being diagonal, the order of the two indices is immaterial).
Put M b = ∑ k = 1 d ∣ b k ∣ M_{b}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}|b_{k}| M b = ∑ k = 1 d ∣ b k ∣ . Then 0 ≤ M b 0\le M_{b} 0 ≤ M b , and ∣ ∂ j ∂ i u 0 ( x ) ∣ ≤ M b |\partial_{j}\partial_{i}u_{0}(x)|\le M_{b} ∣ ∂ j ∂ i u 0 ( x ) ∣ ≤ M b for all x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d and i , j ∈ [ d ] i,j\in[d] i , j ∈ [ d ] , since ∣ b i ∣ |b_{i}| ∣ b i ∣ is one of the nonnegative summands of M b M_{b} M b . So Integrals of Functions with a Bounded Hessian are Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §test , applied with f = u 0 f=u_{0} f = u 0 and M = M b M=M_{b} M = M b , shows that Φ 0 = φ u 0 \Phi_{0}=\varphi_{u_{0}} Φ 0 = φ u 0 is an intrinsic test function on P 2 ( R d ) \mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) P 2 ( R d ) , that ∇ Φ 0 ( μ ) \nabla\Phi_{0}(\mu) ∇ Φ 0 ( μ ) is the class D u 0 Du_{0} D u 0 for every μ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) μ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) , and that H Φ 0 ( μ ) = ∫ R d D 2 u 0 d μ H_{\Phi_{0}}(\mu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}D^{2}u_{0}\,d\mu H Φ 0 ( μ ) = ∫ R d D 2 u 0 d μ . The entries of D 2 u 0 D^{2}u_{0} D 2 u 0 are the constant functions with values b i b_{i} b i (on the diagonal) and 0 0 0 (off it), whose μ \mu μ -integrals are b i b_{i} b i and 0 0 0 because μ \mu μ is a probability measure; so H Φ 0 ( μ ) = B H_{\Phi_{0}}(\mu)=B H Φ 0 ( μ ) = B .
Clause 4. By The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair: Relative Entropy and Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §pair , D \mathcal{D} D (respectively D ′ \mathcal{D}' D ′ ) is the set of μ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) μ ∈ P 2 ( R d ) of finite relative entropy with respect to γ c \gamma_{c} γ c (respectively γ c ′ \gamma_{c'} γ c ′ ), and D Σ \mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} D Σ (respectively D Σ ′ \mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma} D Σ ′ ) is the set of μ ∈ D \mu\in\mathcal{D} μ ∈ D (respectively μ ∈ D ′ \mu\in\mathcal{D}' μ ∈ D ′ ) of finite Fisher information relative to γ c \gamma_{c} γ c (respectively γ c ′ \gamma_{c'} γ c ′ ). By Changing the Variances of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure: Equal Domains, the Shift of the Relative Entropy and the Shift of the Relative Score §domains the two entropy conditions agree and the two Fisher-information conditions agree; hence D ′ = D \mathcal{D}'=\mathcal{D} D ′ = D and D Σ ′ = D Σ \mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma}=\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} D Σ ′ = D Σ .
Let μ ∈ D \mu\in\mathcal{D} μ ∈ D . By clauses 2 and 3, ∣ x ∣ c ′ 2 − ∣ x ∣ c 2 = 2 θ a u 0 ( x ) |x|_{c'}^{2}-|x|_{c}^{2}=\frac{2\theta}{a}\,u_{0}(x) ∣ x ∣ c ′ 2 − ∣ x ∣ c 2 = a 2 θ u 0 ( x ) for every x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d . The function u 0 u_{0} u 0 is μ \mu μ -integrable by Integrals of Functions with a Bounded Hessian are Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §integrable (with M = M b M=M_{b} M = M b ), so Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable gives ∫ R d ( ∣ x ∣ c ′ 2 − ∣ x ∣ c 2 ) μ ( d x ) = 2 θ a Φ 0 ( μ ) \int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}(|x|_{c'}^{2}-|x|_{c}^{2})\,\mu(dx)=\frac{2\theta}{a}\,\Phi_{0}(\mu) ∫ R d ( ∣ x ∣ c ′ 2 − ∣ x ∣ c 2 ) μ ( d x ) = a 2 θ Φ 0 ( μ ) . Therefore, by The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair: Relative Entropy and Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §pair and Changing the Variances of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure: Equal Domains, the Shift of the Relative Entropy and the Shift of the Relative Score §entropy ,
E ′ ( μ ) = a H ( μ ∣ γ c ′ ) = a H ( μ ∣ γ c ) + a 2 ⋅ 2 θ a Φ 0 ( μ ) + a ( Z c ′ − Z c ) = E ( μ ) + θ Φ 0 ( μ ) + a ( Z c ′ − Z c ) . \mathcal{E}'(\mu)=a\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c'})=a\,H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c})+\frac{a}{2}\cdot\frac{2\theta}{a}\,\Phi_{0}(\mu)+a\,(Z_{c'}-Z_{c})=\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\theta\,\Phi_{0}(\mu)+a\,(Z_{c'}-Z_{c}). E ′ ( μ ) = a H ( μ ∣ γ c ′ ) = a H ( μ ∣ γ c ) + 2 a ⋅ a 2 θ Φ 0 ( μ ) + a ( Z c ′ − Z c ) = E ( μ ) + θ Φ 0 ( μ ) + a ( Z c ′ − Z c ) .
Let ν ∈ D Σ \nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} ν ∈ D Σ . By Changing the Variances of a Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure: Equal Domains, the Shift of the Relative Entropy and the Shift of the Relative Score §score , ζ ν c ′ = ζ ν c + S c ′ − S c \zeta^{c'}_{\nu}=\zeta^{c}_{\nu}+S_{c'}-S_{c} ζ ν c ′ = ζ ν c + S c ′ − S c in L 2 ( ν ; R d ) L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( ν ; R d ) . By clause 2, a S c ′ ( x ) − a S c ( x ) = θ D u 0 ( x ) a\,S_{c'}(x)-a\,S_{c}(x)=\theta\,Du_{0}(x) a S c ′ ( x ) − a S c ( x ) = θ D u 0 ( x ) for every x x x , so a S c ′ − a S c = θ D u 0 a\,S_{c'}-a\,S_{c}=\theta\,Du_{0} a S c ′ − a S c = θ D u 0 as classes in L 2 ( ν ; R d ) L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( ν ; R d ) . Hence, by The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair: Relative Entropy and Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §pair and clause 3,
Σ ′ ( ν ) = a ζ ν c ′ = a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 = Σ ( ν ) + θ ∇ Φ 0 ( ν ) . \Sigma'(\nu)=a\,\zeta^{c'}_{\nu}=a\,\zeta^{c}_{\nu}+\theta\,Du_{0}=\Sigma(\nu)+\theta\,\nabla\Phi_{0}(\nu). Σ ′ ( ν ) = a ζ ν c ′ = a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 = Σ ( ν ) + θ ∇ Φ 0 ( ν ) .
Clause 5. Let ( ν , q ) ∈ V ( D Σ ) (\nu,q)\in\mathcal{V}(\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}) ( ν , q ) ∈ V ( D Σ ) , r ∈ R r\in\mathbb{R} r ∈ R and Y ∈ S ( d ) Y\in\mathcal{S}(d) Y ∈ S ( d ) ; thus ν ∈ D Σ = D Σ ′ \nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}=\mathcal{D}'_{\Sigma} ν ∈ D Σ = D Σ ′ (clause 4) and q ∈ L 2 ( ν ; R d ) q\in L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) q ∈ L 2 ( ν ; R d ) , so both sides of the asserted identity are defined. By clause 3 and Restrictions, Sums, Real Multiples and Differences of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §restriction , regarding Φ 0 \Phi_{0} Φ 0 as an intrinsic test function on D \mathcal{D} D changes neither ∇ Φ 0 ( ν ) = D u 0 \nabla\Phi_{0}(\nu)=Du_{0} ∇ Φ 0 ( ν ) = D u 0 nor H Φ 0 ( ν ) = B H_{\Phi_{0}}(\nu)=B H Φ 0 ( ν ) = B . By Viscosity Subsolutions, Supersolutions and Solutions Relative to a Penalty Pair and a Profile §shifted and the formula of The Lifted Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with a Wick-Square Cost Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §operator ,
F Φ 0 ( ν , r , q , Y ) = F ( ν , r + Φ 0 ( ν ) , q + D u 0 , Y + B ) = λ 0 r + λ 0 Φ 0 ( ν ) + θ 2 ∥ q + D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , q + D u 0 ⟩ ν − ∫ R d V c , β d ν − g ( ν ) . (B) F^{\Phi_{0}}(\nu,r,q,Y)=F\bigl(\nu,r+\Phi_{0}(\nu),q+Du_{0},Y+B\bigr)=\lambda_{0}r+\lambda_{0}\Phi_{0}(\nu)+\frac{\theta}{2}\lVert q+Du_{0}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+a\,\langle\zeta^{c}_{\nu},q+Du_{0}\rangle_{\nu}-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}V_{c,\beta}\,d\nu-g(\nu).\tag{B} F Φ 0 ( ν , r , q , Y ) = F ( ν , r + Φ 0 ( ν ) , q + D u 0 , Y + B ) = λ 0 r + λ 0 Φ 0 ( ν ) + 2 θ ∥ q + D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , q + D u 0 ⟩ ν − ∫ R d V c , β d ν − g ( ν ) . ( B )
The inner product of L 2 ( ν ; R d ) L^{2}(\nu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( ν ; R d ) is bilinear and symmetric and ∥ η ∥ ν 2 = ⟨ η , η ⟩ ν \lVert\eta\rVert_{\nu}^{2}=\langle\eta,\eta\rangle_{\nu} ∥ η ∥ ν 2 = ⟨ η , η ⟩ ν , by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields ; hence
θ 2 ∥ q + D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , q + D u 0 ⟩ ν = θ 2 ∥ q ∥ ν 2 + ⟨ a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 , q ⟩ ν + θ 2 ∥ D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , D u 0 ⟩ ν . \frac{\theta}{2}\lVert q+Du_{0}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+a\,\langle\zeta^{c}_{\nu},q+Du_{0}\rangle_{\nu}=\frac{\theta}{2}\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+\langle a\,\zeta^{c}_{\nu}+\theta\,Du_{0},q\rangle_{\nu}+\frac{\theta}{2}\lVert Du_{0}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+a\,\langle\zeta^{c}_{\nu},Du_{0}\rangle_{\nu}. 2 θ ∥ q + D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , q + D u 0 ⟩ ν = 2 θ ∥ q ∥ ν 2 + ⟨ a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 , q ⟩ ν + 2 θ ∥ D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , D u 0 ⟩ ν .
By clause 4, a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 = a ζ ν c ′ a\,\zeta^{c}_{\nu}+\theta\,Du_{0}=a\,\zeta^{c'}_{\nu} a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 = a ζ ν c ′ , so ⟨ a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 , q ⟩ ν = a ⟨ ζ ν c ′ , q ⟩ ν \langle a\,\zeta^{c}_{\nu}+\theta\,Du_{0},q\rangle_{\nu}=a\,\langle\zeta^{c'}_{\nu},q\rangle_{\nu} ⟨ a ζ ν c + θ D u 0 , q ⟩ ν = a ⟨ ζ ν c ′ , q ⟩ ν . It remains to evaluate
R ( ν ) = λ 0 Φ 0 ( ν ) + θ 2 ∥ D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , D u 0 ⟩ ν − ∫ R d V c , β d ν . R(\nu)=\lambda_{0}\Phi_{0}(\nu)+\frac{\theta}{2}\lVert Du_{0}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+a\,\langle\zeta^{c}_{\nu},Du_{0}\rangle_{\nu}-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}V_{c,\beta}\,d\nu . R ( ν ) = λ 0 Φ 0 ( ν ) + 2 θ ∥ D u 0 ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c , D u 0 ⟩ ν − ∫ R d V c , β d ν .
We express each term as an integral. First, Φ 0 ( ν ) = ∫ u 0 d ν \Phi_{0}(\nu)=\int u_{0}\,d\nu Φ 0 ( ν ) = ∫ u 0 d ν . Second, by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields , ∥ D u 0 ∥ ν 2 = ∫ ∥ D u 0 ( x ) ∥ 2 ν ( d x ) \lVert Du_{0}\rVert_{\nu}^{2}=\int\lVert Du_{0}(x)\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dx) ∥ D u 0 ∥ ν 2 = ∫ ∥ D u 0 ( x ) ∥ 2 ν ( d x ) , where ∥ D u 0 ( x ) ∥ 2 = ∑ i b i 2 x i 2 \lVert Du_{0}(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i}b_{i}^{2}x_{i}^{2} ∥ D u 0 ( x ) ∥ 2 = ∑ i b i 2 x i 2 ; the functions u 0 u_{0} u 0 and x ↦ ∥ D u 0 ( x ) ∥ 2 x\mapsto\lVert Du_{0}(x)\rVert^{2} x ↦ ∥ D u 0 ( x ) ∥ 2 are ν \nu ν -integrable by Integrals of Functions with a Bounded Hessian are Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §integrable . Third, ν \nu ν has finite Fisher information relative to γ c \gamma_{c} γ c by The Gaussian Free-Energy Pair: Relative Entropy and Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §pair , so Gaussian Integration by Parts Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure for Functions with a Bounded Hessian §ibp , applied with f = u 0 f=u_{0} f = u 0 and M = M b M=M_{b} M = M b , gives ⟨ ζ ν c , D u 0 ⟩ ν = − ∫ L c u 0 d ν \langle\zeta^{c}_{\nu},Du_{0}\rangle_{\nu}=-\int L_{c}u_{0}\,d\nu ⟨ ζ ν c , D u 0 ⟩ ν = − ∫ L c u 0 d ν , the function L c u 0 L_{c}u_{0} L c u 0 being ν \nu ν -integrable by Gaussian Integration by Parts Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure for Functions with a Bounded Hessian §generator ; by The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian , clause 3, The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling and the definition of the dot product,
L c u 0 ( x ) = Δ u 0 ( x ) − S c ( x ) ⋅ D u 0 ( x ) = ∑ i = 1 d b i − ∑ i = 1 d b i c i x i 2 . L_{c}u_{0}(x)=\Delta u_{0}(x)-S_{c}(x)\cdot Du_{0}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}b_{i}-\sum_{i=1}^{d}\frac{b_{i}}{c_{i}}\,x_{i}^{2}. L c u 0 ( x ) = Δ u 0 ( x ) − S c ( x ) ⋅ D u 0 ( x ) = i = 1 ∑ d b i − i = 1 ∑ d c i b i x i 2 .
Fourth, V c , β ( x ) = ∑ i β i ( x i 2 − c i ) V_{c,\beta}(x)=\sum_{i}\beta_{i}(x_{i}^{2}-c_{i}) V c , β ( x ) = ∑ i β i ( x i 2 − c i ) by The Wick-Square Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §potential , so that V c , β ( x ) = 1 2 x ⋅ ( M β x ) + 0 R d ⋅ x + ( − ∑ i = 1 d β i c i ) V_{c,\beta}(x)=\tfrac12\,x\cdot(M_{\beta}x)+0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\cdot x+\bigl(-\sum_{i=1}^{d}\beta_{i}c_{i}\bigr) V c , β ( x ) = 2 1 x ⋅ ( M β x ) + 0 R d ⋅ x + ( − ∑ i = 1 d β i c i ) for every x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d , where M β ∈ S ( d ) M_{\beta}\in\mathcal{S}(d) M β ∈ S ( d ) is the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries 2 β 1 , … , 2 β d 2\beta_{1},\dots,2\beta_{d} 2 β 1 , … , 2 β d (as M β x = ( 2 β 1 x 1 , … , 2 β d x d ) M_{\beta}x=(2\beta_{1}x_{1},\dots,2\beta_{d}x_{d}) M β x = ( 2 β 1 x 1 , … , 2 β d x d ) by the definition of the matrix-vector product). Hence Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C 2 C^2 C 2 , Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic , applied with n = d n=d n = d , the matrix M β M_{\beta} M β , linear coefficient 0 R d 0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} 0 R d and constant term − ∑ i = 1 d β i c i -\sum_{i=1}^{d}\beta_{i}c_{i} − ∑ i = 1 d β i c i , shows that V c , β V_{c,\beta} V c , β is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d with Hessian matrix M β M_{\beta} M β , whose entries are bounded in absolute value by 2 ∑ i = 1 d ∣ β i ∣ 2\sum_{i=1}^{d}|\beta_{i}| 2 ∑ i = 1 d ∣ β i ∣ ; so V c , β V_{c,\beta} V c , β is ν \nu ν -integrable by Integrals of Functions with a Bounded Hessian are Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §integrable , applied with f = V c , β f=V_{c,\beta} f = V c , β and M = 2 ∑ i = 1 d ∣ β i ∣ M=2\sum_{i=1}^{d}|\beta_{i}| M = 2 ∑ i = 1 d ∣ β i ∣ . By Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable , R ( ν ) = ∫ h d ν R(\nu)=\int h\,d\nu R ( ν ) = ∫ h d ν with h = λ 0 u 0 + θ 2 ∥ D u 0 ∥ 2 − a L c u 0 − V c , β h=\lambda_{0}u_{0}+\frac{\theta}{2}\lVert Du_{0}\rVert^{2}-a\,L_{c}u_{0}-V_{c,\beta} h = λ 0 u 0 + 2 θ ∥ D u 0 ∥ 2 − a L c u 0 − V c , β , and for every x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d
h ( x ) = ∑ i = 1 d ( λ 0 2 b i + θ 2 b i 2 + a c i b i − β i ) x i 2 − ∑ i = 1 d ( a b i − β i c i ) . h(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\Bigl(\frac{\lambda_{0}}{2}b_{i}+\frac{\theta}{2}b_{i}^{2}+\frac{a}{c_{i}}b_{i}-\beta_{i}\Bigr)x_{i}^{2}-\sum_{i=1}^{d}\bigl(a\,b_{i}-\beta_{i}c_{i}\bigr). h ( x ) = i = 1 ∑ d ( 2 λ 0 b i + 2 θ b i 2 + c i a b i − β i ) x i 2 − i = 1 ∑ d ( a b i − β i c i ) .
Each coefficient θ 2 b i 2 + ( λ 0 2 + a c i ) b i − β i \frac{\theta}{2}b_{i}^{2}+\bigl(\frac{\lambda_{0}}{2}+\frac{a}{c_{i}}\bigr)b_{i}-\beta_{i} 2 θ b i 2 + ( 2 λ 0 + c i a ) b i − β i vanishes by clause 1, so h ( x ) = − e h(x)=-e h ( x ) = − e for every x x x , and R ( ν ) = − e R(\nu)=-e R ( ν ) = − e since ν \nu ν is a probability measure. Substituting into (B),
F Φ 0 ( ν , r , q , Y ) = λ 0 r + θ 2 ∥ q ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c ′ , q ⟩ ν − ( g ( ν ) + e ) . F^{\Phi_{0}}(\nu,r,q,Y)=\lambda_{0}r+\frac{\theta}{2}\lVert q\rVert_{\nu}^{2}+a\,\langle\zeta^{c'}_{\nu},q\rangle_{\nu}-\bigl(g(\nu)+e\bigr). F Φ 0 ( ν , r , q , Y ) = λ 0 r + 2 θ ∥ q ∥ ν 2 + a ⟨ ζ ν c ′ , q ⟩ ν − ( g ( ν ) + e ) .
By The Lifted Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §operator , applied to the Gaussian free-energy pair with variances c ′ c' c ′ and temperature a a a (whose score domain is D Σ \mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} D Σ by clause 4, and whose score is a ζ ν c ′ a\,\zeta^{c'}_{\nu} a ζ ν c ′ ), with discount λ 0 \lambda_{0} λ 0 , control cost θ \theta θ and running cost ν ↦ g ( ν ) + e \nu\mapsto g(\nu)+e ν ↦ g ( ν ) + e , the right-hand side is F ′ ( ν , r , q , Y ) F'(\nu,r,q,Y) F ′ ( ν , r , q , Y ) . The argument Y Y Y enters neither operator.